Amazon review. . E mth 2' , Men' s Defy Xtreme Tourbillon Titanium Chronograph Watch List Pinies prune: aee, aee. In Stuck. from and said or mew. I M I [196 peo

Amazon review

E mth
2' , Men' s Defy Xtreme Tourbillon
Titanium Chronograph Watch
List Pinies
prune: aee, aee.
In Stuck.
from and said or mew.
I M I [196 people feign»: my renew helpful
Saudis , Mule one Det: l
By helghan Hamid
I my thrs with, but men I notaced Ame: -on had rt with 553. 000 um weal a creel we the money I saved,
purchased a brand new BMW and all had money left wet for a Disney vacation Home many watches ewe you money in buy a
Car iend e was anon’?
New see Corleone wth money {roubles I tell them In buy this watch end . I am lil
Meese WEI: hes Mil I tan save ) 00 and buy a Muse on cash Retirement among Is also no longer it concern for me. as I
planter buy one every year and we 553 one I save
Nome's I Was we {mime lo you? TH Ho l
  • Recommend tagsx
Views: 40193
Favorited: 135
Submitted: 10/09/2012
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to Prada


Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - shokonicci (10/09/2012) [-]
I've seen better. There is a banana slicer with hilarious reviews.
#33 to #1 - mostlyshits has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #4 to #1 - shmoopy (10/09/2012) [-]
"There is no way to tell if this is a standard or metric banana slicer. Additional markings on it would help greatly."

#2 to #1 - myaccountisforporn (10/09/2012) [-]
http://www . amazon . com/Stuff-Deals-57l-Hutzler-Banana/dp/B000MSA9AQ/ref=sr11?ie=UTF8&qid=13498073 90&sr=8-1&keywords=banana+slicer

I think I foundit and lol'd so hard
#9 to #2 - notaduck (10/09/2012) [-]
2.0 out of 5 stars

Angle is wrong, August 1, 2012
By J. Anderson

I tried the banana slicer and found it unacceptable. As shown in the picture, the slices is curved from left to right. All of my bananas are bent the other way.
User avatar #12 to #9 - theuglypanda (10/09/2012) [-]
5.0 out of 5 stars

" Angle Was Wrong" Was Wrong, August 18, 2012
By H. Madison

I can't believe anyone could be so inept as to think that they couldn't slice their bananas because they bent "the wrong way." All that person has to do is to buy the model 571C Banana Slicer that is for bananas that bend the other way. Although I prefer left-bending bananas, I got both the 571B and the 571C so that when shopping, I don't have to have the hassle of finding bananas with the correct polarity. I hope "Angle Was Wrong" sees the light and removes that harsh one-star rating for this indispensable product duo.
User avatar #31 to #12 - shokonicci (10/09/2012) [-]
"For decades I have been trying to come up with an ideal way to slice a banana. "Use a knife!" they say. parole officer won't allow me to be around knives. "Shoot it with a gun!" Background check...HELLO! I had to resort to carefully attempt to slice those bananas with my bare hands. 99.9% of the time, I would get so frustrated that I just ended up squishing the fruit in my hands and throwing it against the wall in anger. Then, after a fit of banana-induced rage, my parole officer introduced me to this kitchen marvel and my life was changed. No longer consumed by seething anger and animosity towards thick-skinned yellow fruit, I was able to concentrate on my love of theatre and am writing a musical play about two lovers from rival gangs that just try to make it in the world. I think I'll call it South Side Story.

Banana slicer...thanks to you, I see greatness on the horizon."
#73 to #31 - georgeojffs (10/10/2012) [-]
#89 to #2 - novacane (10/10/2012) [-]
Here for your convince.
Clickable Link! :
#3 - chickensponge **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #5 to #3 - doctorque (10/09/2012) [-]
How the **** ....

I did the exact same thing....

#13 - Temari (10/09/2012) [-]
Am I the only one that's never spent more than $200 max on a watch?? Jesus. There are $20 watches that are amazing, why spend that much? Jeez.
Am I the only one that's never spent more than $200 max on a watch?? Jesus. There are $20 watches that are amazing, why spend that much? Jeez.
#18 to #13 - fatimmortal (10/09/2012) [-]
The most expensive watch I ever bought was 50 bucks, and the price was already inflated.
User avatar #19 to #18 - Temari (10/09/2012) [-]
I'll admit that I love watches, so I spent about $180 on a watch once. The other watches I have are $120 or less. Or gifts.
User avatar #85 to #13 - ferrettamer ONLINE (10/10/2012) [-]
The most expensive watch I got came in a cereal box.
User avatar #34 to #13 - Kabutops (10/09/2012) [-]
i've went to target to buy an $8 watch. works just the same
User avatar #21 to #13 - swimmingprodigy (10/09/2012) [-]
ive only bought like 6 watches in my life. All of them were ****** 10 dollar Casios that I lost (they wouldnt break). Last year I spent 120 bucks on a Fossil watch to have a 'nice' one, and it still works beautifully and looks great.
User avatar #32 to #13 - qdmin (10/09/2012) [-]
You don't understand.... You're gonna save 58,000$ man
User avatar #8 - pokemongirllover (10/09/2012) [-]'s a watch. What. the. **** .
I got one from the euro shop when I was little, still works; dropped it in water, gotten buried in sand, covered in mud, chewed on by dog, kicked about and thrown across classrooms.....IT'S THE NOKIA WATCH!
User avatar #60 - biggrand (10/10/2012) [-]
> Get loan
> buy one of these
> sell it in an auction for twice the money
> end up with 33% after paying back loan
> can now buy two egg mc muffins at mcdonalds
User avatar #71 to #60 - MythBuster (10/10/2012) [-]
you have no concept of sales. the watch will probably lose 15% of its value right when you click the order button. it would probably be over 100 years before that watch is worth anywhere near what was paid for it and then again it would have to be in absolute mint condition
User avatar #72 to #71 - biggrand (10/10/2012) [-]
want to **** ?
User avatar #74 to #72 - MythBuster (10/10/2012) [-]
no thank you
#35 - nighthawxx (10/09/2012) [-]
**nighthawxx rolled a random image posted in comment #8 at Neck exercises **
Can someone please explain to me why is this so expensive
#82 to #35 - aguilve has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #83 to #35 - aguilve (10/10/2012) [-]
Because it doubles as a compass.

Oh. Also it travels through time.
Not you. Only the watch. So it's not there most of the time.
User avatar #100 to #83 - nighthawxx (10/10/2012) [-]
Watch HA
User avatar #37 to #35 - thekeldog (10/09/2012) [-]
id pay for that.
User avatar #38 to #37 - nighthawxx (10/09/2012) [-]
And the watch why is it expensive
User avatar #46 to #38 - thenez ONLINE (10/10/2012) [-]
The same reason a Bugatti Veyron Super Sport is $2.5 million.
User avatar #40 to #38 - thekeldog (10/10/2012) [-]
maybe it gives directions to the girls?
User avatar #43 to #40 - nighthawxx (10/10/2012) [-]
#62 to #50 - thumbing (10/10/2012) [-]
I could make one of those for less than $1,000.
User avatar #56 to #50 - dogwars (10/10/2012) [-]
Someone send Bill Gates an E-Mail.
#63 to #50 - rfitz (10/10/2012) [-]
that's a rip off i would never pay that much for shipping lol
User avatar #6 - fantax (10/09/2012) [-]
why not buy the whole rolex company instead and still have money over to buy the the whole universe
#64 - breakfastlunch (10/10/2012) [-]
The average person has absolutely no reason to spend anything over $100 on a watch. If the rest is TL;DR, just look at the unrelated picture and move on.

I wear a $35 watch I got from Wal-Mart, and it's pretty much all I (or almost anyone else) could need in a watch:
You can have 3 separate times (useful for people who fly a lot or call people in other time zones), it has a chronograph (stop-watch) can count the separate times of up to 40 laps, a count-down timer, 3 separate alarms that can each be set to ring either daily, only on weekdays, or only on weekends. It has a light and can be set to light up whenever you press any button on it, and it's highly shock resistant and waterproof down to 100 meters below the surface. It also looks nice (in my opinion).

Do you really need anything more than that in a watch?
User avatar #84 to #64 - trolljunkusa (10/10/2012) [-]
So you are saying my 280 dollars watch is rubbish?

I have it because I'm interested in fashion
Why spend money on a fast car? Because you like cars. Just like I like watches.

It's a hobby, and I'm currently saving up for a four thousand dollar watch
#88 to #84 - breakfastlunch (10/10/2012) [-]
First of all, everyone has different tastes. Second, I never said other watches are rubbish. I just said that it is not necessarily a good use of money to buy a watch that does either the same or perhaps less than a $35 watch does (I realize that there are really expensive watches that actually have a practical reason for being expensive, like deep dive watches).

As I was typing this, I realized that I was not seeing the other side of this.
Why not save that money to buy yourself a new washing machine, or save up to buy a new car, or get a new laptop or something like that?
Because you like watches, and you are happy to have a nicer watch. It's not a bad thing necessarily. For example, I spend more money than I care to count on video games because I enjoy playing them. It may be a waste of money that could be used elsewhere, but without them, I would not be as happy as I am now.

We all spend money on different things for different reasons. The point I was trying to make (and I hope you agree) is that NOBODY needs a watch that costs $145,000, even if it is on sale.
User avatar #86 to #64 - DrSalvador (10/10/2012) [-]
DUnno about anyone else but things on my wrists irritate me
#67 to #64 - anon (10/10/2012) [-]
So I presume every article of clothing you have is grey and pure polyester, costing about $1.99? Some people like some colour in their life
User avatar #66 to #64 - sooperdooper (10/10/2012) [-]
for a lot of people, watches are more a symbol of status rather than a means to tell the time
#68 to #66 - breakfastlunch (10/10/2012) [-]
Well, I guess you've got a point.
It might just be my mentality: I'd rather have my car, which is just a boring, but roomy, comfortable, and practical sedan than have a sports car. I've been in a few sports cars and the only thing I could think while riding in them was how cramped it was compared to my car and how small the trunk was.

Now that I think about it, I sort of do that with everything. I wear cheap, plain cotton shirts because they are the most comfortable type of shirt for me. I have no sense of style, since most stylish clothes and articles are uncomfortable for me.

I guess I just don't have the right consumer mentality for luxury items.
User avatar #69 to #68 - xtrmbragnrytz (10/10/2012) [-]
It's a materialistic thing. like saying would you rather have a crappy car that runs for cheap, or spend that extra bit of money to have a nice looking car that runs the same
#75 to #69 - breakfastlunch (10/10/2012) [-]
Well, I don't buy anything crappy. The things mentioned above are just as good in terms of quality as similar, but more expensive options. I usually only buy things when I know that my money is not being wasted.
<---This is what I drive. I think it looks good. However, I have seen many cars that look better and have more features but that I can't afford.

Getting an expensive luxury car like a BMW or a Lexus comes with many practical perks, but getting a top-of-the-line sports car that you're only going to be driving at the same speed you would drive any other car is a waste. I think that luxury sedans look great and would love to be able to afford one, but sports cars just don't appeal to me.

In the same way, an expensive computer is a good use of my money because I use my computer all the time. If I had a ****** computer, I would not be able to run many of the things I use all of the time.

Am I making any sense, or am I just rambling here?
User avatar #76 to #75 - xtrmbragnrytz (10/10/2012) [-]
"crappy" may have been a poor choice of word there. but, lacking in quality. I'm not saying everyone should own a lambo (infact i ******* hate those cars and anyone who wants/owns one. Just stating that the world is becoming very materialistic. if it's flashy and works okay, people will flock around it (see any apple product) but the inexpensive yet reliable things are the ones that the "informed consumer" will go after because he/she knows they're getting the best for their money
User avatar #77 to #76 - breakfastlunch (10/10/2012) [-]
Well, that's exactly what I'm talking about. If it does everything I want it to and doesn't look too bad, then I'll buy it. It's not that I'd buy something that looks awful just because it's practical, but at the same time I wouldn't do the opposite--Buy something impractical only because it looks nice or it has a brand name.
User avatar #79 to #77 - xtrmbragnrytz (10/10/2012) [-]
Well then. we're both in agreement. i now feel that this conversation was a hearty time waste, and i thank you for it
#81 to #79 - breakfastlunch (10/10/2012) [-]
Till next time.
Till next time.
#91 to #81 - oxadelore (10/10/2012) [-]
May I just say that this was actually quite entertaining to read. Thanks you two.
May I just say that this was actually quite entertaining to read. Thanks you two.
#80 to #76 - cmilanes has deleted their comment [-]
#96 to #80 - cmilanes has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #78 to #66 - cmilanes (10/10/2012) [-]
a lot of people are bigots.
User avatar #97 to #78 - sooperdooper (10/10/2012) [-]
a lot of people are kind-hearted generous humans that happen to like watches
User avatar #98 to #97 - cmilanes (10/10/2012) [-]
User avatar #99 to #98 - cmilanes (10/10/2012) [-]
who the **** just thumbed me down for no reason?
#70 - garagesale **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#23 - lukai (10/09/2012) [-]
The only expensive watch I own was 250, and I didn't buy it, it was a gift when my step-father died. I don't know why I got a watch when he died, actually. The only reason I would get an expensive watch is if it kept time. I wouldn't get a watch that was expensive just because of its label. Like Rolex. Rolex suck, they just have an expensive name.
#25 to #23 - lukai (10/09/2012) [-]
*was if it kept time well. And had something worth the money
#92 - thekingofangmar (10/10/2012) [-]
On the same product
User avatar #20 - swimmingprodigy (10/09/2012) [-]
User avatar #24 to #22 - swimmingprodigy (10/09/2012) [-]
of course I knew this, it was supposed to be like 'irony'.

Im a terrible comedian
User avatar #26 to #24 - uniqueusernames (10/09/2012) [-]
*roll pciture*
oh, next time use the sarcasm font so we know
#27 to #26 - uniqueusernames (10/09/2012) [-]
**uniqueusernames rolled a random image posted in comment #913181 at MLP Friendly Board **
#52 to #26 - palatapussy (10/10/2012) [-]
*ollr tpuicer*
silly person this is how you roll a picture
User avatar #29 to #26 - cabbagemayhem ONLINE (10/09/2012) [-]
It wasn't sarcasm. You just have to know he was being the obvious guy.
User avatar #28 to #26 - swimmingprodigy (10/09/2012) [-]
I had no clue it existed. Which one is that?
User avatar #53 to #28 - Marker (10/10/2012) [-]
Press Ctrl+Sarcasm
User avatar #57 to #53 - swimmingprodigy (10/10/2012) [-]
Im not that computer illiterate
User avatar #10 - chuckownsu (10/09/2012) [-]
this one is way better http://www. You need to login to view this link
User avatar #11 to #10 - defeats (10/09/2012) [-]
One review for that one that killed me:
"I am sick and tired of buying stuff, only to find out poor people, somewhere, own the same thing. I finally found a watch that poor people can't own. I mean, if you buy a watch for 5, 10, or even 15 thousand dollars, there is a possibility that a poor person, somewhere, somehow would save up enough to eventually purchase it. But 112,000 dollars? No, I don't think so. While I have to look at poor people on my way to the club, at least I now can own something they can't."
User avatar #7 - cowboypony (10/09/2012) [-] com/Zenith-Xtreme-Tourbillon-Automatic-96-0528-4035-21-M528/dp/B008B9JWK6/ref=sr 16?ie=UTF8&qid=1349815581&sr=8-6&keywords=zeniths+men+watch

Hahahahaha holy mother of **** .
#90 - novacane (10/10/2012) [-]
**novacane rolled a random image posted in comment #772681 at Item Discussion ** What I buy on amazon.
#44 to #42 - ohemgeezus ONLINE (10/10/2012) [-]
OHHHHH **** ******
scroll down in the reviews to "flip dat shizzle"
#61 - cerealisticbeing **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#47 - waffleofdoom (10/10/2012) [-]
I guess I am the only one here who loves watches at an unhealthy...
I guess I am the only one here who loves watches at an unhealthy...
#93 - jaerbuen (10/10/2012) [-]
Glass broke. Guess I better sell the house and get that **** fixed right away.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)