Art.... .. I worked really hard on that.. :(
x
Click to expand

Comments(199):

[ 199 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#11 - AutumnDOOOOD (11/12/2012) [-]
I worked really hard on that.. :(
#108 to #11 - finkristoffer (11/12/2012) [-]
3 blades in his hands. 4 scratches on the "artwork". Dear god...Science has gone too far.

Dick Sword.
#110 to #108 - John Cena (11/12/2012) [-]
He. worked. hard!
#20 - iAmAWizard (11/12/2012) [-]
If the graffiti was done on a canvas in a gallery, it would be considered art

Doing it on other peoples property is vandalism
User avatar #148 - garymuthafuknoak ONLINE (11/12/2012) [-]
You guys are a bunch of ******* twelve year olds. Yes, it depends on who you are but these pictures can both be art. But the point is, graffiti on private property is very much vandalism. Imagine you had a business and some cuntbag came and spray painted the **** out of it. You would be just a little pissed. So do it to your own goddamn property.
#150 to #148 - mlpmeh (11/12/2012) [-]
If bob ross did that to my property..
well it would just be all one little happy accident.
#165 to #150 - nathiuz (11/12/2012) [-]
**nathiuz rolled a random image posted in comment #1657624 at MLP Friendly Board ** If Bob Ross did that to my property, I'd be pissed.

I'm not in ANY mood to be dealing with zombie ************* .
User avatar #151 to #150 - garymuthafuknoak ONLINE (11/12/2012) [-]
I would be okay with this.
#8 - John Cena (11/12/2012) [-]
Hey, i'm an artist too, I love to paint huge veiny black cocks, to me this is art, so i'm going to paint giant dicks all over someones wall, but its ok because its wonderful wonderful art.

Uhhh the point is he/she drew on someones **** ...thats why its vandalism, now if he wants to paint that on a wall he OWNS it will be considered art.
-3
#47 to #8 - salari has deleted their comment [-]
#48 to #47 - John Cena (11/12/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolls 23** everything anon says is great, it just is always misenterpreted
-2
#50 to #47 - salari has deleted their comment [-]
#170 - iamphoenix (11/12/2012) [-]
Probably because you painted it all over somebody's **** , you douche.
#119 - illusiveman (11/12/2012) [-]
Look at all the "art"
#53 - John Cena (11/12/2012) [-]
Maybe because the second is on the side of someones ******* house.
#24 - geomancer (11/12/2012) [-]
I'm getting tired of saying this, but...IT'S BECAUSE IT DOESN'T ******* BELONG TO YOU
#38 to #24 - kazumamikura (11/12/2012) [-]
Actually that's where you are wrong, some friends and i were hired by my old high school to paint a mural of urban art by the school, in the end we ended up getting arrested and the school was almost shut down
Actually that's where you are wrong, some friends and i were hired by my old high school to paint a mural of urban art by the school, in the end we ended up getting arrested and the school was almost shut down
+2
#124 to #38 - captaincabinet **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #196 to #124 - kazumamikura (11/13/2012) [-]
we had permission from the city and we had some sort of document we were supposed to show the police in case they came, but apparently none of that matter
0
#201 to #196 - captaincabinet **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #183 to #38 - lordmoldywart (11/12/2012) [-]
He is not wrong

If you draw/paint on something that doesn't belong to you without the owner's consent, that is vandalism
User avatar #57 - elementjif (11/12/2012) [-]
It is vandalism. Yeah, it's art, it's beautiful, but it's still ruining government property/
User avatar #61 to #57 - fxremastered (11/12/2012) [-]
That actually isn't Vandalism, graffiti like that would take a very long time. You can ask owners of the store if you can purchase that part of the wall to display art.
User avatar #62 to #61 - elementjif (11/12/2012) [-]
OP says otherwise, i'm just going along with him/her.
User avatar #63 to #62 - fxremastered (11/12/2012) [-]
Indeed.
#173 - ishotthedeputy (11/12/2012) [-]
Neither of those is art. They need squidward noses.
#153 - bitchplzzz (11/12/2012) [-]
And tattoos are for scumbags apparently.
And tattoos are for scumbags apparently.
User avatar #134 - retributionthepimp (11/12/2012) [-]
Haven't we been through this before? It's called vandalism because it's done on private property without permission.
User avatar #101 - froggets (11/12/2012) [-]
Here's some fun fact for you OP

If someone pay's a guy to make this on his wall, it is art.

If he say's "no, don't f***ing spray paint on my wall you asshole! I'll call the police!" it's vandalism!
logic, it's not hard to understand
User avatar #160 - rollertoaster (11/12/2012) [-]
It's not about what you draw, it's about where you draw it.
User avatar #175 to #160 - gragasvlad (11/12/2012) [-]
and about art critics only liking stuff that no one understands
#136 - John Cena (11/12/2012) [-]
If it ain't yours and your drawing on it guess what... Vandalism!
#117 - elatedmonkey (11/12/2012) [-]
The graffiti is pretty cool and artistic, but whenever I see something written in this ubiquitous style I have no idea what is trying to be said.

They are both valuable, and here's why:

The first one has value in that it could be a metaphor for imperfection, or having deep emotional scars....or they could represent the real one's you have after gouging out your eyes from having to see it hang in a museum.

The second one has value in that it could also be a metaphor, visually representing that feeling when you're tangled inside, covered in sticky goo, and those damn stars won't leave you alone.
User avatar #128 to #117 - ManInKilt (11/12/2012) [-]
Modern art is **** .
"Oh, i glued together two milkjugs! I call it Unacknowledged romance! Wheres my government grant?"
-every modern "artist" ever.
#72 - gatsu (11/12/2012) [-]
They call that vandalism because it is its name, and it doesn't exclude art....
They call that vandalism because it is its name, and it doesn't exclude art....
User avatar #34 - PoopyFaceTomatoNos (11/12/2012) [-]
False. Both are art, but the bottom one is also vandalism.
User avatar #1 - atrocitustheking (11/11/2012) [-]
Man, if they put some of that graffiti on canvas or something, I'd definitely go and see it on an art show.

As for modern art, a lot of it is just an artist trying to push the boundaries and ask the question: what is art? What is the definition, is there a bare minimum that must be met? Who would decide these things? So there's that.

Then there's douchebags who take high-speed pictures of their jizz flying past the lens and sell it for several thousand dollars. Or piss inside a fish tank. Or sculpt the Virgin Mary out of animal feces. **** that guy (yes, these were all done by one guy).
0
#22 to #1 - pennstatecivic has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #146 to #1 - seniorpokeman (11/12/2012) [-]
Who is this guy exactly?
User avatar #200 to #146 - atrocitustheking (11/13/2012) [-]
From Wikipedia:
Andres Serrano (born August 15, 1950 in New York City) is an American photographer and artist who has become notorious through his photos of corpses and his use of feces and bodily fluids in his work, notably his controversial work "Piss Christ", a red-tinged photograph of a crucifix submerged in a glass container of what was purported to be the artist's own urine.
[ 199 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)