Faster than fast. now if we can harness it we can build a time machine. Nothing is faster than the light‘ 1. Retard video of the light You have now created some Faster than fast now if we can harness it build a time machine Nothing is faster the light‘ 1 Retard video of light You have created some
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (83)
[ 83 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
38 comments displayed.
#5 - fucktheniggers
Reply +113
(06/22/2012) [-]
>nothing is gayer than op
>clone op
>2 ops have buttsecks
>you have now multiplied ops faggotry by 2, creating something gayer than op
>#fabulous
>problem?
#23 - moosic
Reply +68
(06/22/2012) [-]
vcr?
#6 - droopypoopy **User deleted account**
+11
has deleted their comment [-]
#19 to #6 - anon
Reply 0
(06/22/2012) [-]
God damn you're stupid
#22 to #6 - anon
Reply 0
(06/22/2012) [-]
What are you people talking about... No matter how many FPS your camera records, it will always be a series of still images. There is no movement in the video, the video creates the illusion that there is by showing the images so fast your eyes percieve it as movement.
#34 to #6 - anon
Reply 0
(06/22/2012) [-]
>a camera records light when it impact the lense
>theoretically you can record light before light impacts the lense
wait wat?
#38 to #6 - jgk **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#7 to #6 - pokershark **User deleted account**
+3
has deleted their comment [-]
#18 to #7 - anon
Reply 0
(06/22/2012) [-]
In japan they discovered a molecule that goes faster than light. Now here's my question, By incorporating these molecules to our own ( even if for an amount of time sufficient for time travel) wouldn'tt we combust into flames because of the amazing molecule vibration speed?
F.B.
#24 to #18 - eggsandgreggs
Reply +4
(06/22/2012) [-]
No, they didn't. ever. it would be on the news and the media would hype it up.  Just like those neutrinos recently that were "faster than light" just for there to be a mistake in the experiment.
No, they didn't. ever. it would be on the news and the media would hype it up. Just like those neutrinos recently that were "faster than light" just for there to be a mistake in the experiment.
#41 to #24 - jgk **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#26 to #18 - generaljosh
Reply +1
(06/22/2012) [-]
I don't think molecule is the word you're looking for. Molecules are groups of atoms, and it has been proven both mathematically and practically that matter cannot travel faster than light. Particles, on the other hand, are subatomic, and follow the laws of quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is a relatively new field, and we don't know everything about it. The big question now is if particles can travel faster than light due to undiscovered laws of quantum mechanics, although no evidence has been found to support this.
#9 to #6 - youtubeme
Reply +37
(06/22/2012) [-]
Nasa has a camera that records at 3,000,000,000,000 fps.
#39 to #9 - jgk **User deleted account**
+2
has deleted their comment [-]
#27 to #9 - generaljosh
Reply +1
(06/22/2012) [-]
Yes, that camera was used to record light moving. However, it did not record a single light ray. It took billions of snapshots of different light rays at minutely different time intervals. NASA was then able to piece together the snapshots so it appeared to be a coherent video.
#52 - robalabobolol
Reply +27
(06/22/2012) [-]
I used to think that nothing was faster than the speed of light until I got diarrhea one night. Before I could switch the light on or even think, I had already shat myself!
#64 to #52 - rheago
Reply +16
(06/22/2012) [-]
the sound your ass made
the sound your ass made
#69 to #64 - robalabobolol
Reply +3
(06/22/2012) [-]
It was a bit more like this!  America ain't got **** on me (pun intended)
It was a bit more like this! America ain't got **** on me (pun intended)
#84 to #64 - tinyhippo
Reply 0
(06/22/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#95 to #84 - rheago
Reply 0
(06/22/2012) [-]
Thank you, but i prefer it my way
#96 to #95 - tinyhippo
Reply 0
(06/22/2012) [-]
Indeed.
You are a scholar and a gentleman, here, have some ass.
#54 - feeeeedme
Reply +13
(06/22/2012) [-]
You forgot the part were urnstein dun gave a ****.
#67 - IamEllis
Reply -3
(06/22/2012) [-]
Too bad scientists have already found out going faster than the speed of light is possible
#73 to #67 - unworldlypath
Reply +11
(06/22/2012) [-]
nope that was just a mistake made by the scientists.

they found this out like 2 months ago man, where the hell have you been?
#93 to #73 - roronoas
Reply 0
(06/22/2012) [-]
could you explain this or show a link for me? i thought the whole elongating of mass and consumption of energy made it impossible?
#55 - tkuja
Reply -1
(06/22/2012) [-]
**tkuja rolled a random image posted in comment #19 at Trollerists **
#56 to #55 - tkuja
Reply +11
(06/22/2012) [-]
**tkuja rolled a random image posted in comment #78 at 50 Shades of Party in Aisle 15 ** did anyone ever use those apples
#68 to #56 - ndiliciousa
Reply 0
(06/22/2012) [-]
unfortunately, yes
#70 to #68 - tkuja
Reply 0
(06/22/2012) [-]
why unfortuanately?
#72 to #70 - ndiliciousa
Reply +8
(06/22/2012) [-]
I poisoned myself
#75 to #72 - tkuja
Reply 0
(06/22/2012) [-]
didn't even know that was possible
#63 - daringdash
Reply +6
(06/22/2012) [-]
inb4 wannabe physicists post ****** arguments
#71 to #63 - thecherry
Reply +8
(06/22/2012) [-]
everybody hates smartasses.
#49 - perand
Reply +7
(06/22/2012) [-]
**perand rolled a random image posted in comment #81 at Perverts **
#48 - wheresthefudge
Reply +6
(06/22/2012) [-]
Here's how you move something faster than the speed of light:
Will require:
-Laser pointer
-Moon (or reasonably sized space station)
How to:
-Point laser pointer at moon (or reasonably sized space station)
-Activate laser pointer
-Move laser pointer across an angle (should be around 30-45 degrees)
-The image of the laser has just moved faster than the speed of light.
-Infinite sciences are broked.
#53 to #48 - anon
Reply 0
(06/22/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolled a random image posted in comment #5904095 at FJ Pony Thread ** you totally stole that lol
#94 to #53 - wheresthefudge
Reply 0
(06/22/2012) [-]
**wheresthefudge rolled a random image posted in comment #2 at Wait a Tick **    
Was I the first person to say this ever?   
No.   
Did I steal it?   
Also no.
**wheresthefudge rolled a random image posted in comment #2 at Wait a Tick **
Was I the first person to say this ever?
No.
Did I steal it?
Also no.