Art.... .. I worked really hard on that.. :(
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#11 - AutumnDOOOOD (11/12/2012) [+] (2 replies)
I worked really hard on that.. :(
#20 - iAmAWizard (11/12/2012) [+] (1 reply)
If the graffiti was done on a canvas in a gallery, it would be considered art

Doing it on other peoples property is vandalism
#24 - geomancer (11/12/2012) [+] (6 replies)
I'm getting tired of saying this, but...IT'S BECAUSE IT DOESN'T ******* BELONG TO YOU
User avatar #148 - garymuthafuknoak (11/12/2012) [+] (3 replies)
You guys are a bunch of ******* twelve year olds. Yes, it depends on who you are but these pictures can both be art. But the point is, graffiti on private property is very much vandalism. Imagine you had a business and some cuntbag came and spray painted the **** out of it. You would be just a little pissed. So do it to your own goddamn property.
#119 - illusiveman (11/12/2012) [-]
Look at all the "art"
User avatar #101 - froggets (11/12/2012) [-]
Here's some fun fact for you OP

If someone pay's a guy to make this on his wall, it is art.

If he say's "no, don't f***ing spray paint on my wall you asshole! I'll call the police!" it's vandalism!
logic, it's not hard to understand
User avatar #34 - PoopyFaceTomatoNos (11/12/2012) [-]
False. Both are art, but the bottom one is also vandalism.
User avatar #30 - northleech ONLINE (11/12/2012) [-]
Spray paint your own ******* property and it's art.
User avatar #1 - atrocitustheking (11/11/2012) [+] (3 replies)
Man, if they put some of that graffiti on canvas or something, I'd definitely go and see it on an art show.

As for modern art, a lot of it is just an artist trying to push the boundaries and ask the question: what is art? What is the definition, is there a bare minimum that must be met? Who would decide these things? So there's that.

Then there's douchebags who take high-speed pictures of their jizz flying past the lens and sell it for several thousand dollars. Or piss inside a fish tank. Or sculpt the Virgin Mary out of animal feces. **** that guy (yes, these were all done by one guy).
User avatar #57 - elementjif (11/12/2012) [+] (3 replies)
It is vandalism. Yeah, it's art, it's beautiful, but it's still ruining government property/
#173 - ishotthedeputy (11/12/2012) [-]
Neither of those is art. They need squidward noses.
#153 - bitchplzzz (11/12/2012) [-]
And tattoos are for scumbags apparently.
And tattoos are for scumbags apparently.
User avatar #134 - retributionthepimp (11/12/2012) [-]
Haven't we been through this before? It's called vandalism because it's done on private property without permission.
#12 - gritsreborn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #160 - rollertoaster (11/12/2012) [+] (1 reply)
It's not about what you draw, it's about where you draw it.
#117 - elatedmonkey (11/12/2012) [+] (1 reply)
The graffiti is pretty cool and artistic, but whenever I see something written in this ubiquitous style I have no idea what is trying to be said.

They are both valuable, and here's why:

The first one has value in that it could be a metaphor for imperfection, or having deep emotional scars....or they could represent the real one's you have after gouging out your eyes from having to see it hang in a museum.

The second one has value in that it could also be a metaphor, visually representing that feeling when you're tangled inside, covered in sticky goo, and those damn stars won't leave you alone.
#72 - gatsu (11/12/2012) [-]
They call that vandalism because it is its name, and it doesn't exclude art....
They call that vandalism because it is its name, and it doesn't exclude art....
#56 - sparcon (11/12/2012) [+] (4 replies)
guy's rate my art 1-10
User avatar #60 to #56 - kightofnever (11/12/2012) [-]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)