World War 2 Tic Tac Toe Strategies. Not OC, stolen from lostateminor, check it, they have some good cookies. SURPRISE: MAKE YOUR MOVE BEFORE THE ENEMY G READY T game is rigged

World War 2 Tic Tac Toe Strategies

World War 2 Tic Tac Toe Strategies. Not OC, stolen from lostateminor, check it, they have some good cookies. SURPRISE: MAKE YOUR MOVE BEFORE THE ENEMY G READY T

Not OC, stolen from lostateminor, check it, they have some good cookies

Tags: game | is | rigged
SE mu summon NUMBERS
TO ova: w: -mm THE ENEMY
  • Recommend tagsx
Views: 56895
Favorited: 248
Submitted: 11/16/2012
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to reservoircats


Anonymous comments allowed.
#25 - gevaudan (11/17/2012) [-]
Surely you mean dolphin and whale.
User avatar #72 to #25 - littlenish (11/17/2012) [-]
User avatar #39 to #25 - itotallylold (11/17/2012) [-]
Hey, that is slander and you know it. EVERYONE knows that it was chicken and cow!
User avatar #1 - steelcrasher (11/16/2012) [-]
**I call ******** on germany. Against better players ? Germany had Best trained and equipt soldiers in ww2 they lost because they were heavily outnumbered and because hitler was forcing himself in strategical decisions.
User avatar #16 to #1 - icameisawilostit (11/17/2012) [-]
I can support this.

As Japan looked upon ways it could modernize itself before the League of Nations as an international powerhouse in Asia, the Japanese government hired German military advisers to train Japanese cadets and ranking military personnel.
User avatar #24 to #1 - gevaudan (11/17/2012) [-]
Very true.
Due to the treaty of versailles, Germany could only have 100,000 infantry (for those who were wondering).
#37 to #1 - baditch has deleted their comment [-]
#71 to #1 - thereasonableperso (11/17/2012) [-]
At first they were highly trained, but later in the war they coukdnt afford to take the time to train them highly, also the number of able bodied troops was dwindling.
User avatar #73 to #1 - littlenish (11/17/2012) [-]
Their entire Armory was better than ours. The Gewehr (FG 42, MG42, STG-44, G43) were some of the best rifles ever made. The MP40 packed a harder punch than the M1A1 Thompson and the Bren. Also, the Mauser 98 was stronger than the Enfield bolt action and the Springfield.
#161 to #73 - gewehr (12/07/2012) [-]
#136 to #73 - nathiuz (11/17/2012) [-]
"MP40 packed a harder punch than the M1A1 Thompson*

I'm afraid not. The .45 ACP is a large mass round traveling near the same speed as the 9x19 despite having almost 1.5x the amount of mass. This results in the .45 ACP having more kinetic energy as well as a greater surface area with which to create drag (see Fd=.5p(v^2)CA ) This change in force allows the .45 ACP to distribute more kinetic energy in a shorter amount of time versus the 9x19mm. Combine this with a higher innate Kinetic Energy on many loads, and your result is a cartridge that is very effective against unarmored targets.

However, one thing the MP-40 DID have over the Thompson was a lower weight (MP-40 8.75 lbs/3.97kg vs M1A1 Thompson 10.66 lbs/4.82 kg both unloaded), which was beneficial (Not as fatiguing to carry) and had problems of its own (slightly less controllable sustained fire.

(Sources: Barnes, Frank C. "Cartridges of the World, 12th Edition", Wisconson: Gun Digest Books, 2009

Hornady Manufacturing Company. "Hornady Handbook of Cartridge Reloading: Rifle-Handgun Reloading Data, 8th Edition", Hornady Manufacturing Company, 2010.

McNab, Chris, "Firearms: The Illustrated Guide to Small Arms of the World", Parragon Books, 2008)
User avatar #3 to #1 - reservoircats [OP](11/17/2012) [-]
Probably the best trained, but not best equipped. German tanks were **** , believe it or not. Their tank tech was outdated by like 20 years when they invaded Poland. They were using Kar98s when the US was mass producing Garands. The Soviets had better tanks, except they were driven by potatoes that couldn't hit an elephant within 3 yards range. Read it up, the Germans made the Panther tank so they could penetrate the T-34. But seriously, I don't think there was anything that the allies didn't have that the Germans had.
User avatar #20 to #3 - goodguygary (11/17/2012) [-]
T-34's were so solidly built, they would just ram into tiger tanks instead of shooting them. Russians man.
User avatar #17 to #3 - steelcrasher (11/17/2012) [-]
They did exceptionally well with what they had, you must know that they were forbidden from mass producing and designing new weapons, tanks, aircraft...for a long time. So most stuff had to be done in secrecy and by few men. But yeah panzer 2 and 3 were not that great, but since anti tank weaponry was not advanced that much in the beggining of the war, panzers didn't really had any big problems with what they were fighting at given time (they did got pretty ****** by t34s though)

Also yes, allies did pretty much had everything axis had, But then again, it was war and both sides were copying from each other. Panzerschreck was made after american bazooka, and many firearms took the design of stg44 (though i think most were made after the war)
User avatar #14 to #1 - CRosBY (11/17/2012) [-]
Well as far a tactics go the allies were far better then the Nazi's, because of Hitler having complete control.
#63 to #14 - Xepheros (11/17/2012) [-]
Indeed. That's the biggest ******* they ever made - stripping the full control from the generals and letting that emo-dimwit have last say in just about everything.
User avatar #43 to #1 - glorfindelfag (11/17/2012) [-]
considering it says ON TWO FRONTS hes referring to WW1. where germany by no means had any better/worse soldiers/artillery, but still.
User avatar #49 to #43 - steelcrasher (11/17/2012) [-]
It says nazi ideas and there are swastikas :)
User avatar #55 to #49 - glorfindelfag (11/17/2012) [-]
ah. well op is an idiot then.
User avatar #56 to #55 - steelcrasher (11/17/2012) [-]
#109 to #43 - cidkh (11/17/2012) [-]
1) WW2 also evolved into a two front war for the Germans (USSR on the East, America, Britain and what was left of the French resistance on the west)

2) German soldiers were better than entente soldiers in WW1 anyways. So was their gear. For one, look at the quality of trenches of Germans dug vs the entente trenches.
#2 to #1 - Xepheros (11/17/2012) [-]
This. If Hitler had understood the Art of War (Sun Tzu), he would've let his generals be WAAAAY more autonomous, and they probably would've won the war. Instead, he made the rules so that every decision became beurocratic and essentially ended up on Hitler's desk, which ruined the efficiancy infinitely.

As written in the Art of War, it is the job of the leader to get the **** out of the general's way.
#35 to #2 - localcatbarber (11/17/2012) [-]
This will never be related again.
User avatar #15 to #2 - CRosBY (11/17/2012) [-]
Did you watch that documentary about Sun Tzu too? Because it said the exact same thing.
#62 to #15 - Xepheros (11/17/2012) [-]
I have not. Mind linking it? Sounds interesting enough.
#155 to #150 - Xepheros (11/18/2012) [-]
Thank you very much! It was a great watch, very interesting stuff.
User avatar #158 to #155 - CRosBY (11/18/2012) [-]
I agree, lots of insight on what actually happened during Vietnam.
#159 to #158 - Xepheros (11/18/2012) [-]
Well, as a non-american, I already knew that the US got its ass handed to it because the vietnamese utilized guerilla warfare. I've also played Go a few times, so while a novice in the truest sense of the word, I gotta say that I absolutely loved the Chess/Go analogy.
#9 to #1 - allamericandude (11/17/2012) [-]
Plus, Hitler being a dumbass thought he could invade Russia in the winter. Which is impossible...   
...unless you're the mongols.
Plus, Hitler being a dumbass thought he could invade Russia in the winter. Which is impossible...

...unless you're the mongols.
User avatar #31 to #9 - daentraya (11/17/2012) [-]
For some reason, we call stupid people mongols where i live. Why, i dont know, and no one could find a reason why. The mongols sounds pretty badass to me. Like Khal Drogo
User avatar #41 to #31 - defeats (11/17/2012) [-]
Mongol is a derogatory nickname for people with down syndrome(because facially, they almost look Mongolian), so a few years ago people instead started using it as an insult, many people don't even know who the Mongols are.
User avatar #42 to #41 - daentraya (11/17/2012) [-]
Ah, thats why.. Thanks. I think many people back in time looked a bit dopey, either the artform, or because we actually do look different today. Peacock evolution
User avatar #129 to #41 - TwistedBamboozler (11/17/2012) [-]
Mongoloids to be exact.
#80 to #31 - nengcaste **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#22 to #9 - comradewinter ONLINE (11/17/2012) [-]
That didn't happen. Operation Barbarossa was launched 22. of June 1941, which was during summer. Even though they stayed fighting during winter, they didn't expect the Russians to fight back as hard as they did, and believed to be home by Christmas same year.
User avatar #156 to #22 - allamericandude (11/18/2012) [-]
But still--any 1940's world leader worth his salt would know two things:
1) The Soviets were tough.
2) If your invasion of Russia lasts until the winter, you will lose.

Hitler really should have thought of that before he tried poking the Bear with a stick. He was not the smartest military leader in the world.
#68 to #9 - betesta (11/17/2012) [-]
Don't forget the japanese also won a battle on russian grounds
User avatar #19 to #9 - goodguygary (11/17/2012) [-]
**** , anyone invading russia was a bad idea then, it was like poking a bees nest, sure you can get a lot of them, but you'll still lose
User avatar #10 to #9 - holycrapimacupcake (11/17/2012) [-]
Exactly. The Spetsnaz are trained for Winter Warfare,
User avatar #11 to #10 - allamericandude (11/17/2012) [-]
They didn't even need elite training. All they really had to do was hold tight while the Germans froze to death.
User avatar #12 to #11 - holycrapimacupcake (11/17/2012) [-]
Yep. All the while the Russians were drinking Vodka and singing songs.
#21 - Schwarzenegger (11/17/2012) [-]
Meanwhile in Switzerland!
Meanwhile in Switzerland!
User avatar #54 to #21 - satrenkotheone (11/17/2012) [-]
Lemme guess, Eluveitie?
User avatar #85 to #54 - dethrey (11/17/2012) [-]
User avatar #86 to #85 - satrenkotheone (11/17/2012) [-]
But aren't Korpiklaani Finnish? And I thought of Eluveitie since they're from Helvetia.
User avatar #119 to #54 - reinmar (11/17/2012) [-]
Korpiklaani. Arguably the beginning of any music video ever
User avatar #26 to #21 - perfonator (11/17/2012) [-]
User avatar #52 to #21 - inthurrnet (11/17/2012) [-]
But that's finland
#122 - gaybasherboy (11/17/2012) [-]
If Hitler had won any of those wars, he would have ended up with too big of a nation, and too small of a world. Pic is kind of relevant.
#137 to #122 - iluvharrypotter (11/17/2012) [-]
Hitler didn't want any more countries apart of Germany besides the territory which Germany previously had in past leaderships which were taken from them in after WW1. If he would have won he would probably just installed allied fascist governments who were with him. The Soviets manage to handle a massive areas by doing this after WW2.
#145 to #137 - bosman (11/17/2012) [-]
You're half right. Hitler wanted more than what the Germans previously had. He wanted unify Germanic areas and conquer more for Lebensraum or "living space". The idea was to get enough room for Germans to prosper, including as far as the Steppes of Russia (i.e. past Moscow) and essentially keep the Slavs and Russians past the steppes and use them as slave labor when needed. He didn't want the whole word as many people wrongly think, he just wanted a fascist world just as the US and Britain wanted a democratic world and the Soviets wanted a communist world.
#106 - lieutenantderp (11/17/2012) [-]
Nope. The wehrmacht is a lot better trained and equipped than the Soviets and us Americans. They were just outnumbered as **** .
#138 to #106 - iluvharrypotter (11/17/2012) [-]
Outnumber is a huge factor. But the fronts thing is true, but allies didn't have a better military force. Germany lost in the East because of Soviets and their huge numbers allowing them to get far in to making their long supply lines more vulnerable which worked. Allies did the same, they pratically attacked by a **** ton of areas and fooled the Axis of thinking they were going to attack primary from the Mediterranean north and destroyed a lot of their infrasacture too.
#132 to #106 - anon (11/17/2012) [-]
yep. the german wehrmacht was far better than any other combat force at that time.
#61 - rieskimo (11/17/2012) [-]
America, the Michael Bay of the world.
User avatar #67 to #61 - azraelthemage (11/17/2012) [-]
I'm pretty sure Michael Bay is the Michael Bay of the world.
User avatar #32 - hacksaw (11/17/2012) [-]
Czech: Let the opponent have your moves, because what the hell...
User avatar #75 - Loppytaffy (11/17/2012) [-]
Italy- join the enemy's side.
#40 - anon (11/17/2012) [-]
I know this post will very likely be thumbed down into oblivion
but nonetheless I must post this:

I am not French (Russian actually) and eventhough we have our ***** & giggles about France surrendering every chance they get, the facts to this are very much the opposite.

I want to spread this information, because FJ is far too visited by teens and younger, who very likely consider WW2 (or any war) to just be the script on which awesome COD games are based on....but the truth is that they are mankinds lowest points.

During WW2 France was very ill equipped to fight a war. They had not recovered from WW1 and their military equipment was still 30 years behind that of the Nazis (it would be a disgrace to call them Germans), and they actually did fight. Unfortunately they were fighting a losing battle and when they came near to losing every soldier left, they simply accepted their loses and considered it just useless bloodshed to keep fighting.

So they surrendered, rather than fight till the death and be left with no more French people to populate France.

tl;dr LMAO France...surrender HUEHUEHUE
User avatar #46 to #40 - senseofpurpose (11/17/2012) [-]
That's not an excuse.

Greece was in a far worse state (they just finished the balkanian wars, liberating parts of their captured land, etc) but they still stood against the Nazis.
You of all people in FJ should know that, Greece kept them busy enough for the Russians to win against the German front...

So ya, all i can hear is excuses
User avatar #90 to #40 - ganjalf ONLINE (11/17/2012) [-]
"During WW2 France was very ill equipped to fight a war..."
Wrong and ultra wrong. France had a military power excellent for the time. They had heavy fortifications, modern tanks far superior to thos of the nazis, an excellent air force and the english expeditionary force to support them.

They only managed to hold the Italians back on the Italian border, THEY were very ill-equiped to fight a war, as they had NO decent tanks, NO decent aircrafts and please don't get me started on their navy which lacked completely of air-carriers.
User avatar #45 to #40 - bossdelainternet (11/17/2012) [-]
learn to deal with stereotypical ******** jokes.
America get's beat upside the head by the entire world for stereotypes so i'm pretty sure you can deal with a few coward jokes.
User avatar #50 to #40 - semisane (11/17/2012) [-]
But back it up a few years, Germany has pretty much no military. When they started expanding the military and being aggressive, France and Britain did nothing to stop them, and tried to appease them as much as possible because they didn't want another war on their hands. If they had clamped down on them the moment Germany started breaking the Versailles treaty, the terrible war could have been a much shorter one.
User avatar #59 to #50 - chrolt (11/17/2012) [-]
Well they didn't know that the Nazi's were going to become aggressive, and they hoped dearly it wouldn't come to that. And by the time they started becoming aggressive they kinda already had the army and it was a little too late stop them with military.

Besides it's all much easier in hindsight isn't it?
#81 to #59 - fecality **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#64 to #40 - wildemu (11/17/2012) [-]
Actually France had far superior tanks than Germany at the time. However there were three major flaws with french tanks

1.lack of radio
2.lack of firepower (but then again the Char B2 made up for that with it's 75mm howitzer)
3.lack of tactical knowledge (they used tanks as infantry support instead of fighting tanks)

So no, the French could of stopped the German war machine even before it over ran France.

Furthermore, the French wanted to fight a static war like in WW 1 so they wanted to halt the Germans from taking their original attack route. French positions were entrenched in the maginot line and the same area that the Germans attack from in world war 1

The Nazi high command had initially wanted to do use the same path as in WW 2 but when their plans got discovered in a plane crash that occured in France (not sure of precise location). This caused the Germans to use the Ardennes to attack, and the French, now strongly believeing that Germany would use the same offensive tactic, moved into Holland and Belguim(not near the Ardennes obviously) to stop the Germans faster.

The result was when Germany attacked, the French were caught off guard and were completely out flanked

TL;DR: France could of stopped Germany if not for Strategic Blunders (still doesn't mean they are horrible fighters)
#92 to #64 - moumouxe (11/17/2012) [-]
superior tanks than Germany?? really where do you get that from? I have always been taught that french generals were WWI veterans . They thought it would be a similar war than the 14-18 one and did not believe tanks would be useful.
#152 to #92 - wildemu (11/17/2012) [-]
look up the Char B1, Somua S-35, Hotchkiss H35, Char D2. These tanks were superior to German tanks at the time. If they would of been coordinated with radios + if French forces were not flanked, WW 2 could of ended earlier.
#160 to #152 - moumouxe (11/18/2012) [-]
well you are right thank you
#65 to #64 - wildemu (11/17/2012) [-]
*The Nazi high command had initially wanted to use the same path as in WW 1*
User avatar #47 to #40 - jarelk (11/17/2012) [-]
And don't forget, the France resistance movement was one of the most active resistance movements during the second world war.
User avatar #60 to #47 - rieskimo (11/17/2012) [-]
And full of some of the baddest ass ************* of the last few generations.

amerifag here I have my fun on Frances expense but I recognize badassery when I see it.
User avatar #36 - baditch ONLINE (11/17/2012) [-]
Russia: Trick the ****** into attacking in the winter.
#101 - spaceturtlecadet (11/17/2012) [-]
Where's England?
User avatar #141 to #101 - mickeymaufive (11/17/2012) [-]
The British Army, moron. Not just England.
User avatar #133 to #101 - iliketires (11/17/2012) [-]
England sat away from the table and let their opponent come to their home to play tic tac toe, where they had an advantage.
User avatar #153 to #133 - spaceturtlecadet (11/17/2012) [-]
And we served them tea?
User avatar #5 - flopsternewman (11/17/2012) [-]
oh my god yes! i love bones!
#8 to #5 - bonnienique (11/17/2012) [-]
I actually came back to this page to make sure I read bones right. And then I was excited
User avatar #48 to #8 - guywithafork (11/17/2012) [-]
Did you see the newest one about 9/11 and the hillbilly starts talking about his daddy problems and why he became a stripper?
#135 to #48 - bonnienique (11/17/2012) [-]
I've seen the newest one but I don't remember him taking about being a stripper. Although I have a hearing problem and he's a little hard to understand sometimes. Lol
#148 - anon (11/17/2012) [-]
What is the best way to get USA involved in a war ? Tell them it is over.
#111 - furiousmarshmellow (11/17/2012) [-]
What about Great Britain?
#154 to #111 - wildemu (11/17/2012) [-]
Stay on one side of the # and defend until re enforcements arrive
User avatar #116 to #111 - redwolfradolf (11/17/2012) [-]
don't do **** until the opponent has already almost won.
#149 to #116 - crilleballe (11/17/2012) [-]
Britain couldn't do a whole lot. They were under constant bombardment by the Luftwaffe. Just keeping the Germans out of Great Britain is quite a feat on it's own. Also, remember that on the 6. June 1944, also known as D-day, the British army captured Sword Beach, a neighboring beach to Omaha Beach. They also put up a great fight, and won, against the Luftwaffe.
The British tried to capture land in mainland-Europe several times before the USAs army even arrived.
Furthermore, the rest of the British Empire, places such as Northern Africa, fought the Germans ever since the Germans decided to invade them.
#144 to #116 - anon (11/17/2012) [-]
give and example...
User avatar #110 - papernazi (11/17/2012) [-]
my username has never felt more relevant.
User avatar #83 - moseph (11/17/2012) [-]
I'm up for watching Bones, who wouldn't be?
User avatar #102 to #83 - derangedberger (11/17/2012) [-]
#103 to #83 - maucorn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #84 to #83 - rieskimo (11/17/2012) [-]
I am not really a fan. *shrugs*
#4 - retris (11/17/2012) [-]
I see what they did there...
#30 to #4 - supamonkey (11/17/2012) [-]
You might need this.
User avatar #33 to #30 - willindor ONLINE (11/17/2012) [-]
Wrong plane. Fat Man was dropped by Bockscar.
User avatar #34 to #33 - supamonkey (11/17/2012) [-]
True, but this is a better joke.
#51 - Mesmus (11/17/2012) [-]
**Mesmus rolled a random image posted in comment #1810558 at MLP Friendly Board ** dafuq, thats my tv remote
**Mesmus rolled a random image posted in comment #1810558 at MLP Friendly Board ** dafuq, thats my tv remote
User avatar #57 to #51 - peyko (11/17/2012) [-]
I ******* love dragonball.
User avatar #79 to #51 - badxfox (11/17/2012) [-]
That's awesome
#114 - leetpwnzer (11/17/2012) [-]
"Nazi best idea"
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)