Nvidia / ATI ?. yuno gasai. Nvidia / ATI ? yuno gasai
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (240)
[ 240 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#16 - nexu
Reply +50 123456789123345869
(12/22/2012) [-]
This image has expired
User avatar #46 to #16 - Einsty
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/22/2012) [-]
Precisely.
#22 to #16 - olineadi
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/22/2012) [-]
Nailed it.
(Infinity Blade 2 for iPhone and iPad aka A5(X) powered devices)
User avatar #24 to #22 - rainbowisbestpone
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/22/2012) [-]
resolution.. I

on 10 years old computers for same price you could do same with same resolution
#276 to #24 - olineadi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
Yeah.
But one fits in my pocket and has and the other doesn't.
I think it is astounding that a couple years ago you would have to have a TV, a PS2 and a whole lot of cables (or a decent PC) to get that level of graphical fidelity and nowadays you can have all that computing power in the palm of your hand.
Nevermind the limited movement or gameplay mechanic, this is a glorified Fruit Ninja after all. The graphics are impressive nonetheless!
User avatar #277 to #276 - rainbowisbestpone
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
you know.. 10 years its pretty much time to make technology more advanced...
also I can have much better games on my ps vita. which is much cheaper than iphone or ipad
#56 to #16 - greengreg
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
You're comparing desktop graphics cards against ones from phones. It's like saying "The engine on my Ferrari is so much better than on your Prius!" Well...That's kinda the point...
User avatar #127 - cleanslate
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
This whole post/comment section might as well be in a different language...
#111 - nyrintriball
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
User avatar #173 to #111 - stupidpancakes **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
"Good night, Yuki."
#67 - Calunn **User deleted account**
+10 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #105 to #67 - multiskin
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
far cry 3 at medium with widescreen, i7, notebook aspire
unreal tournament, all maxed
H.A.W.X. maxed
saints row third at medium
...
it is not that ******, it is just for normal people who wants to have fun without bitching about graphics and just enjoy games
User avatar #166 to #105 - OminousDemon
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
no...its pretty bad
i had it on an hp laptop and it couldnt even start some games cause intel integrated doesnt support ALL games
it can play alot with decent res and junk but if u want to beable to play ALL modern games at a higher notch than no
User avatar #256 to #166 - multiskin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
but in my aspire I run every game i've tried, Arkham city was at max
#110 to #105 - hardcoremother
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
Intel integrated: Designed for people to have fun without bitching about graphics
User avatar #257 to #110 - multiskin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
for those who wants to have fun and aren't graphicfags*
rly, if it can run at 16:9 and at minimum 30fps, that is cool, no need to bitch about "mooooar I see ugly pixels and blah blah"
#258 to #257 - hardcoremother
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
You say you have an i7, so it's probably a better card altogether. My old laptop had integrated and playing metro 2033 even on the lowest settings was painful.

Most integrated graphics are designed for watching youtube and playing powerpoints smoothly, not gaming at all.
#96 to #67 - hardcoremother
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
Intel integrated doesn't even render graphics. It just pretends to.
User avatar #261 to #67 - richardbatsbak
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
My laptop with integrated graphics can't run minecraft on the lowest settings without a massive lag. Feels very bad man.
#94 to #67 - needlessfoal
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
Ha, integrated graphics
Ha, integrated graphics
User avatar #3 - charagrin
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(12/22/2012) [-]
I generally go with AMD for graphics cards. They may not have quite the performance cap Nvidia does, but they are easier to overclock and take stress better. Same for AMD CPU's. Of course everyone is different. I have just been burned by Intel to much to try them again.
#23 to #3 - potatos
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/22/2012) [-]
I always go AMD too, actually.
I feel very alone in that choice.
User avatar #26 to #3 - therealjc
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/22/2012) [-]
I have an Intel cpu
but choose AMD graphics
Am I weird?
User avatar #31 to #3 - deathzor
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/22/2012) [-]
I'd stick with AMD if it weren't for the stupid AMD specific ********!
#104 - MuffinMan
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
I went from my parents' ancient imac to an Asus laptop with a GTX 660.
User avatar #147 to #104 - lphabeta
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
If you don't mind me asking, what kind? I'm looking into getting an Asus G55 that has a GTX 660M...
User avatar #278 to #147 - MuffinMan
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/24/2012) [-]
G75, it's just a larger version. I'd definitely recommend them, mine runs amazingly.
User avatar #202 to #104 - dreamthrow
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
I too have a similar tale, only my laptop is a modded MB air with the same card as yours.
User avatar #15 - moltar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/22/2012) [-]
what is the first one?
#20 to #15 - thatnigger
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(12/22/2012) [-]
This image has expired
Inori from Guilty Crown
User avatar #255 to #20 - moltar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
thanks.
#134 - kridane
Reply -21 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
ITT: Fags who spend too much money on computer components.   
   
You guys are literally cancer who are no better than people who buy macs.
ITT: Fags who spend too much money on computer components.

You guys are literally cancer who are no better than people who buy macs.
#159 to #134 - anon id: 18a6b8c1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
lol you're an idiot
#144 to #134 - masri
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
well no, people who buy macs cant really play much games nor can a person with low quality graphics so technically a person with low performance pc is kind of like a person who owns a mac
User avatar #140 to #134 - adunsaveme
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
Nothing wrong with actually wanting to play stuff smoothly
User avatar #141 to #140 - kridane
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
I agree, I am a PC gamer too but people cross the line between playing a game smoothly and blindly throwing money at their computer in hopes that they get 10,000fps on skyrim.
User avatar #153 to #141 - demofox
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
I have to agree with your comment, but not completely. People who know what to buy only pay one bit of the price people who don't know anything pay. I just say Alienware, "Gaming" Laptops, Macs. I for example buy myself a computer for about 1150€ next month. I compared prices from about 20 sites and now i get a future proof computer which i can overclock without problems.
User avatar #143 to #141 - adunsaveme
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
People who know what they're doing will spend the perfect amount on the perfect hardware.
Personally I have no ******* clue what parts I should be getting.
User avatar #146 to #143 - kridane
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
I know I was unclear in my original comment but that's what I meant. People who have no idea what they're doing spend too much on things they do not understand, I.e. macfags.
#148 to #134 - fukkentyranitar
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
You mad tho.
You mad tho.
#136 to #134 - comeherekids
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
User avatar #135 to #134 - primevalnostromo
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/23/2012) [-]
Except we perform better.
#49 - octs
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/22/2012) [-]
User avatar #48 - killerhamster
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/22/2012) [-]
GTX 660 going strong, nvidia all the way
User avatar #52 to #48 - rossthomson
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/22/2012) [-]
2 GTX 660's in SLI, nVidia ftw!
User avatar #53 to #52 - killerhamster
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/22/2012) [-]
******* yeah man!