guys staph. . File . 231x215. ) my ppn' THE Eu HAP syou an motw.' : l In ' rng hourai, har, "rhough ruffies to Inlet draugrs EH o! Slurms EAR " . S ARSENAL'S ME
x
Click to expand

guys staph

File . 231x215. ) my
ppn'
THE Eu HAP
syou an motw.' : l In ' rng hourai, har, "rhough ruffies to Inlet draugrs EH o! Slurms
EAR " . S ARSENAL'S
MEET
bkt. an
forest.
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+1517
Views: 38619
Favorited: 158
Submitted: 09/02/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to thatonetyler Subscribe to 4chan submit to reddit

Comments(93):

[ 93 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#6 - anonymous (09/03/2012) [+] (3 replies)
or the fact that a whole huge populated city is only a little dot on the map of the earth so yes the u.s can fire a nuke at every populated city on the planet, why would anyone bomb the forest and the ocean ?
#19 to #6 - Cookiez (09/03/2012) [-]
Because there are 80000 spiders per acre of green land.
User avatar #5 - firinmalazor (09/03/2012) [+] (3 replies)
forgot to account for nuclear fallout (which is the main destructive property of atomic weapons), which would kill most of the people.

lrn2 science, anon
#35 - pineappleninja (09/03/2012) [+] (11 replies)
Comment Picture
#9 - mynameisnightwolf (09/03/2012) [+] (3 replies)
Yes. Because a nuclear blast has no effect on anything beyond 3.5 miles.
#55 - hardyhs (09/03/2012) [+] (3 replies)
Comment Picture
#67 to #55 - trapitrapeit (09/03/2012) [-]
its worth it
its worth it
User avatar #54 - superunclesam (09/03/2012) [+] (2 replies)
Implying the radiation and fallout wouldn't be enough to destroy what's left of the surrounding- wait, that the **** am I doing?
#7 - bouncyhd (09/03/2012) [+] (4 replies)
stahp*



it'd be pronounced 'staff' the way you spelled it
User avatar #46 - metajunky (09/03/2012) [-]
well golly i wonder if the debate continued in the comment sect-

AND IT ******* DID. congrats FJ, way to prove your retardation
#85 - waffies (09/03/2012) [-]
Always love this post.
#65 - littlenish (09/03/2012) [-]
There's alot of 4chan on frontpage today. Too much in fact.
User avatar #47 - MythBuster (09/03/2012) [+] (4 replies)
that guy is a dumbass, most nukes have a deadly diameter of around 40-60 miles because of all the radiation. we could easily wipe out china, even if the initial blast doesn't kill them all, there is still over 50 years of deadly radiation that contaminates soil, water, weather. the wind would blow all that **** around and **** everyone up. not to mention that we probably have way more nukes than that
User avatar #48 to #47 - BowChickaBowWow (09/03/2012) [-]
He was talking about the blast range, not the fallout zone.
#43 - pinkiepieisacock (09/03/2012) [+] (1 reply)
Funnyjunk-
Hehe you sure are funny 4chan! We're bros right 4chan?

4chan-
Yeah whatever, piss off.

Funnyjunk- Hehe 9gag sucks right! Yeah! Reddits for fags! haha you're so funny 4chan, hehehe
#26 - maxoverderp (09/03/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
+1
#13 - excallibur **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (2 replies)
User avatar #20 to #13 - bananarchy (09/03/2012) [-]
This is /a/
Not all of 4chan /b/
#95 - theoriginaltyson (09/03/2012) [+] (1 reply)
pic related
I capped this because I thought it was hilarious
User avatar #31 - jinchuuriki (09/03/2012) [+] (2 replies)
Um there's enough nuclear weapons on the planet to wipe out every life form 10 times over
User avatar #51 - contradiction (09/03/2012) [-]
radiation nuff said
User avatar #15 - welshdrag (09/03/2012) [+] (4 replies)
Forgot about fallout, which is more than 3.5 miles, and also if we bombed a country, we would spread out the nukes, they wouldn't be within 1 inch of each other
[ 93 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)