What? Logic? Stop that!. . Lie, Pit? s
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - miwauturu ONLINE (01/12/2013) [+] (34 replies)
User avatar #21 - lamarsmithgot (01/12/2013) [+] (6 replies)
you can't unload on a school and kill 20 people with a string.
#15 - superlazer (01/12/2013) [+] (9 replies)
guns shouldn't be fully illegal however, I believe they should make gun laws more strict. I live in Canada and i have my hunting and possession's licence. people shooting up a school rarely ever happens here but how come it's a problem in the U.S.A? Really, that stupid ******* constitution is so outdated and laws should evolve just like the guns themselves. That was signed in 1791 which is over 200 years ago for ****** sake. At the time, everyone had muskets and would take a long time to reload. who could go on a rampage with a ******* musket? this **** happens too often to not consider stricter gun laws.
#127 - killyojoy (01/13/2013) [+] (16 replies)
We have had guns for hundreds of years we don't need to fix guns, we need to fix our mental health.
We have had guns for hundreds of years we don't need to fix guns, we need to fix our mental health.
#76 - ImFrumAija (01/13/2013) [+] (4 replies)
"People don't ban baseball bats, wire or knives so why ban guns?"
Well these items and knives have other uses. Trying slicing onions with a gun and then we'll talk about proper comparisons.

People need to understand that a gun was designed to hurt/kill people. People should be screened for mental health and guns should be kept in reach away from children/teens. People just need to be more responsible about where killing machines end up.
#115 - arnoldbusk (01/13/2013) [+] (13 replies)
Ban bats in public = Kinda stupid
Bad bats 100% = Take away equipment for age old sport

Ban strings in public = Take away a convenient tool
Ban strings 100% = Take away a convenient tool

Ban knifes in public = pretty sure it already is, atleast where I live
Ban knifes 100% = Take away a convenient tool

Ban guns in public = Not everybody has the power to kill anybody whenever they feel like
Ban guns 100% = Rednecks wont get to kill animals
#223 - soggytomatoe (01/13/2013) [+] (20 replies)
Baseball bats- Used for the sport of baseball

Wire- Used for electricity, rope, etc.

Knives- Used for cutting meat


Yeah, OP. I completely understand your logic
#373 - facadeon (01/13/2013) [-]
< op making fj fight about guns
< op making fj fight about guns
#170 - EpicTie ONLINE (01/13/2013) [+] (5 replies)
correct me if i'm wrong but isn't the gun in this post the only one designed to actually take someones life and not serve any other function?
User avatar #163 - SirSheepy ONLINE (01/13/2013) [+] (33 replies)
you can't shoot up a school with a bat *******
#98 - Yesitsme has deleted their comment [+] (5 replies)
#49 - roliga (01/12/2013) [+] (2 replies)
In related news, I passed my firearms class today!
User avatar #298 - desuforeverlulz (01/13/2013) [+] (47 replies)
Really? We're still on about guns? How many times have you heard about stabbing sprees or strangling sprees? People really like to overlook the fact that guns make it so much more easy to kill people.
#328 to #325 - SemiAnon (01/13/2013) [-]
That's....not a flaw in his logic. That's you admitting that other forms of murder are more difficult, then saying if they were easier, there'd be a problem, but it's not easier, so there isn't.
#404 - kingpongthedon (01/13/2013) [-]
Normally, I don't argue about gun control, but tonight is a very special night. About an hour ago, I listened to a shootout maybe 2 blocks away from my house, go on for 5 minutes. I can guarantee somebody is dead as a result. Now that sucks for them, but knowing the area, they probably brought it on themselves. I can hardly feel sorry for them.

But I still have very personal issues with guns over knives:

With a hand-to-hand weapon, if you miss, you hit nothing. With a gun, that bullet goes until it hits something. About a year ago, one of those somethings happened to be the 8 year old in my neighborhood. He was inside at the time and believed to be safe. He had absolutely nothing to do with the situation but was still the only one hurt.

People go somewhere else to avoid the consequences and sometimes that's my property. Now I have a fully-stocked kitchen, an American bulldog, and 3 other fairly large people living here. If they come with a knife, we can overwhelm him, and he's ****** to no end. But with a gun, we can't.

About 5 years ago, I used to have another dog. One night, somebody was running through my backyard (from another shooting several hours earlier) and my dog happened to be out at that time. My dog attacked the trespasser and he ran away. However, to get away, he shot my dog in the chest with a .45 slug. Luckily, he missed the heart, lungs and every other organ and my dog lived, though with a bullet an inch from his spine. Had he not had a gun, he would have been the one fearing for his life and not me and my dog.

My problem with guns isn't that they kill people. There will always be ****** up people killing each other somehow. My problem is that the radius of danger is much higher than with anything else and innocent people get hurt. I don't give two ***** if people want to kill each other, but as soon as a gun is pulled, everyone within range is in danger, even if they have nothing to do with it.
#293 - solarruner (01/13/2013) [+] (5 replies)
MFW Sandy Brook
#318 to #311 - SemiAnon (01/13/2013) [-]
You are severely underestimating my ability to use a pool as an instrument of death.
User avatar #181 - melonwaffle (01/13/2013) [+] (13 replies)
Why does the populace need guns?

inb4 red thumbs 1) there would be no point because I have not stated an opinion
and 2) Your red thumbs makes my nipples hard
#206 to #181 - darthblam (01/13/2013) [-]
The 2nd Amendment, "The right to bear arms", and such was originally put in place as a last resort protection of the people of the United State. Not protection from each other, or even other countries, but from the United States government itself should it become so ****** up that the people HAVE to do something about it for the sake of their freedom and all that.
We don't NEED guns, but in the end we need the right to them. Honestly I think this is an almost genius precaution for a country such as the U.S.

#345 - thefloppinater (01/13/2013) [+] (2 replies)
User avatar #109 - durgesark ONLINE (01/13/2013) [+] (17 replies)
The government wants to disarm the public so it can control them with out resistance.
Its happened before in history, they can pull my gun from my cold dead body.
#383 - noshitholmes (01/13/2013) [+] (20 replies)
I'd say it's much easier to shoot a man than beat/strangle/stab them.
When was the last time there was a massacre via knife?
#17 - freebirdkid (01/12/2013) [+] (6 replies)
I will never understand why people will not see that knives, rope, or a bat WERE NOT DESIGNED TO KILL PEOPLE!!! guns were, that is the problem we have, and the Americans who fall in the right wing on this subject are either blind or are just caught up in their affections with their own firearm
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)