Fox in a nutshell. .


Anonymous comments allowed.
#32 - bdub (06/26/2012) [-]
I prefer to watch Stephen Colbert
User avatar #85 to #32 - commontroll (06/26/2012) [-]
Yeah, unfortunately, the least biased news sources these days are both on Comedy Central...
#83 to #32 - jrondeau **User deleted account** (06/26/2012) [-]
#33 to #32 - bdub (06/26/2012) [-]
And his trusty middle east expurrrt!
#5 - stripeygreenhat (06/26/2012) [-]
I...I sense a political ********* ahead. Aye, one to match ferocity and ruthlessness of the sea herself. Draw the sails raise the oars, men. Hurry, we don't have much time.
#6 to #5 - xxblackcat **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#7 to #6 - stripeygreenhat (06/26/2012) [-]
Yes, clearly people still watch it.

But I think the more invoking factor would be what the sign holder's portrayal of the Fox news message is. Libertarians, conservatives, and liberals clash over the "blame game".
#8 to #6 - thezyzogg (06/26/2012) [-]
There most certainly are. However, most of them seem to not know how to use the internet.
#35 to #6 - anon (06/26/2012) [-]
every news station is biased. ive watched msnbc, cnn, and fox news. sure fox news is the only station that claims to be "fair and balanced" when it obviously isnt. and the ancors tend to be conservative. but every debate i watch on fox news at least has a leftist individual defending the left postition. every "debate" i watch on msnbc is just liberals bashing conservatives with no conservatives to defend conservatism
#165 to #35 - xxblackcat **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#68 to #5 - zeusx ONLINE (06/26/2012) [-]
#66 - charasmaticjdub (06/26/2012) [-]
CNN: How can we spin this poll to make it look like Ron Paul didn't get 34% of the votes?
User avatar #56 to #34 - eight (06/26/2012) [-]
Yahoo is primarily right-winged bias.
User avatar #114 to #56 - corkscrew (06/26/2012) [-]
and CNN is left wing
User avatar #63 to #34 - Sethorein (06/26/2012) [-]
...I.... I just go to the library to learn about issues :\
User avatar #44 to #34 - bostpost (06/26/2012) [-]
No matter how you look at it, business is business.

The company MSNBC is owned by NBCUniversal, which in part is owned and operated by Republicans. Funny how conservatives can make money by feeding people ******** on the "Liberal Media"...

Also FOX news increases revenue whenever their's a democrat in office for obvious reasons.
User avatar #52 to #34 - ahj (06/26/2012) [-]
Fox and MSNBC are both biased, but Fox puts bias into what is supposed to be news. On their 'news' programs, they will edit clips and stop them at just the right time to make liberals look bad, or only do stories that make conservatives look good. MSNBC is just as biased on the pundit side, but they're not nearly as bad on the actual news front.
User avatar #100 to #52 - trojanmannn (06/26/2012) [-]
The way I see it, I might be wrong, this is just my opinion, is that FOX chooses certain stories to cover which usually make liberals look bad, which, I mean happens Vice Versa as well, however they report the whole story. Stations like MSNBC will report all stories that they can get their hands on, but much of them are changed to favor liberals.
User avatar #36 to #34 - thehans (06/26/2012) [-]
more like, family guy and steven colbert say so
#37 to #34 - Gewdaism (06/26/2012) [-]
i think everyone in the universe can agree that both of those networks are bias
User avatar #38 to #34 - aviriorix (06/26/2012) [-]
It's rather obvious that Fox is biased towards the right-wing, and MSNBC is biased towards the left-wing.

The difference is MSNBC doesn't constantly proclaim how it's "fair and balanced" every 5 milliseconds.
#98 - jimmyjewnose (06/26/2012) [-]
Says FOX is evil because of its bias content.
Watches NBC.
#41 - anon (06/26/2012) [-]
#99 to #41 - trojanmannn (06/26/2012) [-]
That's perfect.
That's perfect.
User avatar #57 to #41 - eight (06/26/2012) [-]
Watch the next guy get us into war with Pakistan and other countries. Open up a second "torture" base, and all around screw up everything more. Oh the irony if it happens which I think it will. I do not believe we will recover from this debt, I think it will destroy America. We will have to restart.
User avatar #26 - Trollworth (06/26/2012) [-]
Does anyone here have any idea how many times MSNBC has edited tapes to make certain people look bad? Yet nobody calls them out on it.
User avatar #101 to #26 - trojanmannn (06/26/2012) [-]
FOX and Drudge Report call them out, but the mainstream media tends not to report said instances.
User avatar #39 to #26 - aviriorix (06/26/2012) [-]
You're calling them out on it, I'm sure Fox does too. The same as how MSNBC calls out Fox when they do it. Neither side is clean.
#17 to #10 - Roidrage (06/26/2012) [-]
"Oh, look. A joke about me. I ain't even mad."
"Oh, look. A joke about me. I ain't even mad."
#18 to #17 - lordhaha (06/26/2012) [-]
You better not be ^.^
You better not be ^.^
#133 to #17 - whyyounolaugh (06/26/2012) [-]
**whyyounolaugh rolled a random image posted in comment #5964288 at FJ Pony Thread ** *******
#74 - roberthubbell (06/26/2012) [-]
i do not have a problem with people hating on fox news I only get pissed when people who have never watched it talk ****
#22 - soundofwinter ONLINE (06/26/2012) [-]
$50 says he watches MSNBC
$50 says he watches MSNBC
#45 to #22 - aviriorix has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #76 to #22 - pukingrainbows (06/26/2012) [-]
I hate both, but FOX is more belligerent about it.
#1 - anon (06/25/2012) [-]
MSNBC: RICH people paying RICH people to pretend to be MIDDLE CLASS people telling POOR and MIDDLE CLASS people to blame RICH people for every problem that has ever happened.

Doesn't roll off the tongue quite as nicely, huh?
Also this is a repost.
#128 to #1 - zwartbr has deleted their comment [-]
#9 to #1 - xxblackcat **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#40 to #1 - sketchapaloozar (06/26/2012) [-]
And why would rich people want the country to place the blame back on the rich people.
Your logic is sound my dude.
User avatar #59 to #40 - allamericandude (06/26/2012) [-]
...because the government gives the rich more power. The people who blame the rich for everyone's problems (typically fiscal liberals) usually think the solution is to give the government more power to regulate those rich people. But if you give the government more power, you are giving the rich more power. Take this Obamacare for example. You don't hear many insurance companies complaining about it, because the bill is practically guaranteeing them a customer base. This means they can get away with lower quality service at a higher price.

Big government is a disease masquerading as it's own cure.
#67 to #59 - sketchapaloozar (06/26/2012) [-]
Makes sense.

I just assumed that by "rich people" government and associated companies were included. In which case, middle and low class would act more wary of government intervention rather than turn to more government regulation as a solution. I've just been raised to relate corporate and federal America in one twisted corrupt conglomerate, even if it is unseen or ignored by most Americans. Rich America IS government. I just misunderstood, I suppose.
#55 to #1 - allamericandude (06/26/2012) [-]
Yeah it's a repost. You even reposted my comment.

Although, I can't exactly talk, because I was about to repost that comment myself to try to pick up some thumbs...
#69 - EarthDefenseforce (06/26/2012) [-]
MFW watching CNN, fox or msnbc
MFW watching CNN, fox or msnbc
#14 - anon (06/26/2012) [-]
User avatar #27 to #14 - nucularwar (06/26/2012) [-]
jesus, do some research yourself: Marxism isn't Communism, communism is when people ****** up Marxism by mixing it with totalitarianism
#28 to #27 - anon (06/26/2012) [-]
The only thing about Marxism in there is Marx's book.
User avatar #29 to #28 - nucularwar (06/26/2012) [-]
it's the contrast, they're comparing the two books. Marx wasn't an extremist any more than Smith was
#30 to #29 - anon (06/26/2012) [-]
Well really the point's what the media says about it and not what it actually is.
User avatar #31 to #30 - nucularwar (06/26/2012) [-]
I know, one media source says it's extremist and the other doesn't really say anything about it.
#19 to #14 - orendil (06/26/2012) [-]
Forgot to mention that the tea party is non-violent. Unlike others... Not a fan of them, but give them credit for doing stuff legally.
#23 to #19 - anon (06/26/2012) [-]
And they dont **** on cop cars.
#24 to #23 - orendil (06/26/2012) [-]
Exactly. Or threaten people/do drugs in public/sex in public... I can keep going on.
User avatar #48 to #23 - aviriorix (06/26/2012) [-]
I wanna see a video of an Occupy Wall Street protester doing that.

No really, it would probably be funny as hell.
#43 to #23 - aviriorix has deleted their comment [-]
#122 - parabolaschism (06/26/2012) [-]
<--Real News.
#125 - philshiffley (06/26/2012) [-]
good from time to time
good from time to time
User avatar #107 - proudnerd (06/26/2012) [-]
Fox is the same as any of the other news network, it is just biased the other way.
#148 - buttmuncherscheven (06/26/2012) [-]
When you eat a pepper, and you realize that you shouldnt have done that, its a step towards learning more about yourself and how much eating peppers sucks.
When you eat a pepper, and you realize that you shouldnt have done that, its a step towards learning more about yourself and how much eating peppers sucks.
#145 - angelojuusan ONLINE (06/26/2012) [-]
**angelojuusan rolled a random image posted in comment #208 at perfect timing **

FOX News
User avatar #94 - StaticX (06/26/2012) [-]
There is no such thing as an unbiased news station for the political side of things. I watch multiple news stations then read up on the issue from various sources, if it's an issue that actually means something.
#117 - aresthedragon (06/26/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)