Facebook. people. J AKID ' I clen' t accept black peeple. I mink they are not pure and shan. ilol stay segregated like me bible says they shan. ilol. If Gad rea
x

Facebook

J AKID '
I clen' t accept black peeple. I mink they are not pure and shan. ilol stay segregated like me bible says
they shan. ilol. If Gad really wanted black maple, men he ccn. ilol cit made Adam and Eve black. Even
mcn. igh mere is CIC) scientific inoclence on why i mink this, being black shan. ilol be illegal because they
ccn. ilol be harmful in my kids,
Now, Replace "black peeple" with gays and just leek on hwy ignorant yep guys scn. incl.
Like ' Camment ' Past
l " 3 others like this,
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+1243
Views: 41048
Favorited: 145
Submitted: 12/04/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to redue submit to reddit

Comments(198):

[ 198 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - nyawgga (12/05/2012) [-]
Replace white people with black people and see how tolerant you sound.
User avatar #5 to #2 - TIDYKIWI (12/05/2012) [-]
WOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
User avatar #31 to #5 - goobyman ONLINE (12/05/2012) [-]
it's just wololo
User avatar #122 to #2 - brettyoke (12/05/2012) [-]
Exactly, what if Adam and Eve were white? Ew.
#43 - fattyacid (12/05/2012) [-]
I was completely with him up until that last sentence. But then I was all like "why not both?"
User avatar #60 to #43 - welshdrag (12/05/2012) [-]
Do you go by lipid?
#62 to #60 - fattyacid (12/05/2012) [-]
I used to but then people kept getting me and my brother, Glycerophospholipids, mixed up.
#95 to #62 - AmaterasuNoOkami (12/05/2012) [-]
I made this face IRL. Funnyjunk needs more of your kind.
User avatar #120 to #62 - bokkos (12/05/2012) [-]
Dude, relax, sounds like you need some glycerol
#197 to #120 - fattyacid (12/05/2012) [-]
Due to my large consumption of liqueur, my diet is high in Glycerol. Besides, Glycerol Kinase deficiency is not caused by a diet low in Glycerol but rather a genetic mutation.
#48 to #43 - kornadth (12/05/2012) [-]
**kornadth rolled a random image posted in comment #93 at Genies are dicks. ** DONT FORGET ABOUT THE JEWS!
#121 to #48 - bokkos (12/05/2012) [-]
He didn't, have you read a history book?
He didn't, have you read a history book?
User avatar #14 - symustafa (12/05/2012) [-]
Adam and Eve would have been kinda Middle Eastern anyway.
User avatar #18 - lmOldGreg (12/05/2012) [-]
Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve guys, come on.

jk
User avatar #29 to #18 - jessicaschuette (12/05/2012) [-]
yesss Bill Engvall!!!!!
User avatar #61 - douevensax (12/05/2012) [-]
Replace with gay. Adam and Eve gay. Hmmmmmmm
User avatar #66 to #61 - shashashadow (12/05/2012) [-]
there is actually scientific evidence that the human female existed a couple hundred years before the human male. it's something like that, I saw it on QI.
User avatar #67 to #66 - douevensax (12/05/2012) [-]
>Go back in time to said period
>Leave out camera for a couple hundred years
>Watch 200 years of pure lesbianism
User avatar #132 to #66 - Blargosnarf (12/05/2012) [-]
Yes. Because, in the branch of Human ancestry, we were a-sexual for several million years, just barely developing sexual reproduction several million years after every other mammal on the entire planet. Seems legit.
#145 to #132 - fauxshores ONLINE (12/05/2012) [-]
If you consider humans evolved from an ancestor that was inherently not human, it could be possible that the new traits that defined the species as being different, or "Human" were only seen in the females. If what made the new species human was some different trait of their reproductive system, or some other trait only seen in females, it could have been years before the genes finally started showing up in human males.

Its not to say that females were reproducing asexually, but were technically reproducing with the other species, still so closely related that breeding was possible.
User avatar #129 to #66 - heartlessrobot (12/05/2012) [-]
Too bad one gender of a species could not live more than it's natural lifespan or reproductive life span before the other of it's gender. Total ******** you got right there.
#87 to #66 - benjamino (12/05/2012) [-]
The Asari. That is all.
#21 - anon (12/05/2012) [-]
replace black with daleks.

...yeah.
#80 - defeats (12/05/2012) [-]
Change it to "Mexicans living in America" and you have something the American government may actually say.   
   
P.S. I like Mexican people, I'm just trying to be funny, okay, I won't do it again.   
   
Anyway, time to legalise gay marriage everywhere.
Change it to "Mexicans living in America" and you have something the American government may actually say.

P.S. I like Mexican people, I'm just trying to be funny, okay, I won't do it again.

Anyway, time to legalise gay marriage everywhere.
User avatar #142 to #80 - yumbero (12/05/2012) [-]
"I dont accept mexicans living in america people..."



WAT
User avatar #213 to #142 - defeats (12/05/2012) [-]
Swap "Black people" with "Mexicans living in America"

"I don't accept black people."
Would become:
I don't accept Mexicans living in America.

You are the only "WAT" here.
#92 to #80 - sakuranbokiss (12/05/2012) [-]
chinga tu madre, gringo.
That's something the Mexicans would say to the US Government in return.
User avatar #103 - thenamlessguy (12/05/2012) [-]
"I don't accept gays. I think they are not pure and should stay segregated like the bible says they should. If God really wanted gays, then he would have made Adam and Eve black."
Wat.
"Even though there is no scientific evidence on why I think this, being black should be illegal because they could be harmful to my kids."
Well, this got racist fast.
"Now. Replace "gays" with gays and just look how ignorant you guys sound."
Wait, what?
User avatar #33 - sporkbacon (12/05/2012) [-]
I don't accept Daleks. I think they are not pure and should stay segregated like the Doctor says they should. If the universe really wanted Daleks, then they would have made Sec and Caan human. Even though there is no scientific evidence on why I think this, Daleks should be illegal because they could exterminate my kids.
#147 - astickywhale (12/05/2012) [-]
jokes on you, if he would've made Adam and Eve gay, they wouldn't have gotten very far. that and none of us would be alive lol
#158 to #147 - monkeythefrog (12/05/2012) [-]
But the Jokes on you. For Cain to travel to the Land of Nod, there must have been people there.
Therefore, Adam and Eve were not the only humans at the time, and there were plenty of people having heterosexual sex.
User avatar #182 to #158 - stillnotbob (12/05/2012) [-]
But the jokes on you, because it says "In the BEGINNING, God created Adam." then he created Eve, so obviously, they were the first, I.E, inbreeding.
User avatar #166 to #147 - codyxvasco (12/05/2012) [-]
I don't get how Adam and Eve created a population in the first place.

I mean...they make children, and then the children **** eachother? Won't that lead to birth defects and retardation from the gene make-up being too similar.

I'm actually asking here.
User avatar #210 to #166 - krackhead (12/05/2012) [-]
Not really. God would have created adam and eve biologically perfect. the birth defects seen in incest kids today are a result of hundreds of generations
User avatar #192 to #166 - needsmohoes (12/05/2012) [-]
Just look at our government. Seems there's some truth to it....
User avatar #199 to #192 - codyxvasco (12/05/2012) [-]
Wait....what?
User avatar #203 to #199 - needsmohoes (12/05/2012) [-]
I was making a joke. You wondered if A and E would have birth defects and retardation from the inbreeding, and I made (a rather clumsy, I'll admit) joke on how our Gov. is retarded and inbred
#154 - anon (12/05/2012) [-]
I am a Christian. The bible tells me to hate the sin, not the sinner. I don't hate gay people. I don't support gay marriage because I believe that would be changing what marriage is. I believe in gay unions, though. I have gay friends and they are people also but I just don't agree with their preference I guess you would call it. I am a republican so I disagree with democrats but I still love them. Pretty much the same idea to me. (don't take that as me calling democrats gay, please. That is ignorant to what I am trying to say.)
User avatar #179 to #154 - stillnotbob (12/05/2012) [-]
So you believe we should deny people fundamental civil rights, and that your religion should be the law of the land.
>Not everyone's Christian
>Our laws shouldn't reflect any sort of religion
User avatar #188 to #179 - Harkonnen (12/05/2012) [-]
I like when Republicans say that Muslims are trying to instate Sharia Law in the US when its all projection of their Christian base trying to ingrain church and state
User avatar #193 to #188 - stillnotbob (12/05/2012) [-]
Whoever thumbed me down is probably watching Nascar and eating KFC as I type this sentence.
#170 to #154 - anon (12/05/2012) [-]
The bible also say the sun rotates around the earth but you don't recite those parts do ya
huehuehue
User avatar #177 to #170 - neutralgray (12/05/2012) [-]
Just go away.
User avatar #176 to #170 - neutralgray (12/05/2012) [-]
No.
User avatar #194 to #170 - anonymoose (12/05/2012) [-]
No it doesn't.
#214 to #194 - anon (12/05/2012) [-]
"He has fixed the earth firm, immovable." (1 Chronicles 16:30)
"Thou hast fixed the earth immovable and firm ..." (Psalm 93:1)

Now how does something that is fixed, firm and immovable move around the sun?
User avatar #215 to #214 - anonymoose (12/05/2012) [-]
And the suns rotations is mentioned . . . where?
#191 to #154 - tvfreakuk (12/05/2012) [-]
1. The bible also says that gays should be put to death, and that women who are raped should be married off to their assaulter, and other such **** .
2. You do realise that marriage didn't always hold a religious basis? So the fact that marriage did become a religious (as well as financial and power-based structure) meant that marriage literally had to change to accommodate that, so to say that you can't change it now is complete hypocrisy.
User avatar #200 to #191 - anonymoose (12/05/2012) [-]
I agree that gays should marry, but in the Christian belief a marriage is only official in the eyes of God when they have sex, deflowering the woman [which is why a girl who is raped must marry her rapist, because she has been deflowered and a deflowered woman without a husband is a sinner blah blah blah]. Without a woman to deflower, the marriage is not a Christian marriage and I can understand this.

Although I would rather the church change this, until they officially do, Christians do have the right to believe that gay people cannot marry,not due to segregation or hatred, but due to biological impossibility.
#172 to #154 - anon (12/05/2012) [-]
So you're saying democrats are gay?
#169 to #154 - anon (12/05/2012) [-]
God bless you
#113 - ninjabadger (12/05/2012) [-]
Excellent.
Excellent.
User avatar #110 - spamalope (12/05/2012) [-]
I am actually perfectly fine with gays and I'm a christian
#3 - blackpowabrutha (12/05/2012) [-]
"would of"
User avatar #10 to #3 - Tafixados (12/05/2012) [-]
Not sure if troll or retarded.
User avatar #141 to #115 - DANEATSfatKIDS (12/05/2012) [-]
True.
User avatar #162 to #115 - goondas (12/05/2012) [-]
And yet they put "In god we trust" all over their money and expect people giving evidence in court to take an oath on the holy bible. Stupid country.
#1 - anon (12/05/2012) [-]
I LOVE pie ... now replace pie with Adolf Hitler and see how raciest you sound
User avatar #13 to #1 - foxmaal (12/05/2012) [-]
I ADOLF HITLER pie


......wait, what?
#6 - daddycool (12/05/2012) [-]
There's no scientific reasons for religious beliefs!?

Alert the press!
0
#27 to #6 - gritsreborn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#69 to #27 - daddycool (12/05/2012) [-]
You mean the point that humanities oldest and strongest institution should be changed just so some sexual deviants can feel accepted?

Yeah, I saw that point. It didn't seem worth arguing.
0
#82 to #69 - gritsreborn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#101 to #82 - daddycool (12/05/2012) [-]
Marriage as an institution. Not religion.
User avatar #118 - dburns (12/05/2012) [-]
Replace "black people" with gay.
>Then he would have made Adam and Eve black.
>have made Adam and Eve black.
>Adam and Eve black.
This could end up one of two ways.
"If God really wanted gays, then he would have made Adam and Eve black."
or
"If God really wanted gays, then he would have made Adam and Eve ga."
User avatar #114 - odonnell (12/05/2012) [-]
He should have said replace "Black" with "gay"

Replacing black people with gays would give you:
"...If God really wanted gays, then he would have made Adam and Eve black."
User avatar #149 to #114 - galkawhm (12/05/2012) [-]
No, it would end with "...made Adam and Eve gay."
User avatar #216 to #149 - odonnell (12/05/2012) [-]
He didn't write: "Then he would have made Adam and Eve black people."
So his conversion of "Black People" to "gays" doesn't work here.
He said "...Adam and Eve black."
[ 198 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)