Works everytime.. . DAMED PM NIH’ VET. u. HLL Wu TELL. It's still not a real paradox, he's in bed because parents tell you it's bed time, so you obey
x
Click to expand

Comments(208):

[ 208 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#99 - darthblam (01/11/2013) [-]
It's really not that much of a paradox...
User avatar #121 to #99 - Eventually (01/11/2013) [-]
It's amazing how quickly his mood changes with the addition of angry eyebrows
#127 to #121 - darthblam (01/11/2013) [-]
Eyebrows make a great difference in a facial expression.
#199 to #130 - wyrddarcnyzz (01/11/2013) [-]
Eyebrows you say. I agree that they are indeed important.
Eyebrows you say. I agree that they are indeed important.
0
#190 to #129 - swiftykidd **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #58 - superjavelin (01/11/2013) [-]
Not a paradox, but still mind-blowing as **** .

Each pixel in your screen has the possibility of being red, green, blue, or off. Your screen is made up of a finite number of pixels, however many they might be. Therefore, there are a finite number of images that your screen can display. However, the number of combinations is incomprehensibly large. Because of the good resolution of modern screens, literally any image you can imagine is one of those combinations.

And theoretically, if you went through each possible combination (Pixel #1 Red, Pixel #2 off.... etc.), you would eventually run through every imaginable image. Pictures of you at the Grand Canyon with your family, without your family, and with literally every combination of every person who has ever and ever will exist, and even people who don't. Pictures that, when sequenced, are the frames to a video of Emma Watson beating the ever living **** out of a bear on live television. Pictures that show the future, pictures of people from our past living in today's society, and each of these pictures from every possible angle and through good cameras, bad cameras, cameras with rain on the lens, etc.

I guess it kind of seems like a paradox since the possibilities seem as infinite as our imaginations, yet there are only a finite number of combinations your screen can provide.
#64 to #58 - tocoolforyouinajar (01/11/2013) [-]
All of my wut.
User avatar #67 to #58 - dapianoman (01/11/2013) [-]
Vsauce did a video on that on Youtube except it was music, not pictures. But there were sill more possible 5-minute clips than atoms in the universe.
User avatar #72 to #67 - superjavelin (01/11/2013) [-]
If you enjoy the concept, you'd probably like this.
Click on the "Library of Babel"

http://ww w.sccs.swarthmore.edu/users/00/pwillen1/lit/index3.htm
User avatar #71 to #58 - somethingfunny (01/11/2013) [-]
wouldn't it be 3^(bXh)
but the base and hight would both be able to increase so you could have infinit images
#76 to #58 - funforlife (01/11/2013) [-]
Dude, that was deep.
User avatar #153 to #58 - buttinspecter (01/11/2013) [-]
Let's go with the standard resolution of 1920x1080. We will skip the alpha because it's only part of a virtual pixel, not a physical pixel. That leaves red, green, and blue. Each one of these channels has an 8-bit value. 2 ^ 8 = 256 (possible levels of light emitted from the part of the pixel). 256 * 256 * 256 = 16777216 (equivalent to 24-bit color depth (the only reason 32-bit color exists is because of the 8-bit alpha channel of a pixel)). 1920 * 1080 * 16777216 = 3.47892351*10^13 = 34,789,235,100,000 (approximately) different images that could possibly be on a screen of this resolution.
User avatar #160 to #153 - buttinspecter (01/11/2013) [-]
I made an error. Correction:

(1920 * 1080) ^ 16777216 = 2.9672940933720902840406481557137259989641086354288779012566241509153315687602620178740291854915890098433180439628601478562265650202388678867247441037708570117316801657268243741179040065917421171279934114571056216650298731461517073907560140445233115325429447741578205695024054933873534989894366686287096219820632790244753941648735647622880253979286908725541643328263834445744725590808092955075460996273232874538387042663251073621416912643162*10^105977059.
User avatar #166 to #160 - buttinspecter (01/11/2013) [-]
Here's the number wrapped:

2.967 294 093 372 090 284 040 648 155 713 725 998 964 108 635 428 877 901 256 624 150 915 331 568 546 066 491 576 026 201 787 402 918 549 158 900 984 331 804 396 286 014 785 622 656 502 023 886 788 672 475 269 901 104 441 037 708 570 117 316 801 657 268 243 741 179 040 065 917 421 171 279 934 114 571 056 216 620 179 636 115 029 873 146 151 707 390 756 014 044 523 311 532 542 944 774 157 820 569 502 405 493 387 353 676 459 163 849 898 943 666 862 870 962 198 206 327 902 447 539 416 487 356 476 228 802 539 792 869 087 253 584 779 587 541 643 328 263 834 445 744 725 590 808 092 955 075 460 996 273 232 874 538 387 042 663 251 049 456 058 507 362 141 691 264 316 2*10^105977059
User avatar #126 to #58 - revisandbutthead (01/11/2013) [-]
This works with music too. In one 5 minute audio clip, there are 2^211,000,000 possible combinations of sounds. That includes the sound of every conversation you've had with your parents, it includes the clacking noise on your keyboard when you wrote any of your comments on funnyjunk, it includes the sounds of Emma Watson beating a bear (in case mctrollston was wondering), it includes the sound of a monkey having vigorous sex to a toaster while Stairway to Heaven plays in the background near a bowling alley. To elaborate, 2^211,000,000 is 63 million digits long. But that is, however, a finite number.

More about it here:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAcjV60RnRw
User avatar #154 to #126 - buttinspecter (01/11/2013) [-]
2 ^ 211000000 = 1.216 466 160 229 859 612 828 081 459 181 352 777 277 849 642 849 042 449 201 224 550 248 397 133 695 517 821 747 191 755 615 232 737 657 586 011 265 230 691 382 836 291 010 254 217 125 316 335 917 187 169 682 820 750 520 422 003 983 320 965 173 257 344 047 695 137 670 659 012 524 526 624 865 078 770 598 071 289 589 871 536 832 016 030 865 809 042 743 931 688 426 784 872 960 581 146 111 409 432 445 975 994 272 975 437 900 311 757 208 761 078 964 342 042 563 089 858 904 938 772 718 506 912 501 030 280 116 128 188 196 005 779 580 992 201 392 352 999 466 453 393 748 376 848 288 898 984 577 975 758 276 462 365 078 906 977 727 153 234 247 730 748 050 726 700 500 6e+63517329

That's as precise as I could get.
User avatar #135 to #58 - nitrojoe (01/11/2013) [-]
In a way, think about the universe too, if it is indeed infinite, then there is an infinite amount of places just like this earth, where you are here reading this, but your name is one letter different, or you are a woman, or you wear your pants backwards.... Because infinite, is well, infinite.
User avatar #66 to #58 - corneth (01/11/2013) [-]
it would also show visual noise 99.9999% of the time
User avatar #81 to #58 - kaelanduck (01/11/2013) [-]
If you take the number of combinations for an RGB pixel, you get 24 bits, ie. 256^3 = 16777216 possible colours for each pixel.
To get the total possible number of images you raise that to the power of the number of pixels on the screen.

So for a 1280x720 screen that gives
7.1795000302082985714379879152117203426292750 × 10^6658301
possible image combinations.
Which while being a stupendously big number, is still finite
User avatar #86 to #81 - kaelanduck (01/11/2013) [-]
For a screen that could only display red, green, blue or off, which is 4 possible values for each pixel. It would give 4^(1280*720) possible image combinations.
Or 3.07615241757905628540939820534586310217606314 × 10^554858
Significantly less than regular RGB but still a stupendous number.

If we had a 4x4 display (16 pixels) that could only display red, green, blue or off, it still gives 4^16 = 4294967296 combinations for a 4x4 display.
Simply staggering.
User avatar #163 to #86 - buttinspecter (01/11/2013) [-]
I physical pixel doesn't just do red, green, blue, or off. Each channel (red, green, and blue) of a physical pixel can have different levels of light that it emits. For the usual screen, each channel of a pixel has 256 levels of light it can emit because an 8-bit value is stored in the virtual pixel for the channel. 2 ^ 8 = 256. Three channels (red, green, and blue). 256 ^ 3 = 16777216. He chose a screen resolution of 1280x720. (1280 * 720) ^ 16777216 = 1.9705268263375812042521476459661956915083692122259892470751209186432460252585034826350009749700958963726523122534780343036292010475521952824610170733243651580767916382303222561880800235980324745834983037061310786194233998946780511483093264351300464953471373686563389132799968833352713782365713170165675366898261000289198773791186526634404090466645470044921672613658584033406519608607472286377350980265399258771554456481513220974043532402601*10^100068417 possible images that the screen can display.
User avatar #165 to #163 - buttinspecter (01/11/2013) [-]
Here's the number wrapped:

1.970 526 826 337 581 204 252 147 645 966 195 691 508 369 212 225 989 247 075 120 918 643 246 025 782 867 788 225 850 348 263 500 097 497 009 589 637 265 231 225 347 803 430 362 920 104 755 219 528 246 100 158 738 796 170 733 243 651 580 767 916 382 303 222 561 880 800 235 980 324 745 834 983 037 061 310 786 119 728 116 419 423 399 894 678 051 148 309 326 435 130 046 495 347 137 368 656 338 913 279 996 883 335 271 377 413 047 637 823 657 131 701 656 753 668 982 610 002 891 987 737 911 865 266 344 040 904 666 454 700 448 014 934 952 921 672 613 658 584 033 406 519 608 607 472 286 377 350 980 265 399 258 771 554 456 481 513 230 539 268 142 097 404 353 240 260 1*10^100068417
User avatar #216 to #163 - kaelanduck (01/11/2013) [-]
You realise I was replying to myself right?
Also it's 16777216 ^ (1280*720) not the other way round.
+8
#90 to #58 - hocolol **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #60 to #58 - rokkarokkaali (01/11/2013) [-]
This means that somewhere out there in the huge amount of possible images is the best porn ever. I must find it.
User avatar #85 to #60 - beaterz (01/11/2013) [-]
my god!

ok, i need a super computer, face reconation software and a pixel randomizer software that will create every possible combination of pixels possible, we will turn on the pixel randomzier software on the supercomputer, and the face reconation software will filter out every picture that in which it reconizes a face, that way the most visual noise is filtered and we get the pictures with faces! we will find the best porn ever! and possibly the scaryest **** ever.....
User avatar #88 to #85 - rokkarokkaali (01/11/2013) [-]
We'll have all ideas ever possible. A infinite amount of finite ideas!
User avatar #91 to #88 - beaterz (01/11/2013) [-]
my gawd! we have to spend all our money to get this to work because all possible pictures will also contain the true formule to make gold! or diamond! or cool-aid!
User avatar #93 to #91 - rokkarokkaali (01/11/2013) [-]
We would make virtually infinite dollars. As we have more options than we have days in our life. We then have to spend the rest of the money to patent everything else. So we own every possible product ever made.
User avatar #217 to #93 - beaterz (01/11/2013) [-]
not only every product, we own the past, the present, the future and ******** of random crap!!!! shall we rule with an iron fist?
User avatar #218 to #217 - rokkarokkaali (01/11/2013) [-]
Totally. Except for any places that already had dictators and problems. They just get wiped off the map.
User avatar #223 to #218 - beaterz (01/12/2013) [-]
sounds like a plan ;)
#63 to #58 - mctrollston (01/11/2013) [-]
Can I get a source for the video of Emma Watson beating a bear? I need to masturbate.
#21 - anon (01/10/2013) [-]
How in the **** is that even a paradox?
#65 to #21 - anon (01/11/2013) [-]
an infinite loop or something like that
+1
#37 to #21 - zyketor has deleted their comment [-]
#162 - pendeja (01/11/2013) [-]
The next morning
User avatar #178 to #162 - andreweasley (01/11/2013) [-]
With mountain dew....
User avatar #173 to #162 - Underneath (01/11/2013) [-]
no
User avatar #9 - clechyl (01/10/2013) [-]
Because you forced me to be in bed, daddy.
User avatar #3 - Geviystir (01/10/2013) [-]
It's still not a real paradox, he's in bed because parents tell you it's bed time, so you obey
User avatar #7 to #3 - danielesq (01/10/2013) [-]
i agree NOt a paradox reAL paraDoX folloWS-
You travel back in time and kill your grandfather before he conceives one of your parents, which precludes your own conception and, therefore, you couldn't go back in time and kill your grandfather.
User avatar #13 to #7 - thecratcher (01/10/2013) [-]
whY aRe YuO tyPInG LikE a CUnt?
User avatar #5 to #3 - fllynton (01/10/2013) [-]
Once you were in bed and your parents weren't around, you were all like,"This is ******** . **** beds. **** sleep. I wanna play SNES."

5 minutes later you were knocked the **** out.
User avatar #6 to #5 - Geviystir (01/10/2013) [-]
Nope, I would grab a book or my gameboy untill I got tired... Mostly my gameboy
#40 - checkprofile (01/10/2013) [-]
Did someone say, paradox?
User avatar #45 to #40 - Lainge ONLINE (01/11/2013) [-]
"What's the paradox? I don't see anything. Am I looking for an illusi- ...oh.... **** ."
....Moral of the story.
Go to sleep before 4am.
0
#46 to #40 - whitemager **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #48 to #46 - galkawhm (01/11/2013) [-]
pair of docks
+4
#49 to #48 - whitemager **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #107 to #40 - joshmc (01/11/2013) [-]
i literally tried to figure it out for 5 minutes until i realised what you did there

User avatar #82 - altairibnlaahad (01/11/2013) [-]
"If you're not sleepy, then why are you laying in bed?"

I don't know, maybe because you told me to?
#96 - mytrakytra (01/11/2013) [-]
This image has expired
This statement is false.
User avatar #101 to #96 - zonryu ONLINE (01/11/2013) [-]
umm.....i'll go with tue. true.
huh. that wasn't so hard now was it?
#219 to #101 - mytrakytra (01/11/2013) [-]
That can't work because:

If you say the statement is true then it is wrong because the statement is saying it is false instead of true.

If you say the statement is false then it is wrong because the statement is saying it is false but you are claiming for it to be true.
User avatar #220 to #219 - zonryu ONLINE (01/11/2013) [-]
im aware?
#222 to #220 - mytrakytra (01/11/2013) [-]
Im confizzled.
#105 to #96 - bunssugar (01/11/2013) [-]
Don't think about it, Don't think about it. Don't... THINK about it.
#140 - kenleyP (01/11/2013) [-]
Thats not a paradox-it's a Moa foot. They were a giant species of bird from New Zealand that died several hundred years ago.
#200 to #140 - RequieminMortis (01/11/2013) [-]
Think you forgot something, bro.
Think you forgot something, bro.
#142 to #140 - anon (01/11/2013) [-]
wait i thought sonic was a Moa foot
0
#146 to #142 - ryderjamesbudde **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #177 to #146 - psychopsychedelic (01/11/2013) [-]
You're too Slow!
User avatar #193 to #177 - Fgner (01/11/2013) [-]
GOTTA GO FAST!
0
#145 to #142 - ryderjamesbudde **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#157 to #140 - anonomoz (01/11/2013) [-]
dafuq this moa foot comment is here
User avatar #12 - theshade ONLINE (01/10/2013) [-]
When Pinocchio says "My nose will now grow".





PARADOX!
#16 to #12 - anon (01/10/2013) [-]
If I may, I think it is not a paradox, because he speaks the truth.
He says that his nose will grow, he does not say when or where. So he isn't lying.
Unless he is never going to lie again.
If he would say, my nose will grow NOW! that would be a paradox, because he has said a time. on the other hand, his nose will just grow because there is a split mini-second between him finishing his sentence and the moment that his nose grows.
(If I made grammatical errors, please tell me.)
#17 to #16 - ophir (01/10/2013) [-]
I logged in, please respond to this message, I would like to discus paradoxes.
User avatar #25 to #17 - koobzacc (01/10/2013) [-]
You have to take something into account:

How does Pinnochio's nose work? Does it grow when he is WRONG therefore lying or just when he says something he BELIEVES to be false?

If it is the first, saying "this statement will cause my nose to grow" is a paradox

If it is the second (IMO, the more likely case intended by the author) AND he believes it will not grow, his nose will grow and he will be SURPRISED because he believed it WOULDN'T grow and he was lying. If he believes it will grow, the statement will cause his nose, his nose will not grow because he wasn't lying, he was just wrong.
User avatar #26 to #25 - koobzacc (01/10/2013) [-]
the statement will cause his nose to not grow*
User avatar #23 to #17 - darman (01/10/2013) [-]
Your grammar was just fine sir. I do feel that time is an important specification for some paradoxes as well. I hadn't thought of the "Pinocchio Paradox" with regard to time, however; your argument has many appealing aspects.
User avatar #134 to #17 - asongulol (01/11/2013) [-]
Meh. His nose will grow, then shorten again, then grow again, and so on. His nose will then oscillate very rapidly and people will just get used to it.
User avatar #197 to #16 - mrdrpage (01/11/2013) [-]
My nose will "NOW" grow; indicating when.
0
#28 to #16 - tightybrighty has deleted their comment [-]
#18 to #12 - ophir (01/10/2013) [-]
I see, I didn't read your sentence proper. But I stil included my answer to your Paradox, so please don't mind my first explaination.
#53 to #12 - anon (01/11/2013) [-]
YOU'RE WROOOOONG.
Pinocchio becomes a real boy, which means he'll grow up, which means his nose will grow. Therefor, he is telling the truth, so nothing happens
User avatar #78 to #12 - imabser (01/11/2013) [-]
MAKE THE PICTURE BIGGER...DO IT NOW
User avatar #84 to #78 - theshade ONLINE (01/11/2013) [-]
._.
#204 - hachigomo ONLINE (01/11/2013) [-]
User avatar #212 to #204 - fllynton (01/11/2013) [-]
-Slow clap-
User avatar #147 - pinstre (01/11/2013) [-]
I've seen this so many times and still do not understand how that is a paradox.
#183 to #147 - lumpwump (01/11/2013) [-]
It would be a paradox to a child.
User avatar #111 - misticalz (01/11/2013) [-]
If pinocchio says his nose will grow, Will it?
#156 to #111 - anon (01/11/2013) [-]
it won't because Pinocchio knows that he doesn't always tell the truth. Basically he will lie eventually, he never states when it will grow.
User avatar #169 to #156 - captainfuckitall ONLINE (01/11/2013) [-]
It actually depends on how HE defines a lie. If he believes a lie is just whenever you say something untrue, then yes his nose will simultaneously grow and not grow
#79 - kaelanduck (01/11/2013) [-]
Umm.. True, I'll go true. That was easy.
#189 - palmtoyourface (01/11/2013) [-]
This image has expired
User avatar #47 - galkawhm (01/11/2013) [-]
Does a set of everything contain itself?
User avatar #50 to #47 - dabronydude (01/11/2013) [-]
this is srsly ******* with my head...
User avatar #57 to #47 - anomorphous (01/11/2013) [-]
Yes. The actual paradox is does a set of sets that do not contain themselves contain itself?
User avatar #59 to #57 - bakonforall (01/11/2013) [-]
I disagree. If the word "set" were to be thought of as a unit of measurement, like a liter or a gallon, then it would be impossible for a set, or anything for that matter, not to contain itself.
User avatar #75 to #59 - anomorphous (01/11/2013) [-]
Except it's not a unit of measurement, it's a unit of identification.
#167 - breakfastlunch (01/11/2013) [-]
Is the answer to this question no?
#195 to #167 - anon (01/11/2013) [-]
He loves playing with himself in the park.
#181 to #167 - anon (01/11/2013) [-]
Maybe.
[ 208 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)