Fucking- Biology. Jennifer Lawrence will save us.. Create a stupid acronym like "YOLO" Let it gain in the ranks of the idiotic part of the generation Watch as thousands go by this stupid acronym and en too many asians
x
Click to expand

Comments(219):

[ 219 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#69 - Deavas (01/03/2013) [-]
This image has expired
>Hunger Games
>Africa
>Satellite broadcasting


i think, gentlemen, we could be very profitable with this
User avatar #70 to #69 - kreekydoorS (01/03/2013) [-]
I'd watch it
User avatar #93 to #69 - sixsicsix (01/03/2013) [-]
you'd need to either do it ******* often, or with ******** of people
User avatar #78 to #69 - heartlessrobot (01/03/2013) [-]
I was thinking we do that with either Africa or Convicts.
User avatar #185 to #78 - biggydy (01/04/2013) [-]
I think it would be more interesting with Convicts. I mean, most Africans are skinny and not so strong, while most of the convicts are ripped, and know basic fighting.
User avatar #75 to #69 - melonwaffle (01/03/2013) [-]
Mandigo fighting?
+25
#3 - necessary **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#32 - Nameloc (01/03/2013) [-]
Create a stupid acronym like "YOLO"   
   
Let it gain in the ranks of the idiotic part of the generation   
   
Watch as thousands go by this stupid acronym and end up killing themselves   
   
???   
   
Profit!!!
Create a stupid acronym like "YOLO"

Let it gain in the ranks of the idiotic part of the generation

Watch as thousands go by this stupid acronym and end up killing themselves

???

Profit!!!
#38 to #32 - aludin (01/03/2013) [-]
So are you saying that we should all say YOLO and wait for the idiots to kill them selves?
#35 to #32 - senoldlx (01/03/2013) [-]
you just saved the world
you just saved the world
#8 - benasbenas (01/03/2013) [-]
i have a better idea
i have a better idea
#2 - bkrazy (01/03/2013) [-]
AMC better not kill Daryl!
User avatar #82 to #2 - kjeks (01/03/2013) [-]
Well, they created the character just for him, and he became a main character because he was so well liked among viewers. So I doubt it'll happen anytime soon. At least I hope not.
+1
#158 to #2 - necessary **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#6 to #2 - cjasper (01/03/2013) [-]
there is going to be a game based upon him so probably not ...
User avatar #10 to #6 - pukki ONLINE (01/03/2013) [-]
But the game happens before the show, so anything could happen to daryl in the show.
User avatar #11 to #10 - cjasper (01/03/2013) [-]
even so I don't think they would risk the fan backlash..
#7 - adobo (01/03/2013) [-]
this*
#9 - pussypenisfaggot (01/03/2013) [-]
or this
#161 to #9 - harryscene (01/04/2013) [-]
THAT MOVIE WAS THE 			****		.
THAT MOVIE WAS THE **** .
#13 to #9 - anon (01/03/2013) [-]
Battle royale is way better in my opinion
#40 to #13 - anon (01/03/2013) [-]
yeah, but the hunger games will most likely have better sequels unlike battle royale
#120 to #40 - trainerhack (01/03/2013) [-]
haha i loved how ridiculous BR2 was though
User avatar #194 - technoplasm **User deleted account** (01/04/2013) [-]
**technoplasm rolls 69**
#199 to #197 - technoplasm **User deleted account** (01/04/2013) [-]
#141 - MasterManiac (01/04/2013) [-]
... or remove warning signs from everything and let natural selection do all the work
... or remove warning signs from everything and let natural selection do all the work
#145 to #141 - anon (01/04/2013) [-]
or you could kill yourself, that would help too.
User avatar #142 to #141 - bkrazy (01/04/2013) [-]
dat smile! How can i not thumb up?
#147 to #141 - UlquiGrimmHime (01/04/2013) [-]
who reads warning signs?
who reads warning signs?
#200 - skinless (01/04/2013) [-]
man i wonder when this "Asians can read minds ******** " will end
#77 - awesomenorwegian (01/03/2013) [-]
Re-elect hitler
#99 - baniggernom (01/03/2013) [-]
Tigers.
Tigers.
#220 - anon (01/04/2013) [-]
What's up with all these eugenicist douchebags in the comments? Its pretty sickening that so many people on here are fine with millions of people being murdered simply for existing.
#228 to #220 - anon (01/04/2013) [-]
the dead don't care if they're dead......... because they're dead
#169 - jennalynnification (01/04/2013) [-]
She could save us all...
She could save us all...
#151 - Thenewguygunther (01/04/2013) [-]
idk man, if jennifer lawrence came for me I'm not sure if i could stop from overpopulating, if you know what i mean
User avatar #72 - swampert (01/03/2013) [-]
Kinda funny all these people agreeing in the comments. Then your name gets picked, be pretty ******* ******
User avatar #14 - babbylicious (01/03/2013) [-]
The human population is around 8billion and growing at an exponential rate. Presuming we follow the traditional hunger games format, yearly, and two tributes from every district (country) and if there are around 193 countries in the world, we can expect a turnout of 386 people between the ages of 12-18. Only one person should survive so yearly we are killing 385 people, most of which have barely reached sexual maturity. Because the world is growing at an incredible rate, a hunger games at the traditional magnitude would not be efficient at population growth.
User avatar #16 to #14 - kasperscar (01/03/2013) [-]
Are we at 8 billion?
**** i thought we were on 7
User avatar #34 to #16 - Nameloc (01/03/2013) [-]
It's probably near 7.5
It's really hard to tell. Censuses aren't entirely reliable, seeing how each country could have X amount of illegal immigrants that don't show up on the count.

Either way it doesn't hurt to round towards 8 billion.
User avatar #18 to #14 - aussiepridevil (01/03/2013) [-]
make it from every population center, kind of how proffesional sports are, and make it every 4/6 months instead of year, that's killing of quite a few people ever year, also much better entertainment then the current garbage we watch on TV.
#15 to #14 - lollytool (01/03/2013) [-]
Then we tweak it, six contestants, every two months.
User avatar #45 to #15 - babbylicious (01/03/2013) [-]
However, it does have long term consequences. Assuming that people do not revolt over the two month reaping, you can theoretically gain a population collapse over a period of time.
#46 to #45 - lollytool (01/03/2013) [-]
However, the chances of there not being an uprising is below zero.
User avatar #50 to #46 - babbylicious (01/03/2013) [-]
Allow me to explain.

Lets take a country with a population of 1million people. Relatively speaking, this is a small population. Lets assume that we are in a first world country where excellent health coverage gives a denser working class and lower prepubescent population. (look at the middle one)

Lets examine the US graph and use it to base of statistical information for our country. 16% of the population is in the reaping age range, which in our country, is about 160000 people. Every two months, six people are harvested, which is a total of what? thirty six people per year. As I stated earlier, there are a total of 1158 people in the reaping. The chances of a survivor from our country is 6/1158, or a 0.5% chance of survival. However keep in mind that our data is based on first world data. That being stated, we can assume that institutions play a larger role in training people for these games, so the chances of survival increase by a slight amount, but this is not enough to guarantee a win every year. So lets assume that all 36 people die per year. 36/160000=0.02% population decrease of 16% of the population.

Now, the second largest group (5-9), is about 8% of the population, or 80,000 people. These cannot be harvested as of yet. The average of this group is 7. Now the reaping age starts at 12 so it would on average, take five years until one reaches reaping age. By this time, there would've been 180people killed through reaping. However since we are talking about 80,000 people, there will STILL be a net increase in population growth, even after we consider another factor

Sex is good, sex is fun, until you start seeing the emotional turmoils resulting from the masskilling of children and young adults. Because of this, there will be a decrease in birth rates as parents will not want to have kids only to lose them years later.
#51 to #50 - lollytool (01/03/2013) [-]
I do believe you're the most intelligent person I've talked to on this site.
#53 to #51 - babbylicious (01/03/2013) [-]
I could do better *blushes*
#54 to #53 - lollytool (01/03/2013) [-]
God damnit, I've been awake for over 50 hours straight, I'm having a hard time keeping up with you here xD
User avatar #55 to #54 - babbylicious (01/03/2013) [-]
I'm in the car holding my bladder ><
#56 to #55 - lollytool (01/03/2013) [-]
Probably makes it a bit hard to think as well, I guess.
User avatar #57 to #56 - babbylicious (01/03/2013) [-]
Indeed. I got some other factors to mention, especially the genetic diversity factor, but I cannot think ><
#58 to #57 - lollytool (01/03/2013) [-]
I'm just getting mentally exhausted.
#52 to #50 - babbylicious (01/03/2013) [-]
(forgot this pic)    
   
Because of this, we can expect a decrease in births in a country with an already low birth rate. This itself, is devastating especially since the reaping group is at or starting sexual maturity. With a decrease in population resulting from the reaping and the lower birth rate, we will experience a small lose of genetic diversity especially since more and more people are deciding not to have kids and teens are not reaching adulthood (people who are 16-18 have a higher chance of getting picked, according to the games). Over a long period of time, that 0.2% reduction of the reaping population and lower birth rate in a country with an already low birth rate WILL cause the working population to collapse as well as more and more people are not reaching adulthood.
(forgot this pic)

Because of this, we can expect a decrease in births in a country with an already low birth rate. This itself, is devastating especially since the reaping group is at or starting sexual maturity. With a decrease in population resulting from the reaping and the lower birth rate, we will experience a small lose of genetic diversity especially since more and more people are deciding not to have kids and teens are not reaching adulthood (people who are 16-18 have a higher chance of getting picked, according to the games). Over a long period of time, that 0.2% reduction of the reaping population and lower birth rate in a country with an already low birth rate WILL cause the working population to collapse as well as more and more people are not reaching adulthood.
User avatar #42 to #15 - babbylicious (01/03/2013) [-]
6*193=1158
number of dead: 1157

1year=12months
12months/2months=6

6942 deaths per year... Still not efficient.
#44 to #42 - lollytool (01/03/2013) [-]
Let's try to tweak it even more then. 60, every week.
#60 to #44 - skymuffinz (01/03/2013) [-]
Lets remind ourselves that we're talking here about perfect-case scenario without any cheating pre-"reaping" training 'n 0 influence/advantage by having rich parents

The poor people would revolt, middle one would never do such a thing cuz middle class's always scared of high class.



Best way, to do this sort of "sport" is virtually but we don't yet have the technology to do the "tron" thing.

In all honesty, we're kinda ****** - colonization of other planets really needs to happen within 100 years or so.
#61 to #60 - lollytool (01/03/2013) [-]
They're talking about colonizing mars in 20 years, but I kinda doubt it.
User avatar #62 to #61 - skymuffinz (01/03/2013) [-]
Prob is, as beings/race we're "perfectly" flawed



Which think about it, is a "good" thing

Everyone has right to live, if you were to change that by denying that right

we'd be nothing else than "borg" from Star wars (j/k Star Trek)

There isn't any way to "stop" this kind of growth that isn't unettic and unmoral (Apologies for wrong spelling)
"The diseases" are already doing its toil, just as world hunger is.

Colonization needs to happen - or we gotta find a way to live within the ocean

#63 to #62 - lollytool (01/03/2013) [-]
Living in the ocean would've been kinda awesome.
User avatar #64 to #63 - skymuffinz (01/03/2013) [-]
True dat. But such places would need a strict military occupation that'd prevent terrorism.

As well, the occupation of "rich" class in those places would be enormous which's a problem, it'd cause a revolt among middle/poor class (mostly among poor, it's always among poor)


Someone'd have to figure out a way for people to live there where everyone has equal rights, - i don't support communism but for people to live in a such "dangerous" place - communism seems like a only way to give everyone "equal rights" (>>I'm implying that equal rights nullify chances of "rebel/revolutions")
#65 to #64 - lollytool (01/03/2013) [-]
I'm a fan of communism myself, but yeah, it'd probably be a big advantage.
User avatar #66 to #65 - skymuffinz (01/03/2013) [-]
"Communism" can only work during the "war" time, or "population/crisis"

As soon as things come back to normal its in our human nature to "aspire" towards being better than rest :)
#68 to #66 - lollytool (01/03/2013) [-]
I know, which is kinda depressing, it's a great idea on paper, but it's hard/impossible to actually pull off.
User avatar #83 - vanoreo (01/03/2013) [-]
Execute anyone with an IQ score less than 110.

Those who value their lives will focus harder on studying

Those who don't will be executed.



I'm not a sociopath...
User avatar #136 to #83 - RageguyFuckyea (01/03/2013) [-]
I would aim lower, about 80-85, but I also suggest that we execute all those without a value to society that exceeds their food, power and living space.
#152 to #83 - anon (01/04/2013) [-]
Wow, you and at least 20 others are complete retards.
#154 to #152 - anon (01/04/2013) [-]
I mean, seriously. How can you say people with certain IQs should be dead, meanwhile you don't even know what IQ is.

You just want to feel superior.
User avatar #86 to #83 - seniorawesomesauce (01/03/2013) [-]
Not everything is about intelligence, you know. If everyone was smart then everyone would be cynical.
User avatar #106 to #86 - newposterintown (01/03/2013) [-]
Not necessarily.
User avatar #110 to #106 - seniorawesomesauce (01/03/2013) [-]
Intelligence leads to hostility, this is proven true by history.
User avatar #111 to #110 - newposterintown (01/03/2013) [-]
Are you saying, that cynicism would equate to violence?
User avatar #124 to #110 - awesomenessdefined (01/03/2013) [-]
Hostility leads to hostility. True intelligence only leads to humility.
#85 to #83 - anon (01/03/2013) [-]
im pretty sure executing everyone with an iq under 90 would already wipe out over half of the world's population. africa and south america would be empty at the very least.
User avatar #90 to #85 - thewalruss (01/03/2013) [-]
Actually, latin americans have the highest IQ, but their culture is still adapting to the USA/Europe culture... that's why they have that quantity of social problems... They are native american individuals living in a occidental world. They are like smart children that haven't learned the rules of the game.
User avatar #97 to #90 - Conquistador (01/03/2013) [-]
Actually, they're still pretty violent down there. And they're not full blooded natives, they're Mestizos. Well, most of them are.
User avatar #101 to #97 - thewalruss (01/03/2013) [-]
Yes, they have violence problems, but not for stupidity but for social inadaptation. I've been in canada, US, Mexico, Costa Rica, Spain, Argentina Italy, france, UK, marroco, holand, poland... and the latin americans are a bunch of clever and kind people, but they don't know how to work together... (and is not that violent when you live there). Down there, for example, a lot of people thinks that the violents are the americans, because of all the shootings is schools and stuff like that. But I see a really bright future for them... just remember that most of the powerfull european countries were built by a buch of barbarians.
User avatar #115 to #101 - Conquistador (01/03/2013) [-]
>Clever
>Kind
Ahaha... AHAHAHAHAHA.
You ever been to Juarez? Mexico is still a ******** and it's one of the most prosperous and powerful latin country. Dressing nice down there will so much as get you robbed right on the street. Did you know the average hispanic's IQ is around 80? Trust me, they're no geniuses.

And who would know better than a actual blood Mexican?
User avatar #180 to #115 - thewalruss (01/04/2013) [-]
Otro mexicano de sangre we... has ido a cualquier ciudad del bajío? Si te pones al nivel de juarez, o de la frontera, cualquier cosa ahí está mal, pero es más el territorio seguro que las ciudades como esas. Tanto así, que te aseguro que estás más seguro en el DF o en guadalajara, que en ciudades como madrid o París. Créeme, he visto mundo, y mi trabajo es justamente conocer a la gente. México está a una o dos generaciones de la gloria. Espera y verás.
User avatar #192 to #180 - Conquistador (01/04/2013) [-]
Lol, I wouldn't set foot in Juarez. Mexico city is too crowded and there is still crime. There isn't much to be proud of anymore. The few things I'm glad about being Mexican is our indigenous heritage. Too bad those gringos from spain came over and ruined our glorious bloodline.

Btw, this is a site where we speak English.
User avatar #240 to #192 - thewalruss (01/04/2013) [-]
No one cares man... everytime somebody makes a latin joke, thera are houndreds of treads in spanish... stop being such a faggot. And I'm not sure you are a mexican, because obiously you can't read spanish properly... I said that besides the border with the US (incluing CD Juarez), mexico is not as violent as you may think...
User avatar #242 to #240 - Conquistador (01/04/2013) [-]
Well, I'll admit one thing. It's great we aren't part ****** like those ******* brazis. Eh, comrade?
User avatar #244 to #242 - thewalruss (01/04/2013) [-]
aaaaahhh... you're nazi or a troller... ok, I'll just proceed to ignore you.
User avatar #246 to #244 - Conquistador (01/04/2013) [-]
And having nazistic ideas is wrong?

You're just like all the other libtards who dwell on this site. I prefer preserving our genetic history, not destroying it.
#247 to #246 - thewalruss (01/04/2013) [-]
Yes little buddy... it is. (by the way, that finger is pointing directly to your face)
Yes little buddy... it is. (by the way, that finger is pointing directly to your face)
#248 to #247 - Conquistador (01/04/2013) [-]
Oh really? So tell me how it is.

It's also ironic you use silly little pictures from American cartoon to insult me.
#249 to #248 - thewalruss (01/04/2013) [-]
Why is it ironic? I don't hate the US. Two of my best friends live there.
#250 to #249 - Conquistador (01/04/2013) [-]
Just so you know. It's best to refer to the two continents as separate. Such as North Americans and South Americans. And just American would refer to the US.

It seems to me you judge Americans pretty quickly. But eh, it'd be nice to see gringos go back to Europe and have the continent given directly to the hands of it's proper inhabitants. Those of native ancestry. I'd also like to see Mexico get fixed up.
User avatar #241 to #240 - Conquistador (01/04/2013) [-]
Lol, quit being such a faggot and accept the truth that Mexico's a ******** . And yes, I biologically am Mexican. Doesn't mean I still live in the hell hole. BTW, your English is **** .

I doubt you even been outside Mexico. Mexicans rarely travel outside the continent. And even if you did, your English wouldn't be that ****** , since it's the international language. You're probably just some 12 year old homosexual trying to stand out and appear unique to the other mindless hordes.
User avatar #243 to #241 - thewalruss (01/04/2013) [-]
Well, my english could be ****** , but I can also speak ****** french, italian and german... that's enough to communicate anywhere... and by the way, I'm sorry to tell you this, but you're a ******* chicano... do you know that word? We use it for people like you... I dare you to go to Mexico city, Guadalajara, Monterrey, León, Guanajuato, San Miguel, Queretaro, Puebla, etc... and then to return to your ******* small world and tell me that you saw violence.

I forbid you to keep calling yourself a mexican, coz you're not. You're a chicano, and you were born to be like that. And you know what, I'm pretty sure you're living in the US, because that's where all the lazy, drugdealers and dumb mexicans go to live, and because the people love us, the mexicans, in any other country because they know we are much more than rats in a ******** .

By the way, you may be too blind and ethnocentric to belive this, but in politics and art, the french is the international language, literally by international agreement... the english is the international languague for business and entertaiment, and that's it.
User avatar #245 to #243 - Conquistador (01/04/2013) [-]
AHAHAHAHAHAHA. Well, being a foreign born Mexican is at least better than living like you do. I'm sorry to bring reality to you, but not all foreigners think Mexico is great. I also like how you contradict yourself by telling me to go there as it's all tough, then you say it's not violent and that it's nice. What a ******* moron.

I prefer to call myself a Mestizo. Having labels that originated from there is an embarrassment when interacting with other races. Lazy drug dealers and idiots? Sounds just like Mexico itself. Where more than half of the people are below the poverty line and live in fear of drug trafficers yet hire coyotes to help them cross the border.

English is the most widely spoken language. I see you have trouble looking at statistics and data. Because you can't even tell the overall IQ level, economic standpoint, or productivity of Mexico. You really must be special. Filthy peasant.
User avatar #117 to #83 - lolzordz (01/03/2013) [-]
implying high IQ is the most important thing to have in life
User avatar #128 to #83 - awesomenessdefined (01/03/2013) [-]
The average IQ is 100.
Kill everyone below 110, and the new average would be 100.
Kill everyone below 110 again, and the new average becomes 100.
Repeat until everyone is dead.
Doubt you'd survive 1 round.
#209 to #128 - mrdrpage (01/04/2013) [-]
Am I missing something?
If nobody is below 110, then how is the average 100.
User avatar #212 to #209 - awesomenessdefined (01/04/2013) [-]
The average IQ is always 100.
Like if most people scored an 80%, 80% would be 100.
Then if you killed everyone who got less than 90%, 90% would be the average, and be 100
#219 to #212 - mrdrpage (01/04/2013) [-]
So basically, 100 is just another word for average when it comes to IQ?   
   
Thanks. I learned something new today!
So basically, 100 is just another word for average when it comes to IQ?

Thanks. I learned something new today!
#88 to #83 - anon (01/03/2013) [-]
Studying has nothing to do with IQ.
But I'm glad you would be willing to sacrifice yourself for the greater good.
+4
#157 to #88 - necessary **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
+8
#67 - verinenhimo **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#71 to #67 - anon (01/03/2013) [-]
******* yes.
User avatar #113 to #67 - maxismahname (01/03/2013) [-]
yeah because hunger games turned into a ****** love story half way through the ******* book.
0
#159 to #113 - necessary **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
[ 219 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)