Facial illusion. . Twe pictures with the mes. But, in ene mete we see a girl and in the ether ene — a guy. The feet is thatch's , was en by mixing male and fema Facial illusion Twe pictures with the mes But in ene mete we see a girl and ether — guy The feet is thatch's was en by mixing male fema
Upload
Login or register

Facial illusion

Twe pictures with the mes.
But, in ene mete we see a girl and in the ether ene — a guy.
The feet is thatch's , was en by mixing male and female , features,
whim gave this ' mes. with a Tm.' we N centrist, em brain the ,
en the Mil as being a female me, while en the .'dtt. R% m mete, where centrist is hie her, em
brain lune be a males mes. Fer me, this is the best N the an
...
+1303
Views: 36679 Submitted: 09/04/2012
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (161)
[ 161 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
36 comments displayed.
#70 - mytrakytra
Reply +181
(09/05/2012) [-]
This image has expired
#80 to #70 - tortuga
Reply +2
(09/05/2012) [-]
I laughed so I hard I started to cough
#77 to #70 - missjessicaparker
Reply +11
(09/05/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#57 - thelonelyfeel
Reply +28
(09/05/2012) [-]
Well after some masterful photoshop and close examination I have found it is not the contrast. It is the shading around the eyes that gets it for me. In the right of this photo (girl one) it looks like the eyelashes are thicker and like there is a bit of makeup on the face and more detail/smoothness to the skin creating a more feminine appearance. While on the left it's more flat and broad and plain showing more of a masculine appearance.
#63 to #57 - eternalcorn
Reply 0
(09/05/2012) [-]
people arent symmetrical. though i agree and doubt it's just a contrast thing, just because someone has a differently shaped eye on one side than the other doesn't make it a contrast difference.
#64 to #63 - thelonelyfeel
Reply 0
(09/05/2012) [-]
The contrast is the main difference but it's obvious that it's not the only difference yeah. If it was than the left side would be dark around the eyes too and the lips wouldn't be pretty much the same color.
#79 to #64 - anon
Reply 0
(09/05/2012) [-]
The most obvious difference is how the eyes and lips stand out...making it look more feminine
I thought it was just a before and after tanning picture at first
#148 - aldheim
Reply +27
(09/05/2012) [-]
Why are they both giving me a boner?
#26 - smasselski
Reply +27
(09/04/2012) [-]
#30 to #26 - cupotruth
Reply +3
(09/04/2012) [-]
apparently... yeah he does.
#142 - nockae
Reply +14
(09/05/2012) [-]
I can't be the only one who, even after reading it, still sees no difference?
#147 to #142 - aldheim
Reply +2
(09/05/2012) [-]
Well really there is no difference. It just means your ability to perceive the difference between men and women is ****** up.
#149 to #147 - nockae
Reply +3
(09/05/2012) [-]
Oh. Welp I might have some trouble in the future then.
#25 - Fagdust
Reply +11
(09/04/2012) [-]
Cross your eyes to see a 3-dimensional image of a hermaphrodite.
#134 - MrOblivious
Reply +10
(09/05/2012) [-]
#99 - itsnotatumor
Reply +10
(09/05/2012) [-]
They should call it "professor oak's illusion"
#113 - totallynotafurry
Reply +8
(09/05/2012) [-]
I thought they were both men.
#143 to #113 - mcgeeassy
Reply -1
(09/05/2012) [-]
#144 to #143 - mcgeeassy
Reply -1
(09/05/2012) [-]
#128 to #113 - mcgeeassy
Reply 0
(09/05/2012) [-]
lol the gay goblin!
#114 to #113 - hazardousmx
Reply +2
(09/05/2012) [-]
#115 to #114 - totallynotafurry
Reply +2
(09/05/2012) [-]
Did somebody say Spiderman thread?
#116 to #115 - hazardousmx
Reply +1
(09/05/2012) [-]
#121 to #118 - hazardousmx
Reply +1
(09/05/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#127 to #122 - hazardousmx
Reply 0
(09/05/2012) [-]
#139 to #133 - mcgeeassy
Reply 0
(09/05/2012) [-]
#141 to #140 - mcgeeassy
Reply 0
(09/05/2012) [-]
#146 to #145 - mcgeeassy
Reply 0
(09/05/2012) [-]
#155 to #146 - freakbob
Reply 0
(09/05/2012) [-]
#132 to #127 - mcgeeassy
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#69 - Cakeisalie
Reply +8
(09/05/2012) [-]
and if you make it darker you see a ******.