Logic does not apply to.... Funny Junk.. Are you ? Take the following test to find out. QUESTION if sameone attempted to inflict pain, and possibly death upon t
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Logic does not apply to...

Funny Junk.

Are you ? Take the following test to find out.
QUESTION
if sameone attempted to inflict pain, and possibly death upon
the person yeu bye the most, would you be willing to use a
gun to save your hired one?
SELECT YOUR ANSWER
A) Yes
KEY
if you answered A:
You are not .
If you answered B:
Unfortunately for yew gwed me, you are truly .
If you answered A, but still claim to be antigen: 2 A E
...
  • Recommend tagsx

Comments(775):

[ 775 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #26 - jimmycrank (09/07/2012) [+] (40 replies)
a street gang attempts a drive-by shooting unfortunately your child is accidently hit in the cross-fire...would you

A) Rather they didn't have guns at all?

or

B) avenge your child's death using your own gun?



If you picked A) you're anti-gun.. if you picked B) you might be a psycho, if you picked a) and you're still pro-gun then well.....you're a ******* retard....


That Logic works both ways
#129 - iFail (09/07/2012) [+] (7 replies)
If nobody had guns, the world would be a much better place. I can understand that many gun owners use them for sport or protection, but those who misuse them are generally ******** that only use so that they can pretend they're strong.
Most people who shoot somebody else out of anything other than protection, are too scared to actually put up a fight.
I'll use a real life example, last summer I was playing basketball with my friend in the court outside the school and then these guys come up just trying to cause trouble. I didn't have a gun, but before you know it I got in a fight, and yeah, I might have got beaten up, but it's not all bad. Because now I live with my uncle and auntie in Bel-Air
User avatar #201 - gasster (09/07/2012) [+] (2 replies)
This is stupid ." would you use a localised nuclear bomb on a town of pedophiles? "

Yes? Then you're pro nuclear war!

Silliness
#40 - lujan ONLINE (09/07/2012) [+] (3 replies)
This image has expired
while I don't necessarily think this post is logical, I am not anti-gun.
here's the average anti-gun protester
#664 - rambearclaw (09/07/2012) [-]
Guns are good, did you know Jesus and Moses used guns to defeat the Romans?
User avatar #552 - xxKingKhanxx (09/07/2012) [+] (1 reply)
It would be cool if there were no guns at all and we just solved our problems with martial arts.
#189 - shutes (09/07/2012) [+] (6 replies)
American was founded by men who wanted their damn guns.
American was founded by men who wanted their damn guns.
#389 - stromming (09/07/2012) [+] (1 reply)
What.

"Are you anti-rape?"

"Yes.."

"So you wouldn't rape a perfect 10/10 woman to save 10 million lives?"

"Of course I would"

"THEN YOU ARE NOT ANTI RAPE!!!!"

This faulty logic could be used for about any situation. Pic unrelated but awesome
#493 - mrsecret ONLINE (09/07/2012) [+] (1 reply)
i would just use my bear hands
#303 - callmemrdillan (09/07/2012) [+] (2 replies)
A. No question, if my someone ever hurt my Mom or Dad, I wouldn't think twice.
A. No question, if my someone ever hurt my Mom or Dad, I wouldn't think twice.
User avatar #314 to #304 - thegirlyoudespise (09/07/2012) [-]
your daughter is going to have a fun dating life
User avatar #208 - nerdrugger (09/07/2012) [-]
im not anti gun.

im anti stupidity with guns
#406 - loulougia ONLINE (09/07/2012) [+] (23 replies)
Let's be simpler...   
In Europe, we don't grow with guns, and they are less gun kills.   
Simple correlation:   
If people can get guns easier, criminals can too.   
   
Furthermore, if someone REALLY wanted someone dead, he would now how to, and the revolver  you barely know how to use won't be useful...
Let's be simpler...
In Europe, we don't grow with guns, and they are less gun kills.
Simple correlation:
If people can get guns easier, criminals can too.

Furthermore, if someone REALLY wanted someone dead, he would now how to, and the revolver you barely know how to use won't be useful...
#170 - Spikeydeath (09/07/2012) [-]
i chose c.
use 2 guns
#62 - turbosune (09/07/2012) [+] (20 replies)
I'll just leave this here.
#68 to #65 - mariogomez (09/07/2012) [-]
Japan, about 130 million people, Britain, about 60 million people, Germany about 80 million people, Sweden 10 million, Switzerland about 8 million people, Canada about 34 million people, Israel about 8 million people.

So lets add em up, 330 million people in all those countries against the 314 million in America, now add up the deaths 263 vs 10,728. You must be incredibly smart?
#164 - notsixroller (09/07/2012) [-]
This says nothing about non-lethal action or water pistols...
User avatar #115 - ballsofpenis ONLINE (09/07/2012) [-]
Im anti-guns for one reason and one reason only.
I want to see people fight with swords and melee weapons instead of guns :D
User avatar #64 - semisane (09/07/2012) [-]
This is funnyjunk, not post-your-misinformed-political-opinions.
User avatar #309 - timmywankenobi (09/07/2012) [+] (1 reply)
ok here is a test to determine weather or not you are a animal activists

you see a bunny in the forest do you

A. beat it to death with your bare hands ?
or
B. watch it from a distance

if you answered B. you now work for PETA
User avatar #145 - SuitUp (09/07/2012) [+] (11 replies)
Pfff guns, what a lazyman weapon. I've done archery and fencing for years. Give me a bow and rapier any day; A bow is accurate and effective in the same distances you would use a gun but with the added advantage of being able to go over walls and look badass, and a sword looks pimp as hell when handled properly.
#152 to #145 - irishlawyer (09/07/2012) [-]
Oh really now?
User avatar #502 - metajunky ONLINE (09/07/2012) [+] (5 replies)
guns should continue to be available, but there needs to be better prevention from keeping maniacs from getting high powered kinds. over a decade since columbine and yet these degenerates keep killing innocent people still. purchasing a gun should be stricter
#513 to #502 - dedaluminus (09/07/2012) [-]
Negative, ghost rider. Criminals will get their guns through criminal means; there's a thriving black market in high-powered arms, and every time gun purchase and control laws get stricter, the black market thrives even more. What we need is more money in law enforcement, so they can catch black market dealers of weapons, and make it harder for criminals to purchase those types of armaments.
[ 775 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)