Liberal Machoke. 50% OC. I Ammo EXP. sun as is ' bi, A mum AND IF I WORK HARD To GAIN’ EX ' RENEE, WHY AHOULD I GIVE HALF TO A LAZY MAGIKARP?. Because the magikarp will eventually evolve into a garyados and will probably contribute more to the team than the machoke. You cant expect the world to grow wi Liberal Machoke 50% OC I Ammo EXP sun as is ' bi A mum AND IF WORK HARD To GAIN’ EX RENEE WHY AHOULD GIVE HALF TO LAZY MAGIKARP? Because the magikarp will eventually evolve into a garyados and probably contribute more to team than machoke You cant expect world grow wi
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (63)
[ 63 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#38 - monsieurwaffles
Reply +26 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
Because the magikarp will eventually evolve into a garyados and will probably contribute more to the team than the machoke.   
You cant expect the world to grow without people helping one another.
Because the magikarp will eventually evolve into a garyados and will probably contribute more to the team than the machoke.
You cant expect the world to grow without people helping one another.
#68 to #38 - realyboredguy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/04/2012) [-]
Will probably regret replying, but, that isn't a good example of real life. First, I am pretty sure in the game you have the choice, which is giving, but socialism FORCE you to do it, which is thief. Also, they give it to everybody, and it probably will not be a investment. The guy you will give it to will probably just burn it. You should have the choice to give a which Pokemon you want, if you think it could end up doubling your exp. In other words, you should have the choice of giving your money to the person (or group) you want. So hey sociofags out there, do you know what THAT is called? Capitalism! Not socialism.

Monsieurwaffles, that wasn't necessarily directed to you, just wanted to point it out, because your comment was giving me a good opportunity to do it. Maybe a bit late for other people to see it, but oh well, I will have tried.
#33 - piemanrulezu
Reply +19 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
Shouldn't this be conservative Machoke?
#34 - traviver
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
And Exp. All from gen 1 was COMMUNISM.
#40 to #34 - kibbleking
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
#48 to #34 - smokingman
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
#30 - kraetyz
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
I agree with this Machoke.
User avatar #41 - zarcos
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
That Machoke seems more conservative than liberal to me.
#42 to #41 - masterbob
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#26 - mokeyking
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #45 to #26 - betterguygreg
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
Is that a real episode?
#56 to #45 - thebacondroid
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
banned in U.S but yeah it's real   
here's a random picture
banned in U.S but yeah it's real
here's a random picture
User avatar #64 to #45 - mokeyking
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
Not sure, sorry
#43 - alucardshellhound
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
**alucardshellhound rolled a random image posted in comment #4 at Whovians I am proud **
**alucardshellhound rolled a random image posted in comment #4 at Whovians I am proud **
User avatar #51 to #43 - thebacondroid
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
nice roll
#20 - srskate
Reply -11 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
I dont understand. EXP SHARE doesn't give half away. It doubles experience.
User avatar #21 to #20 - gwankwo [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
If Magikarp in your party has an Exp. share and Machoke does all the fighting, they both get 50% of the experience. If Machoke would hold the Exp. share while he does all the fighting too, he'd get 2x 50% of the experience. Science says so.
User avatar #22 to #21 - srskate
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
I was almost damn certain that it gave double experience in gen 1

upon further research, this appears to be false. There is no exp share in gen 1
User avatar #27 to #22 - derpityhurr
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
Gen 1 has the Exp. All which splits the exp into 6 parts for every party member
User avatar #65 to #27 - srskate
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
Yeah, my research uncovered that.

I couldve sword there was a way to get double xp though.
User avatar #66 to #65 - Sword
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
*sworn

Now stop saying my name
User avatar #67 to #66 - srskate
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/03/2012) [-]
hahahahahahhahahah
#5 - MuahahaOfLore
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
This image has expired
Yes, but the useless ***** that don't work don't evolve and become badasses that help the party overall.

They instead have more children than a normal person and all of them are more likely to need exp. share. while making normal party members level up slower

what were we talking about?
User avatar #6 - biggrand
Reply -8 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
im most likely going to sound ******* retarded to everyone here, but im an anarchist, and i dont believe our government should have any involvement in our economy. i dont care if we **** it up, its our own damn fault, and what the hell kind of people are we if we have to run back to mom as grown working people to fix things.
User avatar #46 to #6 - betterguygreg
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
I can tell by your profile picture that:
A-You are an attention whore that, by being different, you expect loads of attention-
B-You are a hipster.
User avatar #62 to #46 - biggrand
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
that isnt me
#8 to #6 - realyboredguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
Well who is going to pay for the army?(not for attacking other country, just defending your own) police? fireman? That's my problem with anarchism, and the fact that people can do what the **** they want is not a good idea.
User avatar #9 to #8 - biggrand
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
because we naturally think that that is what it means, just because we dont have a physical institution, a physical document saying cunt, a physical government office, dosent mean we cant agree on some things. as human beings, it should come naturally not to kill or steal. obviously that wont happen just yet, but relying on a government as much as we do is counter productive for us as humans from a mental standpoint, we need to mature, otherwise a failing government, economy, religious institution, ect. will have a negative effect on us we could really just avoid. I think it makes sense to have groups for protection and maintaining natural disasters and what not, but do we really need a government to tell us that, and should we really?
#10 to #9 - realyboredguy
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
Well that's the problem, were not mature yet. The police would get 0 funding, because very few people like them. We will need to rely on the government right now. I completely agree with you on one point, the government is way to much involved into the economy, and that's what created the economical crisis. Just let the business and banks do what they want as long as they don't do any fraud. The government simply can't handle every companies in the country, that's insanity. What if there is not a bunch of useless regulation? If they don't lie to the public, they have to be good, or they fail. Same with banks.
User avatar #11 to #10 - biggrand
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
i suppose then we may mature, but at the same time, we may not. We would have to go in with an incentive to mature and move forward, otherwise our grandchildren will most likely face another recession because we did not account for human nature. idk, i feel like im just rambling on because the word socialism is mentioned and i think about this stuff alot.
#12 to #6 - brenavia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
I was going to read these comments between biggrand and realyboredguy, but the bad grammar did me in.
#15 to #6 - anon id: aab7fcbd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
That's not Anarchist. Anarchist is absolutely 0% government. No military, no police, nothing. It's FFA basically.
User avatar #61 to #15 - biggrand
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
my views of what a government is is different than your then. I probably could have worded this alot better.
User avatar #18 to #6 - ginginhunter
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
Define: Anarchist
#23 to #6 - punkaintdead
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/02/2012) [-]
anarchism is social order based on the free groupings of individuals