...bang. . it sh' , roligt' BEE THE tait' Cara QUE . Mtr All set Lads fire up -this ' Lag Hadrian article _ Ger and see. g  bang it sh' roligt' BEE THE tait' Cara QUE Mtr All set Lads fire up -this ' Lag Hadrian article _ Ger and see g
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (110)
[ 110 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
70 comments displayed.
#6 - illusiveman
Reply +66
(09/09/2012) [-]
#17 to #6 - thekeeblerguy
Reply -27
(09/09/2012) [-]
YOU COPIER
#20 - dinkcool
Reply +49
(09/09/2012) [-]
#117 to #20 - hates
Reply 0
(01/05/2014) [-]
I opened the page source to try to change the "Nope" due to boredom, and noticed this

Yes, I have a few tabs open
#118 to #117 - dinkcool
Reply 0
(01/10/2014) [-]
Dude, this comment is over one year old. How the hell did you find it?
#119 to #118 - hates
Reply 0
(01/10/2014) [-]
I don't even remember
#24 to #20 - ponys
Reply +6
(09/09/2012) [-]
Right click, view page source.
#36 to #24 - pineappleninja
Reply +1
(09/09/2012) [-]
<!-- if the lhc actually destroys the earth & this page isn't yet updated
please email mike@ You need to login to view this link to receive a full refund

___
/ / &#92;\ Has the great lazer eyed bunny
\ \ &#92;\ destroyed the world yet?
\ \ &#92;\ _______
______________ \ \ &#92;&#95;_ / \
____ _/ (O)&#45;-------------------------------------------- / \
/ \/ ( __| | |
|____/ | ------- &#92; status: In Progress \ /
|______________/_______________// [73%/100%] eta: ..Soon &#95;_______/


-->
#38 to #36 - pineappleninja
Reply +9
(09/09/2012) [-]
oh ****

what the **** have i done...
#67 to #38 - pokeface
Reply +1
(09/09/2012) [-]
there
#23 to #20 - blehehe
Reply +9
(09/09/2012) [-]
The source of that page is ******* hilarious.

view-source:hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/
#87 to #23 - funnyjunktitan
Reply 0
(09/09/2012) [-]
that's awesome
#29 to #23 - anthonyd
Reply 0
(09/09/2012) [-]
HA
#48 - jjgf
Reply -1
(09/09/2012) [-]
if this were real, how these universe was created?, sorry i´m a little stoned right now
#71 to #48 - gmarrox
Reply 0
(09/09/2012) [-]
Being stoned has never impaired my motor skills or typing ability. You make weed look bad worse when you do that. Stahp.
#56 to #48 - fuzzyballs
Reply +2
(09/09/2012) [-]
that's no excuse
#58 to #56 - kasatka
Reply +3
(09/09/2012) [-]
If anything it should heighten his understanding.
#51 to #48 - ZakyNine
Reply +23
(09/09/2012) [-]
just enjoy the gif
just enjoy the gif
#54 to #51 - adxminisgay **User deleted account**
+5
has deleted their comment [-]
#68 to #51 - dropgasm
Reply 0
(09/09/2012) [-]
FUUUUUUUUCK manthats an awesome gif ive been staring at this fora few minuets its so ******* captivating like wat
its pretty awesome that gif is awesome
#74 to #68 - ZakyNine
Reply 0
(09/09/2012) [-]
yes, but is the gif awesome?
#76 to #74 - dropgasm
Reply 0
(09/09/2012) [-]
what?
#93 to #76 - luismamontes
Reply 0
(09/09/2012) [-]
You repeated the word awesome a couple of times.
#110 to #93 - dropgasm
Reply 0
(09/10/2012) [-]
I don't even remember this lmfao, I was probably drunk out of my mind, sorry :x
#2 - howtosuckdicks
Reply 0
(09/09/2012) [-]
I read that as Hardon Particle Collider..
#11 to #2 - waffies
Reply +18
(09/09/2012) [-]
#33 - nugafluga
Reply +15
(09/09/2012) [-]
seems like a super legit theory...
#41 to #33 - slumberdonkey
Reply -5
(09/09/2012) [-]
....that's not a theory.
#42 to #41 - richardastley ONLINE
Reply +1
(09/09/2012) [-]
There are two different definitions of theory. One is an untested hypothesis, and the other is a system of non-disproven thought.
#73 to #42 - gmarrox
Reply +2
(09/09/2012) [-]
Actually a theory is a thoroughly tested hypothesis. An untested hypothesis is a hypothesis.
#44 to #42 - slumberdonkey
Reply +1
(09/09/2012) [-]
Didn't think about it that way... wow...
#47 to #44 - richardastley ONLINE
Reply +2
(09/09/2012) [-]
lol But using the first definition definitely supports idiots saying "Evolution is just a theory" without realizing what scientific theory actually implies.
#59 to #47 - slumberdonkey
Reply +1
(09/09/2012) [-]
yeah, i realize my idiocy now. I gladly receive my red thumbs
#69 - hadtomakeanewname
Reply +13
(09/09/2012) [-]
**hadtomakeanewname rolled a random image posted in comment #979135 at FJ Pony Thread 14 ** how the universe began
#72 to #69 - yunablade
Reply +13
(09/09/2012) [-]
I came a whole new universe...
#43 - subaqueousreach
Reply +13
(09/09/2012) [-]
Surprisingly enough this is exactly how I figure it might have happened.

Go ahead and thumb me down if you think it's stupid, but I'd like to know how my impossible to truly know explanation is any less relevant than your impossible to truly know explanation.
#45 to #43 - commandurrazor **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#57 to #43 - fuzzyballs
Reply 0
(09/09/2012) [-]
a teacher explained it to me once
and it made sense back then
#77 to #43 - gammajk
Reply 0
(09/09/2012) [-]
That is pretty stupid, no less stupid than believing that a god did it.
BTW, it's not an "impossible to truly know explanation", we actually have a pretty good understanding of how it happened. There's multiple theories, sure, but saying that we will never know is like a 19th century person saying we'll never know how electricity works.
#107 to #77 - subaqueousreach
Reply 0
(09/10/2012) [-]
We have several theories, the most commonly discussed being the "Big Bang", but we have no idea how it actually started. That's why they're called theories, because no one really knows how it happened, we can only project how we think it might have happened. It really is impossible to truly know unless you were there when it happened.
#109 to #107 - gammajk
Reply 0
(09/10/2012) [-]
Actually, no, that's not why they're called theories and you just showed your ignorance of the scientific world by saying that. A theory is NOT a wild guess, a theory is a hypothesis that has undergone rigorous experimentation and reviewing. IE The THEORY of gravity, the THEORY of evolution, the THEORY of magnetism, etc etc etc.

And no, you don't have to have been there to know what happened. If you walk into a room and you see something travelling through the air straight upwards, you can deduce that the ball must have, at a previous point, been lower than its current position and travelling at a faster speed due to the deceleration of gravity. So no, you don't have to have been there if there's no reason to think there's anything else happening, i.e. your ball actually has a rocket booster or it teleported into the room by JESUS HIMSELF
#111 to #109 - subaqueousreach
Reply 0
(09/11/2012) [-]
So you're saying then, that you know without a shadow or miniscule trace of a doubt that the big bang (or whatever theory you choose to believe in) caused the beginning of our universe? 100% fact then?

Your examples of theories are comparing apples to oranges here. The theories of gravity and magnetism have been proven as fact, they are no longer theories because we have proven what causes them to act the way they do. The theory of evolution is still a theory because we are missing the vital piece of evidence that is required to completely prove it without a doubt.

The primary difference between these theories and the beginning of the universe theories is that they are something we can physically study. Something we can legitimately work with. When it comes to the creation of our universe all we can possibly do is think about how it might have happened, because there is no way we can actually know unless we re-create the event or find a way to view it again without destroying ourselves in the process.

Seriously think about it for a second before you go off half-cocked that I'm an idiot because I think differently than you on a subject.

Also, not once did I ever state that theories were random guesses, but our projections of how we think the outcome came to be.
#112 to #111 - gammajk
Reply 0
(09/11/2012) [-]
Please go receive an education before talking about any matter of science, you clearly never have.
#113 to #112 - subaqueousreach
Reply 0
(09/12/2012) [-]
Okay then genius, how did the universe come to be. Since you're clearly so knowledgeable in this particular field.
#115 to #113 - gammajk
Reply 0
(09/12/2012) [-]
cont.
Again, you don't need to physically work with something to come up with a theory on how it happened. Do you disbelieve the theory of star formation? Do you disbelieve the theory of planetary formation?
We can examine phenomena laid out before us. How do you explain cosmic background radiation? How do you explain redshift? I'd like to know, because we already have explanations for these and the math backs it up.

We don't need to recreate the event to know something happened. Again, back to the most basic example I can think of. Imagine you witness a ball flying in a direction at a velocity. You can pick anything for those, flying up at 300 mph or flying diagonally down and right at 30 degrees at .178534 kph. When you first see it, you note its position. Based on the fact that it is moving at a constant velocity in a constant direction without changing, you can draw a line backwards on its trajectory to trace back where it came from. Are you going to say that it may have been flying loop-de-loops and then suddenly starting flying in one direction at a constant speed, simply because you weren't there to witness it? Sure, go ahead, it's just as rational as believing that a god created the universe.

tl;dr learn how to science
#114 to #113 - gammajk
Reply 0
(09/12/2012) [-]
When did I say I know how the universe came into existence?
The big bang theory is NOT a theory of how the universe first came into existence, it explains what happened AFTER that. A more accurate term would be the Ballooning Theory.
"The theories of gravity and magnetism have been proven as fact, they are no longer theories because we have proven what causes them to act the way they do."
No. No, no, no, no and no. NOTHING has been proven as fact. I'm going to lay out a few definitions here for you.
Wild guess - A random guess at what causes something, i.e. fairies control gravity. These are not supported by any evidence and have no actual connection to reality. Sometimes they're right, most of the time they aren't.
Hypothesis - An EDUCATED suggestion based upon examination of a phenomena. IE electric current flow produces a magnetic field or there is a force between any two objects in space. Some are wrong, such as nerves are hollow tubes that carry a fluid to control muscles, demons cause headaches and, something that's still being debated for some reason, god created the universe.
Theory - A hypothesis that is supported by evidence and is capable of adapting as new evidence arises.

So, now that THAT'S out of the way, let's move on.
Gravity and magnetism are STILL THEORIES. They are CONSIDERED as fact, and even today they are still being added to and changed to fit with new evidence. That doesn't mean that it is absolutely 100% flawless with no room for improvement. You think we've solved gravity? Think again.
Evolution IS CONSIDERED AS FACT. There is NO evidence against it and it is supported by MOUNTAINS of evidence. There is no "missing piece of evidence" and if you can name one I'd like to hear it.

And no, you DON'T need to actually witness the event to deduce that it happened. I didn't witness the bombing of Hiroshima, does that mean I'm not allowed to think it happened?
#116 to #114 - subaqueousreach
Reply 0
(09/13/2012) [-]
I'll admit my faults in definitions, I was thinking Hypothesis when I was saying theory, that's my mistake and I apologize for the confusion.

Also, there's a difference between witnessing your example and the creation of the universe again. With the Bombing of Hiroshima there were people there to witness it, it was a major news event, I don't think anybody hasn't seen an image of the nuke going off. We have physical proof of the event.

But reading back, I seem to have left out some information on my "belief". Not once did I say the big bang didn't happen. What I had tried to portray in my first comment, was that I believe there was someone or something that caused our big bang to occur, like it showed in the image. I fully support the Big Bang theory, just not the way most people would have me believe it happened.

On another note (in response to your earlier comment as well), why does believing in god make me stupid? I'm not saying it was, but how do you know for sure a god or similar omniscient being couldn't have caused the reaction that created our universe?
#46 to #43 - commandurrazor **User deleted account**
+4
has deleted their comment [-]
#52 to #46 - adxminisgay **User deleted account**
+10
has deleted their comment [-]
#55 to #52 - commandurrazor **User deleted account**
+8
has deleted their comment [-]
#53 to #46 - adxminisgay **User deleted account**
+6
has deleted their comment [-]
#62 to #53 - commandurrazor **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#30 - iliekcereal
Reply 0
(09/09/2012) [-]
Can someone explain to me what exactly this does? Like, in simple people terms? I am not a clever man.
#32 to #30 - hadron
Reply +9
(09/09/2012) [-]
I hate being brought up in conversation
#31 to #30 - dratyats
Reply +11
(09/09/2012) [-]
smashes particles into each other at extremely high speeds in order to see what happens. its how they found out about the "god particle"
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider
#34 to #31 - iliekcereal
-2
has deleted their comment [-]
#35 to #34 - notstyg [OP]
Reply 0
(09/09/2012) [-]
why... why.... how can you be... really?
#37 to #35 - iliekcereal
Reply 0
(09/09/2012) [-]
....Nevermind. ._.
#1 - anonymousattorney
Reply 0
(09/09/2012) [-]
Nice. I think we've used the Hadron Collider a few times already, though.
#19 to #1 - nengcaste **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#21 to #19 - anonymousattorney
Reply 0
(09/09/2012) [-]
Well, I know we've used it at least once, so I think we're good for now.
#22 to #21 - nengcaste **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#27 to #1 - hadron
Reply +8
(09/09/2012) [-]
CAN YOU ALL STOP TALKING ABOUT ME
#3 to #1 - battlefieldlover
Reply +11
(09/09/2012) [-]
What about a large Hadron Collider?
#4 to #3 - anonymousattorney
Reply 0
(09/09/2012) [-]
That too!
#7 to #4 - ryantheatheist
Reply +1
(09/09/2012) [-]
What about a XXL Hadron Collider
#14 to #7 - anonymousattorney
Reply +2
(09/09/2012) [-]
With a side order of fries?
#8 to #7 - rotosushi
Reply -25
(09/09/2012) [-]
AMERICA IS GOING AS FAST AS THEY CAN DAMMIT!! WE WOULD BE BUILDING FASTER IF SO MANY OF THE WORKERS WOULD STOP HAVING HEART ATTACKS!!



#9 to #8 - zallaz
Reply +3
(09/09/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#15 - needsumcake
Reply +7
(09/09/2012) [-]