Spoons. .. The only reason i want gun control is so that instead of having gangs gun each-other down, they have cool martial arts fights like ninjas. LA would be badass Spoons The only reason i want gun control is so that instead of having gangs each-other down they have cool martial arts fights like ninjas LA would be badass
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (292)
[ 292 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#49 - greatgatsby
Reply +79 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
The only reason i want gun control is so that instead of having gangs gun each-other down, they have cool martial arts fights like ninjas.

LA would be badass
User avatar #186 to #49 - RisenLichen
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
LA? Imagine New york
User avatar #153 to #49 - admiralen
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
they would just shiv each other
#204 to #49 - threenewmessages
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
The only person to have a gun in this show is that dude who has the num. 1 headband.
And the dude with the rocket launcher, if you count that.
#60 to #49 - potatotown
Reply +27 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
what would be so cool about it? when they are fighting you wouldnt even be able to see them
what would be so cool about it? when they are fighting you wouldnt even be able to see them
User avatar #2 - seffie
Reply -45 123456789123345869
(07/22/2012) [-]
Actually, this is not a good comparison.
If you don't have a spoon, you can always use a fork or even your hands.
Yet if you don't have a gun, you really can't throw the bullets and kill people.
The best you can do is with a string, but that is not nearly as good as a gun.
#22 to #2 - sallythemanatee
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #82 to #2 - xxxdemongirl
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
You can kill someone without a gun...
#24 to #2 - jrondeau **User deleted account**
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(07/22/2012) [-]
User avatar #5 to #2 - thamuz
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(07/22/2012) [-]
A gun is a tool. Just like the artists brush is a tool. The gun does not kill animals or people on its own. It takes the user,to take the initiative to pull that trigger. Just like the brush does not paint a picture on its own.

People seem to fail to understand that the gun is not the root of the problem,but people are.
User avatar #37 to #5 - errydayimshufflin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Just trying to have some discussion about this, but should we allow people to have nuclear weapons? I know that's going to the extreme, I'm just wondering where the line is.
User avatar #61 to #37 - commiecomrade
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
I just want to say, with a gun, you can collect them, shoot them for sport, hunting, or fun. You can't really use a nuclear weapon without killing someone, unless you detonate it over the ocean. Even then, there's problems.
User avatar #62 to #61 - errydayimshufflin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Well, yes, agreed. That's what I meant by finding the line. When does something become too dangerous for the masses?
User avatar #64 to #62 - commiecomrade
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
I guess that's a subjective issue left for everyone to decide.
User avatar #66 to #64 - errydayimshufflin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
True enough. Just wondering where the opinion on here skewed. I personally am not for the outlawing of guns, just a lot stricter gun control.
User avatar #39 to #37 - thamuz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Should we allow the every day man to posses them? No. But the science,the physics of it,and the utter simplicity of it,allows them to be there for everyone.

Unless you want to take away everything that could be used to build them,then no people shouldnt. If you dont,then yes they can.

In fact a great majority of the components required can be found in your house.
#3 to #2 - thepsycho
Reply +55 123456789123345869
(07/22/2012) [-]
I you don't have a spoon, you can always eat with a fork or even your hands.

If you don't have a gun, you can always kill with a fork or even your hands.


It goes both ways, buddy.
User avatar #33 to #3 - errydayimshufflin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Yeah, but I don't think someone could go into a theater and kill 12 people and injure 58 others with just a fork or their hands..
#51 to #33 - thepsycho
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
You can always use homemade explosives/poisonous gas bombs. I bet I could make one out of the things I got in my fridge.
User avatar #52 to #51 - errydayimshufflin
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Okay, yes, you could, but you know what those are? Illegal. I think the whole point of the discussion was the legality of guns.

Also, I'm loving having an actual discussion on here. It's a nice change.
#53 to #52 - thepsycho
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Just because you make something illegal doesn't make it unavailable to every single person.

Murder is illegal, if guns are illegal it'll make the process of getting one a bit more expensive and secretive because you'd just have to find a gun dealer.

Drugs are illegal yet I see them everywhere, don't tell me you've not seen one of those news broadcasts X was found with Y drug and arrested at least once.

Back to the point, I could make explosives or poisonous gas bombs. Of course they are illegal, but if my objective is killing people which is also illegal I don't think I'd care at all. Nowadays illegal means 'hide whatever you do or whatever you have better'.
User avatar #63 to #53 - errydayimshufflin
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
While yes, it goes without saying that just because something is illegal doesn't mean it won't be possessed, I disagree with your assertion that it makes no difference if something is legal or not. Drugs are illegal, yes, and because of that it's a lot harder to get your hands on them.

For instance, take weed. Weed is probably the easiest illegal drug that you can get your hands on. However, if weed were to be made legal, you don't think consumption would at least double?

Sorry, but I don't agree that if guns were illegal (which is not what I'm suggesting), that all you'd have to do is find a dealer.
#99 to #63 - realyboredguy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
The difference is, for guns, you're only scared that people will go kill people with it, right?(or get them injured) But, those people will get them illegally anyway, because they are criminals, and they don't care. Weed itself can cause problems long term even if people say that's not true, it is, it's not a big conspiracy made my oil companies and paper companies because family guy said so, for the supporters out there, but that's a other debate, but it's doesn't help you commit an other crime, and it doesn't also prevent somebody from committing that very crime.

I am a bit tired, and what I was trying to say is probably confusing, but what I meant is, like you said, if weed consumption becomes legal, yes it will double. You're again right, for the thing it would be the same with guns. If guns are legal, more people will own guns, like more people would consume marijuana if it weed legal. BUT! The amount of people who own guns will rise, but the amount of gun related crimes, wont, or maybe it will even drop, if criminal are now scared of the general population. That's why the weed argument doesn't really work.
#67 to #63 - thepsycho
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Guns existed since medieval times, they are mass produced and I'm fairly certain there are more guns than people in this world. Drugs are illegal and with a dealer you can get them, it's not easy of course.

Case in point: Guns are illegal, collectors and honest gun users would decrease to respect the law, but murderers, robbers, etc would not decrease as much as you'd expect, they'd just need a dealer, and finding a gun is millions of times better than finding drugs.

Let's say this view actually had a happy ending and there was no way to get a gun, not even with dealers: Murders will still happen, there are infinite ways to kill a man, and a gun is just an easy way out of trillions.

The problem is the people, that's all there is to know, I don't really think a gun would actively push you to commit crimes unless you're schizophrenic.
#94 to #52 - realyboredguy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Yeah, exactly, they are illegal, but the guy who ended up killing 14 people (apparently it's not 12, it's a bit more) had explosives in his apartment, even if they were illegal, thank you for giving a good argument to prove that guns are actually no better legal then illegal.
User avatar #96 to #94 - errydayimshufflin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Okay, and yet, he killed the people using the guns instead of the bombs.

Also, I fail to see how you make the connection that just because he had bombs, guns are just as bad legally as illegally. Please explain.
#101 to #96 - realyboredguy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Yes he decided that for good knows the reason.

My connection is:
Explosives are illegal-> he got them anyway
so...
If guns were illegal-> He probably would of be able to get one also anyway
#122 - taternutz
Reply +33 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Guns don't kill people.    
   
Spoons do.
Guns don't kill people.

Spoons do.
#277 to #122 - fizzled
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
I don't usually say this but seriously.... how long have you been waiting to use that gif?
I don't usually say this but seriously.... how long have you been waiting to use that gif?
#356 to #277 - taternutz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
I wasn't, this post brought it to mind so I googled it.   
   
Although now that I have it in my folder, it waits to be relevant again.
I wasn't, this post brought it to mind so I googled it.

Although now that I have it in my folder, it waits to be relevant again.
User avatar #298 to #122 - invadergirthefifth
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
What is that gif from? The spoon one I mean.
#355 to #298 - taternutz
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
the horribly slow murderer with the extremely inefficient weapon
the horribly slow murderer with the extremely inefficient weapon
#235 - Orangepeel
Reply +28 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
#323 to #235 - adamks
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Which is about the dumbest argument that anyone has ever put up to speak for guns..
#331 to #323 - anon id: 9e508f90
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
DURR less guns means less crime, right???
#336 to #331 - adamks
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Never said so, but that argument holds no water.
#263 to #235 - anon id: b6d79f85
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
this is a meme i don't see nearly enough of...which sucks bc it is one of my favorites
User avatar #307 to #263 - akkere
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
I doubt you'd say the same if it was pointed to the stereotypical conservative right-wing nutjob.
#237 to #235 - brum
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#54 - gryx
Reply +22 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
. Guns don't murder people, spoons don't make people fat. It just makes it easier.
#117 to #54 - elguso
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
yes, well done. that was the joke.
#127 - tormenttheweak
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
to all the people sayng guns should be outlawed...
criminals are going to get their hands on guns, no matter what the law states. so if normal citizens aren't allowed to own guns, wouldn't crime go up?
#141 to #127 - graemearg **User deleted account**
-2 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #170 to #141 - Xedan
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
But unless you have almost a total ban on guns like I believe the UK has, making guns illegal would immediately put criminals at an advantage, because they'd just buy a gun illegally and immediately be impossible to stop, since no good guys have guns to use. It's not like drug laws, because guns can also be used as self-defense. I think the best philosophy on guns, and weapons in general, is that an armed society is a polite society. No one's gonna shoot up a place where I live because they'll probably be stopped by a bullet to the head, not by being subdued and arrested.
#174 to #141 - anon id: f25e5f70
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Laws against drugs have been proven to be ineffective as a gun ban would be. And assault laws are more about setting a standard punishment for the action, it also does little to actually prevent it from happening.
#360 to #127 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #199 to #127 - baditch
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.
User avatar #161 to #127 - shadowhorn
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
It is on this same principle that we should legalize marijuana.
#363 to #161 - tormenttheweak
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/24/2012) [-]
even though i do not smoke pot, i agree completely
User avatar #148 to #127 - jrondeau **User deleted account**
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Crime rates have gone up every time guns have been strictly regulated. Take a look at crime rates after Australia banned guns for example.
User avatar #178 to #148 - dtox
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
And in the UK, since guns have been much more tightly regulated, not only has crime escalated, but you're more likely to get stabbed there than you are to get shot in the US.
#4 - rattolainen
-4 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#8 to #4 - iamphoenix
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/22/2012) [-]
If you're Chinese and the 12 guys are gangsters, it might work.
#12 to #4 - anon id: 7bbf2176
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/22/2012) [-]
Good luck eating soup without a spoon
#18 to #12 - dragonovp
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(07/22/2012) [-]
make your hand into a bowl!
make your hand into a gun?
throw the bullet at the same speed?
what?
#30 to #4 - friednazi
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/22/2012) [-]
You're right, a bomb would be a much more efficient choice.   
People will always be killed, be it a gun, knife, bomb, or another weapon. It's gonna happen.
You're right, a bomb would be a much more efficient choice.
People will always be killed, be it a gun, knife, bomb, or another weapon. It's gonna happen.
User avatar #71 to #4 - noodlelover
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Criminals are called criminals for a reason.....they would still find a way to get guns you idiot.....you think they would follow "a no gun law" hahaa no....
User avatar #9 to #4 - valyn
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/22/2012) [-]
simple. car. where there are people, there will always be a crazy one who wants to kill the others, and he'll always figure out how to do it.Thinking new laws can stop that is childish.
#19 to #4 - slone
Reply +19 123456789123345869
(07/22/2012) [-]
weve had mass murderers a lot longer than weve had guns
#6 to #4 - thepsycho
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(07/22/2012) [-]
#147 - therealdoctor
Reply +19 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
#124 - yourmomsfuckbuddy
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
yah, **** spoons.
#195 - satexas
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
A liberal would see this and decide to ban spoons as well.
A liberal would see this and decide to ban spoons as well.
#201 to #195 - blurpleman
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
Make all the bulbs different colors.
Make all the bulbs different colors.
#205 to #195 - cowboybebop
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/23/2012) [-]
YOU'RE DAMN ******* RIGHT I WOULD!

SPOONS RUIN ******* EVERYTHING!

IF THEY'D NEVER BEEN INVENTED WE WOULDN'T HAVE THAT ********** HYBRID SPORK!