The Hobbit. Tags are a black father.. uhm. If CD“. How can we complain? We get more movies and more Middle-Earth!
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#174 - bslsk (12/13/2012) [-]

I already have the movie.

You're so jelly I could spread you on toast I just know it.
User avatar #218 to #174 - azraelthemage (12/13/2012) [-]
That movie was horrible to be honest.
User avatar #294 to #218 - bslsk (12/13/2012) [-]
I thought it was fantastic.
#192 to #174 - scarytown (12/13/2012) [-]
I grew up with that and its cartoon sequel "The Return of the King". I have that **** on VHS, ************ .
User avatar #193 to #192 - bslsk (12/13/2012) [-]
Aw yeah i remember that one!
#194 to #193 - scarytown (12/13/2012) [-]
That **** was so cash. I loved those movies so much that my dad bought me the book set when I was twelve.
#175 to #174 - Nazistick (12/13/2012) [-]
Whos there?! SHOW YOURSELF...go ahead and take some gold...Theres plenty to spare...
User avatar #176 to #175 - bslsk (12/13/2012) [-]
That movie was the **** .
User avatar #177 to #176 - Nazistick (12/13/2012) [-]
I ******* love Smaug.
#190 to #176 - rhiaanor has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #209 to #190 - bslsk (12/13/2012) [-]
#125 - bosszefronposter (12/13/2012) [-]
The Hobbit is a smaller book, but it's also much denser. More happens in a smaller amount of time. Spreading it out into three movies will allow Peter Jackson to include everything he wants to. Everyone always bitches when movies based on books are released that not everything was included. They're giving us what we've been asking for, and you're still bitching.
#316 to #125 - tankthefrank (12/13/2012) [-]
all of my this
#32 - Bova (12/12/2012) [-]
How can we complain? We get more movies and more Middle-Earth!
How can we complain? We get more movies and more Middle-Earth!
User avatar #296 to #32 - daentraya (12/13/2012) [-]
I hope this means that the whole dahm book, every scene and all, will be filmed. I always wanted such a movie, where everything got in. And since it's a great team making it, I'm happy.
User avatar #60 to #32 - lounmendez (12/13/2012) [-]
Osea que pedo?
#84 to #32 - therussiangadget (12/13/2012) [-]
This. I don't care, I just don't really want to wait.

Oh god the wait is going to kill me :c
User avatar #129 to #84 - licestr (12/13/2012) [-]
after the lord of the rings tilogy ended, and so did the whole harry potter movies, i felt like i had nothing to look forward to, and this is gonna give me that awesome feeling of saying, ''HOLY **** THE NEXT MOVIE IS COMMING IN TWO WEEKS!''
User avatar #222 to #32 - legitcharlatan (12/13/2012) [-]
That's what they said about Star Wars.
#342 to #222 - stubbernaut (12/13/2012) [-]
And I didn't care then either. I got more Star Wars and more lightsabres and I didn't really mind that they weren't as good as the original trilogy.
#3 - zzonked (12/12/2012) [-]
People didn't believe in Sam and Frodo but they pulled it off.

"Is there any hope, Gandalf, for THE HOBBIT SERIES?

There never was much hope. Just a fool's hope. "
User avatar #43 - YoshiBond (12/12/2012) [-]
#167 to #43 - slashendrix (12/13/2012) [-]
**** right off YoshiBond. Sleep in fear tonight.
#50 to #43 - tehskyizblue ONLINE (12/13/2012) [-]
There's a special place in hell for people like you!
There's a special place in hell for people like you!
#65 - appleyjack **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#75 to #65 - dustyshane (12/13/2012) [-]
I've been saying the same thing.
I've been saying the same thing.
#349 - ljxjlos ONLINE (12/13/2012) [-]
3 Movies you say? Still counts as one...
#321 - anonymoose (12/13/2012) [-]
The Hobbit is trying to keep as much of the book in it as possible. LOTR left out a **** load, including one of my favourite characters, Tom Bombadil. The Tolkien books have enough detail in each of them to make 3 movies each.

Plus the Hobbit movie isn't 100% the Hobbit, it has extracts from other books, most likely the Silmarillion, which details Gandalfs adventures when he leaves the group.
#345 to #321 - ljxjlos ONLINE (12/13/2012) [-]
It´s kinda right, but since when details the Silmarillion what Gandalf did when he left the Fellowship of Oakenshield. The only Thing concerning Gandalf that is written in the Silmarillion is who/what exactly he is, I believe. The Parts of what Gandalf did leaving the Fellowship are either from the Hobbit (Where it was shortly touched, carried out with Peter Jacksons own Imagination) or from the Appendixes of LotR... I´m not sure though,correct me if I´m wrong.

+ The Movie was amazing, seen it yesterday.
User avatar #357 to #321 - classybot (12/13/2012) [-]
also seemed like they added some scenes from Tolkien's Unfinished Tales.
#213 - mausbaus (12/13/2012) [-]
mfw description
mfw description
#121 - shazmothree (12/13/2012) [-]

I'm so angry that they'll include as much as they can from the book by making three movies
User avatar #356 - klaatu (12/13/2012) [-]
Anything that keeps me in Middle-earth longer I consider a good thing.
User avatar #302 - dashdashdash (12/13/2012) [-]
Okay, umm so,
1-The lotr trilogy is actually NOT a trilogy, it was seperated into 3 movies, 'cause nobody would want to see a 9 hour film
2-The lotr films could've easily been 6 films with the amount of content the books have!
3-In the Hobbit films, ONLY the first 2 are based on the actual BOOK, the third is based on 120 pages of notes that Tolkien wrote AFTER the return of the king!
4-The Hobbit book DOES infact have enough content for 2 films!
#307 to #302 - deathsreaper ONLINE (12/13/2012) [-]
The LotR trilogy is actually six books so making it into 6 movies just makes sense...
User avatar #310 to #307 - dashdashdash (12/13/2012) [-]
Tolkien wrote it as one book at first, but then his publisher released it as six ('cause nobody wants to read a 1000 pages story), but it was later released as 3 books!
#312 to #310 - wikre (12/13/2012) [-]
That's not true. Originally it's one book and that book is split up into three parts.
#311 to #307 - wikre (12/13/2012) [-]
It's no six books, it was supposed to be. It's one book, because making six books would waste their resources.
#314 to #311 - deathsreaper ONLINE (12/13/2012) [-]
When you read the books there are 6 books... aka why it reads "Book One, Book Two" etc...
#315 to #314 - wikre (12/13/2012) [-]
No, when you read it there's three.
User avatar #323 to #315 - anonymoose (12/13/2012) [-]
There are 3 solid books and each solid book has 2 books within them. 6 in total. As I'm currently re-reading the Two Towers, the I know the first book in it was Aaragorn, Legolas and Gimlis adventure and the second book is Frodo Sam and Gollums.
#325 to #323 - itsbendingtime (12/13/2012) [-]
He's right you know.
There are three volumes, each split into two books.
#72 - EmulateSnes ONLINE (12/13/2012) [-]
This image has expired
If Peter Jackson can do to the hobbit what he Did with Lord of the rings...
I have absolutely no Problem here.
User avatar #336 - Blackdrama (12/13/2012) [-]
When I heard there will be again three movies I wasn't mad or anything. I was kind of happy. I love Peter Jacksons work and what he created with the lord of the rings-films. I felt sad when I saw the "Return of the King" and realized that it was the end of a fantastic story and great movies. Now , with the hobbit , I'm happy he is going to make three films ,so I have many more films to enjoy in the future. It's not about the money. It's about how much these things are worth to you. (<- was that sentence correct? sry bad english though)

I would also like new HarryPotter Movies! Prequels featuring the story of the Dumbledores and Grindelwald, which would result in an epic battle.

#329 - kahandran (12/13/2012) [-]
You mad?
#120 - karnax (12/13/2012) [-]
Bitch you best not complain about Lord of the Rings
Bitch you best not complain about Lord of the Rings
#326 - ludislavonac (12/13/2012) [-]
I'll still watch the **** out of all of them
User avatar #240 - defhood (12/13/2012) [-]
Anyone who thinks the hobbit could be squeezed into one movie obviously hasn't read the hobbit in a while...
#154 - clockworkhearts (12/13/2012) [-]
I think you might be forgetting something.
User avatar #347 to #154 - ljxjlos ONLINE (12/13/2012) [-]
Just imagine a Movie-Version of the One Book and 10 Movies?At for the Creation of the World, One for Feanor, One for the Battle against Morgoth (Round 1), One for Beren and Luthien, One for Turín Turambar, One for Earendil, etc. But somehow I believe that the Silmarillion is one of the few Books that actually IS impossible to make a Movie/Movies out of...
User avatar #156 to #154 - iamnewhere (12/13/2012) [-]
No he isn't, Peter Jackson has nothing to do with that book because there's no movie about it.

User avatar #158 to #156 - clockworkhearts (12/13/2012) [-]
The 3rd hobbit movie is supposedly meant to be based on it.
User avatar #159 to #158 - iamnewhere (12/13/2012) [-]
Where the **** did you hear that?
#162 to #159 - senglish ONLINE (12/13/2012) [-]
he isn't just covering what happens i the hobbit. he is going over many stories of middle earth. elaborating on the movies. he shot another hour of film to justify the 3 movies.
User avatar #165 to #162 - DMRlacrosse (12/13/2012) [-]
Makes sense. I originally heard it was only going to be two movies and then when /i checked a few weeks ago it said there would be three. It confused me as I could not see how they could extend The Hobbit into three movies.
User avatar #202 to #165 - dogwars (12/13/2012) [-]
They could extend the LOTR movies into a 5-6 season T.V. show, which I wish they had.
User avatar #160 to #154 - mrgoodbunny (12/13/2012) [-]
that book is like reading a history text book about middle earth.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)