sigh... r e a d t a g s. WITH USES " TO mun. I hate instagram. Makes everyone think they're a amazing photographer all the sudden. have a nice day
x
Click to expand

Comments(127):

[ 127 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #8 - LexiTheUber (05/30/2012) [-]
I hate instagram. Makes everyone think they're a ******* amazing photographer all the sudden.
User avatar #24 to #8 - topherbav (05/30/2012) [-]
isn't instagram dying? when i was there last time everyone was hating because facebook bought it.
#62 to #8 - fedemiss (05/30/2012) [-]
what do you think of my picture? do I also suck at taking pictures?
#66 to #62 - iregisteredfornsfw (05/30/2012) [-]
Everyone can take a picture of a god damn flower
#70 to #62 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
Oh wow, you took a picture of a ******* flower and did Photoshop101 to add a mask or color exclusions. So deep. So meaningful. So talented. Wallpaper thread go!
User avatar #140 to #70 - fedemiss (05/30/2012) [-]
I'm sorry... :'c
#126 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#119 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#136 to #87 - trojanmannn ONLINE (05/30/2012) [-]
that's a cuntload of backgrounds. here's mine
#133 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#132 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#131 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#128 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#127 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#125 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#124 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#123 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#122 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#121 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#118 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#117 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#116 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#115 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#113 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#112 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#111 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#110 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#109 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#108 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#107 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#106 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#105 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#104 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#103 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#102 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#101 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#100 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#99 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#98 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#97 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#96 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#95 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#94 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#93 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#92 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#91 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#90 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#89 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#88 to #87 - Fgner (05/30/2012) [-]
#129 to #62 - LexiTheUber (05/30/2012) [-]
Lovely I was able to do the same trick as an 11 year old!! Really not that impressed. Plus that whole black and white thing with a pop of color has been overdone so many ******* times. And flowers are usually the ones picked for this photos.

Oh and look what I found on google!! The same ******* thing you did!!!
User avatar #37 to #8 - alleksi (05/30/2012) [-]
lol brb taking pictures of food with 100 filters
#41 to #8 - comradewinter ONLINE (05/30/2012) [-]
Your profile picture contradicts what you just said.
User avatar #22 - herecomesjohnny (05/30/2012) [-]
technology confuses the wild hipster!
+2
#23 - casshern **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #53 to #23 - tkuja (05/30/2012) [-]
i've not been on instagram, please show me the worst picture you've seen
0
#149 to #53 - casshern **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#2 - bollingezonfre (05/29/2012) [-]
picture quality relies on lighting/sensor quality/size.. megapixels is irrelevant. Thumbed up either way.
User avatar #33 to #2 - guidedhand (05/30/2012) [-]
they are both equally important..
#4 to #2 - ratohnhaketon (05/30/2012) [-]
>be photography student   
>specialise in the workings of cameras   
>dissertation on improvements  in sensor quality over last 20 years   
>read this post   
>MFW
>be photography student
>specialise in the workings of cameras
>dissertation on improvements in sensor quality over last 20 years
>read this post
>MFW
#147 to #4 - bollingezonfre (05/30/2012) [-]
I'm lost as to how I should react to that gif. ..
#65 - Rascal (05/30/2012) [-]
or when people are bad at taking pics so they blur and edit them to make them look better
or when people are bad at taking pics so they blur and edit them to make them look better
#6 - ratohnhaketon (05/30/2012) [-]
Oh and Instgram doesn't blur photo's, it compresses them. Smaller file size, less quality but faster to uploaded to their veganized womens-rights flickr page   
(.gif unrelated)
Oh and Instgram doesn't blur photo's, it compresses them. Smaller file size, less quality but faster to uploaded to their veganized womens-rights flickr page
(.gif unrelated)
#43 - saintlygrim (05/30/2012) [-]
usually chicks blur out thier boobs because thier showing a little and im just like
<<<<
#38 - bagofshenanigans (05/30/2012) [-]
Yes, because Mega Pixels are what makes a good camera.
#40 to #38 - comradewinter ONLINE (05/30/2012) [-]
>Implying they don't.

Better pixel size means better quality. Blurring a photo brings the pixels together again, decreasing quality.
#46 to #40 - Rascal (05/30/2012) [-]
What if I told you 1080p is only 2 megapixels? A good camera needs a good lens, good shutterspeed, etc. Protip: smartphones don't have that.
#48 to #46 - comradewinter ONLINE (05/30/2012) [-]
My smartphone has a decent camera, but you shouldn't expect too much of the companies making them. Keep in mind how huge a good camera is in comparison to a normal phone these days.
#49 to #48 - Rascal (05/30/2012) [-]
How is that relevant? You said more pixels means better quality, which is obviously wrong. If you compare two identical photos, one with 5MP and one with 50MP on a 20" screen, you will not be able to tell the difference. You'll be able to tell the difference if you're looking at a massive screen like in the cinema, but only if it's taken with a proper camera. Mobile phones with 20 gazillion megapixels is just marketing ******** , people will think it's amazing, but it's not.
#50 to #49 - comradewinter ONLINE (05/30/2012) [-]
Without the proper lens and grasp it will just make a bigger picture with the same constraints, which is no better.

But pixels means how much quality you can contain.

Pretty much like having a 100 litre bottle filled to the top with water, or having 200 litre but only being filled by half.

Given that the pixels are filled properly, megapixels have a meaning.
#51 to #50 - Rascal (05/30/2012) [-]
It doesn't have anything to do with "how much quality it can contain", it makes for bigger pictures. If you had a 10x10 inch picture taken with a 4MP camera (which more than 4 million pixels by the way), that's one pixel per 0,000025 inch approximately. You'd be able to enlarge that quite a lot before even being able to see each pixel, assuming it's been taken with a good camera. If you took a 10MP picture with your cell phone, and you see blurred areas, chances are it's just your lens, exposure, shutter speed, and/or other (much more important) factors ruining it.
User avatar #44 to #40 - bagofshenanigans (05/30/2012) [-]
sgawne. com/blog/2009/02/22/megapixels-arent-everything/


Yeah.. Sure..
#47 to #44 - comradewinter ONLINE (05/30/2012) [-]
Megapixels aren't everything, but it's a good value of it.

Still, everything improves upon making these new cameras, not just the megas.
#29 - selfjell (05/30/2012) [-]
**selfjell rolled a random image posted in comment #4821394 at FJ Pony Thread ** mfw tags
-1
#25 - justchill **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#20 - ragingbrony (05/30/2012) [-]
This image has expired
The camera doesn't even work on my old brick anymore...
#1 - lollocaust (05/29/2012) [-]
**lollocaust rolled a random image posted in comment #21 at My new super effective diet ** the other one is people using the phone to take a picture in a mirror when they normally have a forward facing camera too
User avatar #7 to #1 - ratohnhaketon (05/30/2012) [-]
A mirror would have an infinite number of pixels (its a ******* mirror) when the forward facing cameras have normally around a megapixel and are only really to be used to get the idea of someones face - a gimmick
-20
#52 - fedemiss has deleted their comment [-]
-7
#54 to #52 - fedemiss has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #144 to #54 - LexiTheUber (05/30/2012) [-]
The main issue is that none of your pictures are original. I've seen these types of pictures a million times over all over the web and in my "creative" photography class. Face it you're not unique. You're just another clone.
User avatar #145 to #144 - fedemiss (05/30/2012) [-]
sorry...
0
#55 to #52 - fedemiss has deleted their comment [-]
-7
#56 to #52 - fedemiss has deleted their comment [-]
-7
#57 to #52 - fedemiss has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #134 to #57 - obbichan (05/30/2012) [-]
Your pictures are **** .
-6
#58 to #52 - fedemiss has deleted their comment [-]
-6
#59 to #52 - fedemiss has deleted their comment [-]
-6
#60 to #59 - fedemiss has deleted their comment [-]
-6
#61 to #52 - fedemiss has deleted their comment [-]
#69 to #61 - GainesWorthy (05/30/2012) [-]
&gt;Takes a picture of 			****		   
&gt;Uses intagram   
&gt;Now pro Artist/ pro Photographer   
&gt;flush toilet
>Takes a picture of ****
>Uses intagram
>Now pro Artist/ pro Photographer
>flush toilet
User avatar #139 to #69 - fedemiss (05/30/2012) [-]
I'm sorry... :'c
#64 to #52 - nunuman (05/30/2012) [-]
Can't belive i had to thumb someone down for so man comments...

Ohh and btw this is not tumblr!
#130 to #52 - kotess ONLINE (05/30/2012) [-]
Nope, really don't care.
Nope, really don't care.
User avatar #138 to #130 - fedemiss (05/30/2012) [-]
I'm sorry... :'c
#141 to #138 - Rascal (05/30/2012) [-]
I feel sorry for you. The FJ community can be assholes sometimes.
#142 to #141 - Rascal (05/30/2012) [-]
fedemiss don't comment as anon. You spammed the board with your images, we didn't want them. PAY THE PRICE
#143 to #142 - Rascal (05/30/2012) [-]
I'm not fedemiss actually, I just don't want an FJ account, simple as that. Well in that case anyway, stop posting as anon, kotess.
#150 to #143 - kotess ONLINE (06/01/2012) [-]
dafuq, I'm not anon... if I could tell the guy I don't care, I'm pretty sure I could tell you I'm not an ass for disliking some guy spamming crappy pics....
#135 - illusiveman (05/30/2012) [-]
Oh the irony...
User avatar #67 - Aspirin (05/30/2012) [-]
Reminds me of that video on the internet of the guy yelling at the dumb kids who use such apps and say "YOU STUPID CUNTS DON'T, NEVER DESTROY YOUR SOURCE FOOTAGE!!!"
#63 - manhal (05/30/2012) [-]
**manhal rolled a random image posted in comment #5260607 at FJ Pony Thread **
0
#42 - saintlygrim has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #39 - sarz (05/30/2012) [-]
i know we all make fun of instagram, but.... lets cut the chase
instagram follow thread (i go first):
xx34x
#27 - Rascal (05/30/2012) [-]
thumb for the tags
#21 - Rascal (05/30/2012) [-]
nokia N950 got 12mp
User avatar #26 to #21 - Looongcat (05/30/2012) [-]
Nokia 808 GOT 41 ************* MEGAPIXELS
[ 127 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)