Shit.... . GANDALF mm: aunt: Wm) ALWAYS LUNG sumo Wm) ALWAYS suxs Roars mm Roars WINNER Aulus I " mun RINGS NOT ; Teu' mm or HR: Frown. PASS mo mm WINNER up l x Shit GANDALF mm: aunt: Wm) ALWAYS LUNG sumo suxs Roars mm WINNER Aulus I " mun RINGS NOT ; Teu' or HR: Frown PASS mo up l x
Upload
Login or register

Shit...

GANDALF
mm: aunt: Wm) ALWAYS
LUNG sumo Wm) ALWAYS
suxs Roars mm Roars
WINNER
Aulus I "
mun RINGS NOT ; Teu' mm or HR:
Frown. PASS mo mm
WINNER
up l x H
IV C
WINNER
WINNER: GAN DALE
BEST FRIEND
faty
SAMWISE GANGER RON WEASLEY
mun V MAIN (mm In
mus mun AND arms may mu mummy
DRAW
mm nun:
I AN we MAGIC.
WINNER
Rtr,
KILL‘ A GIANT SNIDER ANTI V, l) r. ' Is ? FANTASY
WINNER
Dots HALF or THE WORK was m' lir. TO NOTI um: T! r:
AND an MUCH LESS mm: mars mo 5: 15 WITH
cum THEN mu MAIN mm:
WINNER
WINNER RON
Gr n
SAURON mun VOLDEMORT
lall . mls
BE( j\ UAI. **** mm: (Ans BACAUSE nu K Goon can
DRAW
mmn who ' TTN ms
guru's AN ARMY AND mum we: I I/ u( Am' r: x
mm is
WINNER
ANDALE
rm. Dawn mm,
can sir kw an av A WHO an APPARENTY y
GRAMMAR I. E an pawn
WINNER
LIVES 111: mm or
am we TTW, om AS A
WINNER
WINNER: SAURON
G LL' UM ' E GRANGER
lall BASICS
mm, BEING ANNOYING nxsm' n MING ANNOYING
my WI' IND mm Wm: THE
r. or THE ‘"51 or THE "NEST
FRIEND‘ cmcq mm »
DRAW
Hum t?
LIPID'S THE TO N, USES MAGIC AM)
MORDOR (AND TY) A m u/ my mews
mm mm THAT mm suns mm
Wars TO KILL THINK)
WINNER
Att
mm: To M. TOATAL mow mu.
WINNER
rho mun
mm on norm rm
AK swan mum
owns and
Tm. mm OF' POWAR
WINNER
WINNER: HERMIONE
CONCLUSION
6 WINS
6 LOSSES
4 DRAWS
6 WINS
6 LOSSES
4 DRAWS
****.
THAT DIDNT SETTLE ANYTHING, MD IT?
...
+2429
Views: 69061 Submitted: 10/01/2012
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (506)
[ 506 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
54 comments displayed.
#3 - ablt
Reply +171
(10/01/2012) [-]
I thoroughly enjoy Harry Potter, but Lord of The Rings is hands down the better series, especially if we're talking about the films.
#476 to #3 - anon
Reply 0
(10/02/2012) [-]
Can't agree with you there. There is more emotional depth in the harry potter books, along with a better twist, emma Watson and some awesome effects (the duel between Dumbledoor and Slitnose whatshisname)
#501 to #476 - briggsil
Reply +8
(10/02/2012) [-]
More emotional depth? No... just no... absolutely not. If you actually read the LOTR you would know better.
More emotional depth? No... just no... absolutely not. If you actually read the LOTR you would know better.
#512 to #501 - blargchikahonkhonk
Reply +3
(10/02/2012) [-]
as good as the lord of the rings films are and they are amazing films the books still win hands down this is true for most films although there are probably a few exceptions
#514 to #512 - briggsil
Reply +1
(10/02/2012) [-]
Couldn't agree more! I'd say 99/100 the book is always better!
#65 - anonymoose
Reply +150
(10/01/2012) [-]
The person who made this was not a fan of LOTR. I can say that as a fact:
1. Samwise Gamgee
2. Saruman is not Saurons henchman, he wants the ring for himself.
3. Gandalf defeated a giant fire beast that killed an army of Dwarves, to quote that as "not letting people pass", and to say that shows less power than a useless but aesthetic circle of fire is just plain biased.
4. The Witch King wasn't "killed by a grammar loophole" but by a warrior. The "grammar loophole" was a cryptic prophecy.
5. The Eye of Sauron in the books is a metaphor, not an actual giant flaming eye.
6. Sam has a wife and kids with the woman of his dreams, just like Ron.
7. Sam defeated a giant spider while Ron just **** himself at the sight of one.
#71 to #65 - whatevsnicktrololo
-6
has deleted their comment [-]
#86 to #71 - NolanNasty
Reply +3
(10/01/2012) [-]
he is just stating facts
#151 to #65 - anon
Reply 0
(10/02/2012) [-]
the person who made this wasnt simply no fan of LOTR, he doesnt know **** about LOTR. I'm actually pretty mad to see something like this ****.
#488 to #65 - cradlemyballs **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#523 to #65 - alleksi
Reply +1
(10/02/2012) [-]
you know...this whole thing was built around for the punchline at the end



its not a real comparison
#277 to #65 - catassassin ONLINE
Reply +3
(10/02/2012) [-]
Yeah they had to make Harry Potter win some so that the outcome would be a draw. Oh well.
#118 to #65 - EdwardNigma ONLINE
Reply +18
(10/02/2012) [-]
So the whole giant flaming eye thing was just for ***** and giggles in the movies?

I need to read the books. Though, the eye is still damn impressive. It's just "Hey. Middle earth. **** you, I can see you masturbating." and thats hardcore.
#307 to #118 - unfamous
Reply +3
(10/02/2012) [-]
Well a theme in the books they don't really touch on in the movie is how draining and pointless evil and greed is on a being. Sauron fed the power of the ring with his own. This resulted in him being stronger than he originally was with the ring but much, much weaker than he was without it. In the books, by the time of the lord of the rings he did have an actual body but was too weak to actually take to the field and command his army without having the one ring. This is supposed to be ironic because he spent so much time and effort forging this great ring of power and it ended up leaving him weak and useless.
#94 to #65 - fancyshark
Reply +32
(10/01/2012) [-]
me reading point number 7
me reading point number 7
#52 - killerkost
Reply +104
(10/01/2012) [-]
lets give each side one point for each oscar they have won...

The Lord of the Rings: 17
Harry Potter: 0

Damn Harry, get your **** together!
#157 to #52 - LiamNeeson
Reply +1
(10/02/2012) [-]
To be fair, a lot of insanely popular movies don't win ****, despite defining an era.
#361 to #157 - thundagawd ONLINE
Reply +6
(10/02/2012) [-]
If we're talking about movies/stories that inspired an era...   
   
The Harry potter franchise is only 15 years old, the first book having been released in 1997, and the first movie having been released in 2001.   
   
The Lord of the RIngs franchise is over 58 years old, the first book having been released in 1954, and the first movie having been released in 2001 (Less than a month after Harry Potter).   
   
The fact that Lord of the Rings still stands as one of the greatest if not THE greatest fantasy story ever written, and that everyone is still talking about it nearly 60 years later and playing hundreds of games based on the franchise speaks for itself (This coming from a diehard fan of both series).
If we're talking about movies/stories that inspired an era...

The Harry potter franchise is only 15 years old, the first book having been released in 1997, and the first movie having been released in 2001.

The Lord of the RIngs franchise is over 58 years old, the first book having been released in 1954, and the first movie having been released in 2001 (Less than a month after Harry Potter).

The fact that Lord of the Rings still stands as one of the greatest if not THE greatest fantasy story ever written, and that everyone is still talking about it nearly 60 years later and playing hundreds of games based on the franchise speaks for itself (This coming from a diehard fan of both series).
#367 to #361 - LiamNeeson
Reply +3
(10/02/2012) [-]
Oh I know, I said define. As in the 90's 00's kids all know Harry Potter and consider it a major part of their upbringing.

I won't argue that Harry Potter might not exist without LoTR, and that LoTR made the genre.

I'm just saying they've both had massive affects on people's lives.
#372 to #367 - thundagawd ONLINE
Reply +1
(10/02/2012) [-]
I understand, no worries, I grew up with both franchises as a kid, I read the books roughly around the same time, and I saw the movies around the same time as well.

The whole Harry Potter vs. LOTR debates are a little pointless considering LOTR is almost 4 times older than Harry Potter. After all, it could very well be possible that people continue talking about Harry Potter 40 years from now as well. I can understand preferences when it comes to the two, but too many people take it too far =/
#56 to #52 - doomfish ONLINE
Reply +18
(10/01/2012) [-]
#18 - superfrogman
Reply +71
(10/01/2012) [-]
No way are death eaters better than the nazgul. I am ignoring that point.
#378 to #18 - nasavvy
Reply -1
(10/02/2012) [-]
Come on man, they eat ******* death.
#388 to #378 - yayitzmatt
Reply +7
(10/02/2012) [-]
Yeah, and the Nazgul are the ones who kill people, i.e. causing death. It's kind of equivalent to the dung beetles relationship with anything that poops. :D
#98 - asgerfyr
Reply +53
(10/01/2012) [-]
HOW THE **** CAN RON BEAT SAM. HOW CAN ANYONE BEAT SAM IN A BATTLE OF FRIENDSHIP?    
SAM DESERVES THE BIGGEST BROFIST IN THE HISTORY OF TIME.
HOW THE **** CAN RON BEAT SAM. HOW CAN ANYONE BEAT SAM IN A BATTLE OF FRIENDSHIP?
SAM DESERVES THE BIGGEST BROFIST IN THE HISTORY OF TIME.
#133 to #98 - lawkingdom
Reply +1
(10/02/2012) [-]
plus i don't remember Sam being a big pussy
#109 to #98 - worldofwarcraftdog
Reply +14
(10/01/2012) [-]
everyone agree with this
#17 - igelior
Reply +50
(10/01/2012) [-]
>implying gandalf has no real magical powers
>implying sam doesn't get pussy in the end
>implying dragon riding wraiths are less awesome than some mask wearing emo fags
>implying the harry potter series is anything else than some illogical literarily irrelevant fairy tale that is only popular because HERP DERP WIZARDS

still humouros content
#21 to #17 - thatsnotmyname
Reply +15
(10/01/2012) [-]
The person who made this doesnt seem to have read the books at all. Gandalf is unbelievably powerful
#74 to #21 - derakus
Reply +4
(10/01/2012) [-]
Considering the Gandalf isn't even human.
#119 to #74 - franklyimaperson
Reply +2
(10/02/2012) [-]
Considering apparently Gandalf is a friend of all nature, can call upon pterodactyl sized eagles at a whim, and is the aspect of a god I forget the name of...
#374 to #119 - mrbuu
Reply +1
(10/02/2012) [-]
think its called mala (demi-god)
Also, didn't he pimp slap 2 arrows and a axe thrown at him. and one shot from the one of the best archers in the entire world from about 5 feet away.
#509 to #374 - hopetify
Reply +1
(10/02/2012) [-]
Isnt it mayar?
#478 to #119 - anon
Reply 0
(10/02/2012) [-]
The eagles came from another Wizard, Radagast, who only gave a **** to help cause Gandy called for it.
#75 to #74 - derakus
Reply +2
(10/01/2012) [-]
Realised that's slightly confusing, GANDALF ALL THE WAY!
#37 - vrox
Reply +23
(10/01/2012) [-]
Gandalf could wipe an entire army on his own. He doen't use his power so much, however, since the men need to learn be able to solve their problems on their own. He is just there to aid them.

Snape is far more awesome than just being an emo guy, and the fact that the death was staged was pretty epic, but yes, returning from the dead makes Gandalf better.

Sam's power is courage, and determination to help Froto. He nearly drowned himself trying to get Froto to stay with him. Magic is still better, but you gotta give Sam some credit.

Ron probably has some crazy awesome moment other than that, but nothing comes to mind to be honest...

You called Neville the comic relief character? Really? Neville is badass! He should have been the real hero in the series. He's a whole lot better of a person than the whiny Harry Potter.

The rolls of Gollum and Hermione are completely different... Im not even going to comment on those, it so dumb of a comparison.
#390 to #37 - alexkaz
Reply 0
(10/02/2012) [-]
**alexkaz rolled a random image posted in comment #58 at hybrid obesity ** Gollum and Hermione's rolls
#78 to #37 - derakus
Reply +5
(10/01/2012) [-]
The ***** a "Froto"?
#176 to #78 - vrox
Reply +2
(10/02/2012) [-]
Oh shoot, I made that same typo twice in there. I feel kinda dumb.
#177 to #176 - derakus
Reply +4
(10/02/2012) [-]
It kinda sounds like Frodo mated with toto from wizard of oz
#380 to #177 - nasavvy
Reply +1
(10/02/2012) [-]
God **** my sides.
#54 to #37 - anonymoose
Reply +46
(10/01/2012) [-]
To be fair, both Gollum and Hermione are there for sex appeal.
#44 - anonymoose
Reply +33
(10/01/2012) [-]
OHHH **** NO! Gandalf is more powerful than every character in Harry Potter combined.
#215 to #44 - wrpen
Reply 0
(10/02/2012) [-]
It should be noted that, albeit with basically super powers, all the magic users in Harry Potter are at least half human. Gandalf is basically a god compared to average human wizards.
#45 to #44 - anonymoose
Reply +22
(10/01/2012) [-]
Another **** NO!
#200 to #45 - stupidpancakes **User deleted account**
Reply 0
(10/02/2012) [-]
I don't get what they mean by "can be killed by a grammar loophole". Can someone please enlighten me?

iamnotacleverman.jpg
#211 to #200 - wrpen
Reply +2
(10/02/2012) [-]
The witch king can be "killed by no man". So a woman kills him. That's basically it.
#48 to #44 - anonymoose
Reply +31
(10/01/2012) [-]
<- Oh, and just to prove my point.
<- Oh, and just to prove my point.
#250 to #48 - sposadox
Reply +2
(10/02/2012) [-]
I don't get it. All he did was shine a light in their eyes. Did he do any useful magic in the series? (Honest question, havent read the books)
#465 to #250 - anonymoose
Reply +3
(10/02/2012) [-]
In the books, he's a super powerful wizard who is feared by every enemy. The Nazgul are fleeing from fear of him rather than from the light.
#272 to #250 - anon
Reply 0
(10/02/2012) [-]
Assuming that it is just a light, which wouldn't make sense as they're flying out into the sun towards them anyways. The light not only repels them, but is assumed to have enough power that it causes the Fell Beasts to fly away from him in a sort of terror.

Sources: Some ******** that I pulled out of my head using **** I saw and knowing Gandalf is badass regardless of nonbelievers.
#398 - rawrbowwow
Reply +30
(10/02/2012) [-]
I think Nazgul are way cooler than the Death Eaters, but I ******* lost it here
#103 - marlkarxthethird
Reply +28
(10/01/2012) [-]
...How in the name of Satan's fiery asshole did Dumbledore beat Gandalf in any categories?   
HOW THE HELL DID VOLDEMORT BEAT SAURON IN ANY CATEGORIES?   
THIS **** IS BLASPHEMOUS
...How in the name of Satan's fiery asshole did Dumbledore beat Gandalf in any categories?
HOW THE HELL DID VOLDEMORT BEAT SAURON IN ANY CATEGORIES?
THIS **** IS BLASPHEMOUS
#115 to #103 - connorsg
Reply +5
(10/01/2012) [-]
agreed