Anonymous comments allowed.
#104 - darthblam has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #112 to #104 - pebar (01/05/2013) [-]
that was a glitch
they didn't travel faster than light
#113 to #112 - darthblam ONLINE (01/05/2013) [-]
Oh... well.. **** ... that's disappointing news.. how didn't I see or hear that anywhere?
User avatar #116 to #113 - pebar (01/05/2013) [-]
The media doesn't really jump on things like that, they just liked the idea of having something faster than light
you had to have been following news on the subject
User avatar #118 to #116 - darthblam ONLINE (01/05/2013) [-]
Well **** , I was hoping to see some at least tests of some sort of FTL drive in my life time.. oh well. Thanks for letting me know.
User avatar #121 to #118 - pebar (01/05/2013) [-]
if it makes you feel any better, time travel has been proven by experiment, although it was just a few nanoseconds...
they got 2 really accurate clocks in sync and put 1 in a jet and flew it around really fast. Then they compared the clocks and they were no longer in sync.
#122 to #121 - darthblam ONLINE (01/05/2013) [-]
That's something I'd prefer not to hear.. time travel is some dangerous **** .. but, hey, no one seems to be going back in time from the future so I guess it never happens.
User avatar #125 to #122 - pebar (01/05/2013) [-]
it wasn't really time travel per se, it was just messing with time. There's nothing dangerous about it because you can only "travel into the future" so there's no way to screw with things...
User avatar #123 to #122 - pebar (01/05/2013) [-]
Well how about you only need to be traveling really close to the speed of light to actually get somewhere really fast. When you approach the speed of light, time from your point of view slows down, so you could travel lightyears in a few minutes, assuming you had the energy. But from everyone else's point of view, the trip would take the normal time.
User avatar #110 to #104 - bulbakip (01/05/2013) [-]
I love the honesty of them maybe being wrong. they prioritize fact over opinion which is not what all scientists even do.
User avatar #107 to #104 - thenez (01/05/2013) [-]
that was due to a loose connection on their machines.
they are not faster than light.
 Friends (0)