Offical Story. not OC might be repost but its that time of year again.. I can't help but post this image... neunelf
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (96)
[ 96 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
45 comments displayed.
#3 - InglushMayjur
Reply +43
(09/11/2012) [-]
I can't help but post this image...
#9 to #3 - kalram
Reply 0
(09/11/2012) [-]
Thumb for you sir!
#6 - obedientflyer
Reply -44
(09/11/2012) [-]
This image has expired
My father died on 9/11
I can still remember his last words from the plane

What were they?
ALLAH AKBAR!
#44 to #6 - tinkletoes **User deleted account**
Reply 0
(09/12/2012) [-]
I never asked what his last words were.
I never asked what his last words were.
#35 to #6 - bknob
Reply +1
(09/12/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#17 to #6 - HarvietheDinkle
Reply +11
(09/11/2012) [-]
with this joke
with this joke
#7 to #6 - endface
Reply +31
(09/11/2012) [-]
This joke is getting really old. Try coming up with something new please.

For instance, right off the top of my head:

My father was a security guard for the twin towers, he told me that when he saw the first plane hit the first thing he thought to himself was; "****...this better not be coming out of my pay."
#8 to #7 - endface
Reply +1
(09/11/2012) [-]
Thing = building.

...Don't know what happened there...
#20 to #7 - zzforrest
Reply -1
(09/11/2012) [-]
Yeah see?
Why do people repost so ******* often when it is so easy to make something original?
#12 - kraetyz
Reply -3
(09/11/2012) [-]
Allahu akhbar, death to amerikan pigs!! 911 2012!!
كنت وطي ضخمة. انتقل تقتل نفسك.
#18 to #12 - ninjalazor **User deleted account**
+14
has deleted their comment [-]
#19 to #18 - kraetyz
Reply +2
(09/11/2012) [-]
Also 'Go kill yourself', but yes. :D

When I typed it in, I wrote "You are a huge faggot", but google translate is a bad place to do linguistics.
#14 to #12 - vassia
Reply +24
(09/11/2012) [-]
1/10 made me reply.
#28 - outerspacebar
Reply +21
(09/12/2012) [-]
Loot at my reply to a different OPs allegations of conspiracy: I am studying to become a civil engineer so listen up you retard. The building in madrid did not have a plane crash into it, causing major damage even before the fire. When the plane crashed, jet fuel leaked down and started fires as well as the original fireball that shot through the building via the elevator shafts, causing major damage to the buildings supports. The jet fuel, fueled hotter fires than that of the Madrid building. The WTC had older fire fighting technology than the Madrid building. The WTC was also under more stress from the extra weight of other floors. The buildings used a tube support system which was only on the perimeter and core of the building, it had no extra support columns on the floors unlike the building in madrid which is why the madrid building survived. The WTC lacked modern insolation and it was being upgraded but at the time of the crash, only levels up to 18 had been fire-proofed. I also love how you leave out the fact that the building survived a major truck bomb (1,500 pounds of explosives) in the basement of it or the 1975 fire in the north tower that ravaged several floors of the building. Before you post retarded counter-arguments OP, know that you are getting yourself into.
#37 to #28 - sandkastensand [OP]
Reply 0
(09/12/2012) [-]
I don't really believe in the conspiracy stories either.
Just found the picture funny and wanted people's opinion on the matter.
And yours seems pretty sophisticated, so thanks for that.
#55 to #28 - recoveryseven **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#90 to #28 - skcid
Reply 0
(09/12/2012) [-]
thank you.

also I hate when people call it a conspiracy because i ******* live in new york and was there when it happened. my grandmother's house is across the east river from manhattan, and i watched from her street as the towers fell. they did not ******* photoshop real life. the next day, we all woke up to thin films of soot across everything.

people who look at videos of the attack and are like "OOH HURR DEURR THAT HELICOPTER IS FLYING IN A SIMILAR PATTERN MUST BE A LOOP THIS VIDEO IS SHOPPED" make me wish terrorists had killed them and the other idiots who believe that ****, not the innocent ******* people and brave as **** firefighters who actually died.
#38 to #28 - holdup
Reply +2
(09/12/2012) [-]
my dilemma with the "official story" is simply that the plane hit the building from the side (naturally, the supports there weakened the most rapidly and dramatically) yet, the building falls in on it's self. if a ******** with a plane could do that do that then it seems to me demo experts (that have ********* of education and go to great time and effort to achive such results) make a largely redundant effort.
#40 to #38 - gildemoono
Reply +4
(09/12/2012) [-]
Demo experts go to such great lengths so they can contain their collapses, I dont know if you noticed, but debris from the tower decimated ground zero, and the hazardous smoke flooded streets blocks away, not to mention its much more expensive launch something with enough speed to critically cripple a towers stability than it would be to strategically place explosives. Civil engineers also go to great lengths to contain the dreaded day a tower drops. Considering the twin towers were about half a kilometer tall, they wouldnt want the thing to fall over if the cause were a localized, uneven damage zone (i.e. plane crash). So naturally they designed the tower as best they could to collapse in on itself to prevent it from landing on other buildings.

Hopefully this was some food for thought. good night.
#77 to #40 - spartusee
Reply 0
(09/12/2012) [-]
It was 110 stories tall.
#78 to #77 - gildemoono
Reply 0
(09/12/2012) [-]
your point?
#79 to #78 - spartusee
Reply 0
(09/12/2012) [-]
That how would even demo men get that much debris safe? Also the conspiracy is that they did this to start a war to get oil so maybe they wanted it to look legit. I am indifferent just making counter points.
#81 to #79 - gildemoono
Reply +1
(09/12/2012) [-]
I think I wasnt very clear in my first sentence, ground zero was decimated and smoke covered the city even when civil engineers tried to control the collapse. a demo man wouldnt. A tower that size would probably be straight up dissassembled were it to be torn down. Were a demo man to be assigned the job, it would be a slow segmented proccess, leveling the tower story by story.
#41 to #40 - holdup
Reply 0
(09/12/2012) [-]
I know that, but the building did not fall in a awkward direction, or collapse outward.(in the direction of the weakened supports).
#50 to #41 - gildemoono
Reply +2
(09/12/2012) [-]
off topic, but id have to say "down" is a pretty awkward direction for a tower to go.
#58 to #50 - outerspacebar
Reply +2
(09/12/2012) [-]
The structure suffered what is known as a progressive collapse in which a chain reaction contributes to the collapse. In this case it was the floors pancaking on top of eachother and weighting eachother down to the breaking point evenly
#100 to #58 - holdup
Reply 0
(09/14/2012) [-]
problem with that theory being that the damage was more severe in the impact zone, the supports would fail in that side of the building first. and the upper levels would tip in that direction. even if the difference was minute. it would be enough.
#52 to #50 - holdup
Reply 0
(09/12/2012) [-]
well, that is true, but down like a domino is more what I was thinking.
#43 to #28 - nengcaste **User deleted account**
+13
has deleted their comment [-]
#87 to #43 - drewbridge
Reply 0
(09/12/2012) [-]
JEWS
#15 - mspaintpro
Reply +16
(09/11/2012) [-]
#25 to #15 - Anoj
Reply 0
(09/12/2012) [-]
i actually thought about posting that like last week (it would be oc to me at least) but i figured it would be tooo far
#34 to #25 - johnshepherd
Reply +7
(09/12/2012) [-]
Gone too far? On the internet?
Gone too far? On the internet?
#47 - thisisdj
Reply +14
(09/12/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#57 to #47 - bayouconner
Reply +1
(09/12/2012) [-]
what game is that?
#59 to #57 - WAFFLELOLZ
Reply +3
(09/12/2012) [-]
Just cause... two... pic not related
#66 - Sammael
Reply +10
(09/12/2012) [-]
Since answer to every stupid part of the stupid conspiracy theory "proof" can be found on the interent with 10 minute search people who still believe that **** are not just stupid and ignorant (which can be fixed) they are deliberately stupid and ignorant and should BE fixed so they don't breed.
#93 to #66 - anon
Reply 0
(09/12/2012) [-]
You used one period in that entire slur of words.
Please learn to English before you proclaim your genuineness.
#95 to #93 - Sammael
Reply +2
(09/12/2012) [-]
Please learn to English what? To English my muffins? To English my shirt? More information needed.
Also genuineness, it does not mean what you think it means. You probably wanted to say geniusness, but that isn't really an English word.
Try this: "Please learn to write proper English, before proclaiming your genius."
#75 to #66 - JuliusC
Reply +1
(09/12/2012) [-]
omg perfection^
#4 - imaschizo
Reply +10
(09/11/2012) [-]
holy **** i finally get to use all my 9/11 pics (and gifs)
holy **** i finally get to use all my 9/11 pics (and gifs)
#24 - hadrian
Reply +8
(09/11/2012) [-]
Anybody who believes the "inside job" theories clearly knows nothing about architecture, structural engineering, or the chemical properties of steel.
#39 to #24 - varrlegrimscythe
Reply 0
(09/12/2012) [-]
that and mass x acceleration + building = destruction
#45 to #24 - thisisdj
Reply 0
(09/12/2012) [-]
The architect of the buildings even said why and how they collapsed.
#61 - soundofwinter ONLINE
Reply +7
(09/12/2012) [-]
Comment Picture