If They Ban Guns. . OR I' LL Gei REALLY MAD l l. they wouldn't ban guns from cops, obviously.
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#6 - jdsalenger (12/22/2012) [-]
The criminals faces when.
#35 to #6 - mostlyshits (12/22/2012) [-]
just in case you might want it
just in case you might want it
User avatar #50 to #35 - skulldan (12/22/2012) [-]
why does the quality go **** in that gif
User avatar #54 to #50 - nlc (12/22/2012) [-]
I assume it's because gifs can only have 256 colours
User avatar #51 to #50 - mostlyshits (12/22/2012) [-]
i don't know, ask the person that made the gif
User avatar #52 to #51 - skulldan (12/22/2012) [-]
well i dont know who that is do i.
User avatar #140 to #52 - mostlyshits (12/23/2012) [-]
you're right
it is silly of me to assume you would know anything about a commonly used gif
next time i'll make sure not to ask about the quality of said commonly gif
oh wait
User avatar #264 to #140 - skulldan (12/23/2012) [-]
better chance asking you then nothing moron
#300 to #264 - anon (12/23/2012) [-]
>Rude/smug/ass-hat persona
>Not apologizing to users helping out
>Immense faggotry

Those red thumbs were given to you for a reason. To quell your thirst, which puss-clot seriously complains about gif quality? **** ****** . Second, the kind gentlemen who responded to your primitive ass are right. You should be kissing their shoes, and be offering fellatio as feasible punishment immediately.

TL;DR Go **** yourself to oblivion. It's just a gif, stop crying about how it looks, and quit being a faggot; that's OP's specialty.
#301 to #300 - skulldan (12/23/2012) [-]
ok i dont know who you are but lets go through that list

> i was asking why the gif looked the way it did, not complain
> i have nothing to apologise for because he has been nothing but unhelpful and rude
> i acted apon past faggotry
User avatar #296 to #264 - mostlyshits (12/23/2012) [-]
no, better not bitching about gifs when really it isn't that bad
User avatar #1 - theseventhalias (12/22/2012) [-]
they wouldn't ban guns from cops, obviously.
User avatar #46 to #1 - starvaggi (12/22/2012) [-]
Who is so dumb that they think gun control applies to law enforcement officials?
#168 to #1 - slashendrix (12/23/2012) [-]
I already knew this information.
User avatar #3 to #1 - squidfish (12/22/2012) [-]
Obviously, just a joke and I thought the picture went well with the caption.
User avatar #5 to #3 - theseventhalias (12/22/2012) [-]
Yeah, I guess it does. I'll thumb it up one.
User avatar #33 to #5 - squidfish (12/22/2012) [-]
User avatar #4 to #1 - JoshBauer (12/22/2012) [-]
User avatar #7 to #4 - theseventhalias (12/22/2012) [-]
Not true. They have some cops who carry firearms, and some who don't.
#17 to #7 - craigdavid (12/22/2012) [-]
youre ******* stupid, of course we have cops with guns, but theyre trained armed response teams who only go out with the guns in the event of a major security threat, theyre like cops in military gear really

normal police do not carry firearms around on duty
User avatar #26 to #17 - theseventhalias (12/22/2012) [-]
but I am actually right, I just left out some details which you explained. You just proved my point.

I'm not stupid, I know my stuff mate.
#338 to #26 - craigdavid (12/23/2012) [-]
touche, i can see ive made a proper arse of myself here
touche, i can see ive made a proper arse of myself here
User avatar #8 to #7 - blackcomet (12/22/2012) [-]
Meanwhile a lot more crimes are being committed where the criminal has a firearm.
User avatar #148 - neoexdeath ONLINE (12/23/2012) [-]
Take all the guns

Melt them down

Forge Swords

Everybody in the country gets one. If you want to kill a faggot, you have to get up and personal for a goddamn old fashioned DUEL.
User avatar #49 - ningyoaijin (12/22/2012) [-]
If they do ban guns in America, I'm pretty sure police officers would still be entitled to them.
#75 - thisotherdude (12/23/2012) [-]
You're right, we should get rid of guns... And make everyone get a sword of their choice! They should also be required to get adequate training with said sword. Then make it so you are allowed to kill another human being through a duel. This way if people have arguments they can be settled in two ways: One of them stands down, or who's right is determined by cold hard steel.

Sure death rates would increase but it be way more entertaining, I mean who wouldn't want to see a guy with a katana take on a guy with a rapier and parrying dagger in a fight to the death because katana dude insulted rapier dudes mother?
#101 to #75 - anon (12/23/2012) [-]
You know what? This is a ******* awesome idea!
Also because of Miller.
I love Metro 2033.
#40 - EdwardNigma ONLINE (12/22/2012) [-]
Not many Australians own guns, with the strict gun laws, but cops still carry guns. Why? Because you don't take a weapon from the people who may have no choice but to use it in a life threatening situation.

My point being, this is ******* retarded, they won't take guns away from cops.
User avatar #41 to #40 - squidfish (12/22/2012) [-]
Its just a joke
#59 - censorious (12/22/2012) [-]
we cope ok in Britain and our police don't have guns ( apart from specialist units)
#60 to #59 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#65 to #60 - censorious (12/22/2012) [-]
Im the opposite, i feel alot safer knowing that only specialist units who under take more rigorous training and will be alot more skilled have guns, rather than giving them to every officer. but that's just my opinion of course and its what i'm used to.
#68 to #65 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#116 to #68 - anon (12/23/2012) [-]
The scary thing is that Cops in the USA take a two day training course on how to use a firearm. That's it? Two days!? It's a lethal weapon. In the UK, being an armed policeman is very different, it requires a lot of training, they are only called in for situations that demand them and they are a tactical team which use precision weapons.
#76 to #68 - censorious (12/23/2012) [-]
That is what the specialist units are for, we don't really have the same kind of problems with gun crime as you do in the USA because of our laws and restrictions regarding guns, so its rare that an officer will come across those kind of situations. I can see your point though.
#77 to #76 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#81 to #77 - censorious (12/23/2012) [-]
we call the Authorised Firearms Officers (AFO) but yeah same sort of thing
#84 to #81 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#64 to #60 - kuci (12/22/2012) [-]
afaik Policemen does, but not Traffic Police

I could be wrong tho, I live in Sweden
#61 to #59 - anon (12/22/2012) [-]
Oh, how were those riots?
User avatar #78 to #61 - whitcher (12/23/2012) [-]
You mean the riots caused because someone used a gun?
User avatar #63 to #61 - stigman **User deleted account** (12/22/2012) [-]
and how were those children?
#69 to #61 - censorious (12/22/2012) [-]
We managed, granted it took a while but it took the country by surprise.
User avatar #144 to #59 - liquidz (12/23/2012) [-]
How about those riots? How about those knife, and samurai sword attacks? Like those increases in home invasions as well?

What do you do when someone breaks into your house with a knife and tries to kill you?

I am curious... do you hide and hope the police get there in time? Or do you try to defend yourself with a bat, or other improvised weapon?
User avatar #156 to #144 - doctorpibber (12/23/2012) [-]
chances are they most likely wont have a gun either. So yes, you would fight them with an improvised weapon, or you keep a machete or knife in your house. Guns are not the be all end all for defending yourself. In terms of the UK's death rates of innocents, not having guns has been a positive.
User avatar #330 to #156 - liquidz (12/23/2012) [-]
Last I checked in the UK you couldn't have a knife longer than a few inches, meaning you can only have steak knives, and a machete would be illegal.

I've also seen that your violent crime has been on a steady rise since then as well as your home invasions.
#340 to #330 - censorious (12/23/2012) [-]
In the UK you are not allowed a locking blade or a blade longer than 3 inches outside of your home, with in the home you can have any kind of knife you want.

Having a gun wouldn't solve these problems, having a gun is more likely to turn a violent crime or home invasion into a murder.

The Police have stab vests, batons and P.A.V.A (kind of like pepper spray) some have tasers and the are trained to be able to handle some on with a knife so a gun if rarely needed.
User avatar #343 to #340 - liquidz (12/23/2012) [-]
You are aware that a knife does not have to get you in the chest, it can be the neck, arms, face, legs. It only takes a few seconds to lose enough blood to pass out from a strike.

Do you not see the information showing your home invasions are up?

You don't want to neutralize the threat of an attacker in your own home, and hope that they don't actually want to kill you? Are you seriously saying that it's better that you might possibly die, than someone that came to try and kill you?

Also a gun is not an instant death machine, you can shoot to wound. Something far harder to do with a knife or sword. Most attackers will stop their attack with the mere presence of a gun, or being shot at, let alone actually hit.

Further you are telling me that only some cops get training with how to deal with a knife attack?

It sounds like your country is asking you to hope nothing goes wrong.

Ask yourself why do they really want you to be disarmed?

Look at all the laws that have been passed that take away your rights and wonder what happens if they continue doing it? At what point do they take away too many rights, and then what?

Picture that scenario, enough of your rights have been taken away, let's say your ability to speak out against them as you might be a terrorist then... Vote them out? What if they don't leave? What if they pass further laws to extend their time in office? We all complain about our governments, but do NOTHING to counter them. You have no physical means to make them leave office if it came to that.

So do you have democracy, or just the illusion of it?
User avatar #350 to #343 - doctorpibber (12/24/2012) [-]
The last two statements reek of strawman arguments, just saying
User avatar #351 to #350 - liquidz (12/24/2012) [-]
Not arguments, just something for you to think about. Seriously picture that scenario, and try to figure out how you would fix it if it came to that.
#80 - SognaVetr (12/23/2012) [-]
You know, the idea is that criminals don't have access to guns anymore, not police.
User avatar #157 - darkinin (12/23/2012) [-]
Back in the nineties the Democrats passed an Assault Weapons ban, like they're trying to do today. They really must just be thickheaded if they think they'll gain in the House, let alone retain the Senate if they try it again.
#179 to #157 - caplocker (12/23/2012) [-]
I think that's why the cliff ******** is sitting like it is. I think it's a means of leverage for both sides. The ban really didn't do much either .I had an AK-47 during the last ban. I'll have multiple rifles during this ban. Don't underestimate the political propaganda machine on either side.
User avatar #38 - thepalmtoptiger (12/22/2012) [-]
Implying that a gun ban would apply to the police force. Also, no one is going for a full on gun ban, they want to have an assault weapon ban.
User avatar #39 to #38 - squidfish (12/22/2012) [-]
Obviously, its just a joke and the picture goes well with the caption.
#248 - electricbaby (12/23/2012) [-]
This image has expired
I swear this website has become such a right-wing circlejerk lately. I thought this was a humour website, but I guess I was wrong. Call me back when all this political ******** has gone away.
#315 to #248 - fagbagzag has deleted their comment [-]
#257 to #248 - anon (12/23/2012) [-]
Just because it isnt funny for you doesnt mean it isnt funny for others
No offense to you, but I hate when people complain about something not being funny to them. This site doesnt exist to only please a single person.
User avatar #287 to #257 - electricbaby (12/23/2012) [-]
Yes, because political rhetoric in the comments is just so damn funny.
User avatar #325 to #257 - shnoople (12/23/2012) [-]
Since when was political debating considered humor? He's simply saying take your debates elsewhere, not onto a site meant for humor.
#256 to #248 - elgringogordo **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#263 to #256 - elgringogordo **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#30 - comradewinter ONLINE (12/22/2012) [-]
In Norway, the slogan for the police force is "words are our weapons". Guess what the murder rate is here? The lowest in the world. Mostly because few people own firearms.
#135 to #30 - brukernavn (12/23/2012) [-]
I don't necessarily think the low murder rate in Norway has anything to do with a low number of weapons, because Norway actually has quite a lot of firearms. The difference is that in Norway rifles and guns are used for hunting and sports, in America for the right to defend yourself
User avatar #306 to #30 - dadukesta (12/23/2012) [-]
Easy to say when your country's population isn't riddled with psychopaths at a measly 5 million people versus America's whopping 350 million citizens + 40 million immigrants.
#70 to #30 - anon (12/22/2012) [-]
i live in norway and all of my neighbours have guns. why?
#73 to #70 - comradewinter ONLINE (12/22/2012) [-]
Because you live in an uninhabited area deep away in the forest with no immigrants or poverty. Go to the big city and see how many people there are who posess guns.
#159 - sweateagle (12/23/2012) [-]
We'll just get walkie talkies.
User avatar #2 - skulldan (12/22/2012) [-]
australia has a ban on guns and people still hate cops
#47 to #2 - anon (12/22/2012) [-]
little america.
User avatar #48 to #47 - skulldan (12/22/2012) [-]
NO, we are straya cunt, you dont got no claim on me SON
#62 to #48 - watuppig (12/22/2012) [-]
to be fair they still carry guns
#293 - morblid (12/23/2012) [-]
Um...the proposed law is just for assault weapons, not for something like a pistol or a hunting rifle.
User avatar #322 to #293 - shnoople (12/23/2012) [-]
Any gun that you can walk into a gun shop and just buy is not an assault weapon. A semi-automatic AR-15 is NOT an assault weapon. It is a CIVILIANIZED version of an M-16, which is an assault weapon.
#303 to #293 - teutoburg (12/23/2012) [-]
there is no functional difference between a hunting rifle and a legal assault weapon
#311 to #303 - fagbagzag (12/23/2012) [-]
I hope you're including the very hard to acquire legal assault weapons
User avatar #318 to #311 - teutoburg (12/23/2012) [-]
fully automatic guns pose very little risk because of their expense and the difficulty in acquiring them
#319 to #318 - fagbagzag (12/23/2012) [-]
I was just saying because you didn't clarify what you >implied by saying assault weapon
#209 - radtroll (12/23/2012) [-]
Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't Canadians have ********* of guns more than Americans?

the problem is not with guns, the problem is with society.
User avatar #214 to #209 - thisotherdude (12/23/2012) [-]
Not really, all our police are armed (not just special units) and sure it's not that hard to get a gun (hell if I wanted to I could run out and get a nugget at this very moment) but in comparison to the US we don't have that many guns, sure as hell not fully automatic rifles. I'm not against what you're saying though, it doesn't matter if you're using a fully automatic AK-47 or just .45 semi-automatic Beretta Storm (un-restricted gun here), you can still take down a good amount of people and they're pretty easy to get a hold of in the US and Canada (respectively).
User avatar #225 to #214 - radtroll (12/23/2012) [-]
my point is the problem is not with guns or weapons, it's with people
guns don't kill people, people kill people.

I'm sure there are shootings all over the world, even in elementary schools, but it's getting out of control in the US because I think -and I could be wrong- there is something wrong with how society is functioning.

I can't think of another country where people just walk into schools and starts shooting, and I lived in a place where people walk around with AK-47s everywhere, but no such a think happened, Ever.
#237 to #225 - anon (12/23/2012) [-]
It's BECAUSE they were walking around with AK 47's that that kind of stuff didn't happen. The kinds of people who do this stuff are cowards, and there is no way in hell anybody would try this kind of thing with people that are fully armed and could shoot back walking around. Even the guys that have killed themselves after these kinds of shootings did so AFTER the police showed up with guns. I know that doesn't sound exactly logical, but I doubt you could give rationality to these peoples' credit. A lot of the wars in the middle ages played out that way too, they usually killed the serfs and common-folk and left before the soldiers who could protect them could intervene if they could. It may sound counter intuitive, but having formidable weapons around in mass quantities deters violence, not perpetuates it. Just look at prison systems, they have by far the most strict anti-weapons policies, they have to use celery stalks as silverware for ***** sake. And yet, murder is a regular occurance in prison. If somebody really wants to kill someone, they will find a way, and no lack of guns will stop that. If anything, outlawing guns would make gun cartels filthy rich since they would have a monopoly on the market, criminals would be selling to criminals illegally, leaving all of us law-abiding citizens defenseless during any kind of burglary or what have you, because police only respond after the deed is done. One thing they could do as a solution to these shootings in school is to have an armed full-time police officer on campus at all time, and to save on the cost for the officers, they could pool them from the local police stations. -END RANT-
User avatar #233 to #225 - thisotherdude (12/23/2012) [-]
I was agreeing with your point, like I said, you can get a pretty effective gun to kill people with pretty easily (and even legally) in Canada, but crime is still lower here then in the US. The problem is that the USA has a **** ton of people, around 300 million. Canada has about ten times less then that, only about 30 million, UK about 60 million, Sweden only 9 million. This mean that the USA is of course gonna have far more mentally unstable people which factors into it, don't forget the unemployment rate being about 7.9%, the horrid education system (honestly though the Canadian education system isn't really that much better), ext... There are a **** ton of factors to take into account, way to much to just be able to point at something "scary" and say that's the cause of all these problems when the truth is it's a whole plethora of problems that cause this.
User avatar #290 to #233 - timmywankenobi (12/23/2012) [-]
even if you increased the population of Canada to Equal the U.S since crime rates are divided by percentage there would still be less shootings in Canada because it has a lower percentage of gun violence per cap. secondly the American education system up to university is a train wreck and Ignoring this as most do and pretending it is fine cause "This is Merica' **** yeah ! " only worsens the problem.

PS. according to Countries that can actually run a decent math program Canada's education system is in the top bracket .
User avatar #291 to #290 - thisotherdude (12/23/2012) [-]
Really? Last time I heard it was pretty poor, but maybe that was an old statistic or something else. I can't really judge it by experience since I don't have anything to compare it to though since I was only educated in Canada.
User avatar #295 to #291 - timmywankenobi (12/23/2012) [-]
must have been a old stat cause Canada's have been going up for the last 15 years they are currently 4th I think and the US is 33rd so yeah .
User avatar #215 to #209 - ropecat (12/23/2012) [-]
Its more of the Canadian hunters that own rifles and shotguns for hunting- most Canadians don't own guns, our police do though.
#15 - craigdavid (12/22/2012) [-]
welcomem to britain, albeit we've introduced mace spray and tasers over the last 10 years
#224 - lonelygeek (12/23/2012) [-]
banning guns OBVIOUSLY is ment for police officers ya know cause there is no way that you could ban them only for the public!
User avatar #212 - shamrockbandit (12/23/2012) [-]
Laugh now, wait until Officer Bruce Banner is telling you this.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)