Gun Laws. . Nobody blamed the light saber.. This makes startling amounts of sense.
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#8 - Muppetz ONLINE (12/18/2012) [+] (12 replies)
This makes startling amounts of sense.
This makes startling amounts of sense.
User avatar #42 - tolazytomakename (12/18/2012) [+] (50 replies)
One Kid dies from a Kinder Egg, and they ban them all. 20 die from a gun and the same people say we should get more guns. America, get your **** together.
#15 - lucidria (12/18/2012) [-]
This image has expired
Yeah, and nobody blamed the dildo, either.
#10 - mattdoggy ONLINE (12/18/2012) [+] (1 reply)
This is the best thing ive seen dealing with gun laws ever.    
You are my hero for the day sir
This is the best thing ive seen dealing with gun laws ever.
You are my hero for the day sir
#21 - acfurryface (12/18/2012) [+] (12 replies)
But if the lightsaber wasn't there, he couldn't have killed them so quickly.
#264 - sheeplviolator (12/18/2012) [+] (1 reply)
#783 - konamicode (12/19/2012) [-]
>mfw comment section
>mfw comment section
#246 - chevelleguy (12/18/2012) [+] (13 replies)
Day they ban guns is the day we take back our goverment
#13 - waffies (12/18/2012) [-]
Because lightsabers are government issue only, and there's no need to restrict them
Because lightsabers are government issue only, and there's no need to restrict them
User avatar #654 - Cilreve (12/19/2012) [+] (6 replies)
Lets say we are talking about someone who does not have access to guns because they have been banned. But this person is still bent on retribution, retaliation, or just mentally ill. He wants to kill people. He will find a way. It doesn't matter how he does what ever it is. Now lets say, okay, he can't get guns, but he reads some books, looks around online, and learns how to make fertilizer bombs. Or maybe a chemical bomb made from the **** underneath most people's kitchen sinks. This is something INCREDIBLY simple. He plants this bomb in a school, or a mall, or another place of meeting. This bomb will go off, and it will kill mass amounts of people UNLESS it is found. Nothing can stop it except for finding it and disarming it.

Now lets say this same person DID get a hold of guns. He runs in to a mall and starts shooting people. This form kills selectively, randomly, but mostly it CAN BE STOPPED. The gunman is still just a man, and he can be brought down, tackled, shot by officer or citizen, knifed, what have you.

Now which would you prefer?
Case 1: Either lots of people die or no one dies; luck is a huge factor.
Case 2: The degree of death is purely dependent on the reactions of the people present.

I know which I would prefer, and I care not for other's opinions of the matter. As such I will not be responding to any replies. I'm simply stating this scenario for people to think about.

Banning guns won't solve anything. It is a social matter, not a mechanical matter. As a free country we will just have to deal with things like this. We CANNOT afford to give up more rights simply because we are scared. I am not saying that we should be cold and heartless. It is terrible when things like this happen, and they should never happen. The simply fact, though, is that this stuff cannot be stopped simply by banning a method for it. People will kill people and that is all there is to it. The only true way to stop it is to reform the people's minds.
#514 - reallynotdashie (12/18/2012) [+] (2 replies)
No one blamed the force.
No one blamed the force.
#530 - novaknightmare **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (3 replies)
User avatar #1036 - factcube (12/19/2012) [+] (2 replies)
**factcube rolls 55** Nobody blamed dubs.
User avatar #620 - theblacksheep (12/19/2012) [+] (21 replies)
If you don't think there needs to be stricter regulation on a weapon that allows one person to kill as guns do, then you need to look at it again. Yes, hunting is acceptable. Hunting rifles and shotguns are acceptable. But you don't need an assault rifle, machine gun or sniper rife for "home defense". Automatic/high powered weapons are unnecessary.
User avatar #627 to #620 - JoshBauer (12/19/2012) [-]
This country wasn't founded on hunting, faggot. This country was founded based on the fact that governments tend to eventually oppress the **** out of their people and we have the right to protect ourselves from our government.
User avatar #491 - LiamNeeson (12/18/2012) [+] (2 replies)
Looking at the top comments, ignoring the jedi comments, people on both arguing sides seem to forget something.
The real reason the 2nd amendment was made was because the founding fathers wanted the people to have a way to fight the government if they ever got out of hand (communist/dictatorship etc.) That's why they thought it was so important, not because Americans like to shoot up **** .
#406 - DrWeird (12/18/2012) [+] (1 reply)
I came to the comments expecting a 			*********		.   
I was not disappointed.
I came to the comments expecting a ********* .

I was not disappointed.
User avatar #569 - garyleneville (12/18/2012) [+] (12 replies)
That's because it's a ******* film for entertainment. Anyone who's taking this as a genuine reason for stopping gun control should never be allowed near a gun.
#591 to #586 - fivewordminimum **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#114 - Absolute Madman (12/18/2012) [+] (23 replies)
Why do americunts have such massive boners for guns?

#117 to #114 - nocandy (12/18/2012) [-]
Because they're really, really fun to shoot in a controlled environment. And I'll be really sad if I'm not allowed to do that any more because some sociopath didn't get the help he needed.
#41 - rainbowghost (12/18/2012) [-]
I'm not sure OP knows this but Star Wars is a fictional movie.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)