Anonymous comments allowed.
#133 - tidoubleguhurrrr (12/26/2012) [-]
Why is the story of Adam and Eve being debated in the comments? **** never happened guise.
User avatar #138 to #133 - itrinx (12/26/2012) [-]
Opinions, opinions everywhere.
#141 to #138 - tidoubleguhurrrr (12/26/2012) [-]
Saying an event with absolutely no proof of its happening, not to mention evidence against it never happened. Told it's an opinion. lol.
User avatar #143 to #141 - itrinx (12/26/2012) [-]
No one knows, you can't say it didn't happened if you don't have proofs ********
#171 to #143 - anon (12/26/2012) [-]
Why would you insult someone for debating by using logical thinking?
Should you not try to disprove him instead of calling him a ' ********* ?
This just shows your lack of knowledge and social skills.
You have already lost, bro.
#145 to #143 - tidoubleguhurrrr (12/26/2012) [-]
I have more proof that it didn't than you do that it did! Seriously, while some can argue that the stories of the bible were meant to be read for their values and not historical validity (a cop out, in my opinion) they have a much higher grounds for worship on your holy book than believing that the earth was created 6,000 years ago. I suggest you stop being so gullible as to believe everything everyone has ever told you piecemeal. Let's try an easy one: It was Johannes Kepler established the heliocentric model of the solar system.
User avatar #146 to #145 - itrinx (12/26/2012) [-]
Excuse me sir, you're talking like i said that i believed in god or ******* like this. I just said taht you can't say that something happened or not if you haven't solid proofs. If you do then spread it all over the world my friend.
#147 to #146 - tidoubleguhurrrr (12/26/2012) [-]
I find it funny that you defended the story of Adam and Eve with the "insufficient proof" argument. Irony at it's best, no?
User avatar #153 to #147 - itrinx (12/26/2012) [-]
I did that ?
Since your way to see the things isn't universal it's called your opinion.
#158 to #153 - tidoubleguhurrrr (12/26/2012) [-]
"You can't say it didn't happened if you don't have proofs ******** " "I just said taht you can't say that something happened or not if you haven't solid proofs." Yes, you did do that. Care to try again or do you need some time to Google a real argument, seeing as your brain can't even keep track of what you say.
User avatar #161 to #158 - itrinx (12/26/2012) [-]
So from now telling you're probably wrong is defending something ?
#167 to #161 - tidoubleguhurrrr (12/26/2012) [-]
No, you didn't say I was probably wrong. You specifically said that I am wrong because I have no proof, and that if i did have proof to share it to the world, then i'd be right. Burden of proof falls on those who believe in these nonsensical stories. I need no proof to say that something as such does not exist, even though I have evidence that already says it does not exist, for one. Two, you should really have a better grasp on what you say before you say it. I'm guessing English isn't your first language?
User avatar #174 to #167 - itrinx (12/26/2012) [-]
Yep. Would be easier for me if it was.
#176 to #174 - tidoubleguhurrrr (12/26/2012) [-]
No worries, you did fairly well on what is for the most part an unnecessarily difficult language that almost tries to be hard to learn and comprehend
 Friends (0)