Bam Suck It. You can put your coat hangers away ladies... For all the people saying Obama was a terrible president. How the do you know? The Republican majority in the House of Representatives just blocked most things  Bam Suck It You can put your coat hangers away ladies For all the people saying Obama was a terrible president How do you know? The Republican majority in House of Representatives just blocked most things
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (533)
[ 533 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
127 comments displayed.
#55 - garyleneville
Reply +224
(11/07/2012) [-]
For all the people saying Obama was a terrible president. How the **** do you know? The Republican majority in the House of Representatives just blocked most things Obama tried to do. In fact, Obama had more things blocked than any president in history.
#151 to #55 - sethybob
-11
has deleted their comment [-]
#243 to #55 - xmegustax
Reply -1
(11/07/2012) [-]
#81 to #55 - rafikithenig
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
What if that is because he had the most bad ideas in history?

I'm not supporting either side i'm just saying people can spin anything all day long
#83 to #81 - garyleneville
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
That's why I said... "How the **** do you know?" Rather than, "you are definitely wrong".
#136 to #55 - abovelawl
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
not saying your wrong, or that I don't believe you, but how do you know this?
#139 to #136 - garyleneville
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
I'm a Politics student.
#142 to #139 - abovelawl
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
ah cool
#137 to #55 - anon
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
They had the majority the first two years. They still didnt do ****, like pass a budget.
#138 to #55 - anon
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
Republicans own the House again and half of Senate. Enjoy getting nothing passed.
#271 to #55 - anon
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
The same way you guys know how Romney would be a "terrible" president.
#568 to #271 - garyleneville
Reply 0
(11/08/2012) [-]
It depends what you want from a president. I think he has some extremely backward views on some moral issues and therefore I would not support him as a president.
#430 to #55 - petal
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
Bam.
Bam.
#477 to #55 - severepwner
Reply 0
(11/08/2012) [-]
And thank god for that. They didn't block Obamacare though did they. And that was a goat ****.
#534 to #55 - extremedefense
Reply 0
(11/08/2012) [-]
The House GOP passed thirty jobs bills in the past two years; not one has been called for a vote in the Senate. In the opening days of his kim jongistration it was BHO who said "Those are fine ideas, but I'm the President, we'll do it my way." Or his own chief of staff who said "F--k 'em; we have the votes." The party of obfuscation has been the Democrats for the past four years.
#114 to #55 - salari
Reply +1
(11/07/2012) [-]
It's true, not only that, but shortly after Obama came into office, they required the amount of votes for a bill to pass increased by 10 votes, meaning that many that bills that would've passed under normal circumstances (such as Warren Buffet's proposal to increase taxes by a small amount on the super-rich) failed to go through.

You hear a lot of Republicans say "Obama had his chance, and he failed". The irony is, is that every chance he tried to take, he was blocked by Republicans, possibly out of vanity of their party. Well, he's got four more years now, hopefully he can get more done now.
#212 to #55 - fyaq
Reply +2
(11/07/2012) [-]
bailouts, billions on his pet projects, and obamacare.


what part of this wasnt him?
#57 to #55 - vladcobhc
Reply +19
(11/07/2012) [-]
#80 to #55 - Cambro
Reply +104
(11/07/2012) [-]
For the first 2 years Obama had a Democratic Congress and the power to do anything they wanted. The preliminaries of universal healthcare went through at this time, but nothing really You need to login to view this link also included a highly liberal budget and the allowance of many of the bailouts. Obama had more of a majority in Congress than any president since probably Clinton. Also, Obama uses more executive orders than any president in history. They allow the president to go around Congress and do what he wants. I'm not positive where you got the "more things blocked than any other president" fact from, but I guess it could be plausible. The issue Obama really had was he did not deliver satisfactory to the people in his early term which made the nation freak out and vote in Republican congressman. Look at how close this election was, 49/49 for most of it and Republicans weren't even high on Mitt. If conservatives had someone better to run than a moderate flip flopper in his past, they could very well have won.
#109 to #80 - salari
Reply +15
(11/07/2012) [-]
If Republicans had a better candidate all-round, electing one of them into office wouldn't seem like such a terrifying concept. Nowadays it feels like one party is just an affront to the other, and they're ideologically completely at odds. The Republican party is just a shadow of how great it once was, it wasn't filled with bigots who campaigned on the back of keeping all individuals from sharing equal rights, or openly integrating outdated religious beliefs into modern laws.
#122 to #109 - thatonecarlkid
Reply +15
(11/07/2012) [-]
equal rights? gay marriage has been left up to the states for several years now. Republicans even believe in abortion, as long as the woman was raped or the woman's health is in danger. Republicans believe that abortion shouldn't be used as common contraception.
#479 to #122 - graphically
Reply +7
(11/08/2012) [-]
Romney stated that he wanted to ban gay marriage as well as abortion through constitutional ammendments which would over ride the state's say on the issues.

While the majority of pro-life advocates believe that abortion shouldn't be used as commonly as contraception, they're also against the use of contraceptives as well as sex ed to younger children and advocate celibacy due to movements strong religious foundation. Completely ignoring that banning abortion is going to be killing less unborn babies, but it's going to be putting more women's lives in danger who will want abortion whether it's illegal or not. What we should be focusing on is sex education, safe sex awareness, and increasing access to all forms of contraceptives.
#148 to #122 - Chuckaholic
Reply -5
(11/07/2012) [-]
Did you see the stuff saying that if it was rape the baby should be kept because it was Gods will. There were high end republicans with that viewpoint.
#149 to #148 - thatonecarlkid
Reply +16
(11/07/2012) [-]
That wasn't Mitt Romney's belief. He stated that he believed in situational abortions.
#341 to #149 - jakeattack
Reply -2
(11/07/2012) [-]
he also supported the personhood bill which would have banned all abortions and even some forms of contraception.
#150 to #149 - Chuckaholic
Reply -14
(11/07/2012) [-]
I didn't say him I said some high end republicans can't remember who off the top of my head but there were several powerful ones who were a bit scary with their views on abortion, gays etc.
#333 to #150 - pkmnmastersteve **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#401 to #109 - theannoyingFJguy
Reply -1
(11/07/2012) [-]
i lik poltics
#525 to #109 - eatingdisorder
Reply -3
(11/08/2012) [-]
This has nothing to do with which party is better or anything, but if a Republican for example Mitt Romney was elected then most likely the democratic supreme court members would of retired leaving the new U.S Pres to pick 3 new judges, and since he was republican he would most likely pick 3 Republicans leaving the supreme court fully Republican, and making more opportunities for things to get done than any democrat would.
This has nothing to do with which party is better or anything, but if a Republican for example Mitt Romney was elected then most likely the democratic supreme court members would of retired leaving the new U.S Pres to pick 3 new judges, and since he was republican he would most likely pick 3 Republicans leaving the supreme court fully Republican, and making more opportunities for things to get done than any democrat would.
#211 to #80 - errydayimshufflin
Reply +10
(11/07/2012) [-]
Not to nitpick or anything, but "the highest majority of Congress since Clinton" just means he had more than Bush.
#422 to #80 - dinonator
Reply +6
(11/07/2012) [-]
I DONT KNOW WTF IS GOING ON just being dutch
#569 to #80 - garyleneville
Reply 0
(11/08/2012) [-]
And, anyway, the point still stands. When Obama attempted to pass policies the Republicans blocked it, as I said more than ever before.
#567 to #80 - garyleneville
Reply 0
(11/08/2012) [-]
He did not have 'the power to do anything he wanted' because there are no Whips in America and congress is a separate institution to the president.
#352 to #80 - furyofthestorm
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
I like you. I just saved what you said in a .txt because I learned something today.
#147 to #80 - anon
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
Dude I'm guessing you didn't know but Obama would've had a higher win percentage if Halo 4 didn't come out the same day as the election, so it's not really 49/49.
#179 to #147 - swedishviking
Reply -4
(11/07/2012) [-]
thought of the same thing a week ago xD
#140 - traveltech
Reply +98
(11/07/2012) [-]
**traveltech rolled a random image posted in comment #22 at Minecraft Halloween! **
Mitt's reaction
#174 to #140 - willindor
-2
has deleted their comment [-]
#153 to #140 - anon
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolls 99** epic roll is epic
#161 to #153 - ZeBigD
Reply -1
(11/07/2012) [-]
**ZeBigD rolls 46** magical thread?
#163 to #161 - ZeBigD
Reply +1
(11/07/2012) [-]
Preparing my anus to be showered with red thumbs.
#67 - metajunky
Reply +74
(11/07/2012) [-]
#60 - jjjjjh
Reply +57
(11/07/2012) [-]
Okay, I'm a non-American who doesn't care much for politics. Why does everyone say Obama is the worst president ever?

All I hear is "OUR COUNTRY IS IN DEBT". Yeah, in debt due to a war that was caused by the previous president. Obama is trying to clear that war up. America can't just storm a country saying they'll help, blow **** up and suddenly pull the troops out in a day. They have to at least try and restore **** before pulling out and that's what Obama seems to be trying to do.
#64 to #60 - elatedmonkey
Reply -2
(11/07/2012) [-]
Oh believe me, not everyone says that Obama is the worst president. If they did, he would't have been reelected yesterday!

Those that do say that he is have a very short-term memory and seem to have forgotten just how bad things were before he took office.
#120 to #64 - thatonecarlkid
Reply +2
(11/07/2012) [-]
gas was $1.85 before he was inaugurated. Just saying.
#514 to #120 - imaninjaslapyou
Reply +1
(11/08/2012) [-]
The prices were so low because of the recession starting. Oil was in low demand right then.
#559 to #514 - elatedmonkey
Reply 0
(11/08/2012) [-]
Thank you so much for understanding this concept. I'm glad someone knows basic economics.
#574 to #559 - imaninjaslapyou
Reply 0
(11/08/2012) [-]
I try my best.
#77 to #60 - xldarkking
Reply +1
(11/07/2012) [-]
What people fail to realize about Obama's last term was that he was a democratic president with a primarily Republican House and Senate. He wasn't gunna get much done because of that and even then the stuff that could be passed would have to be a compromise. It's not as easy to do that.

Plus Obama is the poster boy that people can blame instead of those voted into house or senate....
#141 to #60 - yuknowherpderp
Reply +1
(11/07/2012) [-]
Thank you.    
******* THANK YOU    
   
All the Republicunts keep saying "oh we're in debt and Obama sux hurrdurr" but finally someone realizes it, none of them would ever consider what you said unfortunately because they're all willfully ******* ignorant bags of **** that can't deal with reality.  You are a good man, have a good day, sir.
Thank you.
******* THANK YOU

All the Republicunts keep saying "oh we're in debt and Obama sux hurrdurr" but finally someone realizes it, none of them would ever consider what you said unfortunately because they're all willfully ******* ignorant bags of **** that can't deal with reality. You are a good man, have a good day, sir.
#220 to #141 - anon
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
The war had NOTHING TO ******* DO WITH SPENDING TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS. You're an ignorant bitch who probably watches MSNBC all day and yes we are in Debt. HUUGGEEE ******* amounts of it $16 trillion ******* dollars. We have to pay that back eventually. Money just doesn't appear one ******* day and say hey spend me!! It comes from a supply and demand factor and all of Obamas frivolous spending defaces the value of our dollar like never before. How can we say that we are the economic power of the world when ALONE china owns 10% of it. That debt HAS to be paid off some how and right now the only way that seems to be able to happen is by taxing even more or cutting benefits.

Not only that but imagine if gas was $3.84 during Bush's term. People would be going ******* insane. But it's fine that when Obama is president and it can hit $4 a gallon, No problem. Can't be his fault for that right? Or you know we could take responsibility for our own resources...
#249 to #220 - yuknowherpderp
Reply +3
(11/07/2012) [-]
Obviously we are in debt **** bag, I know that, but that debt was not all Obama's fault, plus Obama does not control gas prices, neither did Bush when he was in office, that has to do with oil companies, retard. Also on debt, if you Republicunts want to decrease the deficit and the debt THEN ROMNEY WOULDN'T HAVE WORKED, YOU KNOW WHY? Because he wanted to increase the military budget by $2.1 trillion, your wonderful conservative wants to piss away money on the military and **** over the middle class while helping the rich. Obama isn't perfect, but he is and will always be better than Mittens. Also, log in, good sir.
#258 to #141 - xmegustax
Reply -2
(11/07/2012) [-]
All the democrats are saying that they support Obama because "He's black" (Well informed and mature reason) or "Mitt Romney is too rich" (What's wrong with having a president that can handle money) or "Mitt Romney lies to much" (But no one has been able to tell me what he has lied about, meanwhile I have examples of Obama's lies)
#62 to #60 - sluttygoat
Reply +2
(11/07/2012) [-]
Obama is still deploying troops to Afghanistan and will most likely bomb Iran in the near future. Also, he spends more money on bailouts than the government can actually afford,
#75 to #62 - stallwallwriter
Reply +1
(11/07/2012) [-]
I think the Iran contention is overblown. I can't imagine American's want another foreign engagement after what they've been through/are still caught up in.
Also, it was either pay big in bailouts or see a lot of people lose their jobs because Wall Street is primarily composed of giant bleeding assholes.
#85 to #60 - fosforgasxiii
Reply +2
(11/07/2012) [-]
Americans don't like big governments (bailing out companies, welfare programms...) because they think that's evil, still a remnant of the cold war. Ask an average American what he thinks of Europe and there's a big chance he says something like "ew, they're socialists".
#119 to #60 - thatonecarlkid
Reply +3
(11/07/2012) [-]
Obama spent more money in the first three years of his term than George Bush did in all 8 years.
#79 to #60 - rafikithenig
Reply +12
(11/07/2012) [-]
Contrary to this pic i don't support the war. Obama (before he was president) PROMISED us, i mean stood in front of this nation and promised that he would get our troops home right away. Now it has been four years and he plans to get them back in another two.

Do i feel bad for people living it bad conditions over seas? yes
Is it my problem? no

If we had money that would be one thing but we don't so we shouldn't stick our nose where it doesn't belong and Obama has done nothing at all to get our nose out.
#124 to #79 - europe
Reply +4
(11/07/2012) [-]
what makes you think that he hasn't tried?
#82 to #79 - anon
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
Obama actually stated before he was elected president the first time that it would take longer than the 4 years he'd be in term.
The problem was, Obama was stuck with a republican senate or something, which meant that they could oppose any decision that Obama made.
Now the republicans are out, things will change.
#91 to #82 - fosforgasxiii
Reply +2
(11/07/2012) [-]
It was a republican house of representatives. And the problem is that the house is still in republican hands. The senate is still democratic.
#84 to #82 - defeats
Reply +1
(11/07/2012) [-]
This was my comment, but yeah, Obama's the man, don't let any haters persuade you otherwise.
#497 - ryanfitzy
Reply +56
(11/08/2012) [-]
**ryanfitzy rolls 6** 6?
#498 to #497 - kripke
-2
has deleted their comment [-]
#511 to #498 - waffies
Reply +1
(11/08/2012) [-]
wh.... what? troll? psychic? how would EITHER of those apply?
#500 to #497 - yoshiwalker
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#502 to #497 - noobtankz
Reply 0
(11/08/2012) [-]
What the ****.
#510 to #497 - SomeBodyy
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#519 to #497 - TheShadowHog
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#529 to #497 - anticitezenone
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#545 to #497 - counteractive
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#6 - gagster
Reply -207
(11/07/2012) [-]
I'm sorry, but did Mitt already lose? Oh, that's right. The election isn't even over yet. In fact, it's only 86%. Does not having the lead at 86% count as a loss? Is that what you're saying? Because if you're saying that I can assure you that you're wrong. Why would you make this topic when the election is still on? Mitt are still playing right now and they have been the best party in the US for how many terms now? He's against one of the worst presidents in history who just happen to have a lead because they're feeding off the projections of the voters. But you know what? They still ******* suck. Romney is one of the best ******* candidates in the Republican party, it was 50/50 last month and would of won the debate if the ****** didn't cheat. Maybe you should shut the **** up before you make retarded topics like this. You know why? Because you're going to be embarrassed when Romney wins and someone bumps this topic. Oh look at that, Romney just got west virginia, just like Bush did. Are you a ******* drunk? Are you retarded? Are you autistic? You are a ******* idiot and you should never make a topic on this board again and I'm ******* serious. I almost have a feeling you're the only guy making all these anti-Mitt topics because you're a faggot hater who doesn't like the Republicans because they're good. **** you, be good at something in YOUR life and then maybe try to troll these ******* teams on the board, like I give a ****. It's so easy to spot out your threads now, you're a retard. Always doing stupid **** like this. Why don't you try to be a good poster? Just for once? For once in your ******* life try not to make a topic Iike this. That's just you, you're always right at getting it wrong. **** you. You are nothing.
#24 to #6 - striderxir
Reply +18
(11/07/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#9 to #6 - ronyx ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/07/2012) [-]
**ronyx rolled a random image posted in comment #1310249 at Item Discussion **Aw **** *****, you should at least break that wall of text if you're going to post this **** more than once.
#17 to #9 - whiteniggers
-9
has deleted their comment [-]
#19 to #6 - torchrose
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
>Republicans
>Best party
#36 to #6 - anon
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
What the **** did you just ******* say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the **** out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my ******* words.
#37 to #36 - churrundo
Reply -2
(11/07/2012) [-]
hey, precision, they are saying your name again
#70 to #6 - deathdiedead
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#78 to #6 - incomingdespair
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
Obvious troll is obvious.
#39 to #6 - dobbyisafreeelf
Reply +1
(11/07/2012) [-]
Someone seems slightly angry
#38 to #6 - ibashfunnyjunk
Reply +7
(11/07/2012) [-]
#33 to #6 - hawaiianman
Reply +8
(11/07/2012) [-]
#34 to #6 - hawaiianman
Reply +8
(11/07/2012) [-]
#7 to #6 - psmallzz [OP]
Reply +9
(11/07/2012) [-]
I read about half of this before I determined that you're pretty ****** in the head bro.
#10 to #7 - mynameisgeorge
Reply +15
(11/07/2012) [-]
It's copypasta

I'm really tired of telling people that
#20 to #10 - anon
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
Went to downvote all ************ posts, decided to check original one first, SUDDENLY IT ALL MAKES SENSE.
#14 to #7 - whiteniggers
-11
has deleted their comment [-]
#25 to #6 - trevorsta
Reply +11
(11/07/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#72 to #6 - deathdiedead
Reply +13
(11/07/2012) [-]
#26 to #6 - orangepikmin
Reply +2
(11/07/2012) [-]
Obama already has the required amount for the electoral votes. Based on our system of voting, the electoral college votes tally up to be based on the number of Representitives in the House. This means that in order to get elected, you must acquire a certain amount of electoral votes. In our time, you need 270 electoral votes in order to win. Obama, last time I checked, recieved 303 votes. Ergo, Obama wins.
Calm yourself before you post something.
#48 to #26 - wisdombranch
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
Under our system Obama definitely won... but what was the popular vote?
#50 to #48 - wisdombranch
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
Nevermind: www.examiner.com "As of this writing [3 hours ago], 50.1% (58,720,700) of the popular vote goes to Obama, while Romney has 48.4% (56,145,950)."
#12 to #6 - roflcopterkklol **User deleted account**
Reply +2
(11/07/2012) [-]
What is surprising is you are so retarded that in the past 6 hours no one else has left a new comment on this post.
#15 to #12 - whiteniggers
-11
has deleted their comment [-]
#170 to #6 - gagster
Reply +6
(11/07/2012) [-]
#86 to #6 - stallwallwriter
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
I assume the name "gagster" comes from the sound you make while vomiting on your keyboard like you did here?
#44 to #6 - senoldlx
Reply +6
(11/07/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#73 to #6 - jamiemsm
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
so.......
how about some feedback now
#94 to #6 - kodex
Reply +4
(11/07/2012) [-]
#40 to #6 - spycheckingpyro
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
#30 to #6 - mcbiggles
Reply +3
(11/07/2012) [-]
I favorited this comment to laugh at your ignorance when i'm feeling down.
#35 to #6 - darthjangopwnz
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
#28 to #6 - pipedt
Reply +3
(11/07/2012) [-]
Hahahahaha, you are funny, I love how you called him a ******. So, white republican I suppose? Hey I was born and raised in Mexico and moved to the U.S.A. and I vote for Obama, so that makes me a beaner democrat?
#45 to #28 - wisdombranch
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
Nah, he is probably a nazi party follower. ... and yes they are still on the ballot.
#11 to #6 - fuckberries
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
no.. he lost because he resigned from the race...
#16 to #11 - whiteniggers
-11
has deleted their comment [-]
#23 to #6 - kurd
Reply +3
(11/07/2012) [-]
"like a give a ****"


No sir you do not give a ****, you give a **** ton of *****. Holy **** how mad are you?
#105 to #6 - messerschmidto ONLINE
Reply -11
(11/07/2012) [-]
I'm so sorry.    
You don't deserve this.   
Hang in there, the sheep are angry.
I'm so sorry.
You don't deserve this.
Hang in there, the sheep are angry.
#113 to #105 - Brucis
Reply +3
(11/07/2012) [-]
>the sheep are angry
The 'sheep' are amused. He is angry.
#110 to #105 - voltkills ONLINE
Reply +1
(11/07/2012) [-]
"sheep" like your any different, saying that the 50% who voted for obama are "sheep" is ******* dumb since Romney got 48%, that makes romney supporters nearly as bad as sheep and also ********* at the same time.
#111 to #110 - messerschmidto ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/07/2012) [-]
If you do not think for yourself, you are a sheep.
And big brother loves sheep.
#112 to #111 - voltkills ONLINE
Reply +1
(11/07/2012) [-]
i am not a sheep, im from the uk, so your politics dont influence my life at all, im just interested. now see, what i dont get is why you think you are any better then the ombama supporters....
#87 to #6 - isaacbn
Reply +2
(11/07/2012) [-]
**isaacbn rolled a random image posted in comment #127 at Weird Sh*t Bro ** Comment deletion in 5...4...3...
**isaacbn rolled a random image posted in comment #127 at Weird Sh*t Bro ** Comment deletion in 5...4...3...
#107 to #87 - voltkills ONLINE
Reply +4
(11/07/2012) [-]
what the ****
what the ****
#97 to #87 - flyingwhale
Reply +1
(11/07/2012) [-]
dat roll
#8 to #6 - killergrid
Reply +52
(11/07/2012) [-]
AWW IS SOMEONE BUTTHURT ?
#13 to #8 - whiteniggers
-11
has deleted their comment [-]
#31 to #13 - evilmonkeycss
Reply +5
(11/07/2012) [-]
no one ******* cares if its copypasta its stupid. should we thumb him up because he thinks hes trolling? no.
#32 to #31 - whiteniggers
Reply -5
(11/07/2012) [-]
No, I said it's a copypasta because everyone is BELIEVING THAT HE'S SERIOUS.
#146 - mrkillernine
Reply +35
(11/07/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#328 - kidsquicker
Reply +34
(11/07/2012) [-]
And I would have gotten elected, if it hadn't been for those meddling swing-states!
#131 - suzukihondacivic
Reply +31
(11/07/2012) [-]
obama is cool guy.
obama is cool guy.
#156 - brianhimself
Reply +26
(11/07/2012) [-]
Romney didn't have a job to begin with did he?
He holds no political office and he is no longer with Bain Capital.
#199 to #156 - goochmaster
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
He's actually going to resume being governor of Massachusetts
#300 to #199 - kaitheguy
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
no, we have governor Deval Patrick.. and have had him for a while now
#215 to #199 - anon
Reply 0
(11/07/2012) [-]
Mass. lost relevance when the revolutionary war ended anyway.