Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#734 - donkeyking
Reply +77
(05/24/2012) [-]
#747 to #734 - Kingsly
Reply +18
(05/24/2012) [-]
Before thumbing this guy down open the damn image and read it.
#746 to #734 - heyyeyaaeyaaaeyaey
Reply -54
(05/24/2012) [-]
Because its an affront to The Lord, spreads AIDS, and is just overall disgusting. You weren't given a dick so you put it in another guy.
And when people say they were born that way, ya, so are pedophiles! It would be a logical fallacy to claim one is and the other one inst. Normalization of faggots. Paving the way for the next abomination, legalized pedophilia. Is that what you want?
#890 to #746 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2012) [-]
Successful troll is successful.
#878 to #746 - Badger
Reply 0
(05/24/2012) [-]
So here's a hypothetical.

We can already implant electronic devices in the brains of paraplegics so that they can control robotic limbs remotely, so I don't think a full-fledged processor/memory is far off. Now, if an infant is almost instantly imbued with the total knowledge of humanity, then it is mentally mature, and should readily become psychologically mature (within a year or two). Now, this roughly 3 year-old is completely an adult in their minds, yet are not physically. I think that with these modifications to the contemporary human growth model, a 'child' should be fully able to decide for itself whether or not it wants to have sex with a physically mature individual.

TL;DR Babies get knowledge implants, grow a bit, give consent at 3 y/o, seems alright
#875 to #746 - hackapelite
Reply +1
(05/24/2012) [-]
0/10
#844 to #746 - mathiw
Reply +2
(05/24/2012) [-]
Except we position ourselfs agains pedophilia becuse almost ALL cases leads to emotional scars in the future, making the victim suffer for years if she/he can get over it.That doesn't happens in gay sex, becuse is supose to be between two grown men that know what they want.
#874 to #844 - heyyeyaaeyaaaeyaey
Reply -4
(05/24/2012) [-]
Child molesters are overwhelmingly gay males
#920 to #874 - amantes
Reply +3
(05/24/2012) [-]
As are a lot of Spongebob fans. You got something to say to Spongebob?
As are a lot of Spongebob fans. You got something to say to Spongebob?
#842 to #746 - braedenclarkejanze
Reply +2
(05/24/2012) [-]
I could tell by your name I wouldn't like you
I could tell by your name I wouldn't like you
#836 to #746 - petal
Reply +2
(05/24/2012) [-]
If I was religious, I would ask my God to hand you a book.    
   
Whether he beat you with it or taught you to read, would be his choice.
If I was religious, I would ask my God to hand you a book.

Whether he beat you with it or taught you to read, would be his choice.
#806 to #746 - lessthanthreecmt
Reply +6
(05/24/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#804 to #746 - gtxace **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#863 to #804 - amantes
Reply +1
(05/24/2012) [-]
I'm not sure how I feel about Rainbow Dash being used as a mascot like this...
#1150 to #863 - gtxace **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#1154 to #1150 - amantes
Reply +1
(05/25/2012) [-]
Do you have a source for this? It's hard for me to recognize her behind the glasses.
#1160 to #1154 - gtxace **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#1167 to #1160 - amantes
Reply 0
(05/25/2012) [-]
I don't think she is. I haven't red such a statement anywhere. Besides... I don't think she'd do that. It would raise too many questions.
#1168 to #1167 - gtxace **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#1169 to #1168 - amantes
Reply +1
(05/25/2012) [-]
Supportive, yes, but she wouldn't drag one of her own characters into it, especially after she clearly explained why none of RD's questionable "features" imply homosexuality.
#1170 to #1169 - gtxace **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#885 to #863 - hachigomo
Reply 0
(05/24/2012) [-]
Tell me about it. It irks me a little bit. I have nothing against homosexuality but I really don't like the idea of Rainbow Dash being used like that. She used to be my favorite until bronies made a **** fit every time I pictured her as a straight pony.
#900 to #885 - amantes
Reply +1
(05/24/2012) [-]
That's no reason to favor her any less! When I get mad at art, I simply ignore it because that's my own predisposition. But what the woman in the picture is doing is just wrong...
#1001 to #900 - hachigomo
Reply 0
(05/24/2012) [-]
She is still my second fave. It just kind of sucks that I can't really use her for anything now without having someone go after my throat. =/
#846 to #804 - petal
Reply 0
(05/24/2012) [-]
I don't even like ponies and I STILL thumbed you up.
#802 to #746 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2012) [-]
Been browsing FJ for 8months, first time I felt the need to thumb down
#774 to #746 - garrettjacobsen
Reply +2
(05/24/2012) [-]
I am going to shove my five inch dick into your ass.
And enjoy it.
#852 to #774 - petal
Reply 0
(05/24/2012) [-]
lmfao... please find him and rape him.
#765 to #746 - rel
Reply +8
(05/24/2012) [-]
#760 to #746 - ratf
Reply +2
(05/24/2012) [-]
**** you
**** you
#758 to #746 - donkeyking
Reply +12
(05/24/2012) [-]
1) We don't live in a theocracy, so you can't base a law on religion
2) Aids is spread through all sexual contact, not just gay.
3) Disgusting is an opinion, some people think certain foods are disgusting
4) You can't say why we were given a dick to do anything
5) People are born that way, so why should we criticize them for it?
6) Unfortunately, I think there is nothing wrong with certain forms of pedophilia. I think if it consensual between both parties, it should be legal. Unfortunately, so many pedophiles would rape the child then force them to say it was consensual for fear of their own safety, and they would get off scott free. SO it's a precautionary law for safety, so there really is no other choice. Meeting adjourned.
#779 to #758 - heyyeyaaeyaaaeyaey
Reply -8
(05/24/2012) [-]
>I think pedophilia is acceptable, now here are some reasons why you shouldn't hate gay people!
haha alright big guy
#1149 to #779 - anon
Reply 0
(05/25/2012) [-]
Just shut the **** up, you're not doing your argument any good.

You stated your opinion, it was shot down with logic, at this point you're just being a troll.
#790 to #779 - donkeyking
Reply +2
(05/24/2012) [-]
Not exactly what I said. I personally am not attracted to children. I think it kinda weird to be honest. But love is love, no matter age, gender, or whatever. The only reason it is considered wrong is because of how often it is forced on the child. But if the child is old enough to understand and make their own decision, like 15 or 16, then there is really nothing wrong with it.
#854 to #790 - amantes
Reply +1
(05/24/2012) [-]
Be more specific when you make dangerous statements. You scared me there for a moment.
#1148 to #854 - anon
Reply 0
(05/25/2012) [-]
My opinion is that it goes as far as how sexually active the person is. A four, five, six year old, up to like, 9 or 10, is NOT sexually active or even aware half the time of what sex is.

But twelve year old girls these days... not saying I'm interested, but that they do try to push themselves into more "mature" relationships with older men. I wouldn't call a twelve year old and say, a 20 year old pedophilia if both parties fought for marriage/ and both expressed complete understanding of the commitment they were undertaking.

Some 12 year olds are remarkably mature, others are simply just sexually active by their own choice and so it's bound to happen, just like pregnancy among twelve year old parents. A fourty year old marrying one, however, is just creepy.
#769 to #758 - amantes
Reply +4
(05/24/2012) [-]
#6... Why... you were doing SO well...
#778 to #769 - donkeyking
Reply +2
(05/24/2012) [-]
Well honestly, what exactly is wrong with it if is consensual?
#856 to #778 - roninpenguin
Reply +2
(05/24/2012) [-]
The issue comes from what is consensual. Consensual usually means that both parties know exactly what they are getting into when they agree to an action, in the case of Minors their decision making is impaired by the fact that they do not have enough life experience to truly understand what they are agreeing to.

Now I do understand that "18" is an arbitrary age and some people mature to a point of being consensual before that and some later than that, but when you are talking legality you need a base point and our society has deemed it to be "18" (depending on your state or country of residence).
#862 to #856 - donkeyking
Reply 0
(05/24/2012) [-]
I completely agree with you. If they could evaluate each case personally, that would be what I think is good. Unfortunately, this can't really happen. I just think that in certain cases it should be okay, but they need the rule to be safe rather than sorry.
#822 to #778 - amantes
Reply +1
(05/24/2012) [-]
This kind of debate has been had on other sites. One argument is that children can't understand long-term consequences of their actions. I don't recall the details, but I'm just saying you're opening yourself to **********.
#839 to #822 - donkeyking
Reply +1
(05/24/2012) [-]
Yeah, I get that. I'm just saying, sometimes someone who is 15 or 16 will be able to understand. Other times they can't. It's not like when you turn 18 you magically attain judgement, that just seems to be about an average age.
#819 to #778 - heyyeyaaeyaaaeyaey
Reply -5
(05/24/2012) [-]
A child can't give informed consent, end of story.
#824 to #819 - donkeyking
Reply 0
(05/24/2012) [-]
So you think when you turn 18, you instantly become wise about your decisions?
#891 to #824 - ultrarobbie
Reply 0
(05/24/2012) [-]
Between 15-18, yes. But he's right; a child can't do that because they are too young to grasp it.
#841 to #824 - amantes
Reply 0
(05/24/2012) [-]
Donkey... don't argue over this. You won't win. You'll only earn yourself red thumbs.
#847 to #841 - donkeyking
Reply 0
(05/24/2012) [-]
Just saying bro, not arguing, just stating my opinon
#860 to #847 - heyyeyaaeyaaaeyaey
Reply -5
(05/24/2012) [-]
Your opinion is stupid
#867 to #860 - donkeyking
Reply 0
(05/24/2012) [-]
I'm sure, that's why I've been getting so many thumbs
#880 to #867 - heyyeyaaeyaaaeyaey
Reply -2
(05/24/2012) [-]
Ya definitely bro, some people agree with your ridiculous opinion, so you must be right!
#888 to #880 - donkeyking
Reply 0
(05/24/2012) [-]
Some people agree, that's why it has more than 50 thumbs. You disagree, you get tins of thumbs down. At this point, you're not going to give any more "logical," if you could call it that, arguments, so I'm done, and I think I won. And hey, if I'm wrong, I'm sure there'll be a kick ass party in hell, with Freddy Mercury as the entertainment and Niel Patrick Harris helping me get some poon.
#897 to #888 - heyyeyaaeyaaaeyaey
Reply -3
(05/24/2012) [-]
You're arguing for pedophilia, your opinion in itself is illogical, and Queen sucks.
#907 to #897 - donkeyking
Reply 0
(05/24/2012) [-]
You just bought yourself a whole lot of red thumbs sir. And no, my logic makes sense, you're just either a troll or an idiot, possibly both, so I'm not gonna sit you and convince you I'm right
#753 to #746 - vikingfaen
Reply +11
(05/24/2012) [-]
Then why the **** does the male gender have its G-spot up its ass?
#762 to #753 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2012) [-]
well somebody has taken it too far...
#772 to #762 - vikingfaen
Reply +2
(05/24/2012) [-]
Bitches better know.
#767 to #762 - dramakid
Reply +7
(05/24/2012) [-]
...in his ass
#741 to #734 - dyllygaf
Reply +7
(05/24/2012) [-]
Okay, to the person who thumbed this guy down, did you even read what's in his picture? It's called sarcasm

God they really need a sarcasm font for the internet
#810 to #741 - Salamenceco
Reply +2
(05/24/2012) [-]
It's a satire :3
#745 to #741 - donkeyking
Reply +2
(05/24/2012) [-]
Yes, thank you
#749 to #745 - dyllygaf
Reply 0
(05/24/2012) [-]
Yep :)

Thumbs for you too, since we pretty much said the same thing lol
#740 to #734 - donkeyking
Reply +7
(05/24/2012) [-]
People, read the image, not just the title