Wonka. sencond thing i ever uploaded, please dont be harsh, stole from interwebs but thought to share. an Laws yhm.. ... ll, Hm nunnyy. If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns. they are a lie
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #9 - mortality (07/23/2012) [+] (1 reply)
If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns.
#97 - coolcman (07/23/2012) [+] (2 replies)
User avatar #38 - icedmantwo (07/23/2012) [+] (40 replies)
its not about banning guns, its about making them harder to get, especially for people with psychological issues
User avatar #37 - aviriorix (07/23/2012) [+] (38 replies)
My main issue is why the hell can a civilian obtain an assault rifle. There is no circumstance where you would ever need an assault rifle besides killing people. Shotguns, and owning ONE handgun I can see, but how the hell can you justify letting average citizens own a ******* assault rifle.
User avatar #99 to #98 - SuitUp (07/23/2012) [-]
Working as a police office...yes. It really isn't worth their time risking being charged with assault, battery or manslaughter. They're there for a quick buck to fuel whatever habits they have.
#14 - twilightdusk (07/23/2012) [+] (15 replies)
He obtained the guns through legal means. Stricter regulation could have kept him from getting them. The primary weapon in the shooting was actually banned from 1994-2004, had it still been banned he wouldn't have gotten a hold of it.
User avatar #26 to #19 - Welshhobo (07/23/2012) [-]
In first world countries we ban guns and theyre incredibley difficult to attain. Its very rare for even a gang member to have a gun in the UK, and even if they did, its doubtful theyd be an ******* nutjob. The only reason drugs are easier to find is because they have a demand, so theres always someone supplying.

There's no demand for guns in civilized places.
User avatar #2 - flemsdfer ONLINE (07/22/2012) [+] (13 replies)
I think everyone should have a gun personally. No having to register all of them or anything like you have to now. You should have to register once, take a course and be done with it, and you should be able to take a concealed firearm everywhere except court houses (obviously). If everyone had a gun, could there be huge shootings like this? Would the gunman just be shot down immediately?
User avatar #6 to #2 - foelkera ONLINE (07/23/2012) [-]
can't shoot up the school if the school shoots back
#10 - oufancyna (07/23/2012) [+] (2 replies)
Why don't we just tax the 			****		 out of bullets?
Why don't we just tax the **** out of bullets?
User avatar #1 - lilnuggetbob (07/22/2012) [-]
that and most shootings involve illegally obtained firearms.
User avatar #112 - mrmcsnodgrass (07/23/2012) [+] (2 replies)
Hurr Durr, we should ban fire because it can be used as a deadly weapon.

That's some peoples logic.
User avatar #63 - grogabusk (07/23/2012) [+] (4 replies)
Well, considering criminals will ALWAYS be able to get their hands on a gun if they want to shoot people, I don't think making guns harder to get would help at all. It would make things worse, actually. If all of the good people, who follow laws and most likely will NOT go on a murder spree, were armed, would anyone really think about walking into somewhere just to shoot them up?
User avatar #90 to #75 - peacetoad (07/23/2012) [-]
so true. In Europe we hear about shootings in the USA from time to time. In Belgium, no one has a gun. Only the cops ... We had one terrorist that I can remember. A foreign guy with grenades. I have never heard of mass shootings or w/e because they are simply forbidden. So saying gun laws don't do **** is ******** indeed.

And those who really want to commit a crime will still be able to get guns. Or they will be caught trying it. If criminals go buy a gun now, they can't even be stopped. Doesn't seem logic to me.
User avatar #102 - maltionthefurry (07/23/2012) [+] (3 replies)
If you ban guns, people will just get them form an illegal seller. Its like banning computers... People will still buy them somehow, people will still get on them, and there will still be people other then the government using it. (It was an example be quiet.)
User avatar #109 to #102 - XVI (07/23/2012) [-]
You're right. But good people would follow the law, so it would really disarm the wrong people.
User avatar #5 - shakenine ONLINE (07/23/2012) [+] (5 replies)
as a gunsmith and as a arms dealer i make it a point to take illegal guns off the streets but guns will still be out there in the hands of bat **** crazy wanna be villains. that's why i carry a 454 for protection, bitch dont get up after that...
User avatar #7 to #5 - immortalfear (07/23/2012) [-]
Most guns used in gang activity are stolen or smuggled across borders, so more laws wouldn't help to begin with.
User avatar #119 - gasster (07/23/2012) [+] (19 replies)
criminals follow the laws of physics and if there are no guns they cant shoot guns. stupid post.
User avatar #151 to #144 - grogabusk (07/24/2012) [-]
You're implying the only way of acquiring them is through purchase. And YES, people CAN make guns illegally.
#81 - anonymous (07/23/2012) [+] (2 replies)
it would be better if everyone had a gun that way nobody would have the balls to do something because the criminal knows he'll die. It's already proven in florida and texas that crime rates are 30% less than anywhere else because they all have guns. Why would i rob a store if i know everyone around me has the right to shoot me ?
User avatar #113 to #81 - tenaciousjon (07/23/2012) [-]
You made me chuckle, sir! But it is true, if I walk into a bank and pull a gun, then EEEEVERYONE else pulls out their own gun and points it at me, I'm getting the **** out of their and never coming back!
User avatar #61 - fantomen (07/23/2012) [+] (2 replies)
THE AURORA SHOOTING WAS FAKE! It couldn't possibly happen, because the theater was a gun-free zone!
User avatar #82 to #76 - fantomen (07/23/2012) [-]
come on, everyone knows that the little "no guns" sign on the door makes it physically impossible to bring a gun inside.
User avatar #39 - jonluw (07/23/2012) [-]
Congratulations on not understanding the mechanics behind how gun control lowers gun crime.

Every illegal gun (with the odd exception) was legal at some point.
#27 - anonymous (07/23/2012) [+] (5 replies)
Studies show you're up to 4 times more likely to be shot if you carry a firearm.

But please tell me more about how 'safe' it makes you.
User avatar #48 to #46 - AcidFlux (07/23/2012) [-]
That article admits that it may be the attitude of the victims, and not the actual act of carrying a firearm, that is the cause. But it's always easier to jump to a conclusion that supports your bias than actually understand & assimilate the information.
User avatar #24 - neoexdeath ONLINE (07/23/2012) [+] (1 reply)
**** like this is why we need to go back to ******* swords. Some jackass shoots up a movie theater? Whole thing's over in like 30 seconds

Dude brings a ******* claymore into the place, like three or four other people with swords stand the **** up and fight that asshole in a massive sword duel lasting a good half hour, with only one man standing at the end, ideally on a rooftop.

THAT is how violence should be done people. With a little ******* class.
#88 - anonymous (07/23/2012) [+] (4 replies)
you guys are all forgetting the point that GUNS DONT KILL PEOPLE, PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE. If he really wanted to kill that audience he could've easily built a home made bomb or just run in with a sword etc etc. Theres infinite ways of killing someone you shouldn't take away peoples rights because of incidents soon enough this will turn out like 9/11 and they're gonna rape you everytime you try to watch a movie because of terrorism and safety issues. the whole system is ******** dont say i didnt warn you guys
#79 - anonymous (07/23/2012) [-]
Actually their point is that the guy bought all his guns just 60 days before the shooting.
Though yes, simple gun laws would not stop all murders.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)