useless title is useless. . wikileaks
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (157)
[ 157 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
49 comments displayed.
#2 - champaigne
Reply +61
(07/25/2012) [-]
#6 to #2 - hillbillypowpow
Reply +14
(07/26/2012) [-]
#129 to #6 - mcwachner
Reply +8
(07/26/2012) [-]
#46 to #6 - itsmypenis **User deleted account**
+6
has deleted their comment [-]
#24 to #2 - zehutit
Reply +27
(07/26/2012) [-]
#54 - guesswhosnew
Reply +19
(07/26/2012) [-]
Every comment:

Hurr Durr My side is right derpy derp derp.

Consider the following: We're fully out of Iraq as of late 2011 and furthermore, keep your opinions to yourselves because chances are 90% of you have no clue what is actually going on and you trust everything the media says. If you haven't been there yourself, you don't know what's happening and your whole argument is regurgitated ******** fed to you through a spoon of either ultra conservative or ultra liberal media figures who also don't know what's happening.

TL;DR: Quit your bitching and go fap. You don't really care about the ******* ***********.
#58 to #54 - anon
Reply 0
(07/26/2012) [-]
read you comment again your logic goes to you too
since you talking like USA is not at fault then how did you know? media?
also even if your out of Iraq so what? you like beating the crap out of someone then whine about people asking you why your doing this and say: i will stop kicking his ass soon stop whining faggots...
#61 to #58 - guesswhosnew
Reply +6
(07/26/2012) [-]
Moral of the story still stands: No one cares about it for more than 5 minutes. Just like Kony, and just about every other "major" controversy.
#66 to #61 - anon
Reply 0
(07/26/2012) [-]
because they cant do anything about it if they care they will do what they *can* do in this case a hate comment to USA's doings....
just like when you hear about a murder or a rape in TV you would hate the one who did it but if you change the channel you will still enjoy the movie or what ever your watching..
that doesnt mean you dont care you do care but you cant do anything if you can would have done something...
#79 to #54 - jrondeau **User deleted account**
Reply +3
(07/26/2012) [-]
Here, take this
Here, take this
#53 - pancakeswag
Reply +18
(07/26/2012) [-]
Good job on starting a big ass **** storm OP, you've earned my thumb
Good job on starting a big ass **** storm OP, you've earned my thumb
#179 to #53 - bghostreaper [OP]
Reply +1
(07/26/2012) [-]
You're welcome
#3 - salihzzz
Reply +17
(07/25/2012) [-]
#62 - danihollywood
Reply +14
(07/26/2012) [-]
i read that as "useless tities is useless"
i read that as "useless tities is useless"
#4 - MrSith
Reply +11
(07/25/2012) [-]
#131 - isradam
Reply +10
(07/26/2012) [-]
Did someone say Iraq?
Did someone say Iraq?
#146 to #131 - macjigiddy
Reply -1
(07/26/2012) [-]
Rocklobster!
#156 to #131 - bleeduntildeath
Reply +1
(07/26/2012) [-]
death to butter sauce!
#63 - anon
Reply 0
(07/26/2012) [-]
sorry, but, most of the iraqi civlians were family members of brothers or husbands or fathers or cousins that liked to shoot at Americans. Iraqi's would pop a few shots off wiht the family AK47 at them then go back inside and have tea or watch television. that's why we call so many air strikes or use whilly pee (white phosphorous)
#70 to #63 - anon
Reply 0
(07/26/2012) [-]
true that brother!
thumb for you
#69 to #63 - bulbakip
Reply +6
(07/26/2012) [-]
maybe we should idk, not be over there?
#72 to #69 - Envy
Reply -5
(07/26/2012) [-]
Yes, then the blood of thousands of Iraqi's WOULDN'T be on the Americans hands, it would simply be on the IRAQI's as we sit and watch.
Good show :)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Anfal_Campaign
#74 to #72 - bulbakip
Reply +9
(07/26/2012) [-]
and the 50,000 civilians that have died in mexico from the drug cartels? should we invade mexico to keep the peace? oh wait, they don't have a lot of natural resources to exploit.



our foreign policy is nothing but empire building at the will of oil corporations and arms dealers.
#76 to #74 - shadowhorn
Reply +3
(07/26/2012) [-]
well said.
#174 to #74 - Envy
Reply 0
(07/26/2012) [-]
Except for a few key things.
Mexico is not an oppressive nation, it's the cartels NOT the Government, making that a Mexican government problem, the solution wouldn't be to INVADE but to HELP the government whereas in Iraq the problem was the government, this leads to my next point:
The US does have National Guard troops stationed on the border
#177 to #74 - Envy
Reply -1
(07/26/2012) [-]
Even more points to prove you're an idiot, Mexico is the 7th largest producer of oil as well as your northern neighbour Canada being the 6th (Both beating out Iraq which is the 12th), yet there is no reason to invade either and if what you imply is true, the US could easily make an excuse.
#176 to #74 - Envy
Reply -1
(07/26/2012) [-]
You're obviously one of those paranoid skeptics that simply use hyperboles to try and make a point rather than using actual facts. You say 'our' as if you imply I am also from the US. The USA has the largest military RnD of any country, they don't go to 'arms dealers'. Also, every single Western nation RUNS on oil, and are constantly looking for new ways to get it. (Look at the Arctic Sovereignty debate).
#182 to #176 - bulbakip
Reply -1
(07/26/2012) [-]
first off. you're using ad hominem attacks by calling me a moron to try and belittle my point.

Secondly, the RnD for arms development is the "arms dealers" im talking about; Colt and other weapons manufacturers.

thirdly, so what the west runs on oil? are you justifying modern imperialism because us westerners need oil?
#193 to #182 - Envy
Reply 0
(07/28/2012) [-]
I used ad hominems because you hide behind fallacies.
Arm dealers implies an organization that sells weapons the highest bidder. US Military RnD is not like that.
My point on the WEST running on oil is that USA is no different than any country, other than the fact that they have a **** ton of power projection capability. Yet you are so centered on hating them, you seem to think that the US just goes and kills civilians and steals their oil. Both Iraq and Afghanistan were missions maintained by coalitions made of a ton of different countries NOT just the US. If the US was so oil hungry, enough to start a war, why didn't they put ground troops on Libya? You didn't respond to one of my points:

-Lack of invasion of Canada and Mexico, two extremely oil rich neighbours who, by your implication, it would be easy to make an excuse to invade for oil.

The US doesn't invade every single country to keep the peace so you're implying they shouldn't use any action at all?
#73 to #72 - shadowhorn
Reply +1
(07/26/2012) [-]
SO? who the **** cares? our foreign policy is so ****** up. we just need to not interfere with the lives of others.
#75 to #73 - Haruhi
Reply 0
(07/26/2012) [-]
There are civilian casualties in all war. That is an unavoidable truth.
#77 to #75 - bulbakip
Reply -3
(07/26/2012) [-]
not if I... SHIFT INTO MAXIMUM-OVER-V



I mean most war is caused by states. politicians with no remorse for human life. funded by stolen money.
#81 to #77 - Haruhi
Reply -3
(07/26/2012) [-]
You are spewing out garbage. Please go back to your hole. That is not always the case.
#85 to #81 - bulbakip
Reply +2
(07/26/2012) [-]
Can you name a war that wasn't funded by taxation?
#175 to #85 - Envy
Reply 0
(07/26/2012) [-]
You're implying taxed money is stolen.
#181 to #175 - bulbakip
Reply 0
(07/26/2012) [-]
it is stolen money. how is it not?
#95 to #85 - thenukecity
Reply 0
(07/26/2012) [-]
That when time when the Followers of Mohamed fought against the guys in Mecca. But I'm not sure if that counts cuz everyone on one side was poor...
#112 - araell
Reply -14
(07/26/2012) [-]
95% of civilians were killed by their own people, not US army
#118 to #112 - fistoftheaxis
Reply +8
(07/26/2012) [-]
Yeah, that is the OFFICIAL story. But only an idiot believes the official story.
#126 to #118 - trostell
Reply -3
(07/26/2012) [-]
Nice referance, but I'm pretty sure the Army didn't plant a bomb in their own hospital that killed over 100 sick and injured Iraqi civilians, especially with their incredibly valuable medics and field surgeons inside the building.
#120 to #118 - araell
Reply -5
(07/26/2012) [-]
Yeah, but I´ve got bigger trust in army, then in terrorists.
#151 to #120 - zzzebror
Reply 0
(07/26/2012) [-]
I have a bigger trust in Iraqi citizens than the U.S. government
#115 - srskate
Reply -10
(07/26/2012) [-]
HEY GUYS, WHAT WAS THE BIG FAUCET SPEWING.
IT LOOKED RED
I HOPE IT WASN'T BLOOD.
#123 to #115 - ExorArgus
Reply +7
(07/26/2012) [-]
Nah its kool aid.
#124 to #123 - srskate
Reply +1
(07/26/2012) [-]
oh thank god

for those other people, the point is that the author really lacks subtlety.
#125 to #124 - ExorArgus
Reply +2
(07/26/2012) [-]
So do you
#127 to #125 - srskate
Reply +2
(07/26/2012) [-]
which was in turn the joke
#147 to #124 - macjigiddy
Reply +1
(07/26/2012) [-]
It's meant to lack subtlety, its a newspaper comic, they're designed to be obvious.
#172 to #147 - srskate
Reply 0
(07/26/2012) [-]
Ive seen a few more subtle than this.