Gun Patrol. . I conducted an experiment jorday, Took my AR out, set it by the front door, left 3 farily leaded magazines next to it and cracked aspen the door.  Gun Patrol I conducted an experiment jorday Took my AR out set it by the front door left 3 farily leaded magazines next to and cracked aspen
Upload
Login or register

Gun Patrol

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
I conducted an experiment jorday, Took my AR out, set it by the front
door, left 3 farily leaded magazines next to it and cracked aspen the door.
Then I left the ream and watched it. I waited and waited and waited. in
all that time, new once did it try to head itself or go out the deer, much
less shoot anyone. it stayed right where I sat it.
I decided that I have the best behaved AR in the world.
Goad Genl. GOOD GUN!
...
+2015
Views: 61019 Submitted: 01/06/2013
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (856)
[ 856 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
User avatar #20 - scorcho
Reply +161 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
"heroin doesn't inject itself, so it should be legal." seriously some of you gun people are retarded to the point where you should not have access to sharp objects.
User avatar #26 to #20 - Keleth
Reply -24 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
but heroin IS bad you idiot. guns are not bad...its just a ******* tool!!! if heroin could be used as actual medicine i would understand it being legal!
User avatar #36 to #26 - nadastress
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Heroin is an opiate and thus for a pain reliever. Like morfine.
User avatar #407 to #36 - trowlernotparas
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
*morphine
User avatar #436 to #407 - nadastress
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
My bad, my swedish sneaked in there a bit. (morfin)
User avatar #41 to #36 - Keleth
Reply -22 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
heroin is very dangerous. which is why they don't use it as medicine...and i swear if you say "well guns are dangerous" i might just pop you. guns are only dangerous in the hands of stupid people...you know a lady in congress says "high velocity clips" first of all...its high capacity...second of all...its a mag...not a clip. clips have no been used for centuries, at least on a large scale. ignorant people just trying to take my guns away.
User avatar #45 to #41 - nadastress
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Morfine and opiates are very dangerous in the wrong hands as well. I really don't care about either side of the gun debate. But if you say guns doesn't kill people you should agree that heroin doesn't either.
User avatar #48 to #45 - Keleth
Reply -13 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
heroin is addictive. it IS the persons fault...but NOTHING good comes from heroin. guns protect me. and id like someone to break into my house and question me on that.
User avatar #50 to #48 - nadastress
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
It's a pain reliever. But in the wrong hands, deadly.
User avatar #51 to #50 - Keleth
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
its pain reliever with terrible side effects. why would you use it if you have 100 things that work better with none of the side effects? like selling your body to get some more.
#605 to #51 - anon id: 72063834
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Its a pain "killer", not a pain reliever. A pain reliever is **** you buy off the shelves to make you more tolerant of minor pains (tooth ache, head ache, cramps, etc). Pain killers are analgesics which remove actual PAIN (car accidents, being impaled by metal, getting shot). And all pain killers (all drugs in general actually) have side effects. Every last one. And its absolutely no different from morphine, in terms of effect. In fact, most synthetic opiate pain killers have worse long term effects and even a worse addiction than heroin. I understand what you're saying, but at the end of the day, guns do have the potential to kill, just like cars have the potential to kill and drugs have the potential to kill. Should guns be taken away because they kill? In my opinion, no. Everything has the potential to kill. A spoon has the potential to kill. All you have to do is put it in the right hands.
#269 to #48 - scousaj
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
How about if I broke into your house with a gun and shot you whilst you slept?
User avatar #280 to #269 - Keleth
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
my dogs are ******* motion detectors. i have one in the living room in a crate, and 1 in each bedroom. good luck.

but if you did...well...i guess i would be dead. in your scenario there is nothing i could have done. all my doors stay locked...breaking glass would be loud...the garage is RIGHT beside my 1 dog in the living room. the main door makes this weird airy sound whenever it opens or closes from the air rushing out of the canister thing at the bottom so it doesn't slam. ive tried my damnest to not make my dogs go off but that door always gets me. and the creaky ass wooden one behind it sucks too.
#286 to #280 - scousaj
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Meh, I don't even know where I was going with that.
User avatar #312 to #286 - Keleth
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
....and also...why would you shoot me in my sleep? why not just slam a knife through my throat and bring it forward? my lungs would be full of blood before i even wake up. why fire a loud gun and alert everyone? you would get COVERED in blood though....30 feet of blood spray man! but in that case a knife would be a better tool than a gun
#342 to #312 - scousaj
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Well, let me plan this out...

1.I'd bring dog food or steaks to please your dogs and keep them quiet.
2.My pistol (choose one) would have a suppressor to minimize sound.
3.I'd probably wear a thick coat that covers most of my body, just in case your dogs try to bite me... bit of padding. Wear a ski mask aswell
4. I would just lift the lock from your window and remove the window.
5. Feed dogs
6. Try to stay away from doors and step on the inside of stairs to reduce sound.
7. Slowly open your door and shoot you, whilst you're either still asleep or before you can react.
8. Seeing as you don't live alone I have a short window of time before the dogs have woken eveybody else up... I could either kill the rest of them or leave... I'd probably leave.
9. I don't care about getting caught because I'm mental (in this scenario) I'd probably go and turn myself in anyway.

Either that or just run in and spray and pray.
User avatar #413 to #342 - Keleth
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
i see one flaw in your plans.....we have no stairs!
User avatar #285 to #280 - Keleth
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
the little yappy one will just ******* bark even if it knows who it is. I DON'T GET IT! Bringing girls home is a nightmare, everyone gets woken up and the girl is like "um.....do they care?" my family does not give 1 **** though who i bring home ;)
#54 to #48 - anon id: 212f3772
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
The thing no one ever tells you about heroin, and is that it's really nice....
#415 to #41 - xnotcreative
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Your logic: Guns aren't bad!

"i might just pop you''

You're the reason why guns should be illegal.

Also, guns are "bad" *******, their purpose is to harm others, or to end a life. That's what they were made for, you can't argue differently.
User avatar #444 to #415 - Keleth
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
and be right back. i need to go scold my gun on how bad it is. how dare it just sit there and only do what i tell it to do! gee i better yell at my car too CARS KILL PEOPLE OH MY GOD. knives are bad, tall buildings are bad too! thats just asking for people to kill themselves!
User avatar #446 to #444 - Keleth
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
and watch out for the dihydrogen monoxide, that is REALLY bad, that kill plenty of people every year! we should outlaw that too!
User avatar #437 to #415 - Keleth
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
there purpose is to harm bad people.
and yes when my words are turned against me, that is frustrating, thus the joking threat.
There is no reason guns should be illegal. it really scares me thinking about how ugly its going to get if they ban them. What ever happened to this country being ran by the people? its turning into the government making silly rules for "our safety" little people can't design their home to fit themselves because its "dangerous" for normal sized people. THATS YOUR OWN ******* PROPERTY! tell me how ANYTHING you do on YOUR property is any of their business as long as no one else is being harmed or disturbed? it shouldn't be, but they make it their business. soon i won't even be able to take my handgun to the range.
#480 to #437 - xnotcreative
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
"tell me how ANYTHING you do on YOUR property is any of their business as long as no one else is being harmed or disturbed?"

That's the thing, you CAN'T trust everyone who owns a gun to not commit the same crime done in Connecticut.

You're trying to make a promise that EVERY gun owner will keep to themselves. That's just not possible.

And the analogies you're making do not make sense. You're comparing pebbles to mountains here.
User avatar #741 to #480 - Keleth
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
http://gunowners.org/fs0404.htm give that a read
User avatar #756 to #480 - Keleth
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
about .1% of CCW holders lose their permit due to gun related crime. so yes, clearly the law abiding citizens are the problem.
User avatar #746 to #480 - Keleth
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
about 1/4 of all guns used in crimes are actually legally owned by the criminal.
#748 to #746 - xnotcreative
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
That doesn't help your cause...

You just showed me that even people licensed and TRUSTED with guns can be dangerous.

In other words: Guns aren't safe in the hands of anyone.
User avatar #761 to #748 - Keleth
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
let me break it down a bit simpler....if im a legal gun owner...and i have a CCW....in the grand scheme of things...there is less than a 1% chance that i will murder someone, or even shoot someone besides self defense. you take away the Concealed permit and it does go up a bit, because it is easy to walk into walmart and buy a gun if your record is clean.
#769 to #761 - xnotcreative
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
But there's still a chance you're going to murder someone...

Also, what the **** are you talking about? It just seems like you're spouting random gun facts at me.
User avatar #768 to #748 - Keleth
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
if the US would teach proper gun safety and have a better system for finding crazies it would be MUCH better...you can make explosives in your house and go bomb a school. you won't take as many with you, but youll still be a ******* celebrity. crazy people are crazy. and if murder is in your heart...your gonna kill. plain and simple. whether it be with a gun, knife, bomb, or a car.
#801 to #768 - xnotcreative
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Guns make it easier to kill...

What you're saying is... it's okay to make it easy for people to kill because they're going to kill anyway.

You're an absolute ****** idiot, and I refuse to engage any further in a conversation with you.

You are a thickheaded, completely ignorant *******, that is EXTREMELY deluded.

Just ****** face it, GUNS MAKE IT EASIER TO KILL PEOPLE. What people are trying to do by outlawing it is to make the damage people can do to others minimal.

We might as well ****** have nuclear bombs ticking in all of our basements, because we're just going to kill anyways, right?



Out of all my months on FunnyJunk, you are by far the BIGGEST ****** idiot I have come across. Words can not even describe how ignorant and narrow minded you are.
User avatar #857 to #801 - Keleth
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
whats the difference between a liberal and a sewer rat......some people actually like sewer rats.

ive said it many times that crazies are the problem. people who want to murder will murder, but most people will not. guns do make it easier to kill people...but so does no resistance
User avatar #438 to #437 - Keleth
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
harmed or disturbed in a way that they can't affect....coming into my house and you tripping is not my ******* fault. but me playing VERY loud music so that the neighbors are bothered, yes, that should be illegal, your **** is invading their property at that point.
User avatar #43 to #41 - Keleth
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
and thirdly they use Assault rifle for anything that looks scary...go read the ******* definition...a semi-auto rifle on an assault rifle base IS NOT AN ASSAULT RIFLE....its a semi-auto rifle, nothing more.

now their trying to say shotguns have too many rounds and they are going to ban online sale of ammo....so now you HAVE to buy it instantly? your getting rid of a 7 day waiting period caused by shipping?
User avatar #58 to #26 - Crusader
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
It can be used as a medicine.
Also, heroine is just a tool people use to get high.
User avatar #256 to #20 - Keleth
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
i bet your support making all tables round cause people might hurt themselves on the corners. stupid people are ruining this country.

you might think im retarded for owning a gun, but damn it i bet i have a better chance then you when **** goes down.

When someone breaks in your house....you do 1 of two things....grab your gun...or pray to god someone with a gun shows up. and then you get brutally raped for the next 10 minutes while the cops are on the way
User avatar #296 to #256 - scorcho
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
so how many times exactly has someone broken into your home with the intention to rape your ugly ass? Never? Not surprising. Plus i live in germany, where there are no gun wielding psychopaths, so i think my chances of survival are pretty decent. It's called civilisation, dude, you should try it sometime.
User avatar #360 to #296 - buzzin like a bee
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Dude, don't argue with stupid people. Especially about guns. They don't learn.
User avatar #441 to #296 - dreamthrow
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Read the "Armed Citizen" section of the NRA magazine and maybe you'll understand guns better.
#300 to #296 - airforceman
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Germany? No gun wielding psychopaths? Forgetting something?
User avatar #301 to #296 - Keleth
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
oh your right. since ive never been robbed i should never be prepared. and not only that, i like having a gun just to go to the range and shoot. if you've never been you can't talk ****. great way to blow off some steam. just having that nice 45 long colt pop in your hand and put a little hole in the paper. i need to buy a shotgun for they limit how many the tube can hold this month....
User avatar #305 to #301 - scorcho
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
nothing wrong with shooting on a shooting range.
#265 to #256 - scousaj
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Or ya know.. use reasonable force to stop the intruder instead of sending a bullet through his skull.
User avatar #288 to #265 - Keleth
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
i won't shoot for skull...its harder to hit. central mass mi amigo. Federal Flight 12 gauge with a flight control wad at about 10 yards makes a perfect baseball sized hole.
User avatar #625 to #20 - JoshBauer
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Guns protect people. Heroin doesn't protect people.
User avatar #718 to #625 - wooyoungkim
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
What a 'Murican thing to say...
User avatar #737 to #718 - JoshBauer
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
What an arrogant Euro-trash thing to say.
User avatar #819 to #737 - wooyoungkim
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Look at my username. Do I sound European to you?
User avatar #831 to #819 - JoshBauer
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Oh sorry. Your name is so ridiculous that I figured you were just using it as a screen name.
User avatar #838 to #831 - wooyoungkim
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Nice, way to insult somebody's name who doesn't sound Western.

I'm guessing more than half of the world have "ridiculous names"

I'm honestly laughing at how your logic works
#638 to #625 - anon id: 736297d3
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
guns don't protect people in the slightest, i never seen a gun jump infront of a bullet to save someones live
guns are built solely to kill, they don't save anyone
if my life gets threatened and i use a gun to defend myself it still means that I probably killed someone
i'm not saying that i wouldn't use one in a dire situation, but what if nobody would be able to have gotten a gun in the first place?
#671 to #638 - onceapiece
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
If nobody had gotten a gun, then they would've used knives. That's how that **** worked when guns weren't invented. besides, taking away guns now wouldn't get rid of all of the ones that were made, and some people would even be able to make more. In addition, once you outlaw guns, guess who owns all the guns when all is said and done? The criminals.
User avatar #736 to #638 - JoshBauer
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Guns do protect people, the exact same way pepper spray protects women. Should we outlaw pepper spray? I mean, if your idea of protection is a shield, then pepper spray should be outlawed because it's more of a weapon than a shield. Pepper spray isn't going to jump in front of a rapist.
#827 to #736 - wooyoungkim
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
>Guns protect people

If there were no guns accessible to civilians to begin with, there won't be a problem with shootings in the first place.
User avatar #860 to #827 - fredthemilkman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Good luck taking away guns from people. America is so full of guns anyway. Plus drug cartels from Mexico would just send in more. The only people who would have guns are the people who use them illegally.
User avatar #869 to #860 - wooyoungkim
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Oh I never said guncontrol in US would work. With people crying out "Right to bear arms" and the constitution, and the fact that it's scattered everywhere, it wouldn't work.


All I'm pointing out is the fallacy of the people who think guns are completely innocent in crimes.
User avatar #836 to #827 - JoshBauer
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
...you realize most people who commit shooting sprees don't have their guns legally?
User avatar #839 to #836 - wooyoungkim
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
>Columbine Shooting

>Virginia Tech

>Sandy Hook (It was his mother's, who acquired it legally)


User avatar #842 to #839 - JoshBauer
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
>Columbine = "Robyn Anderson, a friend of Klebold and Harris, bought the shotguns and the Hi-Point 9mm Carbine at The Tanner Gun Show in December of 1998 from unlicensed sellers. Because Anderson purchased the guns for someone else, the transition constituted an illegal "straw purchase." Klebold and Harris bought the TEC-DC9 from a pizza shop employee named Mark Manes, who knew they were too young to purchase the assault pistol, but nevertheless sold it to them for $500."

>VA Tech = Unfortunate.

>Sandy Hook = HIS MOTHER'S.
User avatar #847 to #842 - wooyoungkim
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
my mistake on Columbine

>Sandy Hook- his mother bought it legally. I'm guessing she bought it to protect herself. Ironic isn't it?
User avatar #849 to #847 - JoshBauer
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Very ironic.
#490 to #20 - gargman
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
It just depends on your perspective of the situation
For example a wise man once said, "Saying that guns kill people is like saying pencils make spelling errors." Both are tools, used to aid men. They can be used for good, or they can be used for evil.

TL;DR: Dont be a little butthurt faggot and blindly insult people's intelligence just because they have a different opinion than you.
User avatar #533 to #20 - Gundown
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
-.-

But just like guns, it all depends on the person. Heroin does nothing harmful to anybody just sitting in the needle untouched just like a bullet does nothing just sitting in the magazine not being fired. Heroin has zero good uses, while guns do, believe it or not. Besides, 64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday. Don't let one bad apple can spoil the whole bunch.
#400 to #20 - dcj
-2 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#412 to #400 - xnotcreative
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
No dumbass, you're taking it too literally...
User avatar #884 to #20 - dankfrank
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
I know FJ doesn't like opinions but i'm going to post mine.

If heroin was made legal, would you go out and buy some? Probably not.
The government should stay out of peoples habits.
Why should they tell me what I can and can't put in my body
User avatar #885 to #884 - scorcho
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
doesn't apply if someone else puts something into your body, a bullet for example.
User avatar #886 to #885 - dankfrank
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
True, but why would someone try injecting you with heroin?
User avatar #887 to #886 - scorcho
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
not the point. all i was saying is that the argument "guns don't kill people" is completely flawed.
User avatar #382 to #20 - alexusapi
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Heroin should be legal... people that use drugs are not criminals, they are addicts that need health care, not prison time. main purpose of drugs is make a person feel happy, the main purpose of a gun is to kill.
User avatar #439 to #382 - wooyoungkim
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
his point is that heroin is that OP's logic shouldn't be applied to drugs, or much to ANYTHING because that's just ******* stupid.

"heroin doesn't inject itself, so there's nothing wrong with it"

is what scorcho is trying to call a stupid logic.

Which is true I must say.
User avatar #565 to #382 - admiralen
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
the part where you get incredibly addicted is the problem... people are willing to kill for heroin, if you legalize it you increase the people addicted and when they run out of money (since you would have to tax it to ****) they will start doing stupid **** for their next fix
User avatar #690 to #382 - aesguitar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Not if that's not the reason you own the gun... Some people just like guns or like shooting targets.
User avatar #878 to #20 - kookookachooforyou
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
everyone has the right to pursue happiness as long as they dont subtract from anothers happiness. i believe it is ok to to do drugs if thats what you want to do. there isnt anything wrong with using the substance just misusing it. guns dont kill people. people kill people. drugs dont make you an addict. you let yourself become one. i have a good friend that works 14 hours a day to pay child support on two kids he only gets to see twice a year. hes an amazing person and he just happens to like doing heroin after work to help hm wind down. he isnt harming anyone but himself. he does everything he is supposed to do. he takes care of himself. thats why i say it isnt the drugs or the guns that are ******* our world up, its the individual that makes all the difference.

tl;dr heroin is still bad but i wont judge anyone.
#212 to #20 - trowlernotparas
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
It should be legal because the government doesn't have to say "No, that's bad" and take it away. We should legalize all drugs and let the stupid people kill themselves off. deal with it
User avatar #544 to #212 - lamarisagoodname
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
still shouldn't be letting call of duty love'in 14 year olds have access to goddamn automatic weapons, don't you agree? which isn't a restriction issue, it's a parenting issue
User avatar #237 to #212 - blahness
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
i don't think you understand the concept of "the government has to pay for medical fees for all those drug-related illnesses and deaths"
User avatar #406 to #237 - trowlernotparas
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
they don't in the US
#294 to #237 - anon id: c612032b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
In your commie state they do, in what America should be they wouldn't.
User avatar #888 to #294 - blahness
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
last time i checked, canada wasn't a "commie state"
and i doubt the emergency services would just look at a dying person and say: no money? no service.
defeats the whole purpose of having emergency services
User avatar #851 to #212 - redJericho
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Except what about all the innocents that would be killed from drunk 15 year olds driving down the street?

The world would be a scary-ass place if there were no laws.
User avatar #864 to #851 - trowlernotparas
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
I only said no laws with these intoxicants. If it were my way every murderer would be dead within a week of their trial.
User avatar #648 to #212 - elcreepo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
That's drugs.

The difference is that with guns, stupid people have a tendency to kill other people before themselves.
User avatar #825 to #648 - trowlernotparas
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
i was only talking about drugs in that post. stupid people shouldn't be allowed to come near a weapon
#564 to #212 - anon id: b66b0861
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Thats actually the system in several other countries, and they pay for the rehabilitation instead of the drug control. Its cheaper, easier, and they report incredibly lower crime and drug rates after shifting to that policy.
User avatar #419 to #212 - waaw
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
I don't think you understand the concept of basic human empathy
User avatar #828 to #419 - trowlernotparas
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
**** everyone they can die
#17 - semisane
Reply +109 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
>Implying guns aren't tools for killing
User avatar #59 to #17 - Crusader
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
>Implying knives aren't tools for killing
#443 to #59 - wooyoungkim
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Yes, because a man running around with a knife is so much harder for law enforcement to subdue then a man running around with an ar-15
User avatar #854 to #443 - Crusader
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Well no, depending on the situation either or could be more difficult, in an area that has small rooms and narrow hallways, a knife would be better, because a rifle would just get in the way.
But in the same line of thought, if you are out in a field, a rifle is going to be better than a rifle.

I never said anything close to what you tried to imply, I simply said that knives are tools for killing as much as anything else.
User avatar #874 to #854 - wooyoungkim
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
If I was a police officer attempting to subdue a killer in a small building, I would still rather have him have a knife than a ******* firearm.
User avatar #879 to #874 - Crusader
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Well no.
That's just ignorant.
20 pace rule.
WIthin 20 paces a knife is more lethal than a firearm because of the time it takes for a firearm to chamber a new round after each shot, not to mention the amount of time to it takes to at least partially aim.
Someone well trained with close quarters combat will beat someone that is trained to use a gun within 20 paces 9/10 times.
User avatar #900 to #879 - wooyoungkim
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Yes, because there is a building that is only filled with tiny ass room where there won't be room for more than 20 paces. How stupid are you?

Besides, you realize there are PISTOLS, firearms made for compact places. That's why police officers and SWAT teams tend to carry compact SMGs and pistols (beat cops carry this for easier mobility as well).

According to your logic, why arm the entire swat teams with knives when they are clearing a small room?
User avatar #925 to #900 - fuelnfire
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/08/2013) [-]
You have never tried to fire a handgun accurately rapidly have you. A cornered man with a knife within 20 feet is one of the first drills they teach you as an LEO, if they're within 20 feet, you're probably dead if your handgun is not drawn.
User avatar #930 to #925 - wooyoungkim
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/08/2013) [-]
No. As a matter of fact, if you look at my username you can guess I'm Korean. In South Korea we have mandatory service so I actually did shoot rifles when I was in the military.

Also, although you maybe right about being in tight corners with a man and a knife, you should also realize how stupid you sound while you are arguing against my point about how firearms are more dangerous than a knife.

Is that what you think? Why not equip troops with better knives than trying to invent a better firearms! I mean, the enemy or criminals are always going to be 20 feet in front of you right?
User avatar #931 to #930 - fuelnfire
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/08/2013) [-]
Rifles and handguns are different. IMO, a handgun is a way to fight to your carbine or rifle. With a handgun, nothing but a CNS shot will take down someone instantly, and motivated people will still stab you with a few 9mm or .45s in their arms or gut. Not necessarily a guarantee, but knives do have their place, and not every LEO is a crack shot with a handgun. Pistol irons get obscured in dark areas, and even with night sights and lights, a lot of people will panic and fire at shapes, and miss the CNS. With a knife, you can easily aim for the throat, it provides more room for error, or nerves. There was a state trooper who once fired his handgun until slide lock at a suspect, missed every shot, then was killed by a single headshot, from within 20 yards.

I apologise for accusing you of ineptitude, but as a sworn LEO, one of the things drilled into me was that knives and bats are no joke, and in a typical house, or department store, they can be far worse than firearms in untrained hands. Yes, someone well trained could put several COM rounds into someone in a few seconds, but not everyone is trained to do that, raking a blade over a throat, or swinging a bat are nearly instinctive. I don't want to argue with you, so I'll take your point, but military tactics and weapons do not always apply to law enforcement issues in the same method. Depending on the building, you are right though, I would prefer a suspect to be armed with a knife. Good day, and thanks for informing me on South Korea's draft policy, I genuinely did not know that.

TL;DR - Good points by you, and I now agree, you are right mostly, just keep in mind that knives can be as deadly as a glock.
User avatar #933 to #931 - wooyoungkim
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/08/2013) [-]
Okay, and I apologize coming in to rash to inform you about your opinion. And okay, I understand your point. I think you may have misread my argument and I understand. What I was trying to say was the firearms are more dangerous than knives, however there are cases when knives can be more effective than firearms. I think you misinterpereted me. Thank you for educating me on what you know as an officer. And again I apologize for insulting you while trying to make a point.
User avatar #917 to #900 - Crusader
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
I never said that there is a building with only areas with less than 20 paces, but normally during a situation that involves SWAT, they are going to be within 20 paces before anything happens.
The 20 pace rule applies when both parties are ready to draw, but neither has.
20 pace rule still affects pistols, as a pistol is still far less lethal in close quarters than a knife.

According to my logic, is it is a good SWAT team, they should be able to reach the criminal without even having to fire a weapon, 9/10
According to my logic,
#455 to #443 - Crusader
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#924 to #443 - fuelnfire
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/08/2013) [-]
Yes, because law enforcement can see a knife inside someone's pocket in the middle of a mall with their x-ray vision. Law enforcement has not been present during any of the recent shootings until after the victims were shot, that point is moot anyways. Hitler, Stalin, most of histories worst mass murders were not done by men who had easy access to guns, they were done by psychos, people who were not right in the head. Rather than banning guns, perhaps the world should take a step back and see what the **** drives people to these events.
User avatar #929 to #924 - wooyoungkim
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/08/2013) [-]
Yes, because you can't hide pistols either.

Australia, UK, South Korea

What do these three countries have in common?
-Firearm regulations
-Less murders then the United States

You must be a ******* idiot. To tell you the truth, I know gun laws won't work in the US, I'm just saying how stupid people like you are who defend firearms and say there's nothing wrong with it.
User avatar #62 to #59 - semisane
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Knives are tools for cutting fruit, vegetables, bread, and meat, for spreading butter, and tons of other crap. Name something guns are intended for other than killing things or practicing killing things.
User avatar #391 to #62 - inspectah
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
target practice, competition, you have nailguns, you have potato launchers to just have fun with,
User avatar #64 to #62 - Crusader
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Knives were originally made in order to be able to hunt and kill things more easily, and have evolved from there.
Who knows, maybe guns will be used for something else in the future.
User avatar #98 to #64 - cullenatorguy
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Yes, I'll go get my .50 cal to go cut up my orange. All my knives are in the washer.
User avatar #101 to #98 - Crusader
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
That's what they were used for originally.
Do people forget about nail guns and such?
It's a tool, that's a gun.
User avatar #104 to #101 - cullenatorguy
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
.50 cals were not originally made for cutting oranges...

Nail guns came after real guns, and are still very dangerous.
User avatar #108 to #104 - Crusader
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
I was saying that knives were originally used to kill people

Kitchen knives came after daggers, and are still very dangerous.
Hell, most knives came after the primitive ones that were use to kill stuff, they didn't use them for construction or preparing stuff, as the earliest known record of humans using knives is for hunting and nothing else.
User avatar #112 to #108 - cullenatorguy
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
The first knives were more or less used for cutting up food, which then became a hunting weapon. Guns were invented to kill people, not hunt. Hunting came afterwards.
User avatar #121 to #112 - Crusader
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
The first knives were sharp stones, which were used for hunting before other things.
Guns are jsut an evolution of cannons, which are an evolution of ballistae, which was an evolution of bows, which were use for hunting
User avatar #128 to #121 - cullenatorguy
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
No, ballistae were not a previous form of cannon. Cannons used gun powder. Ballistae used tension is bows, rather large ones. Neither took the other's place until cannons were improved upon.

The first knives were first used as tools for cutting meat, wood, and other material. They were a tool first and foremost, not a killing device.
http://www.thewiseedge.com/history-of-knives.php
http://www.catalogs.com/info/people/history-of-knives.html
ezinearticles.com/?The-History-Of-Knives---Learn-Where-It-All-Started&id=789979
User avatar #144 to #128 - Crusader
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
This is the evolution of knives
Naturally sharp rocks that early man chased animals onto (look at the natives all around the world, they chased animals off of cliffs or into pits that usually had sharp rocks at the bottom) or they took sharp rocks and threw them at the prey.
They then make hard rocks and make sharp things, knives, spears, etc.
Therefore the first "true knives' were tools used for many things, but the first knife-like objects were naturally sharp rocks used for hunting, when we created the knife, we were not thinking of construction like we do today, it was more or less gathering leaves and branches and making a lean-to if anything, since they were mainly nomadic.

As for guns and bows.
First you have the spear/sling which launches a projectile,
That evolves to the bow, which uses a tension string to launch a projectile/sling evolved into the trebuchet and catapault
Then a ballistae which was a larger bow, a larger projectile
The cannon added gun powder in to launch a projectile, yes, the cannon is based roughly off of the ballistae
the cannon then gradually was refined into an arkabus which would have been the equivalent of the crossbow, which then was refined into a musket, then a bolt action, and so on.
Whereas shotguns were refined and stayed the basic cannon idea, but with multiple cannon balls.
User avatar #154 to #144 - cullenatorguy
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
I'm not even going to argue with you. I give three perfectly good links supporting my side, and you respond with a comment too long for me to care to read. Ask any archaeologist, knives were used for hunting after they were used for cutting.
User avatar #164 to #154 - Crusader
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
I've laid out my argument clearly, the fact that you are to ignorant to even want to read it just makes me question the validity of your argument.
The frist true knives that were made by man were used for cutting, but the first knife-like objects that were used were used for hunting.
User avatar #208 to #164 - cullenatorguy
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Good for you, I don't need someone's opinion on the internet to validate or invalidate the evidence provided. Good day to you, sir.
#67 to #64 - anon id: 9b6a7a66
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
They were meant for many things, sure killing was one of them, but it was also for cutting leather etc. Can I cut leather with a rifle?
User avatar #70 to #67 - Crusader
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Knives were originally meant to hunt and kill with and since then are used for tools.
Guns were created to hunt and kill people with, much like the bow, and since then they are a symbol of strength and leadership, just like the sword, which is essentially a giant knife.
You could cut leather with a rifle, just not efficiently.
#22 to #17 - anon id: 963149de
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
exactly, they don't kill people but why make it easy for people to do so with them?
User avatar #30 to #22 - Keleth
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
most guns only kill the bad guys. and no, cops are slow as **** and rarely get there in time.
#470 to #30 - anon id: 06280ac0
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Do you have anything to backup that statement? And how did the become "bad guys" to begin with?
User avatar #738 to #470 - Keleth
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
google it dude...depending on where you live, and i live in *******, it takes from 7-10 minutes. which is ALOT of time. and they become bad guys when they want my belonging without my permission.
#33 to #17 - anon id: eb8df5e7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Sporting guns aren't, but yeah most of them are pretty much.
#485 to #17 - cockasian
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
implying that citizens possessing lethal weapons for protection purposes doesn't discourage crime and keep the government from gaining too much power over its citizens.

I know a lot of people use Hitler as an example much too often, but in his power he completely made guns illegal, and confiscated all deadly firearms. Then he, you know, took absolute and complete control over his citizens.
User avatar #580 to #17 - xenigma
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
cars kill more people then guns but we don't ban cars. People will find a way to murder each other no matter what.
User avatar #913 to #580 - semisane
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
I'll say it again, slowly, so you can understand.
Guns are tools for killing.
Cars are tools for transportation that are dangerous if used improperly.

The fact that people will try to kill each other anyways is exactly the reason why we shouldn't be giving them tools to do it more efficiently.
You see a pyromaniac, you don't say "well, he'll find a way to burn **** anyways, so we might as well give him a flamethrower". So why would you think that's an acceptable excuse for guns?
#704 to #17 - anon id: 4ada0cd2
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
I believe OP is stating that without improper usage by people, guns are about as safe as a knife is.
User avatar #260 to #17 - fuelnfire
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Knives, baseball bats, fists, doesn't matter. People are violent, aggressive, and prone to killing each other over trivial matters. Before we had gun we just killed each other with whatever we had. MFW people think if guns are taken away anything will change, the killers will just get more creative. I agree that more gun control could be introduced, but people are violent.
User avatar #369 to #260 - cullenatorguy
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
So what you're saying is, "**** it, they'd kill each other anyways, might as well give them a tool to kill the maximum amount of things in the minimum amount of time."
User avatar #922 to #369 - fuelnfire
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/08/2013) [-]
Let's take a clinical look at the mass killings. Near 1000 rounds expended at Colorado, hundred of other shots were fired, and the death tolls were not actually that high, compared to bombings in Isreal, or Hamas. Hell, mines in Egypt, Vietnam, and Cambodia kill more kids a year than guns, but everyone is being spooked by American childrens deaths. I'm sorry for the loss of those people, but banning guns will not make that issue disappear. Several rural families rely on guns to protect their farmland and property from thieves and such, and be perfectly honest. If you had a gun, for personal use, on your belt, and you were at a mall, and you saw a gunman gunning down children and innocent people, would you not shoot him? Many would be robbers and mass murderers are stopped by average joes with their concealed carry license, but the media does not make money from "Joe Schmoe saves woman from rapist in alleyway shooting, gets 2 years of trials, is put on a watch list, and is ostracised at large?" The media makes money from fear, excitement, and politics. And a gun is not the end all be all of weapons. Seriously? Remove guns, and we'll see worse. Let's think, how bout some bombs. Fertilizer, propane tanks, H2S, all easily accessible, and extremely dangerous. Park a fertilizer bomb van in front of a school at lunch, hide bucket sized homemade bombs around a mall, disguised as backpacks, the list goes on. Guns are not magical death spitting assault weapons, they spit little metal projectiles smaller than a thumb usually, to kill someone would take a lot of ammo, time, or accuracy. A home made bomb, or stabbing someone in a subway station? Simple.
User avatar #926 to #922 - cullenatorguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/08/2013) [-]
TL;DR
You're a little late
User avatar #385 to #369 - inspectah
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
I think he is saying that even if we did ban guns the only thing that would be different is the way people are murdered, and if we banned guns we couldnt hunt which would create a giant incline in animal population which the ecosystem would be prepared for.
User avatar #402 to #385 - cullenatorguy
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
I doubt it. It's much harder to do drive-bys or just walk up and stab someone. Most gun related violence would be in the ghettos and hoods of large cities. I think the death rate would go down tremendously. We need hunting though to keep the ecosystem intact, but hunting of the species that aren't supposed to be in any given ecosystem needs to go up.
User avatar #488 to #402 - revanthewin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
The only problem with that is that people in the ghetto tend to not follow the law, especially if they're someone who would kill a person.
User avatar #394 to #385 - inspectah
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
wouldnt*
User avatar #278 to #260 - semisane
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
See my reply to Crusader. Knives and baseball bats aren't designed to kill. Yeah, people are aggressive. So how about we don't make it so easy for them to get their hands on deadly machines that can be used to easily kill people? Guns are, by design, built to help them kill others. You're not going to see a newspaper headline saying "School stabbing, 20 children dead", because that's really ******* inefficient. Maybe we shouldn't be giving people easy ways to turn their anger into murder.
User avatar #923 to #278 - fuelnfire
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/08/2013) [-]
That's ironic, I believe a man in China recently stabbed 20-30 school children. It's not the US though isn't it.
User avatar #275 to #260 - awesomanium
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Knives can be used for chopping food
Baseball bats are for playing baseball, they're not called killing bats
Fists are clenched hands, and hands have millions of uses
Guns are only used for killing
User avatar #289 to #275 - fuelnfire
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
In this modern age you can use them for competitions, hunting, a lot of people forget that. A lot of competition shooters have never fired at a living being in their life, animal or human, but make their living by a gun. Farmers, outdoorsmen.
User avatar #292 to #275 - Crusader
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Guns can be used for marksmanship
Nail guns are used for nailing stuff together
potato gunsa re used to launch potatos, and occasionally messages

I can say that explosives are used JUST to kill people, but they aren't, that's an ignorant viewpoint, they have non-lethal uses as well, jsut like everything else, saying that guns are just killing machines, is like saying that dynamite is just a tool for blowing people up, knives are just used for stabbing people, baseball bats are just used for beating people.
User avatar #451 to #260 - rokkarokkaali
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
I'd rather die from one bullet than get beaten to death by a guy with a baseball bat.
#365 - cupotruth
Reply +61 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
God if my eyes could roll any harder they would pop out of my sockets.

Could we pointlessly yell about something else?

Because this horse is so dead that the glue is already holding a 4 year old's collage together.
#386 to #365 - garagesale **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#677 to #365 - onceapiece
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Ya, but it was funny.
User avatar #259 - schmitty
Reply +51 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Fake and gay. If you look closely you can see a shock collar on the gun. It's not well behaved, it's just too scared to leave the house for fear of pain.
User avatar #361 to #259 - gingershavetrolls
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
haha i have no ides wtf a schock collar is
#390 to #361 - captnpl
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
It is a collar that shocks you. usually if you leave a certain area.
#267 - spangle
Reply +41 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
User avatar #230 - blahness
Reply +27 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
this post is absolutely ******* retarded. so is op.
nuclear bombs don't go anywhere. nor do they kill people. that means nuclear bombs are perfectly safe for society and everybody should own one.
so are bombs.
makes no sense at all.
User avatar #349 to #230 - DasSpiel
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
You can safely use firearms.

You can't safely use nuclear devices.
#532 to #349 - coolcalx
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
I'm sorry, what?
User avatar #892 to #532 - DasSpiel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
I meant bombs and you know it.
Way to exploit my change in terminology.
User avatar #912 to #892 - coolcalx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
they use the exact same process, bub
#262 to #230 - anon id: aa930cb4
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Implying nukes and guns are similar. \
#268 to #262 - sexuality
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
literally three posts or so above us we see a parody Twitter account comparing guns to spoons, pencils, and cars. But we aren't allowed to compare them to other objects that share the sole purpose of killing things?
User avatar #263 to #262 - blahness
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
implying i wasn't criticizing the post
#313 to #230 - mytrakytra
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
This image has expired
A nuclear bomb can give off hazardous amounts of radiation that can lead to sickness and death.
User avatar #448 to #313 - waaw
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Not really. There's relatively little actual radioactive material in it. The only way to be seriously harmed would be to live with it in your house for a very long time
User avatar #324 to #313 - blahness
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
which is why they're kept in silos, where they pose no harm to the people
see, perfectly safe
#241 to #230 - happyfaceninja
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
I see no problem with people owning bombs, if only we could trust people to not blow the **** out of other people. But we can't, now can we?
#238 - daxxthedog
Reply +24 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
#253 to #238 - miaandvinny
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
And bombs blow people up.
#403 to #238 - alexusapi
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
a pencils purpose is not to misspell, a cars purpose is not to drive drunk and once a again a spoons purpose is not to make people fat, but a guns purpose is to kill.

User avatar #526 to #403 - revanthewin
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
A pencil is used to stain paper, but it can be used to misspell words. It can also be used to stab someone in the neck with. A car is used to drive, and it can be used to drive drunk. It can also be used to run people over with. A spoon is used to get food to your mouth. It can be used too much and make you fat, and it can be used to scoop someone's eyes out. A firearm is mainly used for either personal defense, hunting, or for shooting targets, but it can be used for killing people.

Just because something can be used in a bad way doesn't mean it should be banned. Countless people are hit by cars every day, but you don't see people crying out to outlaw cars. Why guns then?
User avatar #543 to #526 - alexusapi
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
an atom bomb can be used as a means to save us from meteorites and other comets but it can also kill people, lets give everybody an atom bomb. nobody would need a firearm to protect themselves from firearms if there were no firearms. but that said, i'm not even against guns. me and my pop go hunting for christmas every year. but i think the US is way too loose with their gun laws, i mean who needs an AK47 to hunt?
User avatar #554 to #543 - revanthewin
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
What if you see six deer and you wanna kill them all? I mean, I don't know about you, but I'm no Lee Harvey Oswald.
User avatar #560 to #554 - alexusapi
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Ok you win, if i happen to need to kill 6 deer at once, having an AK-47 would be a convenience. because thats a rational and completely valid argument.
User avatar #563 to #560 - revanthewin
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Or if three bears came at you at once. Are you just gonna try to club the other two after shooting one?
User avatar #575 to #563 - admiralen
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
.44 magnum friendo, six bullets with enough force to kill the bear
User avatar #581 to #575 - revanthewin
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
But then what if there's seven?
User avatar #586 to #581 - admiralen
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
thats why you own two
User avatar #590 to #586 - revanthewin
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
But what if there's fifteen?
User avatar #595 to #590 - admiralen
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
thats why you learned to wrestle bears in highschool
User avatar #601 to #595 - revanthewin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
But admiralen,...What if the last one's horny?!
#608 to #601 - admiralen
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
#611 to #608 - revanthewin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
But what if it's a girl?!?!?!?!?!?
But what if it's a girl?!?!?!?!?!?
#619 to #611 - admiralen
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
call roman and he´ll bowl with it
#759 to #619 - revanthewin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Wow, someone came through and thumbed down every one of my comments. I feel honored.
#622 to #619 - revanthewin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
But what if Roman wins and the bear get's pissed off?!
User avatar #780 to #622 - admiralen
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
then roman shoots it down with his uzi since hes an outlaw and its no longer your problem
User avatar #785 to #780 - revanthewin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
But now he has an illegal weapon!
User avatar #898 to #785 - admiralen
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
but its ok since roman is a criminal anyway
User avatar #713 to #526 - elcreepo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Driving drunk is illegal. Misspelling something is a mistake that gets erased. Overeating should be illegal.

Guns meant for killing should be illegal. You can keep your hunting rifles and if you kill someone with it, at least it won't be 20 kids in under 5 minutes.
User avatar #720 to #713 - revanthewin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Driving drunk is illegal, killing people is illegal.
User avatar #744 to #720 - elcreepo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Yes, but tools that kill people are not illegal or even monitored.

If we made it so that a gun can only kill one person, instead of many at once, the lives we could save each year as a nation would be massive.

The mother of the Newtown shooter should not have had those guns in the first place, where her mentally unstable son could easily access.
User avatar #757 to #744 - revanthewin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
But there's no way to make it to where a gun could only kill one person unless everyone had a gun. The fact that you can fire it more than once quickly is kind of why people use guns instead of bows and arrows.
User avatar #773 to #757 - elcreepo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
So you're saying that if everyone had a gun, the person with the quickest gun gets the kill?

Your logic makes no sense. There is no need to have an AK-47. Nor do we need to arm and train TODDLERS in gun use, that's just asking for war in middle school.

You keep your hunting rifles and if you're lucky, kill only half a dozen people. You keep your semi and full automatics and kill three times that. This law wouldn't stop criminals, but that doesn't matter considering that if someone wants to kill you bad enough they'll always find a way, even if you're armed to the teeth.

It would stop the woman from Newtown from having the guns which her son then used to kill 20 little kids. It would prevent the two teenage boys from Columbine from getting easy access to guns.
User avatar #776 to #773 - revanthewin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Wait, are we arguing the same point now? I'm trying to say that banning all guns wouldn't work. What are you trying to say?
User avatar #788 to #776 - elcreepo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Ban guns which are designed only to kill, but allow hunting rifles/ectera that are designed for actual sport (if you can call it that.)

I'm not saying ban all guns either, that would be impossible. I'm just saying limit guns as a preventative measure, like they do with knives.
User avatar #796 to #788 - revanthewin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Oh, then I guess I agree with you. People shouldn't need to own anything other than a shotgun, a hunting rifle or a pistol, but guns shouldn't be illegal.
User avatar #440 to #403 - ojallday
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
yes, true but you can use literally anything to kill any one
#466 to #440 - alexusapi
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
ok let's have a 1v1 fight, you get a toothpick and i get an AR-15 :)
ok let's have a 1v1 fight, you get a toothpick and i get an AR-15 :)
#478 to #466 - ojallday
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Okey... ill wait till you're asleep then i'll tie you down and beat you too death. then ill go to Mcdonalds and get an egg mcmuffin.
Okey... ill wait till you're asleep then i'll tie you down and beat you too death. then ill go to Mcdonalds and get an egg mcmuffin.
#484 to #478 - alexusapi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Awww man, we here in iceland lost our mcdonalds some years ago, not like a ridiculous loss but still, when you don't have it you miss it :P
Awww man, we here in iceland lost our mcdonalds some years ago, not like a ridiculous loss but still, when you don't have it you miss it :P
#515 to #484 - ojallday
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
... what do you have?
User avatar #529 to #515 - alexusapi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Well my favorite is probably subway, but we have dominos,pizza hut, tgi fridays, american style, kfc and probably some more i cant remember. so it's not like our situation is bad :P
#538 to #529 - ojallday
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
what is American Style?
what is American Style?
#549 to #538 - alexusapi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
i just realized it isnt xD here is the website You need to login to view this link
#584 to #549 - ojallday
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
yaaaaaaa... thats not in english soo i dont think i can navigate that. does it say where the company is based?
#600 to #584 - alexusapi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
nevermind, it's icelandic, just a very misleading name and theme.
User avatar #546 to #538 - alexusapi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
a restraunt very much like T.G.I Fridays. i thought that came from america :P
#555 to #546 - ojallday
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
nope never herd of it unless its from the north. those ******* are wierd
#513 - flamingpie
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Guns don't kill people, I kill people, with guns.
User avatar #833 to #513 - voteharveydent
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
Old people burning.
Old people burning.
User avatar #283 - GenerationXero
Reply +17 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Guns don't kill people, people kill people, but the people with guns, can kill a hell of a lot more.
#359 to #283 - anon id: 48bdc250
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
If everybody had a gun, mass shootings would probably not happen often, if it all. Because, if one person decides to start firing on an armed crowd, he won't last long. Who knows, though.
User avatar #537 to #359 - coolcalx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
..unless he is fed up with life and just wants to go out with a bang (ha, puns).

now what happens? he shoots some people, someone shoots him, and now someone ELSE shoots the guy who shot the shooter, because ****, they all look the same.
User avatar #306 to #283 - iHAXnoobs
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
toasters don't toast toast, toast toast toast.
User avatar #318 to #306 - tehmudkipz
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
You should probably be toasting bread not toast. But, hey, extra crispy.
#561 - finnini
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(01/07/2013) [-]
"Guns don't kill people. People kill people. Guns defend people against people with smaller guns."