Liberal Machoke. 50% OC. I Ammo EXP. sun as is ' bi, A mum AND IF I WORK HARD To GAIN’ EX ' RENEE, WHY AHOULD I GIVE HALF TO A LAZY MAGIKARP?. Because the magikarp will eventually evolve into a garyados and will probably contribute more to the team than the machoke. You cant expect the world to grow wi
x

Comments(63):

[ 63 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#33 - piemanrulezu (08/02/2012) [-]
Shouldn't this be conservative Machoke?
#38 - monsieurwaffles (08/02/2012) [-]
Because the magikarp will eventually evolve into a garyados and will probably contribute more to the team than the machoke.   
You cant expect the world to grow without people helping one another.
Because the magikarp will eventually evolve into a garyados and will probably contribute more to the team than the machoke.
You cant expect the world to grow without people helping one another.
#68 to #38 - realyboredguy (08/04/2012) [-]
Will probably regret replying, but, that isn't a good example of real life. First, I am pretty sure in the game you have the choice, which is giving, but socialism FORCE you to do it, which is thief. Also, they give it to everybody, and it probably will not be a investment. The guy you will give it to will probably just burn it. You should have the choice to give a which Pokemon you want, if you think it could end up doubling your exp. In other words, you should have the choice of giving your money to the person (or group) you want. So hey sociofags out there, do you know what THAT is called? Capitalism! Not socialism.

Monsieurwaffles, that wasn't necessarily directed to you, just wanted to point it out, because your comment was giving me a good opportunity to do it. Maybe a bit late for other people to see it, but oh well, I will have tried.
#26 - mokeyking (08/02/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #45 to #26 - betterguygreg (08/02/2012) [-]
Is that a real episode?
#56 to #45 - thebacondroid (08/02/2012) [-]
banned in U.S but yeah it's real   
here's a random picture
banned in U.S but yeah it's real
here's a random picture
User avatar #64 to #45 - mokeyking (08/02/2012) [-]
Not sure, sorry
#34 - traviver (08/02/2012) [-]
And Exp. All from gen 1 was COMMUNISM.
#55 - anon (08/02/2012) [-]
www.isidewith.com/
I think most americans had no idea about who they really support.
#58 to #55 - anon (08/02/2012) [-]
93% Ron Paul
18% Obama
#63 to #58 - anon (08/02/2012) [-]
87% Jill Stein
84% Barack Obama
31% Ron Paul
And somehow 7% Mitt Romney
#43 - alucardshellhound (08/02/2012) [-]
**alucardshellhound rolled a random image posted in comment #4 at Whovians I am proud **
**alucardshellhound rolled a random image posted in comment #4 at Whovians I am proud **
User avatar #51 to #43 - thebacondroid (08/02/2012) [-]
nice roll
#30 - kraetyz (08/02/2012) [-]
I agree with this Machoke.
User avatar #41 - zarcos (08/02/2012) [-]
That Machoke seems more conservative than liberal to me.
0
#42 to #41 - masterbob has deleted their comment [-]
#5 - MuahahaOfLore (08/02/2012) [-]
This image has expired
Yes, but the useless ***** that don't work don't evolve and become badasses that help the party overall.

They instead have more children than a normal person and all of them are more likely to need exp. share. while making normal party members level up slower

what were we talking about?
User avatar #44 - swampert (08/02/2012) [-]
I won't be voting for Romney. He is a smarmy turd of a man
#50 to #44 - anon (08/02/2012) [-]
Just like Obama
User avatar #60 to #50 - drtrousersnake ONLINE (08/02/2012) [-]
or pretty much any other politician
-1
#47 - infinitereaper has deleted their comment [-]
#4 - realyboredguy (08/02/2012) [-]
I am not sure if op is serious, of mocking conservatives.
He posted it with the fox news logo. People here hate fox news, even the conservatives. Same goes for Mitt Romney
#7 to #4 - realyboredguy (08/02/2012) [-]
*or oups, not of
User avatar #1 - puppybiscuit (08/01/2012) [-]
I could never vote for a guy named after a piece of baseball equipment.
User avatar #3 to #1 - swampert (08/01/2012) [-]
What if someone was named eppe lepew
User avatar #25 to #1 - swampert (08/02/2012) [-]
No love for fencing+rapist skunk?
User avatar #6 - biggrand (08/02/2012) [-]
im most likely going to sound ******* retarded to everyone here, but im an anarchist, and i dont believe our government should have any involvement in our economy. i dont care if we **** it up, its our own damn fault, and what the hell kind of people are we if we have to run back to mom as grown working people to fix things.
#12 to #6 - brenavia (08/02/2012) [-]
I was going to read these comments between biggrand and realyboredguy, but the bad grammar did me in.
#15 to #6 - anon (08/02/2012) [-]
That's not Anarchist. Anarchist is absolutely 0% government. No military, no police, nothing. It's FFA basically.
User avatar #61 to #15 - biggrand (08/02/2012) [-]
my views of what a government is is different than your then. I probably could have worded this alot better.
User avatar #46 to #6 - betterguygreg (08/02/2012) [-]
I can tell by your profile picture that:
A-You are an attention whore that, by being different, you expect loads of attention-
B-You are a hipster.
User avatar #62 to #46 - biggrand (08/02/2012) [-]
that isnt me
#8 to #6 - realyboredguy (08/02/2012) [-]
Well who is going to pay for the army?(not for attacking other country, just defending your own) police? fireman? That's my problem with anarchism, and the fact that people can do what the **** they want is not a good idea.
User avatar #9 to #8 - biggrand (08/02/2012) [-]
because we naturally think that that is what it means, just because we dont have a physical institution, a physical document saying cunt, a physical government office, dosent mean we cant agree on some things. as human beings, it should come naturally not to kill or steal. obviously that wont happen just yet, but relying on a government as much as we do is counter productive for us as humans from a mental standpoint, we need to mature, otherwise a failing government, economy, religious institution, ect. will have a negative effect on us we could really just avoid. I think it makes sense to have groups for protection and maintaining natural disasters and what not, but do we really need a government to tell us that, and should we really?
#10 to #9 - realyboredguy (08/02/2012) [-]
Well that's the problem, were not mature yet. The police would get 0 funding, because very few people like them. We will need to rely on the government right now. I completely agree with you on one point, the government is way to much involved into the economy, and that's what created the economical crisis. Just let the business and banks do what they want as long as they don't do any fraud. The government simply can't handle every companies in the country, that's insanity. What if there is not a bunch of useless regulation? If they don't lie to the public, they have to be good, or they fail. Same with banks.
User avatar #11 to #10 - biggrand (08/02/2012) [-]
i suppose then we may mature, but at the same time, we may not. We would have to go in with an incentive to mature and move forward, otherwise our grandchildren will most likely face another recession because we did not account for human nature. idk, i feel like im just rambling on because the word socialism is mentioned and i think about this stuff alot.
User avatar #18 to #6 - ginginhunter (08/02/2012) [-]
Define: Anarchist
#23 to #6 - punkaintdead (08/02/2012) [-]
anarchism is social order based on the free groupings of individuals
User avatar #16 - ginginhunter (08/02/2012) [-]
You guys are gonna cause a ********* but an anarchist , anarcho communist to be presice
User avatar #17 to #16 - ginginhunter (08/02/2012) [-]
i am* DAMMIT
#31 to #17 - anon (08/02/2012) [-]
how's being 8 years old working out?
#69 - realyboredguy (08/04/2012) [-]
Do you have the choice to share it? Pretty sure you do. If you do, that's not socialism.
#59 - KayRed (08/02/2012) [-]
Mitt Romney is a closet moderate, so it is entertaining to watch him dodge questions that might make him come off as too liberal. He answers one question wrong, it could cause a split in the GOP and bring about a 3rd party (Most likely tea party, god help us) candidate, which would then automatically win the election for Barack.
#57 - anon (08/02/2012) [-]
lol but machoke still gets everything he worked for
User avatar #54 - thewastelander (08/02/2012) [-]
Why is the title "Liberal" then it has Mitt Romney. Maybe I just don't know enough about Mitt.
User avatar #39 - gwankwo (08/02/2012) [-]
OP here. I'm not American, nor would I vote for Romney if I were. Also, I didn't mean to start a political debate on here :)
[ 63 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)