Can You Make It? (Part Two). Not mine. Found at StumbleUpon. I hope you like it! Part One: /funny_pictures/4136560/Can+You+Make+It+Part+One www.buzzfeed.com/dav mind blown content
x

Can You Make It? (Part Two)

  • Recommend tagsx
+5618
Views: 126935
Favorited: 1416
Submitted: 10/02/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to imagicialotv submit to reddit

Comments(1191):

[ 1191 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#20 - kuukautisveri (10/02/2012) [-]
Thanks for posting OP! These are really nice!
Thanks for posting OP! These are really nice!
#1254 to #20 - kuukautisveri (10/03/2012) [-]
HOW IN THE HELL DID THIS GET SO MANY THUMBS??!?!?!
#191 to #20 - doctorfetus (10/02/2012) [-]
To anyone wondering what this guys name "kuukautisveri" means, it's "Period blood".
To anyone wondering what this guys name "kuukautisveri" means, it's "Period blood".
+83
#332 to #191 - itsmypenis **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#797 to #332 - yapperson (10/02/2012) [-]
Clearly you've never played Super Meat Boy.
pic related. It's Dr. Fetus; the main antagonist.
+1
#813 to #797 - itsmypenis **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#864 to #813 - anon (10/02/2012) [-]
Still a doctor.
User avatar #1094 to #864 - edmin (10/03/2012) [-]
Still the main antagonist.
User avatar #969 to #332 - mikimoose (10/03/2012) [-]
Well your name is it's my penis.
#90 - rheago (10/02/2012) [-]
I 			*******		 LOVE THESE
I ******* LOVE THESE
#195 - spankidanki (10/02/2012) [-]
funnyjunk my first source of global information
User avatar #1023 - mrsoup (10/03/2012) [-]
**mrsoup rolls 444** interesting fact, i can roll
0
#1039 to #1023 - blazingballsack has deleted their comment [-]
#1042 to #1023 - anon (10/03/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolls 1,876** prepare for dislikes ...
#1050 to #1023 - potatotown (10/03/2012) [-]
**potatotown rolls 54** how in the 			****		...
**potatotown rolls 54** how in the **** ...
#1064 to #1050 - mrsoup (10/03/2012) [-]
**mrsoup rolls 21** don't know if i can, stahp.
**mrsoup rolls 21** don't know if i can, stahp.
#1085 to #1064 - potatotown (10/03/2012) [-]
**potatotown rolls 50** let me help you stahp
#1030 to #1023 - anon (10/03/2012) [-]
Wow
#1033 to #1030 - mrsoup (10/03/2012) [-]
**mrsoup rolls 99**
**mrsoup rolls 99**
#600 - fouringer (10/02/2012) [-]
another cool fact
#1119 - mrhelmetman (10/03/2012) [-]
<My face for every fact.
<My face for every fact.
#1052 - thatkiddonovan (10/03/2012) [-]
thought OP was a cool guy until I saw:   
   
&quot;Not mine. Found at StumbleUpon.&quot;
thought OP was a cool guy until I saw:

"Not mine. Found at StumbleUpon."
#1067 to #1052 - CrossBowPloxz (10/03/2012) [-]
At least he admitted it would you have rather gone on thinking he was a cool guy when he was in fact not?
At least he admitted it would you have rather gone on thinking he was a cool guy when he was in fact not?
#1069 to #1067 - thatkiddonovan (10/03/2012) [-]
Ignorance is bliss, my friend.
#748 - doinmedirt (10/02/2012) [-]
Something is big here
#413 - Pompano (10/02/2012) [-]
If Funnyjunk was just humorous material, I would get bored fairly quickly. The diversity of content because of **** like this keeps me coming back to the site.
#273 to #262 - leyhoooo (10/02/2012) [-]
This is what men are really good to remember, facts that you can't use to anything. (im a male myself)
#226 - kingmaker (10/02/2012) [-]
a compressed spring has more potential energy, but ******** that it has more mass
0
#237 to #226 - drummerperson has deleted their comment [-]
#239 to #226 - pariahlol (10/02/2012) [-]
said weight, not mass
#248 to #226 - anon (10/02/2012) [-]
Weight and mass are different just saying
User avatar #249 to #248 - kingmaker (10/02/2012) [-]
thanks bud
User avatar #457 to #226 - andalitemadness (10/02/2012) [-]
Look up the theory of relativity; when more energy is added, the mass increases because e=mc^2, so it would increase by 10^-14 in grams if you added 1000 joules of energy by compressing it.
#252 to #226 - daisuke (10/02/2012) [-]
not sure about this but mass is a form of energy. e = mc^2 ... dont know if this has anything to do with it. but yeah, it would be hard to measure the weight of a compressed spring since if it would be compressed it would already be held up. maybe it does weigh more after all.
0
#265 to #252 - admiralamory **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #275 to #265 - daisuke (10/02/2012) [-]
nope, its true. So if we were were to add 1,000 joules of potential energy to a spring, its mass would increase by 1,000 / (3*10^8)² or 1.113 × 10^-14 grams.



E = MC ************* SQUARED
#302 to #275 - daisuke (10/02/2012) [-]
funnyjunk, where correct answers explained with correct maths gets thumbed down.
User avatar #645 to #275 - lamarisagoodname (10/02/2012) [-]
False. Last I checked, there was no nuclear reaction so the kinetic energy is simply stored in the fact that you're compressing the atoms together, this does not change the mass. Applying the theory of relativity would be saying if 1 gram of mass underwent nuclear fusion, this much energy is created.
#648 to #645 - lamarisagoodname (10/02/2012) [-]
And here's an image I forgot to add to narrarate my argument.
#1281 to #648 - daisuke (10/04/2012) [-]
go google it "compressed spring more mass" and you will find the answer.

1. im learning about this in physics atm.
2. heres some links to support:

http://debunkeymonkey.blogspot.se/2009/08/does-compressed-spring-weigh-more-than .html

http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/phy99/phy99140.htm

<pic related, einstein facepalm
User avatar #1284 to #1281 - bayakpo **User deleted account** (10/05/2012) [-]
In theory it weighs more, but really that much amount of energy when calculated is not very much. It may weigh more yes. But by how much? Verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry little. Thx for the 2nd link I learned something new =)
User avatar #1289 to #1284 - daisuke (10/06/2012) [-]
yes, very little, what else would u think? ...
User avatar #1290 to #1289 - bayakpo **User deleted account** (10/06/2012) [-]
Thx for the education. In payment a thumb for your response =P
User avatar #1291 to #1290 - daisuke (10/06/2012) [-]
np bro. have a thumb
User avatar #282 to #252 - Brouwera (10/02/2012) [-]
Clever. Except I'm not sure the energy would be converted into mass seeing as the object in question is stationary during the measurment.


And this would indeed be very hard to measure.
User avatar #234 to #226 - graboidzero (10/02/2012) [-]
Weight is the energy exerced on the weightscale. He never mentions mass, so technically he's right.
User avatar #242 to #234 - kingmaker (10/02/2012) [-]
i am aware of the difference between mass and weight (should have know I would be called out on it) but still

take a spring put it on a scale weighs 1/2 pound
take a brick that weighs 4 pounds put it on the scale
the scale is going to read 4.5 pounds
User avatar #247 to #242 - kingmaker (10/02/2012) [-]
meant to say put the brick on the spring
+26
#233 to #226 - jgk **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#245 to #233 - pariahlol (10/02/2012) [-]
make a small machine to compress it, weigh said machine without the spring, then weigh it while it is compressing the spring. Subtract the difference and you have the weight of the spring while it's compressed.
#628 to #245 - anon (10/02/2012) [-]
OR you weigh the relaxed spring and a clamp together, then you put the spring in the clamp, tighten it, and weigh them both again. Find the difference!
#639 to #245 - lamarisagoodname (10/02/2012) [-]
Law of conservation of mass demands that 29 is wrong.
#837 to #639 - pariahlol (10/02/2012) [-]
Weight not mass, and I never said it wasn't wrong I was simply telling somebody how to weigh a compressed spring
User avatar #1051 to #837 - lamarisagoodname (10/03/2012) [-]
I agree with you, but even if you weigh the spring using the correct method (your method) it would still weigh the same.
#1140 to #1051 - pariahlol (10/03/2012) [-]
Well perhaps there's some homo-voodoo sciency **** going on that we don't know about. Based upon all the knowledge i have, it won't change in weight, but it's science, things are subject to change
User avatar #641 to #639 - lamarisagoodname (10/02/2012) [-]
I totally missed clicking the image i wanted.
+2
#254 to #245 - jgk **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#256 to #254 - pariahlol (10/02/2012) [-]
glad to please
User avatar #270 to #245 - daisuke (10/02/2012) [-]
but dude, u would need some badass ******* measurement, lets say if we were were to add 1,000 joules of potential energy to a spring, its mass would increase by 1,000 / c² or 1.113 × 10^-14 grams.

gl measuring that :)
#307 to #270 - daisuke (10/02/2012) [-]
So if we were were to add 1,000 joules of potential energy to a spring, its mass would increase by 1,000 / c² or 1.113 × 10^-14 grams.


pic related to fj community
0
#652 to #307 - mrgaw has deleted their comment [-]
#272 to #270 - pariahlol (10/02/2012) [-]
yeah i'm not saying to do this with a bathroom scale and some duct tape. You would have some crazy equipment, but it is possible
#976 to #245 - spacelubber (10/03/2012) [-]
Rather than making a small machine, you could tie a rope about the top and bottom to compress it.
#987 to #976 - pariahlol (10/03/2012) [-]
true
User avatar #1103 to #233 - points (10/03/2012) [-]
It IS a change in mass "bro". Weight is equal to the constant of gravity times mass. Since I seriously doubt compressing a spring alters the Earth's gravitational pull, a change in weight means a change in mass. The change in mass does not comply with conservation of mass therefore this cannot be true in a closed system.
0
#1250 to #1103 - jgk **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#255 to #233 - anon (10/02/2012) [-]
cause its so hard to know the weight of the stuff that keeps it compresed,right?
0
#257 to #255 - jgk **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#52 - lolzordz (10/02/2012) [-]
Good delivery, OP. looking forward to moar
#1216 - gentlememe (10/03/2012) [-]
It's called a Chinese Burrito.
#53 - ciaranc (10/02/2012) [-]
I wish Jupiter was that close..
#729 to #53 - anon (10/02/2012) [-]
i don't :c **** that would be terrifying
#79 to #53 - shoutie (10/02/2012) [-]
Oh do you now...?
Well, if you're suicidal...
#465 - bitchplzzz (10/02/2012) [-]
mfw this mind blowjob giving post
mfw this mind blowjob giving post
#531 to #465 - xxslendermanxx (10/02/2012) [-]
MFW I'm a Cubs fan. feelsbadman.jpg :(
#993 - yuknowherpderp (10/03/2012) [-]
**yuknowherpderp rolls 767**
#1009 to #993 - anon (10/03/2012) [-]
*Roll one* You missed this
User avatar #1010 to #993 - whyfalsewhy (10/03/2012) [-]
**whyfalsewhy rolls 395** what?
0
#1029 to #1010 - titsjohnson has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #1297 to #993 - Koruo (10/08/2012) [-]
**Koruo rolls 679** Yes.
User avatar #1013 to #993 - soulterminatorm (10/03/2012) [-]
So close...
User avatar #995 to #993 - yuknowherpderp (10/03/2012) [-]
GOD DAMMIT.
[ 1191 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)