Pedro Campos comp. More work from him: .. Just imagine the awesome rule 34's this man can paint!
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Buy your amazon goods through FJ's link.
Just click this link and search for any product you want. FJ gets a commission on everything you buy.



Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - fezzo (12/05/2012) [+] (1 reply)
Just imagine the awesome rule 34's this man can paint!
#78 - frenshsik (12/06/2012) [-]
1) Take random pictures
2) Claim that they are paintings
3) ??????
4) profit
User avatar #58 - sorrowofdaedalus (12/06/2012) [-]
You know what this means, right?

Not even pics can prove it has happened.
#62 - infinitereaper ONLINE (12/06/2012) [+] (3 replies)
Now don't get me wrong, I've never like hyper realism or traditional realism all too much.

I always thought art was about creating and expression, unless it's glorious why recreate something you could just take a picture of? I think it's kind of a waste.

It's cool and all, but I like paintings that not only show reality, but how that reality made you feel and all it inspired. Realism is great, but not really my favorite.
User avatar #57 - trojanmannn (12/06/2012) [-]
he should do a nude of emma watson
#47 - lolyourusernamesux (12/06/2012) [+] (2 replies)
It looks more real than a photography
User avatar #77 - blarghagh (12/06/2012) [+] (3 replies)
I call ********
#50 - satanchild (12/06/2012) [-]
imagine him drawing some porn
User avatar #10 - kurocat (12/06/2012) [-]
man i gotta take a walk and clear my head
maybe grab a fruit rollup
i don/t even know
User avatar #7 - rdangerdash (12/06/2012) [+] (2 replies)
Are we supposed to believe that this was painted just because OP says that it is painted? Could be a ploy to get thumbs.
User avatar #11 to #7 - analleakage (12/06/2012) [-]
dude, i even gave him credit, learn to google you stupid ****
#8 - garamri (12/06/2012) [-]
its legit.
User avatar #69 - noworries (12/06/2012) [+] (8 replies)
Why doesnt he paint something that looks real like that but doesnt actually exist. Like a mythical creature or stargate or something lol
#13 - decibel **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (36 replies)
#85 - holyturkey (12/06/2012) [+] (1 reply)
those pictures look better than real life.
#61 - anonymoose ONLINE (12/06/2012) [-]
Here's another by Denis Peterson.

[if you want more type hyper realism into google. ****** insane!]
#6 - ibleedbmx (12/06/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#91 - appleyjack **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (2 replies)
#96 to #91 - anonymous (12/06/2012) [-]
That's because you don't understand art. It isn't a competition to see who can draw the closest to reality, we have cameras for that. Art is about expression and creating your own unique style. Seeing as art does not have an objective measurement, it doesn't actually make sense for anyone to claim one artist was 'better' than another. When people do make such claims, they should only be implying that that person was more notable for influencing art in a certain way or creating a new or unique and beautiful style that deserves recognition.

27 dicks.
User avatar #4 - Mebeshe (12/06/2012) [-]
And I'm sitting here, wasting my life on funnyjunk.
#3 - anonymous (12/06/2012) [-]
Easy way is to get a camera and skip the crap needed to paint that well
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)