War. Tags are gay. uhum sims Arrete Izmir; . - Huerta ONE OF THE SERIOUS PROBLEMS tht PLANNING AGAINST AMERICAN DOCTRINE m THAT THE AMERICANS NOT READ THEIR MAN im Fabulous
x

War

 
War. Tags are gay. uhum sims Arrete Izmir; . - Huerta ONE OF THE SERIOUS PROBLEMS tht PLANNING AGAINST AMERICAN DOCTRINE m THAT THE AMERICANS NOT READ THEIR MAN

Tags are gay

Tags: im | Fabulous
uhum sims Arrete Izmir; . - Huerta
ONE OF THE SERIOUS PROBLEMS tht PLANNING
AGAINST AMERICAN DOCTRINE m THAT THE
AMERICANS NOT READ THEIR MANUALS NOR
DO THEY FEEL ANY OBLIGATIONS TO FOLLOW
THEIR ."
TIMIE REASON THAT THE ARM? DOES
SO WELL tht WARTIME. tta THAT WAR IS . Ott,
AND THE AMERICAN ARMY OIAMFS
A maul mm mm .
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+568
Views: 17583
Favorited: 78
Submitted: 12/31/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to gwynfyd submit to reddit
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #3 - thepyras (12/31/2012) [-]
>fail in war against Americans
>insult American tactics
Wat.
User avatar #4 to #3 - thegamegestapo ONLINE (12/31/2012) [-]
>implying "tactics"
User avatar #18 to #4 - crazypat (12/31/2012) [-]
Go brush your te- oh wait never mind carry on.
User avatar #75 to #18 - thegamegestapo ONLINE (01/01/2013) [-]
that was actually pretty funny
User avatar #10 to #4 - blackhawksfan (12/31/2012) [-]
> implying you know anything about the American Military.
User avatar #76 to #10 - thegamegestapo ONLINE (01/01/2013) [-]
Read the content and quit being so butthurt. Also the Canucks are always going to be better than the Blackhawks.
User avatar #77 to #76 - blackhawksfan (01/03/2013) [-]
I'm sorry, when is the last time the Canucks won a Stanley Cup?
User avatar #78 to #77 - thegamegestapo ONLINE (01/03/2013) [-]
We had the moral victory
User avatar #58 to #3 - partnerintroll (01/01/2013) [-]
>implying russia and the us waged hot war
User avatar #82 to #58 - kingmarston (01/06/2013) [-]
We waged a war on philosophy, and US won. Notice that when you look on a world map post 90's there is no USSR.
#6 to #3 - anon (12/31/2012) [-]
Well I do acknowledge the fact that it is a very good thing the Americans joined the war I wouldnt say Germany or Russia failed solely against the United states it is a world war so I think credit is due to multiple partys. However the Americans did kick japans ass.
User avatar #7 to #6 - thepyras (12/31/2012) [-]
I didn't say they did it alone. I'm just saying you can't really insult your enemies' methods when you lost.
#8 - imthepunkkid (12/31/2012) [-]
I don't know why, but i love America As a Militarily and Defensive viewpoint
User avatar #32 to #8 - alphadolan (12/31/2012) [-]
M1A
User avatar #61 to #32 - admiralshepard (01/01/2013) [-]
No, that's an accurized Garand, an M1A is a semi-automatic M14, and would therefore have a visible magazine.
#59 to #8 - anon (01/01/2013) [-]
Like how we will have spent an estimated 4 trillion to beat jihadists that live in mud huts and can't beat them. Yeah its highly entertaining comedy.
User avatar #62 to #59 - imthepunkkid (01/01/2013) [-]
Where the hell did that come from, Like that has literally nothing to do with anything going on here
User avatar #80 to #59 - kingmarston (01/06/2013) [-]
No matter how powerful a Nation is it can't defeat a philosophy with brute force. Only with persistence and time.
User avatar #56 to #8 - acfb (01/01/2013) [-]
*and in every school house*
User avatar #12 to #8 - heartlessrobot ONLINE (12/31/2012) [-]
We'd be the most annoying country in the world to invade.
User avatar #14 to #12 - imthepunkkid (12/31/2012) [-]
We Honestly would, The state of Virginia Has more people registered and trained to use fire arms, than most countries have of an army, I mean My neighbor has 3 .50 caliber rifles, and two full auto Ak-47's

I personally have a .45 magnum a room over from me

(I'm against the laws that ban Guns if anyone wants to say anything about that)
User avatar #16 to #14 - heartlessrobot ONLINE (12/31/2012) [-]
If they attempted to ban guns they'd have a full on revolution on their hands. Not to mention many people serving in our military would be against the ban, if not all of them. I fully believe it would tear apart the country or weaken it.
-3
#17 to #16 - imthepunkkid has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #21 to #17 - commontroll (12/31/2012) [-]
Don't forget most of the West Coast.
User avatar #28 to #14 - Tsquared ONLINE (12/31/2012) [-]
they shouldn't be banned they should be regulated, name one reasonable situation where having an automatic, military grade, assault rifle would be necessary
User avatar #41 to #28 - multimedia (01/01/2013) [-]
To avenge your uncle's death in an insanely awesome ninja-gun battle. I hope I'm not the only one who would want this.
User avatar #43 to #41 - Tsquared ONLINE (01/01/2013) [-]
wouldn't a ninja sword battle be even cooler?
User avatar #44 to #43 - multimedia (01/01/2013) [-]
Well, yes, but the swords don't come out until somebody runs out of bullets. That way you could have explosions and bullets everywhere and some dude running around with a sword saying, "Don't bring a knife to a gunfight? THIS ISN'T A KNIFE!!!"
User avatar #39 to #28 - imthepunkkid (01/01/2013) [-]
Because, No one can be trusted on this planet, Everyone has there own personal vendettas, But if you want to see the Most paranoid people in the world, Look at a politician, What happens if the country is over taken, and the government falls, the Military has no command, That causes chaos, then what happens, It is every man for him self, we have to defend it on our own.

The best way to keep a country running, Is to have a fail safe for every situation, And if our final fail safe is a few million civilians with guns, Than you better be damn Sure its a hell of a good fail safe
User avatar #40 to #39 - Tsquared ONLINE (01/01/2013) [-]
you're looking at the worst possible scenario, what's your solution, give everyone firearms? the rate of accidental shoots would skyrocket and the same would go for impulse killing
User avatar #42 to #40 - imthepunkkid (01/01/2013) [-]
No, give the ones that have passed training and a mental evaluation firearms
User avatar #45 to #42 - Tsquared ONLINE (01/01/2013) [-]
you do realise that that's regulation right?

and either way, military-grade weapons are still way too powerful and dangerous for public ownership, they aren't designed with defense in mind, they're meant to kill as many people in as little time as possible
User avatar #47 to #45 - imthepunkkid (01/01/2013) [-]
No they are designed to push the limits of weaponry, No man designs a gun with the thought in mind of HOLY **** THIS THING WILL KILL **** SO FAST

Those are the thoughts of a man who has no respect for gun ownership, Design, or Firearms in general
User avatar #52 to #47 - Tsquared ONLINE (01/01/2013) [-]
that may not explicitly be their though but that's the only possible result,
it has more bullets per magazine: thus can fire longer before reloading: thus more time to do damage/kill
it has fully automatic capability: thus it can fire said bullets faster: thus do damage/kill faster

by the same logic one doesn't make a bomb more powerful to cause more destruction, but to improve explosive technology. same end with a better sounding name
User avatar #54 to #52 - Tsquared ONLINE (01/01/2013) [-]
*thought
0
#49 to #45 - elgringogordo **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#34 to #28 - anon (12/31/2012) [-]
1.a.totalitarian.government.invades.or.tries.to.take.over.and.our.government.can 't.be.everywhere.doing.everything.
2.the.government.tries.to.take.away.my.guns.
the.2nd.amendment.is.needed.most.for.if/when.the.feds.try.to.take.it.away..
there's.2.reasons.

and.my.space.bar.is.broken,not.trying.to.be.a.fag

that.is.why.it.exists,not.hunting.sport.shooting,etc.
0
#50 to #34 - elgringogordo **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #36 to #34 - Tsquared ONLINE (01/01/2013) [-]
2nd amendment talks about state militias not private ownership
as for the invasion, that's the reason we have a military, one which is currently one of the most powerful in the world
User avatar #68 to #28 - Durn (01/01/2013) [-]
Hey, let me try out your logic.

Name one reasonable situation where you would need a 140MPH vehicle in a suburban area.

Name one reasonable situation where you need an 11 inch knife in your kitchen.

Name one reasonable situation where you need speakers that go over 60DB.

User avatar #69 to #68 - Tsquared ONLINE (01/01/2013) [-]
1: in a suburban area, there is none, I'm not 100% sure but I'd think that those wouldn't be street leagle, besides they aren't designed specifically for killing
2: cutting a large piece of meat, I'm not good in the kitchen I assume there is a situation where its preferable
3: last I checked, Speakers aren't particularly lethal, besides that, increased range to my yourself heard at a large event like a concert or massive party
User avatar #70 to #69 - Tsquared ONLINE (01/01/2013) [-]
*street legal*
User avatar #19 to #12 - ivoryhammer (12/31/2012) [-]
That's why nobody has tried it
User avatar #20 to #19 - heartlessrobot ONLINE (12/31/2012) [-]
Also, we have the largest and one of the most powerful militaries in the world.
User avatar #27 to #20 - boeka (12/31/2012) [-]
Russia has the most material (as in: the largest army). according to Wikipedia Russia have over 20mil. men in reserve versus the American 1.5million, and there's also the Chinese army . Sure, they lack the precision of a drone-guided missile, but they can shoot more rounds than the Americans can.
Most powerful? Possibly, but we simply can't tell since the Chinese rarely attack anyone, and Russia only wakes up in spring time when it's time to remind the peasants not to leave the Mother Russia. You must remember that the Georgian war was over in 5 days.

If it comes to invading any of those countries? It can't be done. Russia is cold, harsh land made to destroy empires, the America has too many people willing to fight back, and the Chinese have.. well.. even more people who can be conscripted.
Not to mention the nukes. No one likes nukes.

Sorry for the long comment. I tried to keep it somewhat neutral.
User avatar #81 to #27 - kingmarston (01/06/2013) [-]
Russia and China have nothing close to a fully operational Blue Water Navy or any force projection to speak of. Only way they would win is if we invade their home turf.
#66 to #27 - anon (01/01/2013) [-]
Afghanistan
#29 to #27 - johnshepherd (12/31/2012) [-]
They might have the largest army, but remember: their tech is Russian.
#33 to #29 - electrictroll ONLINE (12/31/2012) [-]
Russian tech is brilliant, for en example during the cold war when the Americans got their hands on some Russian Jets they first laughed at all the outdated components used like Radio tubes rather than Transistors, until they realized that in the event of a nuke only Russian planes would be operational as only the electronics in their planes would be sturdy enough to withstand the emp sent out by the nuke.
(sorry about the *********** of a paragraph)
#71 to #33 - johnshepherd (01/01/2013) [-]
I know that Russian tech is quite good, but isn't there some kind of stereotype about Russian technology being faulty?
#72 to #71 - electrictroll ONLINE (01/01/2013) [-]
I believe the stereotype is that it is simple yet works in every situation.
#73 to #72 - johnshepherd (01/01/2013) [-]
I see. Thanks for correcting me. Have a thumb.
#74 to #73 - electrictroll ONLINE (01/01/2013) [-]
Fare thee well, good sir.
0
#48 to #19 - elgringogordo **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
0
#22 to #19 - dorkly **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #13 to #12 - mykoira (12/31/2012) [-]
clearly, Mexicans have tried it so many years
User avatar #15 to #13 - imthepunkkid (12/31/2012) [-]
Not as an act of war though
User avatar #26 to #12 - Jackimole (12/31/2012) [-]
Yeah, everyone except Canada and Mexico would have to cross an ocean to get to us.
0
#23 to #5 - fargone has deleted their comment [-]
#35 - Lulzilla (01/01/2013) [-]
As a Marine I agree with all three. I don't bother reading my manuals most of the time. During boot we would have 3 maybe 4 big drill instructors tear us a new anus just for existing and whenever we get into fire fights we just improvise (Which is what your supposed to do to be a good soldier.).
Sad enough to say...I've actually what's in my JPEG when clearing houses before.
#37 - eccleston (01/01/2013) [-]
“When in doubt, ATTACK!”
― George S. Patton Jr.
User avatar #31 - killingsin (12/31/2012) [-]
And then you find out that the USA quote is actually from a Canadian staff officer.
#1 - anon (12/31/2012) [-]
Yupp, Americans are pretty stupid :)
#9 to #1 - treekillenyj (12/31/2012) [-]
Just so you know when you refer to Americans, you're talking about the western hemisphere, not just the United States of America. Ass hat.
User avatar #11 to #1 - heartlessrobot ONLINE (12/31/2012) [-]
It's better than being a filth anon peasant. Oh, and no matter what you say, emoticons get you thumbed down.
#2 to #1 - torkildsen (12/31/2012) [-]
It's fake if I'm not mistaken, but I'd say that is pretty badass and somewhat stupid. Stupid, but badass
#53 - anon (01/01/2013) [-]
Yet we still win.
Problem?
#64 to #53 - anon (01/01/2013) [-]
1812. Ha.
America didn't win the World Wars by theirselves. Ha.
Penis. Ha.
#63 to #53 - anon (01/01/2013) [-]
Vietnam. Ha.
#67 to #63 - anon (01/01/2013) [-]
*some technicality about the vietnam engagment not being a war*
#60 - RogersRabbit (01/01/2013) [-]
This sounds like every single episode of Deadliest Warrior ever.
User avatar #55 - cyborgjunky (01/01/2013) [-]
I just want to applaud and thank everyone here for being so kind as to not start throwing pieces of **** at the fan.
User avatar #25 - uzzwick (12/31/2012) [-]
Anon does it again.
0
#24 - dorkly **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)