We've grown up in different generations. Maybe in 20 years - #76758139 added by caplocker at 20 Years

Reply +19 123456789123345869

(12/12/2012) [-]

Well, I guess you can always trust OP to complain about girls showing skin.

The point that bothers me (and I'm a guy) is calling girls sluts because they dress this way. Dressing this way is no indication that they're sleeping with every guy out there, maybe they(themselves) just like how they look.
I have got no problem what so ever with girls dressing that way, in some situations it can be too little but do you complain when you go to the beach, OP? Or the swimming pool?

"Oh my God! Look at all of these sluts wearing two piece bikinis, why aren't they wearing one pieces like respectable women?" - OP

#111 to #108 - caplocker

Reply -6 123456789123345869

(12/12/2012) [-]

So as a guy if I wear a pink halter top and purple speedo bottoms and hang out on your porch, you're cool with that? I mean, clothes mean jack **** right?

#141 to #111 - anon id: b8dd9184

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/12/2012) [-]

Honestly, why should one judge you if you do decide to wear a pink halter top? If that's what you like to wear then it shouldn't matter what others think. It's not hurting anyone else, is it?

#115 to #111 - defeats

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(12/12/2012) [-]

I don't know if you can read or not, but I clearly said girls.

#117 to #115 - caplocker

Reply -5 123456789123345869

(12/12/2012) [-]

Clothes mean something regardless. How about this, if your mom left the house dressed like this with me you'd just say " Dressing this way is no indication that they're sleeping with every guy out there"

I don't even know where I'm going with this, I'm ****** your mom joke perhaps.

#116 to #115 - caplocker

Reply -2 123456789123345869

(12/12/2012) [-]

I'd like to respond but I can't read.

#120 to #116 - defeats

Reply +4 123456789123345869

(12/12/2012) [-]

A mother or a grandmother (for example) are a completely different circumstance, they're not from our generation, which is what the post is about.
You wouldn't have the opportunity to leave the house like that with my mum anyway, so I wouldn't be worried.

But back to topic, the post is stating that girls of our generation are dressing "sluttier" for want of a better word, I'm saying that it isn't. And if every girl is doing it, that can't make them all sluts.
It's the mind set of men who think it's sluttish (and are therefore living in the past) that needs to change, not the girls.

#123 to #120 - caplocker

Reply -4 123456789123345869

(12/12/2012) [-]

So if you have a daughter and she's "that age" you're going to be fine when she leaves the house like this. I don't know how else to call you out on your ********, the point is you're a ****** retard if you think clothes don't say something about us.

#128 to #123 - defeats

Reply +5 123456789123345869

(12/12/2012) [-]

You obviously are living in some Christian extremist community or something, if you honestly think that way.

I'm 20, so I can't say for certain how I'd feel if I had a daughter in this situation, I probably wouldn't like it. That said, the girls of my generation and younger have all dressed this way throughout the summers where I live, so it really isn't abnormal to me.
In 40°C (104°F) summers I won't be sending my daughter outside in trousers and sweaters.

#129 to #128 - caplocker

Reply -4 123456789123345869

(12/12/2012) [-]

We've grown up in different generations. Maybe in 20 years you'll see young women dressed in strings (hopefully) and some kid will be telling you it's the male mind that needs to change. you instantly think he's completely full of ****.

#130 to #129 - defeats

Reply +4 123456789123345869

(12/12/2012) [-]

So you're telling me you're a 40 year old male debating with me about how girls my age should dress?

#146 to #130 - superfudge

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(12/12/2012) [-]

either that or he's 12. either way he's annoying as ****

#150 to #146 - tuckthisphit

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(12/12/2012) [-]

#110 to #108 - reaperriley

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(12/12/2012) [-]

I completely agree with you, but I have a feeling someone is going to try and say that was the intent or something. Either way your point is still completely valid. Thumb for you.