world of warcraft. . WORLD OF 1/ WARCRAFT Two level 85 wizards and a. wow has no "wizzards" noob... gandalf was a ta
x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - turian (12/29/2012) [-]
wow has no "wizzards"
noob...
#20 to #1 - anon (12/30/2012) [-]
You corrected his spelling even though he was right...
User avatar #3 to #1 - rainbowisbestpone (12/29/2012) [-]
they don't even have tier 1 gear..
#2 - Mesmus (12/29/2012) [-]
lol noob my 90 can smash them all
lol noob my 90 can smash them all
#28 to #2 - llmattll (12/30/2012) [-]
You're cool.
#7 - blynx (12/30/2012) [-]
You don't get a wizard class in world of Warcraft.
You don't get a wizard class in world of Warcraft.
#27 - slandersalamander (12/30/2012) [-]
You... you just called Peter ******* Jackson a noob.

Do you have any idea what you've brought down upon us?
#10 - hellsjester (12/30/2012) [-]
there are no wizards in world of warcraft
#11 to #10 - anon (12/30/2012) [-]
If mages aren't considered Wizards by one definition or another, then I don't wanna be right!
User avatar #12 to #11 - hellsjester (12/30/2012) [-]
they aren't... mages use the arcane .... wizards use natural forces and warlocks use ******* demons... get it right and gtfo
#13 to #12 - anon (12/30/2012) [-]
Theeeeen, are druids/shaman more closer to the definition of wizards? you konw... natural force- Yeh, no nevermind...
User avatar #14 to #13 - hellsjester (12/30/2012) [-]
not shamans use the elements and druids maybe would be close .... think of a magical hunter jedi.... then you have an idea
User avatar #30 - thehomelessbanana (01/04/2013) [-]
As much as I love World of Warcraft, I hate this.
User avatar #25 - liftplus ONLINE (12/30/2012) [-]
**** no peter jackson is magical fairy princess!
User avatar #26 to #25 - liftplus ONLINE (12/30/2012) [-]
i wrote a.d.m.i.n tho what happened
#22 - anon (12/30/2012) [-]
You Stupid ******* idiot, that right there is Gandalf and Sauroman, and the so called "n00b" is Peter Jackson, The director of Lord Of the Rings, and the Hobbit! This Picture has no relation to World of Warcraft, you make me want to shoot my self!
User avatar #24 to #22 - EvilWolf (12/30/2012) [-]
this troll tries too hard
#21 - thepyras (12/30/2012) [-]
>all these commenters so proud of themselves for knowing there aren't any wizards in WoW.
User avatar #16 - Xplode (12/30/2012) [-]
Like all the other comments below. There are no wizards in wow. Looks more like 2 high level priests and one is in shadowform
User avatar #17 to #16 - Xplode (12/30/2012) [-]
And I think the guy on the left is one of those newbie pandas
User avatar #18 to #17 - Xplode (12/30/2012) [-]
And by left I meant their left.
User avatar #15 - butterfultoast (12/30/2012) [-]
level 90 rogue, shaman, deathknight here bitch
User avatar #8 - Sataria (12/30/2012) [-]
Bitch please. Using world of warcraft, he is not a noob, he is blizzard.
User avatar #6 - BrotherBaner (12/30/2012) [-]
no he's the mod
#4 - dildobarbarian (12/29/2012) [-]
What if this 'n00b' is fact is the player and those wizards are his 2 level 85 accounts?
#5 to #4 - harleyzone (12/29/2012) [-]
Have you seen the movies and read the books?
pretty sure jackson's the noob...
User avatar #23 to #5 - RequieminMortis (12/30/2012) [-]
I'm tired of people acting like the changes made to the movies somehow made them any less good. Yes, they weren't fully accurate the books. No movie adaptation of a book is. They were STILL great movies.
#29 to #23 - harleyzone (12/31/2012) [-]
the book was written and released in two parts originally, jackson cut out practically the entire first half of the book, ie, most of part 1. he also cut out a character who was incredibly important to the backstory of the book's world. cutting out that huge part also made the movie fail in showing just how great the scale of the shire actually was, and how far they had to travel to get out of it, there was also the whole "mother nature fighting against them"  and the literal magic of the countryside and forests. so many things were left out. it would have better satisfied the fans and made a better profit if he had just split the books into their intended parts and made them more manageable movies, they would have been more complete, more movies=better profit, and they would have been able to fit the books in their entirety into the films, the parts of the books also have great endings to them, it's not some lame cliffhanger ending. the part has a satisfying closer, and the opening of the next part is pretty solid too, nothing that really needed to be messed with
the book was written and released in two parts originally, jackson cut out practically the entire first half of the book, ie, most of part 1. he also cut out a character who was incredibly important to the backstory of the book's world. cutting out that huge part also made the movie fail in showing just how great the scale of the shire actually was, and how far they had to travel to get out of it, there was also the whole "mother nature fighting against them" and the literal magic of the countryside and forests. so many things were left out. it would have better satisfied the fans and made a better profit if he had just split the books into their intended parts and made them more manageable movies, they would have been more complete, more movies=better profit, and they would have been able to fit the books in their entirety into the films, the parts of the books also have great endings to them, it's not some lame cliffhanger ending. the part has a satisfying closer, and the opening of the next part is pretty solid too, nothing that really needed to be messed with
#9 to #4 - anon (12/30/2012) [-]
I just imagined what would happen if the characters people roleplay in RPG's came to life.
 Friends (0)