Animal Testing. Not even once.. Why are we testing animals when there are pedophiles in prison Animal Testing Not even once Why are we testing animals when there pedophiles in prison
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (213)
[ 213 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #26 - residentevilfan
Reply +155 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
Why are we testing animals when there are pedophiles in prison
#36 to #26 - jimbobji
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
It's probably humans rights and Christians.
User avatar #71 to #36 - Wazzy
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
what do Christians have to do with it?
User avatar #77 to #71 - residentevilfan
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
priest
User avatar #95 to #77 - shitshitshit
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
no, you mean catholics
User avatar #96 to #26 - shitshitshit
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
good point
User avatar #30 to #26 - monotuei
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
The resemblance of your comment with the 6th one is highly suspicious.
#48 to #26 - anon id: c3436cfb
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
I'd rather test medicines on a Nazi like you to be fair
#111 to #26 - funnyjunknsfwsecti
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
What. WHAT? Have you never ******* heard of human rights? By the way, being a pedophile isn't a crime in the same way that being gay isn't bad in the eyes of religion. It's acting upon it that's a crime. Also, WHY SPECIFICALLY PEDOPHILES? There are thieves, murderes and *other* types of rapists? What about drug traffickers and mob bosses? Why don't they get some hate too, you ******* fascist?

Do you realise how inhumane it is to test on a PERSON? Was the Universal Declaration of Human rights written in vain? Seriously, to whoever wrote this, and anyone who thumbs this up; go **** yourself. Not even in a joking, Aussie-style "haha, **** off mate" kind of way. Go **** yourselves. You're infringing on others' rights as PEOPLE. And if you say "Well, he did the same to those children", let me quote some Ghandi to you: "An eye for an eye makes the world blind."

And heck, while we're at it, why aren't you a vegetarian or a vegan? Just stop eating meat, man, because animals suffer too and stuff. You know what? **** it, I've got an alternative to eating animals. The animals have done nothing wrong, they're innocent... But the pedophiles aren't! Let's eat all the pedophiles guys, LET"S EAT THE ******* PEDOS.
#235 to #111 - residentevilfan
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/05/2012) [-]
#29 to #26 - bagofshenanigans
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
#35 to #26 - crazycommando
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
User avatar #78 to #26 - juciefruit
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
US constitution. Cruel and unusual punishment part.
#28 to #26 - atrumaliger [OP]
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
I wish I could thumb this more then once.
User avatar #51 to #26 - wrpen
Reply +38 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
If we test on them, we might accidentally discover superpowers, and the pedophile would be able to take over the world.
User avatar #88 - Lambda
Reply +30 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
I propose we do away with animal testing and just use the rapists and serial killers from the prisons. Then if we run out of them, start using teenagers who say "swag" a lot.
Doing science AND making the world a better place.
User avatar #105 to #88 - fnordyy
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
And thus the zombie apocalypse
User avatar #110 to #105 - xgeneration
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
I think we're all well prepared for that so won't be much of an apolocyse.
#11 - bluematterman
Reply +25 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
Reminds me of two things. The music video for Modest Mouse's "King Rat" and,
<This.
User avatar #13 to #11 - pancakeswag
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
The Doc Gerbil's World song still haunts me to this day...
#1 - loganhusted
Reply +25 123456789123345869
(08/03/2012) [-]
#3 to #1 - ghostlespaul
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
and smoke some weed
#55 - PedoBearFTW
Reply +22 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
Rabbits and **** that they do tests on aren't human like at all. I say we grab some people in jail that have extremely long sentences, like 25+ or life, and do **** on them.
User avatar #62 to #55 - AnAnonForLife
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
I always thought the same thing, I mean, we did pay to keep them in there, why not have them pay and die for science?
User avatar #107 to #62 - Sethorein
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
Because we value human life :\
User avatar #76 to #55 - TheMather
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
Actually, rats have a pretty similar brain to ours, hence why they are used for testing the psychological effects of medication and such.
Meanwhile a pigs physiology is similar enough to ours that they serve as an adequate indicator of something's effect on our bodies.
User avatar #108 to #55 - Sethorein
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
we ascribe some irrevocable value to human life because... well **** we're pretty self centered and like to think we're more important than anyone else... jk jk... there's a reason...

Ethical slippery slopes. You start with the worst criminals... start to run low... but you're expected to keep up the rate of progress... so you move to less heinous criminals because criminals have less protection now and behind closed doors no one will know... then poeple start being framed for crimes... or worse, the disabled or vegetative humans become test subjects.

The second you decide one human is worth more than another you start to risk doing some pretty bad stuff down the road...
User avatar #119 to #108 - PedoBearFTW
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
Personally, I don't like people. They're disgusting and mean, they lie, cheat, and steal. Animals are innocent and so much better than people.
User avatar #123 to #119 - Sethorein
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
Animals would be just as bad as people if they had our cognitive capacity... they don't so their evil is limited.

Fact of the matter is, a life is a life and we cannot judge one as of greater value than another... and since animals are not humans we lack the same value for them... It's all about preserving OUR DNA xD
#113 to #55 - funnyjunknsfwsecti
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
>Aren't human at all
>Let's do some tests on them

Huh, I wonder where I've heard this before...
Can't link because of a new account, but why don't you google "Nazi human experimentation".

'Jews are untermensch, we shall EXPERIMENT ON ZEM."
#56 to #55 - leveetothechevy **User deleted account**
+6 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #57 to #56 - PedoBearFTW
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
The Jews were innocent. People in jail for that long are pedophiles, rapist and murderers.
User avatar #67 to #57 - corundum
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
Or, at least that's what a jury decided.
#58 to #57 - leveetothechevy **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #59 to #58 - PedoBearFTW
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
haha, ma'am, but thank you, sir.
User avatar #21 - salari
Reply +19 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
Sure, ban animal testing. Have fun with the whole 'curing diseases' thing, at least you'll have some extra mice and rats to cuddle as you endure a slow and painful death.
User avatar #6 - ironsoul
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
But why test stuff on animals when we have all those perfectly good pedophiles in prison that we could be testing **** on?
User avatar #7 to #6 - inyourmind
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
we don't have millions and a rather large amount of pedophiles are probable due to statutory issues not that they were actual pedophiles.
#24 to #7 - craigdavid
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
such as an 18 yr old and a 17 yr old where the 17 yr old (most likely female) gets pissy over being dumped or it being a one night stand and gets the other one convicted for statuatory rape

great justice system youve got there america
User avatar #17 to #6 - cheesymuffins
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
We should test HIV vaccines and cures on death row inmates instead of executing them.
User avatar #12 to #6 - zaggystirdust
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
we tried that once
subject 105473 turned into a bear.
He escaped the lab, after that they shut the project down.
they say 105473 still roams the earth.
User avatar #97 to #12 - shitshitshit
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
oh christ...pedobear
User avatar #43 - Bohya
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
They should just use humans to test. I mean... they are more genetically identical to us than other species. Why arn't people on death row, or with life sentences andno chance of parole, not used as subjects? There'll always be a supply of them, and it may even double benefit in that it could become a greater deterrent for for performing crimes. I'm not a tree hugger or anything, but I definitely think that the current system used is barbaric and unjust. Until they either replace animal subjects with better human subjects, or find a way to make them completely braindead, I will always be against animal testing. Even if it is for our own sake - there are better options.
#46 to #43 - anon id: 11fba3ae
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
Heinrich Himmler would be bro-fisting you right now if he were alive
#60 to #46 - anon id: ed3ee93c
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
I read that as fisting not bro-fristing...
#49 to #43 - xelihope
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
The worry isn't the drug killing the tested.

The worry is the drug TORTURING the tested.
Doing it to criminals would be against the consitution for "cruel and unusual punishment".
#52 to #49 - anon id: 16633e5d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
Well, if it was made clear what would happen to those who commited such serious offences, then you basically have the criminal's 'approval' to being tested. Also life sentences are a form of torture, even if the government doesn't want to admit to it. At least if they were test subjects they would be useful and beneficial to everyone in society society. Animals are currently being 'tortured', and a move to human subjects would prove both better and just as 'inhumane'. It's the stupid humanity pieces of ***** that are trying to make a distinction between animal testing and human testing. Most of these people aren't even directly involved in such testing and know very little knowledge behing the applical work of it. I'm pretty sure that the smarter ones (who should be pulling the strings) would be in favour of human test subjects, since they can actually see why it would be positive.

Unfortunately, it's the idiots in society and the people who think they are intelligent, but aren't (with the power to actually change things) who are holding the future of science and our species behind.
User avatar #89 - ronyx
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
If mice were as smart as humans are portrayed on the picture then we wouldn't be testing on them.
User avatar #68 - painispancakes
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
Is it me or does the rabbit in the background looks like a playboy logo?