Partle. . Partle
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (558)
[ 558 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#7 - ascendedwings
Reply +329 123456789123345869
(09/03/2012) [-]
User avatar #590 to #7 - flamedragoon
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
it works
#629 to #7 - lphstf
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/09/2012) [-]
hey whats goin-
#609 to #7 - ascendedwings
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
sweet, first time making front page, thanks guys.
sweet, first time making front page, thanks guys.
#627 to #609 - PiMaker
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/06/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#76 to #7 - stickypuff
Reply +58 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
You lack the basic knowledge equivalent exchange.
#129 to #76 - cjasper
Reply +39 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
so did you....
User avatar #150 to #129 - xtrem
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
win
#434 to #129 - vanhohenheim
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
User avatar #136 to #76 - alleksi
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
shut up shorty
#177 to #76 - anon id: 94d822d1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
EE2 is overpowered.
#21 to #7 - rhettrox
Reply +156 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Matter cannot be created or destroyed.
User avatar #30 to #21 - KillYourself
Reply +241 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
sure it can, all you need is a
User avatar #43 to #30 - whitcher
Reply +87 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Candlejack knows that the secret is to
User avatar #378 to #43 - beep
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Come on candlejack is stupid stop using this overused jo
User avatar #222 to #30 - theannoyingFJguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
nicely played...
#194 to #21 - songemot
Reply +22 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Oh yeah?
#27 to #21 - tinfoilhat
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
As far as we know.
#286 to #21 - fractalius
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
I love how you make the claim that matter cannot be created or destroyed, etc.

BUT NO ONE ******* SAYS THAT PORTALS AREN'T REAL.
User avatar #387 to #21 - wiredguy
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
No but it can be stolen from other dimensions.
#370 to #21 - funkybutloving
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Black hole's destroy matter.
Unless they are portals......
#632 to #21 - anon id: 35991272
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/29/2012) [-]
well, if you could just walk into a portal and end up on the top floor of the empire state building from ground level, you have more potential energy, and therefore, portals already violate laws of thermodynamics. So why can't this work?
User avatar #599 to #21 - whogivesadarn
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
*energy
#351 to #21 - anon id: ab912001
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Matter is merely a different state of energy. Under certain conditions, matter CAN be created or destroyed.
User avatar #327 to #21 - renaissancemanxx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
False. Matter cannot be created or destroyed in chemical reactions. Nuclear reactions are a different matter (huehuehue).
#148 to #21 - anon id: 078c5fb5
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Portal guns do not exist. What's your point?
#171 - misfitsftw
Reply +185 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
#3 - lupislord
Reply +116 123456789123345869
(09/03/2012) [-]
but what if this happens?
#90 to #3 - betesta
Reply +27 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
You will not be able to shoot a portal on a prism as portals only stick to walls coated in moon rocks
User avatar #283 to #90 - gunzas
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
I don't think so. What about the maintenance areas in the 2nd part of portal and portal 2?

I'm pretty sure there's just some materials on which portals cannot be created (like the black one, glass, metal, I think). Anyway you couldn't place portals on glass doors so that pretty much aplies for prisms too, I guess.
User avatar #5 to #3 - successburger [OP]
Reply +174 123456789123345869
(09/03/2012) [-]
then i'll **** on your bed
#35 - Jesusnipples
Reply +164 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
This was funny until the jawbreaker thing at the end.
Then it became ******* awesome.
#145 to #35 - dalgaard
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #623 to #35 - Jesusnipples
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/05/2012) [-]
Holy haggis why does this have 164 thumbs
#190 - triggathepirate
Reply +76 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
MFW THIS MAY BE THE CORNERSTONE OF PUZZLES IN PORTAL 3
MFW THIS MAY BE THE CORNERSTONE OF PUZZLES IN PORTAL 3
#231 to #190 - renzard
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
<New antagonist of Portal 3
<New antagonist of Portal 3
#195 to #190 - ncaffsa
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
**ncaffsa rolled a random image posted in comment #440523 at MLP Friendly Board ** MFW THIS MAY BE THE CORNERSTONE OF PUZZLES IN PORTAL 3
User avatar #210 to #190 - Nightinear **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
I so hope for that
#388 to #190 - anon id: ec6add60
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
>Wheatley is in space for good
>GLaDoS dont care about testing Chell
>Chell is forever free
Portal 3?
User avatar #441 to #190 - jakekel
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Valve doesn't know what 3 is.
#212 to #190 - lilya
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
#191 to #190 - jpg
Reply +98 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
&gt;Cornerstone of puzzles in Portal 3   
&gt;Portal 3   
&gt;3
>Cornerstone of puzzles in Portal 3
>Portal 3
>3
#193 to #191 - triggathepirate
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
The existence of this man means more than we think.
#204 to #191 - gevaudan
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#365 - thedarkhavok
Reply +57 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Hypothetically, let's say portals exist. Matter cannot be created or destroyed, so there are two options. The less likely one being that the coin would just split, the more likely being that like a circuit, the 'quarter' acting as an electron would take the easiest route. In this case, the route with the lowest gravitational potential, the lower portal.
#427 to #365 - lordofthenash
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#371 to #365 - anon id: 5bc4b3f0
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
You are right!

BUT DAMNIT MAAN

damn science make us poor all the time..

still gotta love it
User avatar #392 to #365 - ambience
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
but what if the portals were horozontal from each other? not vertical?
User avatar #395 to #392 - thedarkhavok
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
An interesting point, it really depends on how the portals operate. If an entity enters the portal and is transported to the secondary portal without the presence of a third party dimension, what would probably happen was the first theory, where the entity would split equally, a bit like current in a series circuit with identical components in each series. Although this doesn't really make sense because there isn't really an explanation for how the transportation itself occurs at all. If portals were real, what would probably happen is the net energy of the area replaced by the portal would be converted into a tiny unknown dimension, through actual distance would be covered. In this more plausible instance, the entity would exit from the closest portal. If all three were entirely equidistant, which is even more hypothetical, as that is more or less an impossibility, **** knows what would happen. The latter theory makes more sense, too, because when the portal vanish you can sort of see the prior material re-materializing.
#396 to #365 - anon id: 7e9cce59
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Assuming we are living in the world of portals. This would create a portal through to the next parallell universe where he drops the ball in and it doesn't come out either of the holes. So the result would be. Either to balls come out of the holes or nothing.
User avatar #398 to #396 - thedarkhavok
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Did you mean two*? If so, matter cannot be created, so that's impossible. As for nothing, matter cannot be destroyed, unless you mean it would be deposited in the parallel universe?
#424 to #365 - anon id: c2d4dc3f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Where did hydrogen and helium come from? They must have been created at somepoint(Not the big bang, because something must have been before that). Or am I missing something.
If matter cant be created then where the hell did it come in the first place?
User avatar #438 to #424 - thedarkhavok
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
It was compressed to a single point, the big bang. The argument that the big bang cannot be the 'first cause' because something must've been before it is awfully flawed, because it's completely circular. What about before that? And then before that? It's just a dull argument created by a moronic priest called St. Thomas Aquinas who didn't much know what he was talking about. I'm not saying the big bang is the first cause necessarily, just that it is a simple fact that matter cannot be destroyed or created. Chemistry is the study off matter and change for that reason.
User avatar #553 to #365 - anonymoose
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
If portals existed, then conservation of energy would be nullified and conservation of mass could very well be nullified along with it.
User avatar #562 to #553 - thedarkhavok
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Of course, but I was purely hypothesizing about this very limited context.
#369 to #365 - zzjames
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
OP just got done.
User avatar #379 to #365 - Zeigh
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Don't forget that all of this is based on the assumption that portals act exactly the same way as light.
User avatar #381 to #379 - thedarkhavok
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
That's why it's hypothetical.
#394 to #381 - Giachianeo
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Jax being OP isn't hypothetical.
#243 - butiloveu
Reply +49 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
********
User avatar #246 to #243 - firebapx
Reply +26 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
then dont ******* jump in
#236 - vegetagurl
Reply +40 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
#264 - DemSilver
Reply +39 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
&gt;implying portals work like light
>implying portals work like light
#279 to #264 - cuntmuffins
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Implying portals exist. Hahahah
#484 to #279 - drillur
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
Implying portals don't exist. Look, I even have proof.
#474 to #279 - drillur
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#263 - eggoman
Reply +39 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
**eggoman rolls 33**
#265 to #263 - anon id: 991b870d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolls 23** check 'em
#273 to #263 - newonee
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #304 to #263 - phantomprincess
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/04/2012) [-]
i want to thumb but it has 33 thumbs right now...