Art.... .. I worked really hard on that.. :( Art I worked really hard on that :(
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (199)
[ 199 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#11 - AutumnDOOOOD
Reply +102 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
I worked really hard on that.. :(
#108 to #11 - finkristoffer
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
3 blades in his hands. 4 scratches on the "artwork". Dear god...Science has gone too far.

Dick Sword.
#110 to #108 - anon id: eda46400
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
He. worked. hard!
#20 - iAmAWizard
Reply +91 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
If the graffiti was done on a canvas in a gallery, it would be considered art

Doing it on other peoples property is vandalism
#138 to #20 - upunkpunk
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
#24 - geomancer
Reply +28 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
I'm getting tired of saying this, but...IT'S BECAUSE IT DOESN'T ******* BELONG TO YOU
#38 to #24 - kazumamikura
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
Actually that's where you are wrong, some friends and i were hired by my old high school to paint a mural of urban art by the school, in the end we ended up getting arrested and the school was almost shut down
Actually that's where you are wrong, some friends and i were hired by my old high school to paint a mural of urban art by the school, in the end we ended up getting arrested and the school was almost shut down
#124 to #38 - captaincabinet **User deleted account**
+2 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #196 to #124 - kazumamikura
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/13/2012) [-]
we had permission from the city and we had some sort of document we were supposed to show the police in case they came, but apparently none of that matter
#201 to #196 - captaincabinet **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #183 to #38 - lordmoldywart
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
He is not wrong

If you draw/paint on something that doesn't belong to you without the owner's consent, that is vandalism
#25 to #24 - geomancer
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #148 - garymuthafuknoak
Reply +27 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
You guys are a bunch of ******* twelve year olds. Yes, it depends on who you are but these pictures can both be art. But the point is, graffiti on private property is very much vandalism. Imagine you had a business and some cuntbag came and spray painted the **** out of it. You would be just a little pissed. So do it to your own goddamn property.
#150 to #148 - mlpmeh
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
If bob ross did that to my property..
well it would just be all one little happy accident.
#165 to #150 - nathiuz
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
**nathiuz rolled a random image posted in comment #1657624 at MLP Friendly Board ** If Bob Ross did that to my property, I'd be pissed.

I'm not in ANY mood to be dealing with zombie *************.
User avatar #151 to #150 - garymuthafuknoak
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
I would be okay with this.
#119 - illusiveman
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
Look at all the "art"
User avatar #101 - froggets
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
Here's some fun fact for you OP

If someone pay's a guy to make this on his wall, it is art.

If he say's "no, don't f***ing spray paint on my wall you asshole! I'll call the police!" it's vandalism!
logic, it's not hard to understand
User avatar #34 - PoopyFaceTomatoNos
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
False. Both are art, but the bottom one is also vandalism.
User avatar #30 - northleech
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
Spray paint your own ******* property and it's art.
User avatar #1 - atrocitustheking
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(11/11/2012) [-]
Man, if they put some of that graffiti on canvas or something, I'd definitely go and see it on an art show.

As for modern art, a lot of it is just an artist trying to push the boundaries and ask the question: what is art? What is the definition, is there a bare minimum that must be met? Who would decide these things? So there's that.

Then there's douchebags who take high-speed pictures of their jizz flying past the lens and sell it for several thousand dollars. Or piss inside a fish tank. Or sculpt the Virgin Mary out of animal feces. **** that guy (yes, these were all done by one guy).
#22 to #1 - pennstatecivic
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #146 to #1 - seniorpokeman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/12/2012) [-]
Who is this guy exactly?
User avatar #200 to #146 - atrocitustheking
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/13/2012) [-]
From Wikipedia:
Andres Serrano (born August 15, 1950 in New York City) is an American photographer and artist who has become notorious through his photos of corpses and his use of feces and bodily fluids in his work, notably his controversial work "Piss Christ", a red-tinged photograph of a crucifix submerged in a glass container of what was purported to be the artist's own urine.