Lolis. Kodomo no Jikan in a nutshell. Lolis Kodomo no Jikan in a nutshell
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (148)
[ 148 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
36 comments displayed.
#95 - ferriumerris
Reply +49
(08/29/2012) [-]
#10 - Nihatclodra ONLINE
Reply +9
(08/28/2012) [-]
I just recently finished reading the manga... oh gods, the anime can't even compare!

Lolicon or not, you MUST read Kodomo no Jikan: all 86 chapters of it out so far! The fanservice and sex-jokes do go quite a bit too far, but it is amazing non-the-less!

btw, the manga is quite a bit darker than the anime... Child abuse, rape (or at least attempted), child abuse, suicide attempts, deeply-embedded trauma... just a few things taken out for the anime adaptation. Then again, the anime didn't exactly get too far into the story...
#47 to #10 - thekeldog
Reply 0
(08/28/2012) [-]
it would have been nice if u coulda not put the spolier tags in there.
#195 to #47 - Nihatclodra ONLINE
Reply 0
(08/29/2012) [-]
sorry, thought I did...
#54 to #10 - anon
Reply 0
(08/28/2012) [-]
**** you.
#146 to #10 - gingershavetrolls
Reply 0
(08/29/2012) [-]
This thread reminds me of my uncle.
#11 to #10 - Nihatclodra ONLINE
Reply +6
(08/28/2012) [-]
*replace one of the "Child abuse" with "Incestuous pedophilia"...
#14 to #11 - xxxpedoxxxbearxxx
Reply +12
(08/28/2012) [-]
sounds like my kind of read
#16 to #10 - mattkingg **User deleted account**
Reply +35
(08/28/2012) [-]
i was pumped for this and ready to take your advice until child abuse showed up



then i got a boner
#1 - MOFOJOYO
Reply +26
(08/28/2012) [-]
#118 - deathbylock
Reply +15
(08/29/2012) [-]
A-as you wish~
#124 to #118 - Kennyalways ONLINE
Reply +4
(08/29/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#127 to #118 - Lightclaw
Reply +4
(08/29/2012) [-]
Uhm... where is this from? For science of course.
#145 to #127 - Kirbyman
Reply 0
(08/29/2012) [-]
my current guess is that that girl is hinagiku from Hayate the Combat Butler.
Could be wrong.
#68 - yourmomsfuckbuddy
Reply +15
(08/29/2012) [-]
*erection*
#71 to #68 - linkDrkguy **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#98 - exrflarion
Reply +10
(08/29/2012) [-]
This image has expired
It hurt me to think that they will grow up and leave me.
#92 - gravyseal
Reply +10
(08/29/2012) [-]
She's....just so cute...
She's....just so cute...
#171 - cadaverbox
Reply +9
(08/29/2012) [-]
Delicious flat chests.
#24 - precision
Reply 0
(08/28/2012) [-]
Nothing times 2 is 15, she's wrong. Not a 100%, NONE FOR YOU.
#29 to #24 - MetaIIica
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#37 to #29 - precision
Reply 0
(08/28/2012) [-]
No it isn't, it's cut off right before it would've connected to form the 6.
#39 to #37 - MetaIIica
Reply +5
(08/28/2012) [-]
Just checked. It actually is a 15.
#53 to #24 - YeYouKnoMe
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#55 to #24 - YeYouKnoMe
Reply 0
(08/28/2012) [-]
Another note, maybe she got extra credit on the back?
#56 to #24 - cubanwhiteman
Reply +5
(08/29/2012) [-]
7.5 * 2 = 15


Yeah... your arguement, it's kinda invalid.
#27 to #24 - vleasian
Reply +9
(08/28/2012) [-]
7.5 x 2 = 15

:3
#35 to #27 - precision
Reply +1
(08/28/2012) [-]
and also look at the number that is multiplying by 2, doesn't look like a 5, looks more like a 6 or a 10 based on the 0 shaped outline.
#38 to #35 - vleasian
Reply 0
(08/28/2012) [-]
7.50 XD I'm messing around. you can also assume that there is an addition in front of the number. It's possible. I learned basic order of operations in my third grade.
#41 to #38 - precision
Reply -1
(08/28/2012) [-]
We can't assume anything. If we assume it makes an ASS(out of) U (and) ME.
ASSUME. :)
#42 to #41 - vleasian
Reply 0
(08/28/2012) [-]
That's clever. However, if we cannot assume, we cannot hypothesize. And if we cannot hypothesize, we cannot prove. And if we cannot prove, no one wins. But whatever. Let's shake hands and go on with our lives. :3
#45 to #27 - sagedivinity ONLINE
Reply 0
(08/28/2012) [-]
But the cut off number is not 5
#34 to #27 - precision
Reply 0
(08/28/2012) [-]
Let's just say that she's nine, most nine year olds are in 4th grade around that time, this may just have been my school system but we didn't learn decimals until 6th grade.