pretty much. . TH_ lhl( S HMS Will an PUT. "people who will use guns to kill will obey our stricter gun laws because they're such upstanding citizens!"
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #11 - iamthou ONLINE (11/04/2012) [+] (1 reply)
"people who will use guns to kill will obey our stricter gun laws because they're such upstanding citizens!"
User avatar #4 - JwBread (11/04/2012) [+] (3 replies)
Whenever I see this, I always think her hair is actually turds.
#33 - deletedmyaccount (11/05/2012) [+] (3 replies)
Outlaw guns? Good policy. I mean, criminals can't break laws, right?

#125 - mrskids (11/05/2012) [+] (4 replies)
I live in New Zealand, we have very strict gun laws here. Shootings don't really ever occur, when they do it's a BIG deal, like front page news. Police rarely carry guns, because there's no need, because no one has a gun.
I agree that when someone shoots and kills a person, it is their fault, not the gun's. However, I still think that strict gun laws do lower the frequency of gun related deaths.
User avatar #115 - jinjo (11/05/2012) [+] (2 replies)
I just feel that there should be stricter laws on guns.

I'm Canadian, and we have, I think, more gun owners per capita than the US. But our laws are stricter so we have a lot less gun related deaths per capita as well.

And obviously it doesn't stop people from getting shot, I lived in the ********* city in the country for 7 years of my life, and I live 45 minutes from Toronto, so I'm aware that there are still murders every day.

Maybe it's just because I know we have strict laws, but I really feel that the US should also have stricter laws than they have now.
#88 - bacontrips has deleted their comment [+] (2 replies)
User avatar #90 to #88 - Ruspanic ONLINE (11/05/2012) [-]
Missing the point.
The point is that if making pot illegal hasn't stopped people from obtaining and smoking it, making guns illegal is certainly not going to stop violent criminals from obtaining them.
#129 - pinta **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (2 replies)
User avatar #15 - hubaa (11/05/2012) [+] (8 replies)
Not instantly but eventually gun laws will decrease the amount of guns since it will be a lot harder to get one. It may take decades but I think that gun laws will help. Yeah you can kill person with a knife and yeah you can still get guns but less guns to civilians is a good thing if you ask me. I live in Europe and this is just my humble opinion.
#26 to #15 - Aejax (11/05/2012) [-]
"I live in Europe"

Your argument is invalid
#141 - dingbox (11/05/2012) [+] (10 replies)
Laws against guns works pretty fine here in sweden, even socialism works here.
User avatar #133 - qjmihuia (11/05/2012) [+] (1 reply)
every time i see this face i want to go inside my laptop and punch it really hard!

i hate hippies
#190 - loveyameanish (11/05/2012) [-]
She looks like if you touched her your hand would smell for a while...
She looks like if you touched her your hand would smell for a while...
#64 - pickledpee (11/05/2012) [+] (6 replies)
Alright, **** it, serious opinion time. Posted a mostly useless comment earlier and I enjoy a good pointless debate.

People who keep saying **** like "Oh criminals don't follow the laws hurr durr" don't realize that putting regulations on guns would make it much harder for anyone to own or operate a firearm, as well as make it easier to track down punish those who do break the law. It's not that they follow the rules or regulations, it's just that being able to have access to them and carry them around would make it just as obvious as, say, someone smoking pot in their front yard. The police would be able to find and take down those without the proper credentials and provide them with a fine or imprisonment.

As far as legalizing marijuana is concerned, I don't give a **** . Maybe de-criminalize it, or put the same regulations and taxes on it as alcohol, but either way I wouldn't do it.
#156 - gorgonzolarolla (11/05/2012) [+] (3 replies)

her hair looks like nugs
User avatar #139 - bgbba (11/05/2012) [+] (1 reply)
Well, in defense of the whole gun control argument, it's not exactly easy to mass produce illegal guns. Or more accurately workable illegal guns. Pot is a freaking plant for gods sakes. All you have to do is grow it in the basement and then sell it to the local stoners. Guns require a lot of mechanical expertise as well as industrial production to make more than a few of them, not to mention the fact that nobody wants to ban ALL guns. And let's not forget that a black market would be pretty small given the amount of people who NEED guns on demand is pretty small. So while this pic is somewhat true, it isn't entirely accurate to compare the two.
User avatar #132 - thepastryistrue (11/05/2012) [-]
Thinks laws will keep people from owning apples

Smokes banana.
User avatar #94 - MegaAwesomeSauce (11/05/2012) [+] (4 replies)
Who the **** thought it was a good idea to think the majority of the population should own a gun?

This? From a site that thinks the majority of people are technically retarded? I mean, banning guns outright is a bit too far but surely it should be a little harder to get hold of one. I can get hold of one as long as I am of legal age and after I wait a few days. I don't have to do a psych test to make sure I am not going to shoot someone with it.

Above all, I don't see the point of owning a gun, you wouldn't need one for protection if the gun laws were a bit tighter, you wouldn't need it to overthrow your government, because, well you can't overthrow a government with a pistol if they have multiple war machines.
User avatar #97 to #94 - Zarke (11/05/2012) [-]
To quote Air Farce...

"If you outlaw guns, outlaws will have guns!"

It's kind've true, really. Up here in Canada, the laws are a bit tougher. It gets to the point where if you wanted to go through the process to get a handgun legally, you aren't the kind of person who would do something dangerous anyways (that and you need a few character witnesses and a clean criminal record). However, this summer's had a few public shootings (I'm pretty sure a few of them involved handguns) that were thoroughly covered by the media. You think these kids went through the licensing and registration process to get them?
#82 - hankhillofthe (11/05/2012) [+] (1 reply)
#83 to #82 - hankhillofthe (11/05/2012) [-]
the **** is that
User avatar #169 - noopis ONLINE (11/05/2012) [+] (5 replies)
I don't get how the liberals can be smart about drugs saying "prohibition will only create a black market" but when it comes to guns they're the exact opposite "get rid of all the guns!" I'm pretty far left myself but god dayum people have a right to arm themselves, and really taking away people's guns is pretty much impossible. There's more armed civilians than there are people in our military, if you try to take these people's guns they'll shoot you. And I don't think we can afford to send SWAT teams to everyone's homes until the gun owner's run out of ammo. Guns are a necessary evil, as long as there are criminals people will need to arm themselves. Although I am more of a hidden blade guy, if someone has you at gunpoint it's easier to get close and stab the ****** in the throat than it is to pull out your gun, aim, and shoot. But that's just me.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)