true dat. .. fixed true dat fixed
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (317)
[ 317 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
126 comments displayed.
#15 - Dantee
Reply +572
(11/28/2012) [-]
fixed
#383 to #15 - hewhoepicfails
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
Scout: My guts! He busted all of my guts!

Soldier: You call that hurting my sides?! You ladies don't know how to hurt sides even i- OW MY SIDES!!

*questionable noises*
#249 to #15 - inboundpotato
Reply +1
(11/29/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#326 to #15 - modernclassmusic
Reply +1
(11/29/2012) [-]
OH YES, FANTASTIC
OH YES, FANTASTIC
#64 to #15 - auraguardian
Reply +2
(11/28/2012) [-]
thing on the left looks like the kid from 'Recess' with the long face.
#81 to #15 - falloutreaper
Reply +3
(11/28/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#133 to #15 - gabrielbelmont
Reply +3
(11/29/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#151 to #15 - BroadSword
Reply +5
(11/29/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#59 to #15 - thisotherdude
Reply +8
(11/28/2012) [-]
I'm ******* dying over here dude!
I'm ******* dying over here dude!
#21 to #15 - amandatoddd **User deleted account**
+12
has deleted their comment [-]
#40 to #15 - furyr
Reply +21
(11/28/2012) [-]
That was the most amazing thing that I have ever witnessed.
#149 to #15 - mmmribs
Reply +24
(11/29/2012) [-]
I should probably just post this in Morbid.
#150 to #149 - mmmribs
Reply +3
(11/29/2012) [-]
* Fat Kardashian made 17 pounds of her Mcdonalds trip and continues getting bigger over the last 72 days. And we're worried about the hot one ******* Kanye West?
#95 to #15 - tehranisauruss **User deleted account**
+32
has deleted their comment [-]
#19 to #15 - Moog
Reply +53
(11/28/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#17 to #15 - thatoldhorse
Reply +293
(11/28/2012) [-]
it took me a while to figure out what was different.
#117 to #17 - oishiine
Reply +128
(11/29/2012) [-]
Your profile picture tricked me into thinking I had thumbs.
#311 to #117 - adgymous
Reply +15
(11/29/2012) [-]
You get thumbs... for having the same avatar as someone.

...That's genius
#371 to #311 - oishiine
Reply +5
(11/29/2012) [-]
It was destiny. Our fates are intertwined. A connection forged by the mark of the profile; a sacred band.
#321 to #117 - steelbubble
Reply +3
(11/29/2012) [-]
#243 to #17 - harryscene
Reply +6
(11/29/2012) [-]
Her hair covered her ears.
#314 to #17 - xxpinksxx
Reply +1
(11/29/2012) [-]
I honest to God didnt notice the difference... I had to scroll back up and look at the original to compare...
#26 - coolcman
Reply +149
(11/28/2012) [-]
exactly what i thought when i saw that face
#216 to #26 - JubJubJubJub
Reply +3
(11/29/2012) [-]
10/10
#38 to #26 - frozenpickle
Reply +4
(11/28/2012) [-]
oh god my sides
#124 to #26 - TITTYFISH
Reply +24
(11/29/2012) [-]
Jabba The Slut
#1 - kridane
Reply +76
(11/28/2012) [-]
#8 to #1 - maddboiy
Reply +5
(11/28/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#2 to #1 - TITTYFISH
Reply +97
(11/28/2012) [-]
and whatever else happens to be lying around......
#29 to #2 - anon
Reply 0
(11/28/2012) [-]
hahahahahaha!!!!!!!
you sir, you made me laugh out loud, my friend started starring at me from across the hallway!
#114 to #29 - TITTYFISH
Reply +3
(11/29/2012) [-]
Glad to be of service!
#80 - diqface
Reply +82
(11/28/2012) [-]
I am a straight man, and the thought of two guys together disgusts me. You know what's even more disgusting though? The fact that two men can't get married by law and have a normal life just because other people don't like it. It's not my right to say anyone else can have less right than I have. I think it's unconstitutional, because, gays are denied the full liberty and the pursuit of happiness, because they can't share benefits and finances (easily and seamlessly) like heterosexuals do. I was raised a Christian in a conservative family, and I believe in creation (not necessarily Christianity), but it's not right for me to force my personal tastes on other people. If churches want to ignore gay marriage, that is fine, but gays should be able to get married by law and share credit and mortgages and insurance and whatever else they want to do. I'd rather have two gay parents than be in foster care and have none. Also, I do not think being gay is a choice. I do not think that a person is born straight (presumably normal to opponents) and one day goes "you know what? I think I want penises in my mouth" to piss off their parents or whatever. I don't care how much my parents hate me, I'm not sucking a dick because of it. I think we need to evolve from this close-minded ********.
#102 to #80 - byposted
Reply -21
(11/29/2012) [-]
It is not a sign of a healthy and prosperous society for homosexuals to be raising children and being represented as normal. This shows the ever growing disintegration of the family unit.

Homosexuals, "transsexuals" and whatever other sexuals there are should not be glorified by the media nor should they be allowed to touch children.
#159 to #102 - bettywhitefan
Reply +6
(11/29/2012) [-]
Children are better off being raised by two normal gay men or lesbian women then being raised by an abusive father or mother (not saying that all are). You can't know if a person is a good parent just by asking their sexual orientation. And you know what, there are straight people that should never be allowed to touch children so stop thinking that the gays are just out to molest all mankind
#171 to #159 - byposted
Reply -6
(11/29/2012) [-]
Sure thing, but homosexuality as a whole is not something to be cherished. The premise that there is lying around millions of "good homosexual couples" is ludicrous, especially concerning the evidence I give to link Pedophilia to Homosexuality.

Homosexuality as a culture is backward and immoral, and this isn't just my opinion if you look at things like HIV rates among gays and their higher likelihood to commit child-abuse.

Even the libertarian Ron Paul knows this. The sad thing is libertarianism gives rise to backward ideals, which is why I am not one.
#191 to #171 - bettywhitefan
Reply +2
(11/29/2012) [-]
How on earth is homosexuality immoral? It is displayed in nature countless times. And your link of pedophilia to homosexuality is ludicrous. And HIV is actually more common in women. Get your facts straight. And yes, SOME commit child abuse, but to say that it is only the gays that do is, well, just plain stupid. What Ron Paul said is an opinion, Why should they have to hide their activities? They aren't going into peoples faces and yelling out "me and my same-sex partner are going to have unprotected sex and make sure G-d is disappointed in us". why shouldn't straight people have to hide their activities?
#227 to #191 - byposted
Reply -5
(11/29/2012) [-]
How on earth is homosexuality immoral? It is displayed in nature countless times.
Unintelligent, underdeveloped animals=/= humans.
Animals like donkeys do not have a concept of "culture" and "society" beyond their straightforward instincts.

And yes, SOME commit child abuse, but to say that it is only the gays that do is, well, just plain stupid.
Nobody ever said that, the rate of Homosexuals committing child abuse is approximately 1 in 3.

G-d
How's the weather in Tel-Aviv?
#182 to #171 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#193 to #182 - byposted
Reply -7
(11/29/2012) [-]
Then you are not part of the open-homosexual lifestyle. If I were you, I wouldn't dare to publicly associate myself with gays just because of what a grand portion of them are.
#196 to #193 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account**
+4
has deleted their comment [-]
#384 to #193 - bettywhitefan
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
then you should most likely never leave your home
the gays may try to get to you and turn you into one of them
#298 to #171 - konyewest
Reply -1
(11/29/2012) [-]
You're right about Ron Paul and Libertarians, but wrong about everything else.
#109 to #102 - revanmal
Reply +3
(11/29/2012) [-]
In what way is homosexuality not 'normal'? They aren't the majority, but it's not harmful and it's not going to make their children gay. Two people of the same gender can raise children responsibly and healthily, and there is nothing wrong with the kids afterward that them being gay caused. If the family unit is disintegrating, it's because the world is getting smaller and less insular, letting people find connections outside their immediate surroundings and need their family less. Families can still love one another, they just don't have to rely on each other so much.

I agree with the sentiment that people of any minority (or majority for that matter) shouldn't be glorified simply because of their peer group.

But 'not should they be allowed to touch children.'?

Do you mean 'at all'? Because if so, that's just stupid.

If you mean 'sexually molest them', well... DUH. But being a sexual minority does not make you a sexual DEVIANT who harms children. There's plenty of straight people who touch little kids too.
#105 to #102 - angelmatvey
Reply +2
(11/29/2012) [-]
What the hell do you mean "nor should they be allowed to touch children"? I strongly disagree with your opinion.
#276 to #105 - cockasian
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
I disagree; would you not say the common trend of straight couples divorcing shows the ever growing disintegration of the family unit? Yet straight people are still allowed to marry.

And that "gay's should not be allowed to touch children" thing man? Seriously? gay people aren't automatically pedophiles, you know.
#279 to #276 - angelmatvey
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
I agree.
#277 to #276 - cockasian
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
replied to wrong comment, sorry :P
#280 to #277 - angelmatvey
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
Took me a minute, I was kind of confused as to why you were disagreeing with me and saying what I agree with
#281 to #280 - cockasian
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
haha yeah i went full retard on that one
#284 to #281 - angelmatvey
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
All's well, I think I've done the same a couple times. And I like that pic, made me laugh
All's well, I think I've done the same a couple times. And I like that pic, made me laugh
#108 to #105 - byposted
Reply -15
(11/29/2012) [-]
See post number 106. Homosexuals are much more likely to engage in pedophilia and sexually abuse children.
#127 to #108 - angelmatvey
Reply +2
(11/29/2012) [-]
The statistics in your post seem a little strange. Not saying they're inaccurate, but they seem biased. It seems as though you're taking the statistics of two completely different surveys and sticking them together.
Of all men, 2-4% are homosexual. Of all male pedophiles, 25-40% prefer boys.
Why not instead take a survey of how many homosexuals prefer underage boys to adult men? I think that would be a bit more accurate and easy to understand. It seems like you've drawn a circle around the issue, but you're pretending you have the center colored in. Just seems a little suspicious, and I don't see how surveying pedophiles would give you a clear picture of homosexuality.

If African Americans had a higher violence rate, would you prohibit them from buying guns?

Anyways, forgive my ignorance if I look like a fool. I've never been good at debating and I don't feel like looking up any facts to back up my side.
#129 to #127 - angelmatvey
Reply +3
(11/29/2012) [-]
I used the word seem 5 times in that post. *sigh*
#152 to #127 - byposted
Reply -3
(11/29/2012) [-]
>If African Americans had a higher violence rate
They do. If all the blacks left America, the crime rates would sink dramatically.

Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children.

#181 to #152 - angelmatvey
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
If such a large percentage of a country's population left, I'm sure that crime rates would drop, since, you know, there are so fewer people available to commit these crimes. Also, while this is a common stereotype, I'm not convinced that it's actually founded on any solid evidence.

And as diqface pointed out earlier, correlation does not imply causation. I can't believe any of your statistics, simply because I have doubts about their reliability, but even if they are true there are so many other factors that it's impossible to accurately say that homosexuality is at all connected with pedophilia and child molestation.

This may sound kind of weird, so bear with me, but pedophiles are clearly mentally unbalanced, and I don't think that being attracted soley to young kids makes a person completely gay. That's like saying that someone who likes two metal songs is a metalhead. That's just my own opinion, though.
#214 to #181 - byposted
Reply -1
(11/29/2012) [-]
imgur.com/dSyya

File attachment ****** up, here is link.
#201 to #181 - diqface
Reply -1
(11/29/2012) [-]
It is a fact that significantly more firemen are found at a larger fire

CONCLUSION: Firemen cause larger fires.
#205 to #201 - angelmatvey
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
Made me lol
#206 to #181 - byposted
Reply -2
(11/29/2012) [-]
Of course not all homosexuals are pedophiles and degenerates, and of course not all blacks are criminals, but this is a trend that cannot simply be ignored. There is never total causation in anything here, but the overall picture shows something that cannot be dismissed.    
   
If a large portion of Whites left America, this would have an extremely less impact on crime rates than would it be a large portion of blacks. Considering this, take a look at the fact that Whites, in government terminology (which couples in "white hispanics" north africans, and arabs with Whites) account for 70% of the US population while blacks are at around 15%. Examine my file attachment knowing this.
Of course not all homosexuals are pedophiles and degenerates, and of course not all blacks are criminals, but this is a trend that cannot simply be ignored. There is never total causation in anything here, but the overall picture shows something that cannot be dismissed.

If a large portion of Whites left America, this would have an extremely less impact on crime rates than would it be a large portion of blacks. Considering this, take a look at the fact that Whites, in government terminology (which couples in "white hispanics" north africans, and arabs with Whites) account for 70% of the US population while blacks are at around 15%. Examine my file attachment knowing this.
#223 to #206 - angelmatvey
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
This is where we disagree. You claim that there is some correlation between homosexuality and child molestation, while I claim that there is no proven correlation.

I'd also like to add that pedophilia technically encompasses anyone 0-17 years old. So you could have sex with a senior in high school and be a pedophile, which isn't as disturbing as having sex with, say, a twelve-year-old. Again my opinion, but I don't have any anti-homophobic documents handy.

Regarding your file attachment, not only is that poster agonizingly racist, where are these statistics coming from? Even if they're from supposedly scientific papers, such blatant disrespect towards the African-American race has led me to be inclined towards the idea that these "facts" may be swayed or fabricated completely. I cannot take it seriously.
#242 to #223 - byposted
Reply -1
(11/29/2012) [-]
I found an excellent non-biased source for you that is well cited:

www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.pdf
#235 to #223 - byposted
Reply -1
(11/29/2012) [-]
I believe the evidence outweighs your doubt when it comes to homosexuals, but there is no changing your mind.

The picture on black crime rates is based on government statistics. A google search would give you the same results if you look at FBI files and other agencies dealing with crime. I don't know what year this particular picture's information was based on, but black crime rates stay similar every year so do the research for yourself for 2010-2012.

Take a smaller example to the left. The disproportionate state of black crime cannot be argued with.

#119 to #108 - diqface
Reply +2
(11/29/2012) [-]
Source: Fox News
#167 to #108 - bettywhitefan
Reply +1
(11/29/2012) [-]
Sexuality is about gender preference. Pedophilia is about age preference. Two COMPLETELY OPPOSITE THINGS. To link the two is ridiculous. Yes there are gay pedophiles but there are also pedophiles that prefer the opposite gender, So maybe it's straight people that shouldn't be able to touch children.
#131 to #102 - heartlessrobot
Reply +1
(11/29/2012) [-]
You know what? You can go **** yourself. You are one person. It's good that people like you are few and far between, because I don't want anyone like you having a political voice with support. You can say all you want, but it doesn't mean ****. We are going in a good direction. A very good direction, where people, regardless of sexual orientation are beginning to have equal rights. Good people don't need you mucking it up. And you know what? After I typed all this ****, I saw your username and realize you're that troll I've fallen for so many times, and I don't feel like deleting this.
#136 to #131 - diqface
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
I thought he was a troll. If so, then good job, I will admit that.
#139 to #136 - heartlessrobot
Reply +1
(11/29/2012) [-]
Yeah. I realized he was a troll and my jimmies were still rustled.
#230 to #131 - byposted
Reply -3
(11/29/2012) [-]
Pipe-dream at its finest. While such a course benefits you, society doesn't.
#107 to #102 - diqface
Reply +1
(11/29/2012) [-]
You dun goof'd, sir. Your comment and your Ryan pic are gonna get you killed in here, lol. I will say that I respect your opinion and expression of freedom of speech. But I will tell you this: I am not glorifying people other than heterosexuals. I just want them to be treated as equals-- able to share benefits and raise children (whom they adopt from broken heterosexual homes, mind you). My mom left when I was young and my dad has been on crack for some time. It's horrible. Luckily I got through college, so it's okay for me personally, but I feel for my parents. That said, I would rather be raised by gays who love me than live in foster care or live with parents that don't care about me. It's not like the kid will catch the faggot virus. Sure, the kids might be predisposed to be gay, but I don't think the environment will change an inevitability such as homosexuality. Even if a gay family produces a gay child--- SO? The only reason that would be bad is if that gay kid were born in today's society, where people like you won't let anyone different be equal and happy because of your religiously-biased upbringing. You have to have an open mind and realize that gay people aren't science accidents-- they're people like you and me, and they have unalienable rights that we have alienated.
#126 to #107 - byposted
Reply -7
(11/29/2012) [-]
The arguments you used:

1) My personal experiences push me to be emotional about my stance.

2) I just suffer from a "religious-upbringing."

3) There is no difference between a Heterosexual family and a "Homosexual family."

My responses:

1) Just because your family was broken shouldn't shift your opinion on the subject of adoption by homosexuals; especially considering that you find them repulsive.

2) I am not religious in any sense. I am a rare breed; an atheist who is not also a liberal hippie douche.

3) I fundamentally disagree because I believe that the family has a natural bond. The relationship of the woman and man existed long before institutionalized marriage, stemming from the time of the Ice-Age in which a relationship between 1 man and 1 woman was necessary for survival.

Homosexual marriage and adoption is part of the larger picture in which Western Society is disintegrating. Such a degenerate group as Homosexuals are far more likely to be pedophiles as I posted @ #106, which leads me to believe that within my lifetime there will be a stride for pedophile rights.

I think this can be represented best when you take into account that homosexual newspapers and travel publications advertise prominently for countries where boy prostitution is heavy, such as Burma, the Philippines, Sri Lanka and Thailand.
#163 to #126 - bettywhitefan
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
Sexuality is about gender preference. Pedophilia is about age preference. Two COMPLETELY OPPOSITE THINGS. To link the two is ridiculous.
#130 to #126 - diqface
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
Can you not agree that two loving, gay parents are better than two abusive, heterosexual parents?
#138 to #126 - festiveorc
Reply -1
(11/29/2012) [-]
Do you have any idea how insane you sound, when you infer that there will be pedophile rights movement from gay rights?
#156 to #138 - byposted
Reply -3
(11/29/2012) [-]
It seems pretty likely that sex with minors will continue to be less opposed to the point in which such an act will be completely acceptable. I use my knowledge linking homosexuality and pedophilia coupled with the fact that our society is becoming more and more leftist to draw this conclusion.
#250 to #102 - blacknbluebrony
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
Holy ****, you're just an outright ignorant, sexist, and racist ****, aren't you?
#110 to #102 - diqface
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
Also, tell me what a healthy and prosperous society is? I'll bet I can tell you. A place where every man is married to a woman and they have two kids and they are free to worship Jesus without the abominations of Muslims and followers of other religions skewing the truth and getting in the way. Also we throw out evolution (because it says we came from monkeys, even though it doesn't) and just embrace Jesus in all his glory. And all the mexicans stop coming to our country and we get white people back in all of the offices and make the blacks work at McDonald's so we can have the white collar jobs. Yeah, that sounds awesome.



Rly.
#104 to #102 - byposted
Reply -5
(11/29/2012) [-]
But America is heading down the pooper in terms of social-norms and politics in general, so further deviance won't be anything shocking.

Soon enough, "transsexual" will be an option on gender classification and there will be a pedophile rights movement, or at least increasing amnesty for them.
#121 to #104 - diqface
Reply +3
(11/29/2012) [-]
Sexual orientation is not comparable to rape and molestation. Why do you people always go with this snowball argument. "If we give the gays rights, pretty soon, we'll give rapists rights and then we'll give murderers rights and then satan will arise from Yellowstone National Park and he and Obama, the Antichrist, will run across the world, sodomizing us all.

WAT?
#106 to #104 - byposted
Reply -2
(11/29/2012) [-]
Dignity USA and other homosexual groups strenuously deny any connection whatever between a homosexual orientation and child sexual molestation. They repeatedly claim, as Dignity USA does, that "All credible evidence discounts any link between the molestation of children and homosexuality."3

Yet these groups never cite any of this "credible evidence," nor do they quote any studies to buttress their claims that there is no such connection.

In fact, a number of studies performed over a period spanning more than half a century — many of which were performed by homosexuals or their sympathizers— have shown that an extremely large percentage of sexually active homosexuals also participate in child sexual molestation.

This is not "homophobia" or "hatred," this is simple scientific fact.

------------------
*** Homosexual Alfred Kinsey, the preeminent sexual researcher in the history of sexual research, found in 1948 that 37 percent of all male homosexuals admitted to having sex with children under 17 years old.4
* A very recent (2000) study published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that "The best epidemiological evidence indicates that only 2-4% of men attracted to adults prefer men. In contrast, around 25-40% of men attracted to children prefer boys. Thus, the rate of homosexual attraction is 620 times higher among pedophiles."5
* In a 1992 study published in the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, sex researchers K. Freud and R. I. Watson found that homosexual males are three times more likely than straight men to engage in pedophilia, and that the average pedophile victimizes between 20 and 150 boys before being arrested.12**
#125 to #106 - diqface
Reply +1
(11/29/2012) [-]
If you have taken any science classes, you will have learned that "correlation does not mean causation". Just because there may be a higher ratio of gays molesting children, that doesn't mean that gay=molester. You have to look out for what we call "confounding variables"-- other things that explain the correlation. My theory is that gays are treated so badly that they lose self-worth and stoop to molestation more often than straight, white men, who are the top of society. There's probably a higher correlation between blacks and molestation too, for this very same reason.
#137 to #125 - byposted
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
>Homosexuals rape children because they are treated badly by society.

That sounds a lot like the leftist adage that states, "Blacks have low IQ's and commit more crimes simply because of racism."

If you will argue for that thesis, I will throw up over my keyboard.

---------------------------
My interpretation of the studies which show homosexuality having a big correlation between pedophilia is that both are more likely to be genetically intertwined together. The open-homosexual lifestyle is one of obvious degeneracy.** Is it a wonder why Homosexuals also have higher rates of HIV and AIDS?**

#145 to #137 - diqface
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
Blacks score lower on IQ tests because IQ tests are socially specific, as hard as people try to eliminate that. gay people don't get AIDS from being gay, that get AIDS by being whores, the way any person will. And, having studied genetics, I highly doubt that the allele(s) influencing sexual orientation are linked to the allele(s) influencing moral compass and liking little kids. I have been informed that you are a troll, and will dignify you with no further responses. In the end, you are a human too, and I respect your ideology, even if I disagree with it. I will not start a movement to outlaw close-minded people from getting married.
#187 to #145 - byposted
Reply -1
(11/29/2012) [-]
>Blacks score lower on IQ tests because IQ tests are socially specific, as hard as people try to eliminate that.
There have been IQ tests which have been significantly lowered in standard to fit the Black culture, BY BLACKS, and yet status-quo reins. Whites and Asians score as much points higher than blacks as the average on normal IQ-tests. Studies done in Africa show similarities on the entire African race in IQ and the same goes with Africans in America, who have higher IQ's likely due to their European admixture.

>gay people don't get AIDS from being gay, that get AIDS by being whores, the way any person will.
My point exactly. gay people are thus more likely to participate in degenerate culture. There have been studies which put the average amount of sexual partners in a typical openly homosexual's life to be in the thousands. They are more likely to die younger due to this culture.

>I highly doubt that the allele(s) influencing sexual orientation are linked to the allele(s) influencing moral compass and liking little kids.
Homosexuality is a disorder (if everyone was homosexuals, the human species would die in a generation) which does indeed have genetic composition; everything does. It's only common sense to assume that if a homosexual gives birth to a baby, that it will be more likely to be a homosexual itself. The only counter-argument you can make here is to state that homosexuality is completely composed by environment, which even homosexuals disagree with.

> I have been informed that you are a troll
Lol. I raise very politically incorrect opinion on the internet, I don't see how that makes all the points here illegitimate. Don't respond if you wish, but take the time to research further into what I state.
#132 to #106 - festiveorc
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
So you said "25-40% of men attracted to children prefer boys"? Doesn't that mean that the other 60-75% of men attracted to children prefer girls? Which is the exact opposite of your point.
#141 to #132 - byposted
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
"Thus, the rate of homosexual attraction is 620 times higher among pedophiles"

It was showing that not all Homosexuals may be Pedophiles, but a significantly higher rate of Pedophiles are also homosexuals.
#146 to #141 - festiveorc
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
Yes, but more of them are heterosexuals. So there are more heterosexual pedophiles. So its obviously not 620 times higher.

Are you aware that there are biased studies? Do you believe those studies of the "negroid brain" from the 1800s? Or maybe the studies that proved that leaving trash in a jar will magically spawn rats?
#161 to #146 - byposted
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
Homosexuals are just 2-4% of the population but account for more than a quarter to a half of pedophiles.

Homosexuals are also more inclined to act on their impulses; committing 1 in 3 child abuse crimes.
#84 to #80 - zackmorris
Reply -8
(11/28/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#111 to #80 - anon
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
I dont like homosexuality. And no, im not religious or anything. I just dont.
The thought of 2 guys or girls just sickens me.
Its my opinion. Sue me.

Bring on the red thumbs .
#153 to #111 - diqface
Reply +2
(11/29/2012) [-]
Also, don't say "no, I'm not religious or anything" like it would be a crime if you were. I think it's fine to be religious. I think it helps society as long as religious people can keep an open mind and let scientists so their jobs and let society evolve.
#116 to #111 - diqface
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
It grosses me out too, but I greened this. I don't like homosexuality, either, because I'm not gay. Cantaloupes gross me out too, because I don't like them, but I'm not pushing to outlaw cantaloupes, because some people like cantaloupes, and I want those people to be happy, too. Just don't stop other people from being happy.
#266 to #80 - anon
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
I will take you seriously because of your username
#345 to #266 - diqface
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
That's what I was going for-- credibility, LOL.
#85 to #80 - SuperCookie
Reply +1
(11/28/2012) [-]
#101 to #85 - diqface
Reply +2
(11/29/2012) [-]
I'm not sure why exactly you posted this, but thanks for your input, haha.
#103 to #80 - bronychef
Reply +1
(11/29/2012) [-]
Its a shame that there are not enough people that belive in the same morals as this. You Sir, have given me a small but strong hope that maybe one day more people will come to think this way.
Its a shame that there are not enough people that belive in the same morals as this. You Sir, have given me a small but strong hope that maybe one day more people will come to think this way.
#112 to #103 - diqface
Reply +1
(11/29/2012) [-]
Thank you. I just want everyone to respect each other as human beings, because our biggest resource is each other, and it's stupid to throw it away due to differences.
#91 to #80 - angelmatvey
Reply +2
(11/29/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#98 to #91 - diqface
Reply +1
(11/29/2012) [-]
It just doesn't make sense to fight it, because it doesn't affect anyone.

Without gays: sitting on couch watching tv

With gays: sitting on couch watching tv, but I have to do that KNOWING that there are people out there of the same sex who are happy together.

I mean, it's really just inconvenient, ha.
#83 to #80 - skyrn
Reply +3
(11/28/2012) [-]
**** public opinion, thumb for you sir. It's a well thought out rant, and I like to hear opinions moderated by basic human compassion.
#97 to #83 - diqface
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
It's not like I think homosexuality shouldn't happen. Dicks just gross me out because I'm not gay, lol. I honestly don't know how girls like them, but I guess they feel the same way about their snatches, lol. But, like I said, I am no one to tell anyone else what to do if it doesn't affect me.
#86 to #80 - darkangeloffire
Reply +13
(11/28/2012) [-]
You, my friend, have restored a small amount of my faith in religious people. You have your opinions, but you're fair in them, and you don't force them on others. I commend you.
#94 to #86 - diqface
Reply +3
(11/29/2012) [-]
I mean, I'm not really even religious. I just believe that we did not appear spontaneously. Even as a scientist, I think that, at least at the moment, it takes just as much faith to believe in spontaneous formation as it does to believe in creation. I'm pretty much up for grabs if someone can come up with convincing evidence. I just think it's stupid to get mad about other people's preferences, as long as they don't affect the economy or the well-being of a society in general. I mean, I have gay friends who are pretty cool. They come up with their boyfriends/girlfriends holding hands and stuff, and I think it's odd, yeah, but I'M not holding hands with a dude, so I don't really care. It doesn't affect me. I think it's sad that this country is still run by religion. I think it's fine to be run by religious people, but it's when you have close-minded people running things that **** like this happens. Not to say that only religious people are close-minded.
#16 - Magermass ONLINE
Reply +56
(11/28/2012) [-]
anyone else
#25 to #16 - karvarausku
Reply +11
(11/28/2012) [-]
**karvarausku rolled a random image posted in comment #649 at Wallpapers Galore ** Naruto **** yea!

(this is the point where everyone thinks I'm fully retard and thinks that I don't know what One piece is.)
#30 to #25 - gildemoono
Reply 0
(11/28/2012) [-]
you know. i lost interest in both those series years ago and see now that they still air and have hundreds of episodes. It would not have surprised me if that was naruto, since they must be scraping the bottom of the barrel at this point.
#31 to #30 - karvarausku
Reply 0
(11/28/2012) [-]
Haven't watched Naruto in long time... I found it annoying that the main character CAN'T DIE or if he dies he is always resurrected...

I would love anime where you have to follow main character to some point just to see him die and see "main character swap"
#33 to #31 - gildemoono
Reply 0
(11/28/2012) [-]
Have you perchance watched "gurren Lagaan"?
#35 to #33 - karvarausku
Reply 0
(11/28/2012) [-]
No but my friends who has cosplayed as the cape guy and titty girl have said that it's good anime and worth the watch...
#37 to #35 - gildemoono
Reply 0
(11/28/2012) [-]
No time to explain. go watch it. Just. now. please. this is most likely the first and last time i will ever meet you, as a farewell request, i ask you to watch it. trust me. you will enjoy it.
#47 to #37 - yunogasaii
Reply 0
(11/28/2012) [-]
Why exactly does everyone love Gurren Lagann?
#143 to #47 - gildemoono
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
Literally, i do not even know. And im not saying that because i dont see what people like about it. its because theres not one thing that could be put down in words to describe the qualities of this anime. It seriously makes no sense, but at the same time, all the sense.

just watch it. its amazing. I dont even like anime, but ive watched the entire series 4 times now.
#36 to #35 - karvarausku
Reply 0
(11/28/2012) [-]
*have*
#340 - wallbuilder
Reply +41
(11/29/2012) [-]
Here's the original if anyone wants...
#368 to #340 - anon
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
the one up top is still more ugly
#346 to #340 - FightClub
Reply +10
(11/29/2012) [-]
This image has expired
dude why are you claiming that's original when it obviously isn't

this is the real photo
#349 to #340 - doctorpibber
Reply +21
(11/29/2012) [-]
#22 - srskate
Reply +38
(11/28/2012) [-]
#164 - gorgonzolarolla
Reply +34
(11/29/2012) [-]
#172 to #164 - HEADSHOTyou
Reply +26
(11/29/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#175 to #172 - kingoflulzfool
Reply +6
(11/29/2012) [-]
#165 - anon
Reply 0
(11/29/2012) [-]
Man, what is Shrek doing on Kim's wedding picture?
#169 to #165 - nyanpoptart
Reply +33
(11/29/2012) [-]
#9 - latadam ONLINE
Reply +33
(11/28/2012) [-]
#34 to #9 - truenord ONLINE
Reply +2
(11/28/2012) [-]
How could you! I was planning to sleep.
#99 to #9 - trojanmannn
Reply +2
(11/29/2012) [-]
I tried