Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #167 - fosforgasxiii (11/08/2012) [-]
Armstrong took hundreds of photos on the moon. Just sayin.
User avatar #171 to #167 - thegamesnitch (11/08/2012) [-]
Yeah, he must of took loads on his phone
#174 to #171 - goodmusiclover (11/08/2012) [-]
*must have
It's not that difficult, you know.
User avatar #177 to #174 - thegamesnitch (11/08/2012) [-]
Wow! A real life English teacher!
#169 to #167 - goodmusiclover (11/08/2012) [-]
*in a film studio
#172 to #169 - newcoolusername (11/08/2012) [-]
Except that there is a lot of evidence they've been on the moon.
#175 to #172 - goodmusiclover (11/08/2012) [-]
Like what? A video and pictures that are full of mistakes and errors.
User avatar #179 to #175 - herblegerble (11/08/2012) [-]
#189 to #179 - goodmusiclover (11/08/2012) [-]
The flag waving while there's no wind on the moon.
On some pics, the astronauts have more than one shadow, while there's only one lightsource on the moon; the sun.
You can see the same background on different moon missions even tough they "landed on different places on the moon".
The distances are wrong compared with the size of the mooncar.
On some pics you can see parts of the astronauts, spaceship, mooncar that are printed over the raster that is found on moonphotos.
In some video footages you can see a cable on the helmets of the astronauts to fake the low gravity effect.
When you speed up the videos of the astronauts walking on the moon, the astronauts walk as they normal walk on earth. The video is slowed down to fake the low gravity effect.
User avatar #197 to #189 - willindor (11/08/2012) [-]
Did you know who had the most interest the Moon Landing? The Soviets did. If the moon landing didn't happen then the commies would reveal evidence that it didn't happen. Did they? NO! A lot of people followed the spacecraft with their telescopes. Trust me, if these guys were flying in orbit around the world then those guys would have found out.
#196 to #189 - kadrismieryu (11/08/2012) [-]
1. Caused by them twisting the pole into the surface (and maybe a wire in the top part of the flag to hold it up)
2. Not true, proven on Mythbusters. (There are multiple shadows but it can happen from a single light source)
3. (Guessing you mean the hills and stuff) Not true, some of the "evidence" is actually photos cropped and put tgoether a certain way to look like they go to together when they actually don't.
4-5. Not sure what you mean here.
6. Antennas on their bakcpacks
7. Again not true, proven on Mythbusters. (also how the dust behaves when they kick it up)
#199 to #196 - goodmusiclover (11/08/2012) [-]
4. A mooncar appears to stand at least 200 feet away but it's ******* huge and appears to actually stand really close to the camera, meaning we have to deal with a fake background.
5. The moonphotos have a raster on it, but some pieces of the spaceship, mooncar and astronauts are above the lines of the raster. I would give an example but my level is too low to give links or photos.
#200 to #199 - kadrismieryu (11/08/2012) [-]
I've looked at a few pictures to try to find which ones you're talking about but I didn't find them. But the moon rocks that were brought back and the fact that scientists in various other countries have examined them too and none of the has said anything about it being fake or a lie or anything is a pretty big indicator that it probably wasn't fake.
User avatar #194 to #189 - badsamaritan ONLINE (11/08/2012) [-]
So all six are fake? I do have an explanations for the shadows thing. On the Earth will reflect sunlight, also the Lander they had emits light
 Friends (0)