Simple math. Click this: . um 1 Then: 2: 95 xas. real answer Cars crashes
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (106)
[ 106 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
40 comments displayed.
#1 - bigbawser
Reply +28
(11/05/2012) [-]
Is it bad that i read the title as "Simple Meth"?
#2 to #1 - bleeduntildeath
Reply +82
(11/05/2012) [-]
fixed
#81 to #2 - drfranky
Reply +5
(11/06/2012) [-]
Stay out of my territory
#60 to #2 - drfranky
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#5 - rainbowtacos
Reply +40
(11/05/2012) [-]
******* math.
#100 to #5 - elcreepo
Reply -1
(11/06/2012) [-]
Why would you go through all that just to prove that 3 times 9 equals 27.

A third grader could tell you the answer.
#23 to #5 - anon
Reply 0
(11/06/2012) [-]
wait...lolwat. 3 times the square root of 81=81 divided by 3?
#43 to #23 - shadir
Reply 0
(11/06/2012) [-]
Actually that's not wrong since both equals 27

3 X square root of 81 = 3 X 9 = 27
81/3 = 27
27 = 27

This isn't wrong.
The only thing wrong is how he solves the equation, not every equation will be able to be done like that
#41 to #5 - kolsinder
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#58 to #41 - Bigelow
Reply +1
(11/06/2012) [-]
"√81 can be rewritten as 9 x 9"
no
#61 to #58 - kolsinder
Reply 0
(11/06/2012) [-]
Crap, what an embarrassing mistake to make... Regardless, the picture is still largely meaningless. Does 81/3 = √81 x 3 really merit the title of "******* math"?
#13 to #5 - yourbaus
Reply +16
(11/06/2012) [-]
Im sure Im not the only one who sees whats wrong with this equation
#15 to #13 - randomnezz
Reply -77
(11/06/2012) [-]
Ohai look...


Surely everyone knows you can't divide by 0 >.>
#27 to #15 - retardedtriforce
Reply +47
(11/06/2012) [-]
Are you 12?
#21 to #15 - points
Reply +8
(11/06/2012) [-]
That is not a division... it's shorthand for showing subtraction.
#94 to #15 - thenickel
Reply +3
(11/06/2012) [-]
I feel bad for you, no one gets your joke.
#99 to #15 - sweateagle
Reply +1
(11/06/2012) [-]
#59 - jasonrussel
Reply +40
(11/06/2012) [-]
real answer
#30 - hyrule
Reply +21
(11/06/2012) [-]
Actually the two sided limit is undefined. But as x approaches 8 from the left, the limit is -infinity. As x approaches 8 from the right, the limit goes to +infinity.

Sources: I'm Chinese. I'm born with this knowledge imbued in me.
#37 to #30 - thenamlessguy
Reply +2
(11/06/2012) [-]
SO!

Hyrule is located in China!
I knew it existed!

THEY CALLED ME CRAZY
#33 - darman
Reply +13
(11/06/2012) [-]
Neither of the two limits exist.
Neither of the two limits exist.
#34 to #33 - anon
Reply 0
(11/06/2012) [-]
The question is asking what the equation approaches as x gets closer to the limit but not what it is AT the limit. so in both it would be +- infinity because you are dividing over a number that is infinitely small in + or - depending on what direction you approach from. [url deleted]
is a graph of both of these questions (not really but it shows the idea)
#35 to #34 - partnerintroll
Reply +15
(11/06/2012) [-]
No. Math has notation just like English has grammar. The limit doesnt exist because coming from the right and coming from the left the limits are different, meaning the overall limit does not exist.

Pic related. It's the same way with math. If it was limx->8- [1/(x-8)] then it would be true
#38 to #35 - flameroo
Reply +1
(11/06/2012) [-]
thumbed for logic (and knowledge)
#47 to #35 - darman
Reply 0
(11/06/2012) [-]
Thanks for explaining that to silly anon while I was away! Have thumb and this gif!
Thanks for explaining that to silly anon while I was away! Have thumb and this gif!
#40 to #35 - anon
Reply 0
(11/06/2012) [-]
This is why schools should just use standard limit notation. (parentheses) for approaches without bound, and [brackets] for reaches. so this would be (-∞,5) (5,∞) because the function never has an X value of negitive infinity, 5, or positive infinity.
#66 to #35 - dubstepforme
Reply -2
(11/06/2012) [-]
you just said the same thing twice
#45 - dragonchick
-18
has deleted their comment [-]
#46 to #45 - anon
Reply 0
(11/06/2012) [-]
Actually that's only true if you're assuming x=8, so y(x-8) would be infinity x zero which equals 1. What's more, in the case that (x-8) is zero or even less than one, y would have to be greater than one for the whole thing to equal 1.
#49 to #45 - DrBobsPatient
Reply +12
(11/06/2012) [-]
it's the limit of, you idiot. limit doesn't mean equal to.
#79 - gunmetal
Reply +11
(11/06/2012) [-]
How the **** repost like this get so many thumbs?
#91 - holololland
Reply +6
(11/06/2012) [-]
**holololland rolled a random image posted in comment #1228229 at Item Discussion ** mfw math
#102 to #91 - haseotakaeda
Reply +2
(11/06/2012) [-]
******* perfect
#36 - blackenvy
Reply +5
(11/06/2012) [-]
I remember seeing the picture as a kid. At that time I was looking at it for 30 min trying to figure out how it is done. In the end I have come to a conclusion that I just can t do it.   
On this very day in exactly 1 h I have a partial exam in limes and demand and supply functions. Is it irony that I see this picture today ?
I remember seeing the picture as a kid. At that time I was looking at it for 30 min trying to figure out how it is done. In the end I have come to a conclusion that I just can t do it.
On this very day in exactly 1 h I have a partial exam in limes and demand and supply functions. Is it irony that I see this picture today ?
#55 to #36 - cryingchicken
Reply 0
(11/06/2012) [-]
No. It isn't irony.

Irony: The expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect.
#56 - kanatana ONLINE
Reply +4
(11/06/2012) [-]
This took me a second to get, I never took higher mathematics