The War on Drugs is a joke. The Second Amendment. uii, ' iii' writs WERE. Whenever I see politics on FunnyJunk, I just like to sit back and wonder why the I keep coming back here. Then I usually masturbate.
x
Click to expand

Comments(485):

[ 485 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#165 - Benry (10/06/2012) [-]
Whenever I see politics on FunnyJunk, I just like to sit back and wonder why the 			****		 I keep coming back here.   
   
Then I usually masturbate.
Whenever I see politics on FunnyJunk, I just like to sit back and wonder why the **** I keep coming back here.

Then I usually masturbate.
0
#176 to #165 - cabbagemayhem has deleted their comment [-]
#51 - ragingflamingos (10/06/2012) [-]
MFW exercising my second amendment rights.
User avatar #351 - hachigomo (10/07/2012) [-]
I personally think that getting a gun should be similar to getting a driver's license. You should have to take several classes and a psych test before you can get your permit. That way you can know everything you need to know before you make your purchase.

Seriously, if you **** up with a car or a gun someone might end up dead. So require the same amount of responsibility.
#380 to #351 - anon (10/07/2012) [-]
that's why I took my Concealed Carry class. I'm currently a full time student, so I have neither the time nor the money to take more carry classes or general weapons classes, but once I graduate its something I plan on doing frequently
#395 to #351 - crazysexyhorse (10/07/2012) [-]
But, I've already taken such a class! See?
#400 - kidsquicker (10/07/2012) [-]
Pretty related, but I'm too lazy to look through nearly 400 comments to see if it's been posted already.
Oh well.
User avatar #411 to #400 - poopee (10/07/2012) [-]
nearly 400 comments... well done.
#237 - connorsg (10/06/2012) [-]
i love my gun. and i would never do anything to anyone or any animal with it....i just like to shoot targets.
+1
#258 to #237 - anonsoftomarroww **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#240 to #237 - drakonov (10/06/2012) [-]
do you have a favourite one to use? i like shooting my Mosin Nagant
User avatar #245 to #240 - connorsg (10/06/2012) [-]
It depends because i really like both shot guns and rifles. im biased toward my 22. but thats kus i can buy 2100 rounds for 85 dollars haha. But shooting 12 gauges is one of the most badass feelings in the world.
User avatar #272 to #245 - thecrazedtortes (10/06/2012) [-]
I have to agree with you, shooting a 12 gauge has to be one of the most badass feelings ever.
User avatar #390 to #272 - connorsg (10/07/2012) [-]
i know lmao you just feel like a boss. plus manly as ****
#263 to #245 - drakonov (10/06/2012) [-]
i actually never really liked a .22. they're great for practicing and cheap as hell but i prefer shooting rifles that i will actually take hunting. a .300 is tonnes of fun to shoot blocks of wood with, but it's so damn expensive per shot that i only use it when i need to site it before hunting. a mosin has cheap enough ammo and a decent kick. my favourite part is when i go shooting at my comrade's farm and it sends hunks of sod 8 meters into the air.
User avatar #392 to #263 - connorsg (10/07/2012) [-]
haha thats the reason i love my 22 its so cheap, my friend and i are going to the range on monday and i literally bought 2100 rounds for 84.99. and packs of 100 rounds go for 8 bucks haha while my friend got 30-30 ammo for like 20 bucks and only got 20 rounds.
User avatar #253 to #240 - CoolStoryBrosky (10/06/2012) [-]
I <3 my mosin too.
#10 - anon (10/06/2012) [-]
I´m living in Germany, I´ve never owned a gun neither has anyone I know. None of us was assaulted, victim of robbery or ever had to protect his house with a shotgun (that´s what we have locks for). Now if something happens I can be sure there´s a very small chance someone is coming at me with gun since they´re something that rare (due to strict gun law). If you see a cop over here pointing a gun at a person in a car that´s not called a usual traffic-control but you can be sure there has something seriously dangerous been happening.

It´s not about banning crime by banning guns, it´s about making it more difficult for potential criminals to get one on a legal way and therefore protecting the potential victims. Anyone insisting on easy gun laws should give away his cellphone, car, medicine and any other technical thing to be living in the 17th century with firearm laws coming from this age !
#227 to #10 - moechler (10/06/2012) [-]
I like ***********
User avatar #11 to #10 - durkadurka (10/06/2012) [-]
>Robber walks up to door
> Tries to open door, fails
>" **** , I can't get in!"
> Robber gives up.

Banning firearms effects people who have no intention of breaking laws the most.
User avatar #12 to #11 - analleakage (10/06/2012) [-]
If people didn't have a gun, maybe they wouldn't have any intention of breaking the laws. I know some still have.
User avatar #643 to #137 - analleakage (10/07/2012) [-]
To be honest, I think all of you misunderstood what I was trying to say, so I'm going to put this in another way.
What I mean is if people already own a gun, a greater amount of people would go out and mug people, compared to people who doesn't have a gun.
#469 to #10 - anon (10/07/2012) [-]
thumb down alll the people who think other wise.

Ban guns.....go a head see how long it lasts in america

just......good luck.....
User avatar #19 to #10 - KellyisAwesome (10/06/2012) [-]
Thank you!
I'm so tired of this 'if guns are illegal people can still get them' ******** .
Ofcourse they can, but it'll be much much harder. I really think that the columbine massacre wouldn't have happened if guns were illegal.
Honestly, I'm happy not to live in america.
#60 to #19 - natedizzie (10/06/2012) [-]
Yeah great logic let's blame inanimate objects for massacre and not the kids that did it.    
Oh yeah I forgot People should never be accountable for their actions just the tools they used. So lets let every pedophile off because if children weren't so easily accessible they wouldn't be committing the crime.    
also rapists I mean come on women stay in your houses so the rapists have no way to get ahold of you 			****		 is this hard?    
Lets make Law abiding citizens pay the price for criminals by taking away their freedoms that makes the world a happier place doesn't    
I mean Germany accepts any crazy rule thrown out them Like that one oh yeah lets kill all jews. Yes let's let the most gullbiel and sheepish people decide what laws to follow because they have a great track record with this sort of thing. Hitler The kaiser i mean just brillant 			*******		 leaders
Yeah great logic let's blame inanimate objects for massacre and not the kids that did it.
Oh yeah I forgot People should never be accountable for their actions just the tools they used. So lets let every pedophile off because if children weren't so easily accessible they wouldn't be committing the crime.
also rapists I mean come on women stay in your houses so the rapists have no way to get ahold of you **** is this hard?
Lets make Law abiding citizens pay the price for criminals by taking away their freedoms that makes the world a happier place doesn't
I mean Germany accepts any crazy rule thrown out them Like that one oh yeah lets kill all jews. Yes let's let the most gullbiel and sheepish people decide what laws to follow because they have a great track record with this sort of thing. Hitler The kaiser i mean just brillant ******* leaders
#71 to #60 - anon (10/06/2012) [-]
1/ "great logic let's blame inanimate objects for massacre and not the kids that did it. "

not what he said, a young dude is really less likely to be able to get a gun + ammo with guns being illegal, and yes with a knife he wouldn't be able to kill many people,

2/ The rest of your argument is just stupid
User avatar #188 to #60 - KellyisAwesome (10/06/2012) [-]
You're an idiot.
User avatar #534 to #60 - Fgner (10/07/2012) [-]
Anon answers the first two things

> Germany is the 4th greatest economic power, greatest economic power in all of Europe. They haven't been to war since WWII, and they have a very stable and good country now. In fact, my cousin, my wife, and I are all moving to Germany because it's better than the U.S. (no offence to the US). After WWI everyone was poor, it was terrible, they needed someone to blame, so when Hitler offered a solution, and used his amazing powers of speech, they really had two choices: Suffering and poverty for the rest of their lives, or go along with it. You forgot the fact that without WWII, no nuclear weapons would have been invented, and therefore the world would still be at war, rather than nuclear stalemate, and countless wars would have raged by now, you forgot that without the Holocaust, Israel would have never been created. You do realize that without the Holocaust, numerous technological advancements would have never been made, and the United States would have never become a world power, and therefore, the world would not be near as good as it is (admit it, as much as we all hate the US, it contributed endlessly to modern society forming the way it has). And yes, Germany has had extremely brilliant leaders. They're brilliant innovators and leaders and people, the problem mainly lying within the fact that they keep to themselves and don't dick themselves in other peoples business. And the couple times they do something wrong, everybody decides to point "OH LOOK THEY DID SOMETHING WRONG!" Don't be such an ignorant dumbass, and don't make fun of one of this world's best countries.
User avatar #577 to #534 - trololoface (10/07/2012) [-]
So your saying


The Holocaust made the world a better place
#580 to #577 - Fgner (10/07/2012) [-]
As much as all of us hate to admit it...
yes.

I'm ready to embrace red thumbs for this viewpoint, but think about it. Without WWII, the world would have maintained it's economic depression, if not fallen even deeper in it, for quite some time. This would have halted all progress on all fronts, as the world would struggle to recover. Because the wars never existed, then America would have never gained any power, and would have remained isolated and in their own depressions. This would remove the world's new central hub. Because Japan was never attacked by the U.S. the modernization of their country would have never occurred (as well as numerous others). Now imagine a world without Japan, already pretty ****** , am I right? But without the unifying central hub, the world wouldn't have come together in unity near as quickly, as European nations struggled and fought for the right to be so. Already locked into major stressors, war would have broken out eventually, this time the Holocaust would not have existed to make a two sided war, it would be full out European-War, and would most likely end in just as great, if not greater death tolls and losses than WWII. After such a war, almost the same timeline would play out, Europe requires resources, imports from America, America gets rich, America becomes hub, bibbidy bobbidy boo - modern society, but 50 years later.
User avatar #581 to #580 - trololoface (10/07/2012) [-]
Oh yeah, because if WWII never happened, then the world would have ceased to modernize and we would still be masturbating to rocks
User avatar #586 to #581 - Fgner (10/07/2012) [-]
World-wide economic depression does that kind of thing.
User avatar #593 to #586 - trololoface (10/07/2012) [-]
Then how come today, even in the worst economic crash since the great depression, and this is happening not just in the US, we are still inventing and moving on?


It was the same after WWI, even the most simple inventions were made, such as toasters, traffic lights, the rocket, lie detector, ect..

The Great Depression didn't stop anybody from making things, so if the Holocaust would have never happened, then we would have still moved on...


But seriously, who the **** considerers the Holocaust a good thing?
Sure this is the internet, and people say stupid **** like this all the time, but your actually defending this.

Now go say this to somebody in real life if you truly believe in this.

And join the Nazi Party of America while your at it
User avatar #601 to #593 - Fgner (10/07/2012) [-]
1) Because this is modern society, where we borrow 5 trillion dollars to throw at people saying "SPEND IT HOW YOU WILL JUST DO OUR JOB AND MAKE THINGS BETTER" We spend money we don't have and act like it's normal. Back then, when everyone was in poverty, who the living God was going to just hand out money or anything?
2) Yes it did. Name some great inventions that came out of America during the Great Depression. I can think of a few things: laundromats (hand washed - makes sense, new business = money), tampons (it's freaking cotton shoved in the vag, nothing groundbreaking), and sliced bread (I think). I'm sorry, but I don't hear the sound of post WWII progress going on there. And I don't mean right after WWI, I meant once the global depression began sinking in. You know, one of the causes of WWII.
3) The Holocaust is bad - WWII is good. However, Holocaust was a part of WWII, and by extension is good.
4) I'm not defending the Holocaust directly. I'm not defending Nazi'ism. I'm defending the fact that those two DID cause accelerated steps toward modern society and a prevention of a major global collapse. We can't change the fact that the Holocaust happened, and it was bad, but is it truly wrong to look at the positive sides of things for once?
5) I have told people in real life, but they understand I'm not supporting the Holocaust, but addressing the positive factors that were on the other side of the coin. Everything has another side, don't be so one-dimensional.
#58 to #19 - anon (10/06/2012) [-]
Yeah great logic let's blame inanimate objects for massacre and not the kids that did it.
Oh yeah I forgot People should never be accountable for their actions just the tools they used. So lets let every pedophile off because if children weren't so easily accessible they wouldn't be committing the crime.
also rapists I mean come on women stay in your houses so the rapists have no way to get ahold of you **** is this hard?
Lets make Law abiding citizens pay the price for criminals by taking away their freedoms that makes the world a happier place doesn't
I mean Germany accepts any crazy rule thrown out them Like that one oh yeah lets kill all jews. Yes let's let the most gullbiel and sheepish people decide what laws to follow because they have a great track record with this sort of thing. Hitler The kaiser i mean just brillant ******* leaders
User avatar #222 to #10 - supermegasherman (10/06/2012) [-]
13% of your population isn't black.
#18 to #10 - johnshepherd (10/06/2012) [-]
Do you want to have a debate about this? I'd love to, I'm pro gun, btw, just so you know.
#53 to #18 - johnshepherd (10/06/2012) [-]
Wow, I ask for a polite debate and i get thumbed down.   
   
   
   
   
.......well, this is the internet, I guess I should have seen this coming.
Wow, I ask for a polite debate and i get thumbed down.




.......well, this is the internet, I guess I should have seen this coming.
#68 to #53 - glasgowrangers (10/06/2012) [-]
But i'm on the same side you are
But i'm on the same side you are
#111 to #68 - johnshepherd (10/06/2012) [-]
Aw rats! Too many people agree with me on the internet!
User avatar #126 to #111 - glasgowrangers (10/06/2012) [-]
We could have a Presidential esque debate

Please Mr John, you are so much more right than me.

Oh no! I completely disagree! You are so much more right than me
#139 to #126 - johnshepherd (10/06/2012) [-]
No, Sir Glasgo! It is most certainly you who is more in the right. Of our two parties, you are the more correct!
#350 to #139 - sirmatthew (10/07/2012) [-]
well of course john shepherd is pro guns
well of course john shepherd is pro guns
#546 to #350 - johnshepherd (10/07/2012) [-]
I wonder how long you were waiting for that image to become relevant to something.....either way, it's fairly entertaining.
User avatar #170 to #68 - lazypaul (10/06/2012) [-]
How does it feel that you're favorite football team went bankrupt.
User avatar #171 to #53 - lazypaul (10/06/2012) [-]
I'l have a debate with you, it may be more appropriate to have one with someone who's first language is english.
#67 to #10 - anon (10/06/2012) [-]
You can't get guns legally in North Ireland.
Ever hear of the I.R.A and U.V.F?

Let's live in the real world, i could get a gun in dublin(ireland) in the next 3 hours with ammo from some drug dealers in a number of run down areas. Hell, the IRA go their hands on SAM sites ffs, I don't remember being able to get them even in america.
User avatar #123 to #10 - symustafa (10/06/2012) [-]
I live in Germany too, but moving to Malaysia in December. Let's just say guns are still illegal, but the crime rate is so high and corruption is a major problem to the point where it doesn't matter. Everyone just lives in constant fear.
User avatar #22 - fantomen (10/06/2012) [-]
I live in Sweden.
It's harder for a swede to legally buy a normal hunting rifle or shotgun than it is for an American to buy a machine gun.
There are shootings around where I live about once a week.
But I can drive 3 miles away to my local career criminal's headquarters and buy a fully automatic AKM assault rifle from the Yugoslav wars for 2000US dollars, or a Handgun for 1000.
User avatar #278 to #22 - princesslilian (10/06/2012) [-]
considering transferable full automatic machine guns are well over 15,000$, plus all the paperwork, it's not easy at all.
User avatar #627 to #278 - fantomen (10/07/2012) [-]
I know the procedure on how to get an NFA weapon in the US.
A swede still has to get through WAY more ******** and paperwork to get a .22 target pistol. And then if you don't do it all over again 2 years later the cops knock on your door and take your guns away.
User avatar #644 to #627 - princesslilian (10/07/2012) [-]
glad i live here.
i can buy a semi auto ak-47 with no paperwork.
0
#559 to #555 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #567 to #555 - GainesWorthy (10/07/2012) [-]
I'll take my red thumbs for this...
But that is a terrible analogy.

Guns kill people....

Voter ID fraud is serious, but the way they are going about it is unfair. I can't use my college ID to vote, but if I owned a weapon, I could use my firearms permit/license? Yeah... Okay.

Obvious statement of the day: Firearms kill people. Criminals have access to guns, however it is proven, if you have to jump through more loopholes to own a firearm, less guns would be illegally sold, since it would be harder for a black market dealer to acquire them.

/rant

Oh, also. I stand by Chris Rock when I say: Bullets should be expensive. If you shoot a dude with a 500 dollar bullet, no one will question it. If you're a criminal, the bullet prices would go up too to equal out the supply cost. So less criminals would be shooting people if their bullet they used was higher price.

(inb4 but that would drive companies into the ground....) I know.
#574 to #567 - youarenotme (10/07/2012) [-]
you are retarded, saying guns kill people is like saying playboy causes chaffed dicks. its like blaming the cheese burger for your being overweight. Guns don't kill, idiots with guns kill. If you make them harder to own then it just means the criminals will be the ones with them and the average joe like you or me is more susceptible to being victims of violent crimes since you want to take away our right to defend ourselves.
User avatar #671 to #574 - GainesWorthy (10/14/2012) [-]
Oh and your logic is wrong, that isn't how it works. There is a supplier who usually acquires guns legally or from a back door shop. If you crack down on that by enforcing gun laws. You can essentially help remove guns from the street.

My logic (Based off of several documentaries and Chris Rock)> Your logic.
User avatar #670 to #574 - GainesWorthy (10/14/2012) [-]
COnsider this. WHen I say guns kill people: It is implied that their owners do the shooting. An owner can't throw a bullet at someone and have it kill them. THey must fire the weapon. My logic still stands even though you're to ignorant to use common sense to see around what I said.



I am an concealed carrier btw.
User avatar #637 to #567 - techketzer (10/07/2012) [-]
Guns are inanimate objects. They do not kill. They do nothing on their own at all.

"since it would be harder for a black market dealer to acquire them."

You clearly have no idea how a market works.
Price is established by supply and demand, and there are quite a lot more firearms than people in this world.
And while nobody knows the exact figures, ~14 billion rounds of ammunition are newly manufactured annually. That makes approx. 40 million rounds every single day.

While the demand for weapons is high, the supply is over the top-abundant, so the prices will be low to moderate at worst.
Now how can you raise those prices? Taxes and trade limits.
What do taxes and trade limits have in common? Black market dealers laugh about them because they fully intend on violating them and they make their competition, the legal salesmen, utterly unable to compete.

tl;dr: Guns and ammo are cheap because there are metric ******** of them.
Those willing to break laws for a profit can always acquire and/or sell them very cheaply. Raising prices on legal gun sales only makes the black market even more profitable, while banning guns makes the black market the only option alltogether.
User avatar #672 to #637 - GainesWorthy (10/14/2012) [-]
That isn't how the market of back door shops work. Most guns sold to criminals are either from a supplier who acquires them legally and uses loopholes to get rid of the weapon. OR a back door shop.


Price would still be what you set it as. If you made guns a little harder to acquire it would still be harder for criminals to acquire.

I'm a proud concealed carrier.
#571 to #567 - violenthandjob (10/07/2012) [-]
Well by definition though a black market dealer wouldn't be affected in acquisition or selling thereof his wares by legalities surrounding them, which simply means laws don't affect black market trade.
+8
#404 - dirtywizarder **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #410 to #404 - elitejerkz (10/07/2012) [-]
yeah most crims use melee weapons
User avatar #428 to #404 - kabizus (10/07/2012) [-]
It works because the criminals ride kangaroo's throwing giant spiders at people. They don't need guns.
#537 - ajmartin (10/07/2012) [-]
Related.
#304 - nocta (10/07/2012) [-]
cause this ***** is a badass
+7
#254 - anonsoftomarroww **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #371 to #324 - rhinoplasty (10/07/2012) [-]
shooting sprees are carried out by dormant crazy people not criminals
User avatar #373 to #371 - kauestud (10/07/2012) [-]
shooting sprees makes them criminals

Are you retarded?
User avatar #376 to #373 - rhinoplasty (10/07/2012) [-]
thats a fair point but you can go **** yourself for being a prick
User avatar #377 to #376 - kauestud (10/07/2012) [-]
I was genuenly worried
User avatar #378 to #377 - rhinoplasty (10/07/2012) [-]
genuinely* good day asshole
User avatar #379 to #378 - kauestud (10/07/2012) [-]
god damn squiggly red line didnt show

#383 to #378 - supbiatches (10/07/2012) [-]
Let the butt hurt floooooow, I knew that post would cause some
Let the butt hurt floooooow, I knew that post would cause some
+6
#82 - divinity **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #32 - dantemp (10/06/2012) [-]
Yeah, you're right. There is no point in forbiding anything, cause someone will always find a way to do it anyway. Let's legalize drugs. Heck, while we are at it, let's legalize rape and murder!
User avatar #38 to #32 - BrayBoy (10/06/2012) [-]
The same idea still applies, the people who no not to rape and murder wont do it even if its legal. Although it does differ in other points.
+5
#45 to #38 - nengcaste **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #48 to #45 - BrayBoy (10/06/2012) [-]
I agree with you, I was just pointing it out
#35 to #32 - alkassim (10/06/2012) [-]
Would instantly improve crime statistics...
#27 - oosulley (10/06/2012) [-]
Now Im a man who likes his military crap (Guns, Veichles etc.) but on a single, basic logic point, surely the less people WITH guns,the less people will be killed by them ?(be it accident,homicide etc.)
#33 to #27 - anon (10/06/2012) [-]
yeah, because someone with the intent of shooting someone in the the face is really worried about being caught with a gun on them. gone laws only take guns away from the people who weren't planning on doing anything bad with them anyways. oh, and out of 2,437,000 deaths a year in the united states, only 12,250 were gun related; not including suicides.
User avatar #31 to #27 - mikepetru (10/06/2012) [-]
are you saying the more people with guns, the more likely one person would kill another person? That's like saying the more drugs that are legalized, the more people are likely to do drugs. You can't correlate the availability of an item with personal responsibility of individuals. Gun don't make people commit murders and other acts of violence. The person must already have a predisposition of violence to engage in said violent activities. These people are irresponsible and immoral well before they obtain any weapons, whether those weapons are guns, knives, chairs, glass bottles, etc. and will use any of these weapons to carry out their crimes. The intent necessitates the means, not vice versa.
User avatar #39 to #31 - defeats (10/06/2012) [-]
The more people with guns, the more likely people are to be killed by guns.
And if drugs were legalised of course there would be more people using them.
Don't be fooled into thinking having these things doesn't change our perspective about things. Having your own personal firearm gives you a new sense of power and control, a false sense, if you will.
Guns are illegal in the UK and gun crime is quite low, much lower on proportion than the US.
0
#46 to #31 - nengcaste **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #57 to #46 - mikepetru (10/06/2012) [-]
alcohol was illegal during prohibition, how many people still drank? Not to mention how many people died in gang warfare between bootleggers. Concerning your second point, alcohol does not have the same addictive properties as drugs like heroine that literally become a necessary part of your body's chemistry after constant use. Knowing the dangerous properties of even using the slightest amount of drugs like heroine, how many people would start using it if it was legalized tomorrow? Drinking a glass of champagne has much less severe consequences than injecting yourself with a needle full of heroine. Knowing this people understand there is much less risk when drinking, so they reason that the funny feeling of getting tipsy is much less dangerous than the actions you might take when tweaking from not having heroine in the past few hours.
User avatar #91 to #46 - pokemonstheshiz ONLINE (10/06/2012) [-]
that has nothing to do with gun laws. Alcohol is something used for recreation. The only real purpose for having a gun is to have the ability to hurt people, whether you're doing it for protection or whatnot withstanding.
#401 to #91 - fartingzombie (10/07/2012) [-]
that's crap. I own guns not to hurt people nor for my personal protection but solely for recreational use. e.g. Hunting and target shooting.
User avatar #645 to #401 - pokemonstheshiz ONLINE (10/07/2012) [-]
That's not the reason you're allowed to own them. They're to protect yourself.

But you probably don't hunt with handguns, and those are the ones that are used most for protection.
#16 - Aejax (10/06/2012) [-]
Loving all the arguments (on both sides of the issue) with no evidence whatsoever

Please refer to this before talking about things you've no experience with:
www.gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-facts/5.1/gun-facts-5.1-screen.pdf
#21 to #16 - delicioushat (10/06/2012) [-]
At one point, this article (?) compares gun registration with Hitler.
User avatar #24 to #16 - ericzxvc (10/06/2012) [-]
This is horribly outdated, citing evidence from 20 years ago. Besides it's obviously biased so why even bother taking it into account. Just from the top when referring to "assault weapons" it only qualifies illegal "assault weapons" as part of their numbers.
#353 - LocoJoe (10/07/2012) [-]
MFW people only think govt should have guns.
User avatar #386 to #353 - MegaAwesomeSauce (10/07/2012) [-]
I honestly can't see a problem with only the government having guns
#403 to #386 - LocoJoe (10/07/2012) [-]
**** off fascist. You think the govt has to protect you?
User avatar #487 to #403 - Canucklehead (10/07/2012) [-]
They should protect us, yes. How is that fascism? Lol. Next you'll be calling me a libtard.
User avatar #626 to #487 - LocoJoe (10/07/2012) [-]
Because you think only the govt should have the power to kill and us citizens must sit here defenseless.
[ 485 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)