Who's the real winner here?. love these. Diamonds are a girls best friend. Dogs are a man' s. From that, I think we can gather which of the sexes is more intell
x
Click to expand

Who's the real winner here?

Diamonds are a girls best friend. Dogs
are a man' s. From that, I think we can
gather which of the sexes is more
intelligent.
2 hours ago
4 people like this.
Love this haha
2 hours ago h Like
A woman' s best friend is a chunk of
super heated carbon. A man' s best
friend is a highly intelligent creature
capable of aiding with hunting, security,
transport and companionship. You' re
right, this does show who the more
intelligent sex is.
if minutes ago q Like
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+1434
Views: 37688
Favorited: 126
Submitted: 12/27/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to junkisftw submit to reddit

Comments(196):

[ 196 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #12 - anonymoose (12/28/2012) [-]
In the universe, Dogs are rarer than diamonds.
#14 to #12 - anon (12/28/2012) [-]
Diamonds aren't really that rare, they are artificially rare because de beers refuses to sell more than so many per year, and takes part in price fixing. Even if they were rare, they're still ******* useless in every way except that they sparkle.
User avatar #15 to #14 - anonymoose (12/28/2012) [-]
I said they weren't rare. They're found throughout the universe, dogs are specific to one planet.
User avatar #18 to #15 - omenaaa (12/28/2012) [-]
Probably. There could be another planet or planets somewhere in the universe with similar lifeforms, perhaps even exact lifeforms.
User avatar #19 to #18 - anonymoose (12/28/2012) [-]
The DNA structure that makes up a dog would have to be almost exact which would be essentially impossible.
User avatar #22 to #19 - omenaaa (12/28/2012) [-]
Well, it's a vast universe, perhaps somewhere life developed similarly to Earth's.
User avatar #23 to #22 - anonymoose (12/28/2012) [-]
The universe isn't even a fraction of the size it would need to be for that to be statistically likely.
User avatar #98 to #23 - ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (12/28/2012) [-]
I'm not sure why you're getting thumbed down, you're correct.
The chances that a single celled organism on another planet would evolve into something similar to the dog is basically nothing. And the chances it will be EXACTLY like our dog is even less likely.
#57 to #18 - anon (12/28/2012) [-]
even if there was such a thing, dogs would still be infinetely less common than diamonds, the entire core of big gas giants is in fact diamond, shaped under the immense pressure inside said gas giants, so there is in fact more diamond in our solar system than the entire mass of earth..
#192 to #14 - discordwhooves (12/28/2012) [-]
Oh 			****		, they found Midnight.
Oh **** , they found Midnight.
User avatar #119 to #14 - brawlerboi (12/28/2012) [-]
Well actually, they are one of the hardest (if not the hardest) known materials, but we're too retarded to actually use them efficiently, besides certain tools like diamond tipped drills.
User avatar #21 to #14 - masdercheef (12/28/2012) [-]
I don't know about useless. I'm pretty sure that a warhammer made of diamonds (while being insanely heavy) would hit like a freight train.
#27 to #21 - anon (12/28/2012) [-]
You clearly don't understand the properties of diamonds.
User avatar #28 to #27 - masdercheef (12/28/2012) [-]
No, I don't, all I really know is that they are one of the hardest minerals naturally on earth, if not the hardest. Please, educate me.
User avatar #45 to #28 - killinkyle (12/28/2012) [-]
They are extremely powerful- when shaped correctly. A diamond in the shape of a warhammer would shatter or splinter very quickly in the traditional shapes, while if shaped for minimal damage to the diamond, would also result in a loss of power per swing, a very weak frame for anything but smacks, not to mention it would be so ******* heavy lugging that piece of **** around would be like lugging around an anvil.

User avatar #198 to #45 - masdercheef (12/28/2012) [-]
So, it would be more effective if in the shape of, say, the head of an axe? Something with a striking edge, not a blunt face?
#63 to #12 - anon (12/28/2012) [-]
dogs only exist on 1 planet, scientists have discovered a planet that they believe is made mostly of diamonds
#97 - ptik (12/28/2012) [-]
i thought dogs are better than diamonds before reading the second comment
#108 - fishinyourface (12/28/2012) [-]
the only reason I would want diamonds is to sell them for money.
the only reason I would want diamonds is to sell them for money.
User avatar #111 to #108 - fpsnoob ONLINE (12/28/2012) [-]
Diamonds are actually very useful for things other than jewelry.
User avatar #113 to #111 - eddiethead (12/28/2012) [-]
Like swords! and armor.
User avatar #117 to #113 - darkjustifier (12/28/2012) [-]
Was that a minecraft pun?
User avatar #148 to #117 - eddiethead (12/28/2012) [-]
Why yes it was.
Thanks for noticing!
-1
#145 to #111 - nocturnavg **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#155 to #145 - hanakoikezawa (12/28/2012) [-]
How about having one as a sex friend?
User avatar #114 to #108 - LonelyCamel (12/28/2012) [-]
and buy as many dogs as you want!
User avatar #116 to #114 - fishinyourface (12/28/2012) [-]
I already have three, I think I would buy a house and THEN get more
#144 - oopsmapoops (12/28/2012) [-]
"Love this haha"
#141 - sirchris (12/28/2012) [-]
"Transport"
User avatar #64 - lemoron ONLINE (12/28/2012) [-]
you can't really **** a diamond...
User avatar #72 to #64 - pseudobob **User deleted account** (12/28/2012) [-]
Now, dogs, on the other hand...
User avatar #75 to #72 - generaljosh (12/28/2012) [-]
I hate it when people think they're being clever for getting the implied joke
User avatar #78 to #75 - pseudobob **User deleted account** (12/28/2012) [-]
Consider it a common courtesy. Some people might not get it right away.
#167 to #78 - anon (12/28/2012) [-]
That is the point of a vast number of jokes.
So unless it's ******* incredibly obscure; don't do that **** .
User avatar #84 to #64 - abesimpson ONLINE (12/28/2012) [-]
In the end, it all goes down to bitches.
#129 to #64 - davajz (12/28/2012) [-]
therefore the dogs are better
#65 to #64 - anon (12/28/2012) [-]
you can do anything if you really want to
#68 to #64 - manirock ONLINE (12/28/2012) [-]
Not with that attitude
#47 - puccypirateisback **User deleted account** (12/28/2012) [-]
J'sFW
J'sFW
+10
#94 - Yesitsme has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #99 to #94 - junkisftw (12/28/2012) [-]
How do you get blue username? rank or time?
0
#109 to #99 - contradiction has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #104 to #99 - AresX (12/28/2012) [-]
time
0
#100 to #99 - Yesitsme has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #101 to #100 - junkisftw (12/28/2012) [-]
dammit
User avatar #103 to #101 - EnergizierAnon (12/28/2012) [-]
time. gotta be a member for over a year i think
User avatar #105 to #103 - junkisftw (12/28/2012) [-]
it's weird because I made this account October in 2011 and I dont have blue username, but my old account that I still own but don't use was made like 2 months earlier and it got blue text
User avatar #120 to #105 - garaichu (12/28/2012) [-]
I believe you had to have signed up before a certain time (That being at least one year) at the time people got blue usernames. New people can never get blue usernames again unless magical fairy princess decides to do it again.
User avatar #122 to #94 - TigerShark (12/28/2012) [-]
I'm pretty sure diamonds have been valuable for a long ass time
0
#127 to #122 - Yesitsme has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #130 to #127 - TigerShark (12/28/2012) [-]
no. they've been valuable for thousands of years...
#150 to #130 - anon (12/28/2012) [-]
while it is true that diamonds have been valuable for a very long time, they were only valuable because of their extreme rarity within europe and their natural resilience.
however, today diamonds are obtainable very easily and cheaply through rich deposits in africa and artificial production. while this should cause their price to plummet, the price of diamonds has remained artificially high due to de beers practically monopolizing their production and fixing the prices.
interestingly, the US actually banned trade with de beers and now they have to work through other businesses in european countries, namely switzerland.
User avatar #123 to #94 - viscerys (12/28/2012) [-]
That's a good point. Diamonds don't look that spectacular. I think sapphires and rubies and stuff look better
User avatar #133 - chrolt (12/28/2012) [-]
I don't like that he wrote "companionship"... It sounds rapy to me.
#54 - BlockinYoAss (12/28/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#177 - drizzydrakerogers (12/28/2012) [-]
How about a diamond covered dog?
#191 to #177 - karnax (12/28/2012) [-]
Is a pony close enough?
#196 to #191 - drizzydrakerogers (12/28/2012) [-]
Even better , a dog pony covered in diamonds.
I'll start experimenting
#181 to #177 - anon (12/28/2012) [-]
Butt-Canine?
#29 - anon (12/28/2012) [-]
Well, you can sell the diamond, and have more dogs than only one,?
#82 - madkip (12/28/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#112 to #82 - xbenas (12/28/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
0
#138 to #112 - magceral has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #125 to #87 - impaledsandwich (12/28/2012) [-]
How the hell would you do that?
User avatar #128 to #125 - madkip (12/28/2012) [-]
You'd just use a...
Um...

**** , WHAT HAVE I DONE
#31 - nordicmike (12/28/2012) [-]
To play devil's advocate here, Diamonds are useful in drilling for oil. They sometimes use diamond tips in the drills to help drill through the dense layers of the earth.
-4
#32 to #31 - ishalltroll has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #55 to #31 - colegaleener ONLINE (12/28/2012) [-]
They're synthetic
User avatar #86 to #31 - slumberdonkey (12/28/2012) [-]
you're right! we should put them on our fingers
User avatar #110 to #31 - heartlessrobot (12/28/2012) [-]
Yes, but is that what the girl's gonna use them for? I think not. And industrial diamond looks like a rock, whereas jewelry diamonds look like sparkly rocks.
#56 to #31 - cheesepotato (12/28/2012) [-]
True. But that isn't why girls want them.
#1 - boch (12/27/2012) [-]
hear?
User avatar #2 to #1 - junkisftw (12/27/2012) [-]
ha, thanks
#73 - sweetellie (12/28/2012) [-]
I would much rather have a dog than diamonds..
but then again, I'm not very good at being a girl.
#159 - hoggu (12/28/2012) [-]
Problem solved.
User avatar #89 - xfortune (12/28/2012) [-]
Most of the girls that wants diamonds are dogs.
#42 - ninaf (12/28/2012) [-]
Pic related.

sort of...

diamond dogs...

I'll see myself out.
#102 to #42 - uncleblazer (12/28/2012) [-]
That's just horrible.
That's just horrible.
User avatar #126 to #42 - misticalz ONLINE (12/28/2012) [-]
What a hottie.
#151 to #42 - zaggystirdust ONLINE (12/28/2012) [-]
no...   
no thanks
no...
no thanks
#179 to #42 - blastinawf (12/28/2012) [-]
****		 yeah I 			*******		 love David Bowie
**** yeah I ******* love David Bowie
#140 to #42 - creosote (12/28/2012) [-]
I never noticed his back feet! Oh God, I'll never look at that album again!
I never noticed his back feet! Oh God, I'll never look at that album again!
#59 to #42 - Enternal ONLINE (12/28/2012) [-]
#51 to #42 - washingxmachines (12/28/2012) [-]
i.. dont know how to respond...
#58 to #42 - jacencaedus ONLINE (12/28/2012) [-]
dude you got the wrong Diamond Dog sorry couldn't help myself
#46 to #42 - thefasrdog (12/28/2012) [-]
JESUS CHRIST!
User avatar #53 to #46 - xXMAQXx (12/28/2012) [-]
nope, i dont think thats him...
User avatar #107 to #46 - baditch ONLINE (12/28/2012) [-]
Not quite. It's actually David Bowie
User avatar #69 - ibejbean (12/28/2012) [-]
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3166897/Debunking+women+s+logic/

Always nice to see my own content elsewhere, shame it's back on this site though...
User avatar #70 to #69 - junkisftw (12/28/2012) [-]
This isn't your OC
User avatar #74 to #70 - ibejbean (12/28/2012) [-]
Actually it is. Gimme a minute...
User avatar #71 to #69 - junkisftw (12/28/2012) [-]
not mine either
#76 to #69 - jsrf (12/28/2012) [-]
Rule 8, 21, and 24
User avatar #124 to #76 - misticalz ONLINE (12/28/2012) [-]
People are allowed to talk about /b/.

Just not when /b/ is raiding something.
#96 to #76 - cuntroyerdesu (12/28/2012) [-]
sup with rule 41 mang ?
User avatar #121 to #96 - Haentar (12/28/2012) [-]
yeah, man, desu is SO last decade...




de geso.
User avatar #79 to #76 - junkisftw (12/28/2012) [-]
Yes and it your post was also a repost of a repost
User avatar #81 to #79 - jsrf (12/28/2012) [-]
Mhmmm
User avatar #77 to #76 - ibejbean (12/28/2012) [-]
Fair point, Sir.
User avatar #83 to #77 - jsrf (12/28/2012) [-]
yup but he still could of gave credit though
User avatar #90 to #83 - ibejbean (12/28/2012) [-]
Indeed, but worse than that, he accused me of lying 'This isn't your OC'... Absolute pet hate of mine lol
User avatar #88 to #83 - junkisftw (12/28/2012) [-]
sorry I just saw a few hours ago that this was already posted before a few times on fj
User avatar #93 to #88 - ibejbean (12/28/2012) [-]
It's cool. If somebody hasn't seen it before it's new to them :)
User avatar #91 to #88 - jsrf (12/28/2012) [-]
Dont worry about it allot of people re-post stuff witout even realizing its a re-post
[ 196 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)