Mexicans.... . File: 1355089728101 ) KB, 204x200, 1355053663986. jpg) CI 12/ 09/ 12( Sun) 16: 48 No. 166096283 Replies: :) 98518 moments during Vidya Pplaying K


File: 1355089728101 ) KB, 204x200, 1355053663986. jpg)
CI 12/ 09/ 12( Sun) 16: 48 No. 166096283 Replies: :) 98518
****** moments during Vidya
Pplaying Killing Floor
sin a modded it users
Milne dude says "I wonderwhat a ' s cock looks like"
huge discussion starts
say their cocks must be huge and others say that they might not even have any cocks
re around
mexican dude says "I bet he' s uncut and big like me"
say "I really didnt need to knowthat"
Outhers claim that he' s lying
says "held on"
re all wondering what he' s doing
Miinutes later he links pictures of his uncut cock, both erected and flaccid
label him heme while others say his cock is impressive
server becomes a ********* whether it' s gay to compliment a man for his penis size.
chick thinks it' s not since girls do the same with anotherloner/ s tits SC) why couldnt guys with dicks.
discussion gees and until I nearly become interested in seeing uncut hispanic cocks
I wanted to do was play the ******* game without this ******* discussion
Godamn I wish an admin was that night..
  • Recommend tagsx
Views: 43839
Favorited: 90
Submitted: 12/09/2012
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to iqapocalypse Subscribe to 4chan


Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - CanadianNuts (12/10/2012) [-]
I heart the internet
I heart the internet
#32 - Ulmer (12/10/2012) [-]
#25 - aesis (12/10/2012) [-]
Or.. You know.. You could just leave the server and find a new game..
Or.. You know.. You could just leave the server and find a new game..
User avatar #35 to #25 - bbboy (12/10/2012) [-]
oh jontron
#53 to #35 - anon (12/10/2012) [-]
I love that other people here love him.
User avatar #5 - greatboobya (12/10/2012) [-]
"women compliment each others tits" yeah, but I've never seen women complimenting each others vaginas, so complimenting dicks is just as weird.
User avatar #11 to #5 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/10/2012) [-]
Vaginas aren't typically seen as an object of attraction in modern society. Sure it is a component of sex, but what people always want and think about are the breasts and buttocks of a woman. In the same way, the primary sexual object sought after in a man is typically the penis, so it would make no sense in this culture to discuss the appearance or effectiveness of the vagina.
User avatar #19 to #11 - pelwi (12/10/2012) [-]
Well I wouldn't dip my schlong into a beef-curtain.
User avatar #76 to #19 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/10/2012) [-]
Sure, but when you think of a hot woman, typically the first thing that comes to your mind is how her tits and ass, as well as the face, look. Whether or not her pussy is nice looking doesn't occur to most men, or if it does, it usually doesn't occur until AFTER thinking of that T&A.
User avatar #80 to #76 - greatboobya (12/10/2012) [-]
When you think of a hot guy do you think about a lanky dude ridden with cystic acne but with an amazing penis, or just a good looking guy.
User avatar #81 to #80 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
I don't think of men in a sexual manner, usually. However, if I were to work on visual aesthetics viewed by the conscious mind yes I would think of the face and body, however I'm discussing SUB-CONSCIOUS attraction, unfiltered by a societal screen of what is or isn't attractive. Remember that in ancient china Fat men with large noses were considered extremely attractive due to the fact that only successful people could afford enough food to be fat. Women didn't go 'look at those fine muscles on that slave', they literally looked at fat folds in the same way that females look at muscles today.
User avatar #84 to #81 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
That is because marrying a fat man back in the day meant your material well-being. Marriage was the only way a woman could get through in life, don't think she didn't have them muscular slaves on the side. Fat was a symbol of status, however there is no evolutionary advantage to being SEXUALLY attracted to fat, it was all superficial. And remember marriages were just simply contracts between the families.

However, way back before money was invented primates sought after the butt, which is a sign on sexual maturity both in males and females, also facial and bodily symmetry is just as important. Hair, teeth and skin are strong health/sexual indicators too. Our smell senses are greatly diminished and is not strongly used in picking a mate.
User avatar #87 to #84 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
Once again you fail to see beyond the conscious mind. You are simply being factually incorrect, there truly was a view of fat being aesthetically pleasing DUE to the cultural implications.

Our scent is really not that greatly diminished from several hundred or even thousand years ago, we just don't ACTIVELY pick up on the scent differences.
User avatar #77 to #76 - greatboobya (12/10/2012) [-]
But a penor isn't a first thing that draws attention of an interested party. In men the first thing sought out is face, body and booty, too. Schlong isn't as sexually valueable as guys consider it to be.
User avatar #82 to #77 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
You're right, a penis isn't. As I've stated again and again, what causes the sub-conscious attraction is the scent.
#21 to #11 - anon (12/10/2012) [-]
Muscles are a big part of attraction, the part you can see (if he's not flaunting his schlong all over the place).
User avatar #75 to #21 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/10/2012) [-]
Hey anon, I know you can't reply to this but I'm replying for the sake of the readers. It may be true that muscles are a part of attraction, but you know what has been proven to be the MOST dominating feature in a woman's physical attraction to a man? Scent.

Just thought you should know that. Also, that isn't really relevant seeing as they were discussing how women compliment eachother's vaginas yet men can't compliment eachother's dicks. Fact of the matter is, whether they can see it or not, cock matters more than muscle. Not just size either, shape is a larger portion than size is to the sub-conscious actually, and, believe it or not, the most important in regarding attraction is still, in this case, how it smells.
User avatar #79 to #75 - greatboobya (12/10/2012) [-]
Why do you think that guys you deem "douchy" get more chicks? Looks. Both genders seek out looks first. As a species we stopped relying on smells and most of our attraction comes from visual perception. By tweaking there and there I could write a ******** thesis about how vaginal scents drive men crazy and I'd be none the wiser, because scents and humans have not been documented yet and the area remains open to interpetation. I know you want to be proud of your genitals, but using questionable sources to do so is just silly. Even as a straight female I find vaginas to be tenfold times more attractive that penises in fact, I don't find dick arousing in any way, so either I am an exception or your cock divinity is just an unsupported claim.
User avatar #83 to #79 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
I never claimed that guys I deem 'douchey' get more chicks, though that is another matter entirely and unrelated to what we're discussing now.

I am not using a questionable source and it is NOT a thesis. See the American Psychological Association's pages on both 'Senses and Perception' and 'Huamn Sexuality' and see for yourself.
User avatar #86 to #83 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
Lets put men in three groups: handsome, average, and unattractive. All of them are sexually viable, however the handsome group will end up getting more mates. the average one a lower number and unattractive ones will have the hardest time finding a mate. If your smell theory was true all three groups would get an equal amount of mates, however, in reality, that is not the case. As primates we are very dependant on visual attraction, because it's the most recognisable indicator of health and genetic condition, as our sense of smell was pretty much discarded in course of evolution. Most species can tell apart which individuals are healthy just by sense of smell, however, with humans that is not the case.
User avatar #89 to #86 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
No, because women today have, as I've stated time and time again, a CULTURAL LENS over what they CONSCIOUSLY want as opposed to what they SUB-CONSCIOUSLY want. IF it were a group of men and women ENTIRELY REMOVED from modern society, you'd see a very different result.
User avatar #93 to #89 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
Subconciousness is still not well researched or documented and remains an area for interpretation, so I wouldn't go as far as to continuously bring it up as proof. When it comes to removing cultural bias the undeniable sexual attractors are: symmetry, hair,skin,teeth condition, as these are pretty much universal strong health indicators and remained unchanged through course of recorded history, unlike prefered body shapes which changed as the decades passed and cultural context changed.
User avatar #95 to #93 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
In addition, those are all definitely what appeal to the eyes, but as I've mentioned before, scent is a much larger factor.

Now what you need to ask is if people who have nice teeth, hair, and hygiene probably smell better or not. I'd say probably so.
User avatar #100 to #95 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
Well, your theory would prove correct if the scent potency correlated with visual pleasantness, since people we find beautiful still get a lot more laid than average ones. Scent still remains secondary, since we can feel arousal through lifeless images which portray only visual qualities.If scent was so important we couldn't get hard simply on photo of a butt.
User avatar #101 to #100 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
Now, that is an argument over how potent the effects of smell are in conjunction to the strength of appearance. I imagine it takes several still images (or several minutes of active imagination) to actually get aroused without any other visual stimulation or movement, but even still, scent has a more profound effect in 'turning people on' than visual imagery. It is, however, very uncommon to come across ONLY a scent without any other stimulation, so this isn't commonly recognized by people who aren't consciously seeking out such an environment to test it.
#102 to #101 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
I don't think anyone could get turned on by someone who looks like this, no matter how good their cock stench is, since visual indicators a completely off. You keep claiming that smell has a much higher impact than looks but yet I haven't heard a single argument from you instead of you just throwing words "conscious" and "subconscious" around.
User avatar #104 to #102 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
Also, not just 'cock stench' but stench in general.
User avatar #103 to #102 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
Maybe you should read the words around the words 'conscious' and 'sub-conscious' and you'll see a very clear, concise argument presented.

I don't feel you're an idiot so I don't think I need to put this in simple words, but I will reiterate.

Cultural factors cause us to view certain visual effects as particularly attractive or unattractive, but this is subject to change based upon the culture. Visuals appeal to the conscious mind's decision process in mating.

Scent is a cultural universal in attraction. It appeals to the sub-conscious mind's decision process in mating.

From a comparative stand-point, scent is the stronger of the two.


In this culture, due to a heavy importance placed on visual aesthetics of a particular kind, it is often misconstrued that visual appeal would be clearly more important. That is not the case.
User avatar #107 to #103 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
In general, I get the feeling that you rule out looks as purely cultural influence, however, in truth, it's just as universal as scent. Good condition of hair, skin, teeth is a universal attractor, which never falls under influence of cultural fads and applies to all, as it confirms that an individual is healthy and will provide offsprings with a higher chance of survival.

However, we may assume that good health condition means good scent, can we not?

User avatar #108 to #107 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
Except certain things aren't. For example, it was customary that men did not wash themselves of battle upon returning until after they were attended to by their wives, and it became a cultural factor that bloody, wild, hair was attractive, the very opposite of what you'd call 'good condition', yet it was seen by those women as attractive because it meant your man was a powerful warrior.

In france, the stereotype that they all have bad teeth is not due to the fact that there are simply no dentists and that french people are filthy, it is because crooked teeth aren't considered unattractive, and I've even met women who claim they find straight teeth odd-looking!

Good condition is not a universal factor. What is considered 'good' is influenced by culture.

However, I would agree that good health condition probably leads to a better scent.
User avatar #112 to #108 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
"good condition" as in healthy condition.
User avatar #110 to #108 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
By "good condition" I meant fullness and look of hair, not how it's kept. For example, when a mammal is sick it's coat loses it's shine and starts falling out, same with our hair. It changes as our health, age, sexual potency change too. Don't forget that hair folicles produce oil which has a scent. So hair is one of those universal indicators which fall both under visual and olfactory category.

When it comes to teeth I wasn't talking about their shape but rather the amount left in the mouth and how damaged they are. Damaged teeth produce unpleasant smells.
User avatar #114 to #110 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
Fair enough, I'll agree that having a full head of hair and all of your teeth is a major factor, but I feel that is less a manner of visual preference and more a manner of bodily dysfunction, and it would only make sense that we adapt to find these things unattractive.
User avatar #116 to #114 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
Finally! The way you summed it up was exactly the point I was trying to make all along.

Lack of hair, teeth, disease- ridden skin points to bad health, that is why we consider the opposite attractive.
User avatar #119 to #116 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
I'll agree to that! I was looking at it from a much less extreme view in terms of hygiene.
User avatar #106 to #103 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
But I don't think you should isolate looks solely as a cultural factor. Many many species depend on looks when picking a mate, and I'm pretty sure they don't have any cultural bias when it comes to it, heh.

Looks play a major part in picking a mate for us, too. For example, male brain in under a second "scans" all individuals around him and can tell if they are viable mates just by looking at their faces. It is the act of subconscious mind too (at least my biology book said so). Male and female brain seeks visual attraction at all times, wether we realise it or not. I think scent plays a larger part in the act of mating and pairing itself and primary attraction comes from looks.
User avatar #109 to #106 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
True, those species, at least as far as I know however, aren't as smell-oriented and have a much less complex system of deciding in their mate.

And, I think that is where the disconnection comes from. We're talking about two different types of attraction.
User avatar #111 to #109 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
I just read a ******** article which said that women care only about the scent ( then they advertised AXE) and don't pay attention to looks and then claimed that men don't care for smell at all. I don't think you'd want to date a chick, no matter how pretty, if she reeks of old sweat and dead bacteria. I think that olfactory attraction goes both for men and women.
User avatar #113 to #111 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
I DEFINITELY do not agree with that. NEVER believe articles from product companies. They grossly exaggerate the truth. Just because Scent is the most defining factor DOES NOT mean that you can be absolute **** in everything else and still be successful in the mating pool. As I said, the information I'm giving is supported by the APA.

I also agree, a woman that smelled like dead bacteria probably wouldn't make me that attracted to her. I agree that olfactory attraction does affect men and women both, though I don't know whether or not it is equally so. I'm not saying it is or isn't, I'm just saying I don't know. I've never seen any testing on it.
User avatar #115 to #113 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
"absolute **** in everything else and still be successful in the mating pool" that's exactly what it said. It was some "manly" webpage, but probably they advertise products here too.
It basically said this: "weight, height, money don't matter, just put on some cologne and any girl is yours". and I'm not lying. Made me rage.
User avatar #117 to #115 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
Would make me rage too. That is absolutely ridiculous and a complete misuse of science. It reminds me of a woman who wrote a book about relationships, and advertised her book claiming that 98% of all women were unhappy with their current relationships, and that 74% were cheating on their husbands.

She got her results from a magazine ad she posted that explicitly said "IF YOU ARE HAVING TROUBLE IN YOUR RELATIONSHIP, SEND A LETTER TO ME. "
User avatar #118 to #117 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
Yeah. Our official "news" websites are full of bogus articles like that and people actually buy them. They should fine these authors for misleading information.
User avatar #94 to #93 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
Actually, the sub-conscious was not only among the first things researched, it is one of the most extensively looked in to. The issue is that every person has a different sub-conscious, so there are no rules that concretely apply to EVERYONE.
User avatar #96 to #94 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
The eyes of science were not upon subconsciousness up until begining of 20th century and rise of psychology field, so I wouldn't call it one of the first things researched.
User avatar #98 to #96 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
I was discussing in the world of psychology, not in all of science, since this deals within the psychological field.
User avatar #78 to #75 - greatboobya (12/10/2012) [-]
I think your source is unreliable and has a lot of cock propaganda. There are no defined or proven human pheromones yet, so scent is irrelevant. I've never seen a dude and went "whoaaa his cock smells delicious, must mate now". I notice well kept looks first.
User avatar #85 to #78 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
They aren't necessarily pheremones, but even so, their existence is not defined solely upon whether or not we've identified them. We don't know all of the neurotransmitters that Cocaine interacts with, but we sure as hell know it has an effect and that they exist.
User avatar #88 to #85 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
I do not doubt that some pheromones exist, however, they would go bothways. It is suggested that they may exist both in male and female genetalia, and also feet and armpits.
User avatar #90 to #88 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
I never said they wouldn't, in theory.
User avatar #91 to #90 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
Could you believe that we are debating over attractiveness of cock stench?
User avatar #92 to #91 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
Believe me, you're talking to the guy who debated for three hours last week with his wife over what the spirit probably does during reproduction.
User avatar #97 to #92 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
That sounds pretty silly.
User avatar #99 to #97 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/11/2012) [-]
It is, but it was fun.
User avatar #105 to #99 - greatboobya (12/11/2012) [-]
Gee, I don't think its even possible to debate anything concerning spirits properly, since you can't base this on any physical evidence (since it deals with metaphysical area, duh) and it usually depends on perception and cultural upbringing of an individual. But I'm sure it was still fun.

Did she get mad?
User avatar #15 - charitar (12/10/2012) [-]
And he didn't link the pics?
User avatar #74 - sgc (12/10/2012) [-]
best momment of tf2
playing balloon race
this medic is on mic with a german accent
he starts singing songs to us, he is drunk as ****
he see's a mlp spray, i try to explain to him what a brony is
"ah, ze furfag?" "not quite"
he sees a nazi spray
"no! no! zat is evil! take it down now!"
he covers it with his spray, it's a ******* sausage
i ask him what it was all about he goes off on this long tangent about german food
he forgets what he is saying half way and sings again
starts telling us how he was at the tearing down of the berlin wall
starts to sing again
during all that he was also the best medic i ever played with

#24 - asianizer (12/10/2012) [-]
I bet that's what OP likes
I bet that's what OP likes
#57 - hauntzor (12/10/2012) [-]
I thumbed up because Killing Floor
#55 - tikledpikle (12/10/2012) [-]
only thing i could think of while reading this.
User avatar #29 - hellsjester (12/10/2012) [-]
don't you just hate it when a uncut mexican penis is distracting you from killen zombies.... i just hate when that happens....
#27 - adimkkassem (12/10/2012) [-]
God damnit, I ******* love Killing Floor. Anyone in the east coast want to start up a game right now?!
#36 to #27 - lnyanchl (12/10/2012) [-]
PA here, sure.   
I'll be Herman the German.   
yay germans
PA here, sure.
I'll be Herman the German.
yay germans
User avatar #52 to #36 - adimkkassem (12/10/2012) [-]
You need to login to view this link

That's the IP to the server, come on in!
User avatar #37 to #27 - fuperbooper (12/10/2012) [-]
U.S. East coast (Because there are many East coasts in the world).
Ready to play.
User avatar #50 to #37 - adimkkassem (12/10/2012) [-]
You need to login to view this link

That's the IP to the server, come on in!
User avatar #43 to #37 - adimkkassem (12/10/2012) [-]
I'll get a server going, give me a second.
User avatar #30 to #27 - garrettjacobsen (12/10/2012) [-]
I'm buying that game soon, it's ******* great.
When I get it I'll play with you.
Both sexually and in the game.
User avatar #40 to #30 - effort (12/10/2012) [-]
If I remember correctly, all the DLCs and the game was for $8 last Christmas.
User avatar #42 to #40 - garrettjacobsen (12/10/2012) [-]
**** .
#28 - sadisticsalmon (12/10/2012) [-]
User avatar #4 - nang (12/10/2012) [-]
Killing floor = epicness on a stick
#73 - triggathepirate (12/10/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#67 - therealredhood (12/10/2012) [-]
<--- What OP was really doing.
<--- What OP was really doing.
User avatar #48 - blacklite (12/10/2012) [-]

User avatar #58 to #48 - hauntzor (12/10/2012) [-]
User avatar #63 to #58 - sladee (12/10/2012) [-]
User avatar #45 - jimmyprice ONLINE (12/10/2012) [-]
one day i was playing world of warcraft and my guild got into a conversation about which race would end up having the biggest penis.
Orcs ended up winning god the conversations people get into in games with other people are hilarious and weird as ****
#47 to #45 - anon (12/10/2012) [-]
I remember that in our guild everyone talked about everything, you came with a problem and people listened to you, they were very close to each other, and eventually we organised barbecues
User avatar #46 to #45 - phunkyzilla (12/10/2012) [-]
No way dude Taurens have to have the biggest cocks, they're ******* GIANT COWS!
User avatar #23 - platypoos (12/10/2012) [-]
in all my years of gayness, i have never once seen a cut hispanic penis. now i am intrigued.
User avatar #62 - atangytaco ONLINE (12/10/2012) [-]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)