Homosexuality is a sin. I bet they would love to join them... >Support gay rights >Really horny one day >Get some friends together >Make some signs >Pretend to be gay bashers and set up camp >Watch girls  lesbians are awe
x

Comments(270):

[ 270 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#11 - thunderpony ONLINE (10/10/2012) [-]
MFW the girls are not even lesbians
#22 - pariahlol (10/10/2012) [-]
>Support gay rights
>Really horny one day
>Get some friends together
>Make some signs
>Pretend to be gay bashers and set up camp
>Watch girls make-out
>???????
>Profit
User avatar #58 to #22 - elbrysobrony (10/10/2012) [-]
Watch out, man. Might get some gay guys too.
User avatar #41 to #22 - colegaleener (10/10/2012) [-]
Get cursed at by passersby
Someone pulls out a glock
'Holy *****
Run for your life
Shot in the appendix
Pray it away, man
#166 to #41 - sideffect (10/10/2012) [-]
Get shot in the appendix   
Don't really need one anyways   
Get it removed   
Spared pain of appendicitis   
and watch girls make out   
sounds like a profit to me.
Get shot in the appendix
Don't really need one anyways
Get it removed
Spared pain of appendicitis
and watch girls make out
sounds like a profit to me.
#208 - anon (10/10/2012) [-]
5$ says those were 2 straight girls who thought "OMG this would look so awesome on tumblr, lets les out for the cam!"
#125 - LaughedatThat (10/10/2012) [-]
If someone likes watching lesbian porn, does that technically mean they like gay porn?
If someone likes watching lesbian porn, does that technically mean they like gay porn?
0
#126 to #125 - LaughedatThat has deleted their comment [-]
#182 to #125 - EKcEntRIC (10/10/2012) [-]
yes, lesbian is a turn of phrase used for gay women since gay men are phanny bandits
User avatar #130 to #125 - notmutzaki (10/10/2012) [-]
Yes, why wouldn't it?
User avatar #132 to #125 - LegititmateKyle (10/10/2012) [-]
Yes. Then you just have to be specific about it.
User avatar #131 to #125 - iamthebestfapper (10/10/2012) [-]
Ohhh..... **** .
User avatar #244 to #125 - xxxdemongirl (10/10/2012) [-]
Yes. it also means that nobody that has watched lesbian porn can oppose gay marriage unless they're hypocrites.
#127 to #125 - therealowenevr (10/10/2012) [-]
...That's actually a good point...
User avatar #220 to #127 - guywithafork (10/10/2012) [-]
Thats from a hentai...
#138 to #125 - blackswat (10/10/2012) [-]
you have a good point
#251 - theswagmobile (10/10/2012) [-]
Something tells me they're not even lesbian.
User avatar #271 to #251 - dengekisushi (10/10/2012) [-]
I had that same feeling when pictures of people of the same sex kissing in front of Chik-Fil-A were circulating the internet.
#89 - grimmwaters ONLINE (10/10/2012) [-]
User avatar #64 - xdiabolicx (10/10/2012) [-]
bet those hypocrites all got raging boners
+6
#189 - zahnradthereposter **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #4 - ericforeman (10/09/2012) [-]
I live in Topeka Kansas and recently ******* with the Phelps has become a very common past time. Every time I drive d own 10th and Gage I see those ******* with their signs and like 2 or 3 gay couples making out like crazy. It's GREAT!
User avatar #16 to #4 - garrettjacobsen (10/10/2012) [-]
Would you like to have gay sex with me at said rally next week?
#35 to #4 - jeroylenkins (10/10/2012) [-]
We should hook up at their next protest give me the details and I'll be there.
We should hook up at their next protest give me the details and I'll be there.
#12 to #4 - thefasrdog (10/10/2012) [-]
Topeka?
Topeka?
#128 to #12 - EdwardNigma (10/10/2012) [-]
***** sake, THE ONE TIME, the ONE TIME I see the chance to finally use that gif, and someone already did it TEN HOURS AGO.

**** .
User avatar #107 - kinglobster (10/10/2012) [-]
10 bucks says those arent lesbians, theyre whores.
User avatar #118 to #107 - warrenzthehero (10/10/2012) [-]
Oh, they were. I was there, and they were.
User avatar #284 to #170 - warrenzthehero (10/10/2012) [-]
I was there. It was in Austin two(?) weeks ago. After a while, I bought a 3'x5' flag and held in front of their signs. I saw these two. They were pretty whorish.
User avatar #162 - LookinHereWhy (10/10/2012) [-]
I'd like to tell you what Jesus said bout homosexuality.
I'd like to but he didn't say anything.
#171 to #162 - aaricbrewer (10/10/2012) [-]
That's what I thought here until I looked at the second right's "citation" and found something that said it.... Although it said men on men, not female on female :)

1 Corinthians 6:9
User avatar #230 to #171 - xxxdemongirl (10/10/2012) [-]
This is the direct translation from the original Greek, not the Vatican's flawed over-translation.

"Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God."

Anyone who has premarital sex, masturbates, worships those other than God (as many Christians actually do; they may not see it, but many actually worship the saints they pray to), any man who takes on some responsibilities that used to be purely associated with women (ie, taking care of a child, cooking, cleaning), men who treat other men as inferior, and anyone who drinks.

This verse does not actually condemn homosexuality at all. And it's also not the words of Jesus. It's the beliefs of Paul, written in a letter.
#291 to #230 - aaricbrewer (10/11/2012) [-]
Then.... no fapping? :(
User avatar #292 to #291 - xxxdemongirl (10/11/2012) [-]
most things people do are outlawed by the Bible. it doesn't mean that they're still considered bad in today's society.

so no, no fapping.
+12
#205 - mousekill **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
0
#206 to #205 - gritsreborn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #212 to #206 - techketzer (10/10/2012) [-]
By posing in front of a camera for the sake of attention.
Maybe.
0
#216 to #212 - gritsreborn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #217 to #216 - techketzer (10/10/2012) [-]
How would you know they're making a point? That's just another assumption.
Practice what you preach, hypocrite.

Love is something very personal and intimate. It's not unthinkable to argue that using/instrumentalising it for either attention or political leverage is highly unethical.
-5
#219 to #217 - gritsreborn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #223 to #219 - techketzer (10/10/2012) [-]
You've got it all wrong.
It's you who has to put forward evidence of them being an actual couple.
You're not doing this whole logic thing terribly often, do you?

Yes, exactly. Good luck finding any absolute in ethics.
Are you even thinking about what you're writing in here?
0
#231 to #223 - gritsreborn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #247 to #231 - techketzer (10/10/2012) [-]
That's not at all what happened.
TO voiced an opinion, an observation to be exact.
You asked for his reasons to come to this conclusion.
At that point, I named a possible reason.
You completely dismissed it with absolutely no evidence as to why.
Upon my inquiry on how you could know that, you put forward a completely baseless claim, no evidence, no reasoning, no nothing.
Then I told you to stick to your own standards, which you failed to do, as well as providing another possible explanation for TO's interpretation of this picture.

Notice how I have not at all claimed any knowledge or even voiced my own opinion yet? No, of course you didn't. That's why I have to spoon-feed this to you.

tl;dr: You're possibly the biggest failure I've met all week. You'd be terribly offended if you knew what that actually means for you.
0
#259 to #247 - gritsreborn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #267 to #259 - techketzer (10/10/2012) [-]
>I listed possibilities advocatus diaboli-style. That changes the matter fundamentally, wouldn't you agree?

>Do you seriously not understand the difference between "to assert" and "to suggest"?
Also, I suggest you apply that quote to itself to uncover its fallacy.

>You made an assumption based on the photo. There is no way of knowing whether we are looking at a legit couple here from looking at the photo alone.
Even if, my argument of abusing romance for attention or political leverage still stands, so I don't understand your obsession with this point in the first place.

>What exactly do you not understand about the word "maybe"?
I suggest you look it up, it's of pivotal importance here.

>Silly kid, one does not stoop to a higher level. That is called "ascend".
0
#279 to #267 - gritsreborn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #280 to #279 - techketzer (10/10/2012) [-]
Again, I have not made a single claim anywhere. I was cautious not to.
You might want to read up on what a hypothesis is and how the word "maybe" relates to it.

This is getting very dull very quickly.
And no, we're doing this chronologically.
It's your turn to provide evidence for "They're making a point". How do you know?
#249 to #231 - fawkwayne (10/10/2012) [-]
<--- MFW your a 			*******		 narrow minded idiot who doesn't know how to see any point of view but his own.
<--- MFW your a ******* narrow minded idiot who doesn't know how to see any point of view but his own.
0
#252 to #249 - gritsreborn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #256 to #252 - fawkwayne (10/10/2012) [-]
I don't need to prove you wrong moron.
You are like high ranking politicians, you shove what you believe down our throats. But when we present alternatives, you blatantly deny them as blasphemy.

I honestly wouldn't be surprised if you were a homophobic prick who is just trying to get some attention on FJ by claiming to be pro gay.
0
#260 to #256 - gritsreborn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #268 to #260 - fawkwayne (10/10/2012) [-]
Baseless? Check your ******* comments you ******* imbecile. Everything you have said up to this point is my base. I've been going through all the comments in this page and for some reason I keep seeing your name? And under your name is some speech about people not hating on gay couples? Yeah totally baseless. As far as ad hominem, I'm not attacking you, I'm attacking your jaded opinion. Being so close minded that even though you say your pro gay, you shove **** down people's throats isn't any better than being a gay-hater. You should be more open minded and accept that not everyone shares your beliefs and stop being a pretentious cunt.


Also the fact that FJ is a breeding ground for hypocrites.
0
#277 to #268 - gritsreborn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #285 to #277 - fawkwayne (10/10/2012) [-]
I ain't mad bro. Your just not listening to what I have to say.
I said it wouldn't surprise me if you were thumbwhoring by attacking people who weren't saying pro gay things, but in fact in real life be against the gay community.
Also my logic is sound, as I am not attacking you as a person. I'm saying I believe that despite your allegedly good intentions, the message you are trying to get across to people is being polluted by your negative attitude.
Comprende?
0
#287 to #285 - gritsreborn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#288 to #287 - fawkwayne (10/11/2012) [-]
Are you trolling or just that stupid?
Are you trolling or just that stupid?
0
#289 to #288 - gritsreborn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#290 to #289 - fawkwayne (10/11/2012) [-]
I....I really don't know. It was fun?
I....I really don't know. It was fun?
+4
#173 - anonsoftomarroww **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
-1
#196 to #173 - gritsreborn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
0
#200 to #196 - anonsoftomarroww **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
-1
#202 to #200 - gritsreborn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
+1
#204 to #202 - anonsoftomarroww **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#109 - lezbeyan (10/10/2012) [-]
my name is very relevant right now...
my name is very relevant right now...
User avatar #262 - mrwatcher (10/10/2012) [-]
look at the board i doubt matthew said it like that
[ 270 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)