I lol'd. You know it's true.. MOI If Fll' : That cant passi bly That must mean the be , There answer tn the puzzle are mamy gaps! is Creation! Shitstorms everywhere
x
Click to expand

I lol'd

I lol'd. You know it's true.. MOI If Fll' : That cant passi bly That must mean the be , There answer tn the puzzle are mamy gaps! is Creation!

You know it's true.

MOI If Fll' :
That cant passi bly That must mean the
be , There answer tn the puzzle
are mamy gaps! is Creation!
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+1418
Views: 39257
Favorited: 73
Submitted: 08/13/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to cullenatorguy Subscribe to atheism submit to reddit

Comments(314):

[ 314 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#186 - mvtjets (08/13/2012) [-]
Damn you OP, what have you done...........
Damn you OP, what have you done...........
User avatar #196 to #186 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
I thought people would laugh at this, and say things like, "I'm a Christian but I found this funny" like so many other jokes, but alas, people found a way to get pissy.
#201 to #196 - mvtjets (08/13/2012) [-]
Well this is basicly shoving your beliefs down people's throats, of course you would start a 			*********		..........
Well this is basicly shoving your beliefs down people's throats, of course you would start a ********* ..........
User avatar #217 to #201 - cullenatorguy (08/14/2012) [-]
poking fun at creationists is shoving my beliefs down other's throats?
#73 - iamphoenix (08/13/2012) [-]
Evolution does not interfere with faith.
User avatar #77 to #73 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
Yes it does
http://spaninquis.wordpress . com/2012/07/10/bible-%E2%89%A0-science/
User avatar #162 to #77 - gmarrox (08/13/2012) [-]
No, it really doesn't.
0
#169 to #162 - rottengrits **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#176 to #169 - iamphoenix (08/13/2012) [-]
The original separation from God was when we became capable of distinguishing right from wrong and subsequently chose wrong. Some believe the redeemed state of man is better than the innocent one, and I agree.
User avatar #209 to #176 - sterlingarcher (08/13/2012) [-]
Yay a smart person! and I mean that... Why can't people understand this easy concept...
User avatar #200 to #176 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
So other apes can go to hell? Or dogs even? I sure as hell know that my dog does something bad and knows it's bad, cus when I catch her she lowers he head and walks away. Other animals know right from wrong.
0
#183 to #176 - rottengrits **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#210 to #183 - iamphoenix (08/13/2012) [-]
Being that I'm not a clergymen I don't feel it necessary to explain to you the basic tenets of Christian faith. You're interpreting the Genesis creation story as absolutely literal while failing to understand the principal of sin.
#154 to #73 - threenippledcousin (08/13/2012) [-]
thank you sir someone thats shares my views
#229 - John Cena (08/14/2012) [-]
Hang on!
User avatar #107 - daboomee (08/13/2012) [-]
If there is a god, I really don't think he gives two ***** about what I do on my sundays.
#37 - John Cena (08/13/2012) [-]
Most educated christians don't believe in the old testament literally
#39 to #37 - vanoreo (08/13/2012) [-]
Correct my dear anon. (I take a theology class at a Catholic school, they actually teach that the old testament is pretty much all myth.)
User avatar #101 to #39 - vleasian (08/13/2012) [-]
the old testament is mainly lessons to be learned. right?
User avatar #104 to #101 - vanoreo (08/13/2012) [-]
Pretty much
#239 - rrrrr (08/14/2012) [-]
the tide goes in, the tide goes out. the sun goes up, the sun goes down, without any miscommunication. you can't explain that
#247 to #239 - noblexfenrir (08/14/2012) [-]
Tide goes in....tide goes out....what?
User avatar #260 to #247 - noblexfenrir (08/14/2012) [-]
and just so people realize, I know what he's talking about...I just replied with a picture of Dave Silverman and his reaction to when Bill said that.
#267 - zaskaishi (08/14/2012) [-]
**zaskaishi rolled a random image posted in comment #160 at Kneegone ** mfw the Christians come out to play
#58 - GeorgeBush (08/13/2012) [-]
This image has expired
Make fun of Christians = 1000+ thumbs

Make fun of Atheists = -20 thumbs

lol
User avatar #123 to #58 - bobodevetjedan (08/13/2012) [-]
but you're making fun of jews right now
User avatar #125 to #123 - GeorgeBush (08/13/2012) [-]
I don't even know that Cyrillic alphabet, bro.
User avatar #126 to #125 - bobodevetjedan (08/13/2012) [-]
it writes : "need more jews"
User avatar #155 to #126 - GeorgeBush (08/13/2012) [-]
oh o . O. I assure you I didn't have any intentions of that :(
User avatar #337 to #155 - bobodevetjedan (08/14/2012) [-]
i understand, it just came up funny and ironic actually :D

i'm not religious
User avatar #66 to #58 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
Jokes making fun of Christianity are exaggerated facts about what all or some christians do or believe.
Jokes making fun of Atheism are out right lies, if you're going to joke about a belief, at least get your facts right, then take them out of context.
User avatar #78 to #66 - GeorgeBush (08/13/2012) [-]
Well yes I understand what you're saying; but you do have to admit that whenever someone is revealed to be religious they are usually relegated to the box of ignorance and stupidity. Most religious jokes on this website at least are fine-funny even- but whenever I see a post making fun of Atheists the poster is admonished and thumbed down. Irony, I suppose.
User avatar #81 to #78 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
They don't post enough, I'm fine with being made fun of, I can laugh at myself. I wish they would too, even out the number of atheistic posts.
#89 to #81 - GeorgeBush (08/13/2012) [-]
This image has expired
I understand. I can totally laugh at myself; I realize my beliefs are hard for many to understand. I also enjoy seeing an alternate perspective by talking with such people as yourself. You carry yourself with the prominence of an educated man, and don't spontaneously **** spam someone else because of their different beliefs. Wonderful talking with you.
User avatar #97 to #89 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
I have a confession to make...
I **** spam the **** out of stupid people.
Sorry.
But thanks, I hold back fairly well. I only really argue when someone says something completely and utterly retarded, but I still respect their right to believe those things.
I hope you can forgive me, Mr. President.
User avatar #92 to #81 - jakerszzzz (08/13/2012) [-]
I wouldn't argue with the ex-president, i don't think it is a good idea.
User avatar #128 to #81 - organiclead (08/13/2012) [-]
Atheist: What’s this fly doing in my soup?
Waiter: Praying.
Atheist: Very funny. I can’t eat this. Take it back.
Waiter: You see? The fly’s prayers were answered.
#165 to #66 - gmarrox (08/13/2012) [-]
"They bring up the negative points of our belief in satirical manner! They must be lying!"
User avatar #173 to #165 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
Sorry, I should have said most. You've seen that one picture about atheism. It says something along the lines of
Atheism
The belief the everything came out of nothing from nothing
because nothing happen randomly

or something like that. That isn't even close to what atheists believe about the creation of the universe. That's what I mean. If you're gonna make fun of us, make fun of the stretched truths, not something made by someone who doens't understand what we believe.
#305 - heyimathespian (08/14/2012) [-]
I'm agnostic, and so feel like I have no standing ground to even begin to criticize other's beliefs. But I find those who reject evolution stupid. Not because they believe in a god, but because that's plain ignorance. Evolution has happened in mammals we use in the past couple centuries, and in bugs and birds in such, within our lifetime. That's not faith, that's refusing to look at the world around you.
#309 to #305 - John Cena (08/14/2012) [-]
So im guessing your an atheist?
#310 to #309 - heyimathespian (08/14/2012) [-]
I'm agnostic. I started with that.
#312 to #310 - John Cena (08/14/2012) [-]
Agnostic is a declaration of knowledge not of belief.
#313 to #312 - heyimathespian (08/14/2012) [-]
Agnostic is also a religious viewpoint.
#316 to #313 - John Cena (08/14/2012) [-]
Let me ask you one question, do you believe in god?
#317 to #316 - heyimathespian (08/14/2012) [-]
I don't know. I have no pull to either direction.
#319 to #317 - John Cena (08/14/2012) [-]
If your saying I dont know then technically you're an atheist.
#72 - youser (08/13/2012) [-]
**youser rolls 09** if dubs god is real
#273 - tomtomvdp ONLINE (08/14/2012) [-]
#170 - teamrocketninja (08/13/2012) [-]
Oh look. Another unfunny post thats intended to do nothing but start a 			****		 storm.
Oh look. Another unfunny post thats intended to do nothing but start a **** storm.
+4
#175 to #170 - rottengrits **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #177 to #175 - teamrocketninja (08/13/2012) [-]
Im agnostic and frankly I find it to be a low form of humor.
+7
#180 to #177 - rottengrits **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #184 to #180 - teamrocketninja (08/13/2012) [-]
Youare aware that an agnostic atheist is an oxymoron right?
+4
#191 to #184 - rottengrits **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #225 to #184 - noblexfenrir (08/14/2012) [-]
You are aware agnostic isn't a determination of belief only of knowledge right? If you are using agnostic to say "I don't know" then you are an agnostic atheist.

Seriously this **** isn't hard to grasp.

Also I found this post hilarious.
#86 - urfunnyman (08/13/2012) [-]
evolution deal with it
evolution deal with it
#24 - alanthewhite (08/13/2012) [-]
**alanthewhite rolls 066,793,641** So you're implying that an individual cannot accept Evolution as well as believing that God created the world?
**alanthewhite rolls 066,793,641** So you're implying that an individual cannot accept Evolution as well as believing that God created the world?
User avatar #26 to #24 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
I don't think you can be Christian.
http://spaninquis . [url deleted]
User avatar #27 to #24 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
http://spaninquis.wordpress . com/2012/07/10/bible-%E2%89%A0-science/
User avatar #30 to #27 - alanthewhite (08/13/2012) [-]
**alanthewhite rolls 492,100,425** Just because Eve was made from Adam's rib does not mean that they were 100% identical, and even if they were, their children would eventually have differing DNA.

Also, there is a possible factor that God started Evolution to back his Creations. Evolution does not equal Atheism.
User avatar #31 to #30 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
Correct, but it cancels the need for Jesus. How many years ago do you think Adam and Eve lived?
User avatar #32 to #31 - alanthewhite (08/13/2012) [-]
**alanthewhite rolls 322,615,031** Millions of years ago, and I'm not Christian. I believe that the Bible said the world was thousands of years old because perhaps that's when recorded history in the Middle-East began.
User avatar #33 to #32 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
Then what are you? The human race began between 100,000 to 200,000 years ago btw
User avatar #34 to #33 - alanthewhite (08/13/2012) [-]
**alanthewhite rolls 581,529,950** Fine then, 100,000 to 200,000 thousand years ago then. And I'm Jewish.
User avatar #36 to #34 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
Ah well, recorded history in the middle east is waaaaaay old, since it's right by Africa. I like how you protect your belief system from criticism by changing what you believe, even though it goes against your holy book.
User avatar #42 to #36 - alanthewhite (08/13/2012) [-]
**alanthewhite rolls 099,108,077** Thanks.
User avatar #46 to #42 - diverdee (08/13/2012) [-]
**diverdee rolls 465,479,506** <---- thats how old the world is!! no matter if it was made by some junkie with a beard, or came from an explosion!
#44 to #27 - John Cena (08/13/2012) [-]
Evidently, atheists believe God is powerful enough to create the heavens and the earth, but too stupid to figure out DNA.

I hate to break this to you, but once you accept the God card EVERYTHING is possible. I mean, do you honestly believe it would be harder for God to speed up evolution(specifically, the mutation of DNA in human beings) than it would be to part the Red Sea? Or maybe feed 5,000 people with some bread and fish? Maybe save your immortal soul?

Atheists never seem to think things through very far, do they? Get to a question you don't want to answer, throw up your hands and say, "nope, no God." I mean, it's not possible that something could possibly be beyond your understanding right?
User avatar #51 to #44 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
links in order as they appear
http://i.imgur . com/91b7g.jpg
http://imgur . com/XMphk
http://imgur . com/0z1zy
http://imgur . com/OZcnw
http://imgur . com/E695Y
http://imgur . com/iqMjV
http://imgur . com/r0Eg8
User avatar #49 to #44 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
You don't think that's a bit of a cop out? I'm just going to paste why I'm atheist. It wasn't written for this situation, but it explains pretty well. I didn't lose my faith by throwing my head up and doubting god, I used to think like you.
First off is this list/chart. This shows all the contradictions in the Bible. http://i.imgur.com/91b7g.jpg if it's not large enough, google Bible contradictions chart And then this awesome quote. [url deleted] So that completely ruined the Bible for me, and what is Christianity without the Bible? In case you're not convinced, I'll present this in my own words. Based on the incredible amount of evidence, evolution is true. If evolution is true, then Adam and Eve didn't exist. If this is so, then there was no original sin, thus no reason for Jesus to have died. If Jesus had no reason to die, then Christianity is completely false. In the same so if christianity is false, what about the other religions? Well I'm sure they all seem very silly to you. Worshiping Thor, Zeus, Krishna, and anyone else is just plain weird. But hey, let's just say one of those religions is the correct one. Here's this: [url deleted] Okay, well say you think there's a creator, but just no correct religion. Is this creator omnipotent? Probably, but then I present you this paradox. "Can a god create a rock to heavy for him to pick up?" It's a tough one, so tough, in fact, that you can't answer it. Alright, so maybe your god isn't all powerful, maybe he's not even a god, just a creator. Well does this creator defy every scientific advancement in today's world? Then your "creator" is most likely ******** , or is it in a completely different realm of being? A place that science can not yet, or perhaps ever, explore?
#96 to #49 - John Cena (08/13/2012) [-]
Just throwing this out there, but many stories in the Bible were never meant to be taken literally. Hence why there are so many contradictions in it.

It also doesn't help that so much of it was written by religious leaders throughout human history in ways to make it easier to manipulate and control the masses.

There are even letters written by some of the people who wrote various parts of the Bible, where they actually discuss with other leaders how to alter the Bible in order to accomplish that. It's not even a matter up for debate since their letters still archived by the Vatican and numerous historical documents.

The reason for allowing pork and shellfish to be eaten? According to the letters those changes were made in order to make converting Romans easier since those were such popular foods with the Romans.

Just because many parables and anecdotes can contradict each other, or parts of the Bible were fabricated by individuals craving more power over others doesn't mean that it's impossible for there to be any truth behind any of it.
User avatar #103 to #96 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
Then what do you base your faith on?
#113 to #103 - John Cena (08/13/2012) [-]
The underlying meaning of course.

Why would you even ask something like that? Can a man not believe something unless there's a peer-reviewed text about it?

If it were something like a mathematical formula or a scientific process then there would of course need to be a sound, proven basis for it in order for it to work.

But this isn't math or science now is it? Faith is not a science, it's a system of belief and philosophy. If you've ever taken a college level logic course you can see just how different these fields are and why you can't address something like religion with just science.
User avatar #116 to #113 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
If one part isn't correct, what makes you think any of it is correct? Hell, the whole book didn't even start to be written till at least 90 years after Jesus' death.
#136 to #116 - John Cena (08/13/2012) [-]
You really aren't understanding any of this, are you?

Why are you stuck on this idea that all branches of Christianity work the same way, or that they all have to follow the Bible the same way?
User avatar #139 to #136 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
I know they don't, I used to be Episcopalian, not very many people took the bible as it is.
Without the bible, you would have nothing to base your faith on. If there was no Bible, what would be left of Christianity? If there was no bible ever.
#152 to #139 - John Cena (08/13/2012) [-]
Do you realize that there have been plenty of faiths throughout history whose faith were not based upon a written record or document? Even Abrahamic religions started out this way. Writing it all down just made it easier to spread the belief (part of what allowed Islam to spread as well as it did).
User avatar #168 to #152 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
http://www.youtube . com/watch?v=UcrJ2HFKogs
User avatar #167 to #152 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
I do realize that, and they had absolutely no reason to believe that stuff other than they just made up a story and decided to believe it. this video does wonders.
[url deleted]
#179 to #167 - John Cena (08/13/2012) [-]
Just because something isn't written down doesn't mean it doesn't contain truth.
User avatar #181 to #179 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
But with no evidence for a god, and no reason to believe a book about him, why would you have faith in it?
#188 to #181 - John Cena (08/13/2012) [-]
I've seen all the evidence I need in order to believe. Perhaps not what you would consider to be evidence, but evidence all the same.

The problem here is that you don't seem to have any actual understanding of philosophy or faith and how they work.

You seem to look at these things and dismiss them if they lack scientific reasoning, but ignore the fact that they are in a field where that cannot be applied in order to understand them.
User avatar #193 to #188 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
Your mind, and everyone else's, including mine, is full of **** . You can't trust it. You can't trust your emotions or that funny "feeling" you get called a spiritual high, because it can all be generated artificially. I don't trust my head. The only way I'll ever go back to religion is if God were to come down to me in the middle of the day and talk to me. I'd then get at least 5 other people to verify that God is there. I'd then get us all blood tested to see if we had any drugs in our systems at that time, and a brain scan to be sure nothing was screwing up in my head. With no physical proof of a god, and no reason to trust your own feelings, why would you believe in god?
#202 to #193 - John Cena (08/13/2012) [-]
Again, you are completely missing the point.

You claim to side with reason and logic, but utterly ignore the only types applicable in philosophical matters.

Do you see the irony in this?
User avatar #218 to #202 - cullenatorguy (08/14/2012) [-]
No, no I do not. I go by scientific evidence to support claims. You are confusing me.
#250 to #218 - John Cena (08/14/2012) [-]
I really don't see how it can be so difficult to understand that you can't apply scientific evidence (like physics, DNA, chemistry, etc) to a philosophical subject of this nature.

Not all things in life are scientific in nature, and when you try to examine them as though they were you are of course not going to get very far or be able to understand them.

The above mentioned irony is that you accuse those with faith in religion of not analyzing the subject of religion from more than one field of sound reasoning, but you in turn ignore all but traditional science. Even when others point out other well established, sound venues of critical analysis to you.
User avatar #326 to #250 - cullenatorguy (08/14/2012) [-]
thread ran out of room.
I realize that, but religion is not a science. It's, well, religion.
User avatar #265 to #250 - cullenatorguy (08/14/2012) [-]
Ah, I see what you're talking about now, and I think you misunderstood me as well. Do you really not think that's a cop out? All things are of scientific nature, your thoughts are just electronic signals flying around your brain. While we may not understand consciousnesses or thought clearly yet, it is a physical nature, whether or not that has to do with what we're talking about. My point is that it seems like a cop out to say that because your deity can't be proven physically with traditional science, it's of another realm, which is what I mentioned in my whole explanation thing.
#325 to #265 - John Cena (08/14/2012) [-]
Notice how I never said anything about other realms of existence?

I'm talking about something that is in the same realm as science, but is in another field of reasoning and study.

Just because you can't fit a round peg through a square hole doesn't mean the hole is in some completely alien realm. It just means that you have to change your approach to interacting with it.
#82 to #49 - John Cena (08/13/2012) [-]
#1: I don't believe in an infallible Bible. A lot of Christians do, I don't. Scripture is given by inspiration of God(that's why people believe it's true), but that doesn't mean it's translated by inspiration of God.

#2. Christ didn't die for original sin. That shows a complete lack of understanding of both original sin AND sin in general. Christ died for ALL sins, not just original sin. Even if there is no such thing as original sin, there is still a such thing as sin. Thus, Christ was still necessary as God cannot accept ANY sin. Furthermore, Christ was not here solely for sin. Try actually finding out all of what Christians believe before you start throwing around such spurious claims.

#3. I don't believe in original sin, nor do any of the Christians I know. Being a Christian does not make you a believer in original sin.

#4. Can God create a rock too heavy for him to lift? You assume waaay too much about God by that statement. Furthermore, it's a trick question, as both answers(yes and no) both invalidate the existence of God. If you're going to go into the question of theism honestly, are you really going to be exploring the intricacies of a trick question, designed to cast doubt upon a creator?

I don't care if you believe in God or not. All I ask is that you actually try to find answers instead of asking questions and then believing you know everything so there can't possibly be any other explanation.
User avatar #93 to #82 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
1. Then you have nothing to base your beliefs on

2. Without original sin, there would be no sin, correct?

3. umm k

4. It's called a paradox. It shows an omnipotent god can't exist.

I have, I did, still am, and I have ca=ome to the conclusion I'm at today. God is not real.
User avatar #50 to #49 - cullenatorguy (08/13/2012) [-]
Well I can't help you there. Just think, is it really in a nonphysical realm? or are you just making excuses so you can hang on to your faith? I'm sure it's the latter if your thought process was anything like I just described. Here's a few other pictures and quotes that I like. [url deleted] [url deleted] [url deleted] [url deleted]
0
#28 to #27 - alanthewhite has deleted their comment [-]
#277 - asianizer (08/14/2012) [-]
**asianizer rolled a random image posted in comment #23 at Death of Islamic Savages ** MFW I'm an avid Agnostic and proud and could honestly give less of a **** about the evolution-creationism debate.
#278 to #277 - John Cena (08/14/2012) [-]
Agnostic is not a statement about belief but of knowledge.
User avatar #283 to #278 - Ninotori (08/14/2012) [-]
No, its a statement of belief.
#286 to #283 - John Cena (08/14/2012) [-]
Agnostic is not knowing
Gnostic is knowing
Atheist is not believing in god
Theist is believing in god

That is literally what these words mean.
User avatar #288 to #286 - Ninotori (08/14/2012) [-]
Agnosticism in it's usage relating one's beliefs, it means that someone BELIEVES that we cannot know.

It may also be a statement of knowledge, but in this situation, its a belief.
#297 to #288 - John Cena (08/14/2012) [-]
You are saying there is no way of knowing. Let me ask you one question do you believe in god?
User avatar #301 to #297 - Ninotori (08/14/2012) [-]
My personal beliefs are of no consequence, and I will not share them.

Whether we can know or we can't know is of no consequence either, what decides the belief is that we can't even know whether we can or can't know!

Therefore, in order to accept that as a truth, you have to believe it, because you can't know it.
#308 to #301 - John Cena (08/14/2012) [-]
I'm wondering what your personal beliefs are because regardless of whether your gnostic or agnostic, your either an atheist or theist. Unless you truly do not know what you believe in.
User avatar #315 to #308 - Ninotori (08/14/2012) [-]
I'm a theist, and happy to be so.

True one might be skeptic or unsure whether their foundation is correct or not but that doesn't make agnosticism a secondary designation alone.

We could argue this point until everything on the front page has cycled off and neither one of us would reach a point of agreement, I suggest we discontinue.
#318 to #315 - John Cena (08/14/2012) [-]
Thank you, I know agnosticism is a belief but it irks me when people try to use it as a way out from either theism or atheism. Like it gives them an out to talk down about either one while actually being one.

Also I know its not secondary since I'm sure there's gnostics out there who know that we will discover whether or not there is a god while there theism or atheism is secondary.
User avatar #320 to #318 - Ninotori (08/14/2012) [-]
That there makes much more sense.

Personally, I find the argument meaningless. Life is too short to waste on trying to please each other, it is more important that we make our own decisions and live happily with them.

If everyone could just learn to shut up and live with their choices and let others live with theirs, we might have a better world. But unfortunately, it's one of those inalienable truths.

Everything bad for you is amazing, **** happens, and people are ******* stupid.
User avatar #280 to #278 - asianizer (08/14/2012) [-]
**asianizer rolls 34** I'd prefer to think of it as a profession of my not giving a crap.
[ 314 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)