mathematical

#24 - yunogasaii

Reply +11 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

I didn't know anyone on FB was mathmatical.

#40 to #24 - franklion

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(01/11/2013) [-]

#25 to #24 - mathmatical

Reply +80 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

Yup, that's me.

#51 to #25 - mathmatical

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(01/11/2013) [-]

Why the heck did this get so many thumbs (shocked)

#53 to #51 - circuit [OP]

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(02/08/2013) [-]

to tell truth. i still have no ******* clue, and im the one who posted it.
i thought it would get 30-40 thumbs maybe, but give fj math and the go bananas.
love your user name btw.

#54 to #53 - mathmatical

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/08/2013) [-]

What do you mean you're the one who posted it?

#55 to #54 - circuit [OP]

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(02/08/2013) [-]

i made the comment on Facebook, i screen clipped it, and i posted it here on fj.

#26 to #25 - GBird

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

FJ*

#13 - anon id: 6a0d0570

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

Lol @ poor people that can't buy expensive stuff. I have a $200 tie, what are you going to do, occupy me?

#17 to #13 - blackhawksfan

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

Lol @ anon trying to show off for a website by lying about being rich.

#28 to #13 - schwerdaddy

Reply +7 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

To be honest, I thought the last bit was actually kind of funny. People taking anon so seriously.

#18 to #13 - semisane

Reply +38 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

< this is you

#30 - zaggystirdust

Reply +12 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

make the number stop

#31 to #30 - volto **User deleted account**

+7 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#47 to #31 - pringlez

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(01/11/2013) [-]

Here you go.

#19 - semisane

Reply +7 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

It's actually a very simple logical leap that nobody notices.
It's not 49+49+1. It's 49+49-1.

#33 to #19 - anon id: 115edf11

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(01/11/2013) [-]

Another way you can look at it to get back to 100; he pocketed one dollar and paid them each one dollar. Since he's adding together how much he continues to owe, he needs to also add how much he's already paid them.

#22 to #19 - gorginhanson

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

right---
he's confusing debt with assets

#2 - JCP

Reply +6 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

Hate to get all srs when the funnier answer is in the post, but-
Instead of talking about a mixture of who they owe and what they have, when you focus on who dealt the money and who finally received it, the answer is obvious.
They took 50 dollars from their mother, and 50 from their father. (50 + 50 = +100$)
They gave the store 97$, gave themself (kept) 1$, gave 1$ to their mother and 1$ to their father. (-97 - 1 - 1 - 1 = -100$)
There, now all of you amateur mathfags can sleep at night.

#3 to #2 - xdiabolicx

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

well the dude in the response has the right idea as well. the remaining 97 divided by 2 is 48.50 per parent. add a dollar for both parents to get 49.5 per parent. multiply by two again and get 99. the spare dollar is yours. totaling 100.

#9 to #3 - anon id: f61937c8

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

Actually you don't keep the spare dollar. The thing that is wrong is that you are adding the money that you owe($98) and then add the money that you have ($1) together when like 98+1=99 when you are actually supposed to say -98+1=-97 which is the money that you used on she shirt.

#36 - Bobtheblob

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(01/11/2013) [-]

#35 - yomyhomez

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(01/11/2013) [-]

wait....you borrowed 50$
how do you suddenly owe them 49.50 each?
bastard stole the extra dollar

#39 to #35 - crazyhindu

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(01/11/2013) [-]

the equation says you keep a dollar for yourself

#49 to #35 - gogobrendo

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(01/11/2013) [-]

what is that video called? i saw it a while ago

#50 to #35 - gogobrendo

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(01/11/2013) [-]

please, i really want to watch that video now

#32 - SokkaTheWarrior

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

#16 - koobzacc

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

My Dad is good friends with the owner of this restaurant we go to on sundays and when I was like 9 the owner told me the same riddle except it involved a hotel and two people who overpaid for their room and a greedy bellhop. trolled the **** outta me for years until I realised he added the bellhop's theft rather than subtracting it. It's been so long I bet if I told him the answer he'd be like "what da fuq you tlaking about?"

#7 - anon id: dde866a9

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

Why are people thumbing this **** up? What the **** is wrong with buying a 97 dollar shirt? If I work my ass of, to get me that shirt, that looks good and is made from some famous brand, why the **** is that bad? I'm sorry, but this Nerd-community on FJ is starting to piss me of, cheap clothes, 0 interest in fashion and clothing, and here you are. Judging people because of what they wear, should I do the same? "Who the **** buys a 3 dollar shirt?" "Does he want to look like a bag of ****?"
Seriously, **** you.

#8 to #7 - weirdoo

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

Kinda depends on the situation, like if you have bills to pay but don't have the money, but could afford 100 dollar t-shirt

Lame example, yea, but an example is an example.

#10 to #7 - mikesch

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

I like wearing good clothes, but I'd never spend around 100 bucks on a shirt. I could get some really nice pants for that or something.

#15 to #7 - doctadoc

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

You speak as if you are a part of the funnyjunk community, yet you remain anonymous. Show yourself, coward.

#27 to #7 - anon id: 230f0a64

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS enjoy.

#29 to #27 - resbiansrock

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#52 to #7 - mathmatical

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(01/11/2013) [-]

#14 to #7 - DahColeTrain

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]

You come to FunnyJunk, which is mostly populated with nerds (mostly), and you complain... about the nerds? That's like going to America and complaining about Americans. If you don't like our sense of humour, no one's asking you to stay.

#21 to #7 - bruisedtoblue

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(01/10/2013) [-]