Anonymous comments allowed.
#747 to #734 - Kingsly (05/24/2012) [-]
Before thumbing this guy down open the damn image and read it.
#746 to #734 - heyyeyaaeyaaaeyaey (05/24/2012) [-]
Because its an affront to The Lord, spreads AIDS, and is just overall disgusting. You weren't given a dick so you put it in another guy.
And when people say they were born that way, ya, so are pedophiles! It would be a logical fallacy to claim one is and the other one inst. Normalization of faggots. Paving the way for the next abomination, legalized pedophilia. Is that what you want?
#890 to #746 - anon (05/24/2012) [-]
Successful troll is successful.
#878 to #746 - Badger (05/24/2012) [-]
So here's a hypothetical.

We can already implant electronic devices in the brains of paraplegics so that they can control robotic limbs remotely, so I don't think a full-fledged processor/memory is far off. Now, if an infant is almost instantly imbued with the total knowledge of humanity, then it is mentally mature, and should readily become psychologically mature (within a year or two). Now, this roughly 3 year-old is completely an adult in their minds, yet are not physically. I think that with these modifications to the contemporary human growth model, a 'child' should be fully able to decide for itself whether or not it wants to have sex with a physically mature individual.

TL;DR Babies get knowledge implants, grow a bit, give consent at 3 y/o, seems alright
#844 to #746 - mathiw (05/24/2012) [-]
Except we position ourselfs agains pedophilia becuse almost ALL cases leads to emotional scars in the future, making the victim suffer for years if she/he can get over it.That doesn't happens in gay sex, becuse is supose to be between two grown men that know what they want.
#874 to #844 - heyyeyaaeyaaaeyaey (05/24/2012) [-]
Child molesters are overwhelmingly gay males
#920 to #874 - amantes (05/24/2012) [-]
As are a lot of Spongebob fans. You got something to say to Spongebob?
As are a lot of Spongebob fans. You got something to say to Spongebob?
#842 to #746 - braedenclarkejanze (05/24/2012) [-]
I could tell by your name I wouldn't like you
I could tell by your name I wouldn't like you
#836 to #746 - petal (05/24/2012) [-]
If I was religious, I would ask my God to hand you a book.    
Whether he beat you with it or taught you to read, would be his choice.
If I was religious, I would ask my God to hand you a book.

Whether he beat you with it or taught you to read, would be his choice.
#804 to #746 - gtxace **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #863 to #804 - amantes (05/24/2012) [-]
I'm not sure how I feel about Rainbow Dash being used as a mascot like this...
#1150 to #863 - gtxace **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #1154 to #1150 - amantes (05/25/2012) [-]
Do you have a source for this? It's hard for me to recognize her behind the glasses.
#1160 to #1154 - gtxace **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #1167 to #1160 - amantes (05/25/2012) [-]
I don't think she is. I haven't red such a statement anywhere. Besides... I don't think she'd do that. It would raise too many questions.
#1168 to #1167 - gtxace **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #1169 to #1168 - amantes (05/25/2012) [-]
Supportive, yes, but she wouldn't drag one of her own characters into it, especially after she clearly explained why none of RD's questionable "features" imply homosexuality.
#1170 to #1169 - gtxace **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #885 to #863 - hachigomo ONLINE (05/24/2012) [-]
Tell me about it. It irks me a little bit. I have nothing against homosexuality but I really don't like the idea of Rainbow Dash being used like that. She used to be my favorite until bronies made a **** fit every time I pictured her as a straight pony.
User avatar #900 to #885 - amantes (05/24/2012) [-]
That's no reason to favor her any less! When I get mad at art, I simply ignore it because that's my own predisposition. But what the woman in the picture is doing is just wrong...
User avatar #1001 to #900 - hachigomo ONLINE (05/24/2012) [-]
She is still my second fave. It just kind of sucks that I can't really use her for anything now without having someone go after my throat. =/
User avatar #846 to #804 - petal (05/24/2012) [-]
I don't even like ponies and I STILL thumbed you up.
#802 to #746 - anon (05/24/2012) [-]
Been browsing FJ for 8months, first time I felt the need to thumb down
User avatar #774 to #746 - garrettjacobsen (05/24/2012) [-]
I am going to shove my five inch dick into your ass.
And enjoy it.
User avatar #852 to #774 - petal (05/24/2012) [-]
lmfao... please find him and rape him.
#760 to #746 - ratf (05/24/2012) [-]
****		 you
**** you
User avatar #758 to #746 - donkeyking (05/24/2012) [-]
1) We don't live in a theocracy, so you can't base a law on religion
2) Aids is spread through all sexual contact, not just gay.
3) Disgusting is an opinion, some people think certain foods are disgusting
4) You can't say why we were given a dick to do anything
5) People are born that way, so why should we criticize them for it?
6) Unfortunately, I think there is nothing wrong with certain forms of pedophilia. I think if it consensual between both parties, it should be legal. Unfortunately, so many pedophiles would rape the child then force them to say it was consensual for fear of their own safety, and they would get off scott free. SO it's a precautionary law for safety, so there really is no other choice. Meeting adjourned.
#779 to #758 - heyyeyaaeyaaaeyaey (05/24/2012) [-]
>I think pedophilia is acceptable, now here are some reasons why you shouldn't hate gay people!
haha alright big guy
#1149 to #779 - anon (05/25/2012) [-]
Just shut the **** up, you're not doing your argument any good.

You stated your opinion, it was shot down with logic, at this point you're just being a troll.
User avatar #790 to #779 - donkeyking (05/24/2012) [-]
Not exactly what I said. I personally am not attracted to children. I think it kinda weird to be honest. But love is love, no matter age, gender, or whatever. The only reason it is considered wrong is because of how often it is forced on the child. But if the child is old enough to understand and make their own decision, like 15 or 16, then there is really nothing wrong with it.
User avatar #854 to #790 - amantes (05/24/2012) [-]
Be more specific when you make dangerous statements. You scared me there for a moment.
#1148 to #854 - anon (05/25/2012) [-]
My opinion is that it goes as far as how sexually active the person is. A four, five, six year old, up to like, 9 or 10, is NOT sexually active or even aware half the time of what sex is.

But twelve year old girls these days... not saying I'm interested, but that they do try to push themselves into more "mature" relationships with older men. I wouldn't call a twelve year old and say, a 20 year old pedophilia if both parties fought for marriage/ and both expressed complete understanding of the commitment they were undertaking.

Some 12 year olds are remarkably mature, others are simply just sexually active by their own choice and so it's bound to happen, just like pregnancy among twelve year old parents. A fourty year old marrying one, however, is just creepy.
User avatar #769 to #758 - amantes (05/24/2012) [-]
#6... Why... you were doing SO well...
User avatar #778 to #769 - donkeyking (05/24/2012) [-]
Well honestly, what exactly is wrong with it if is consensual?
User avatar #856 to #778 - roninpenguin (05/24/2012) [-]
The issue comes from what is consensual. Consensual usually means that both parties know exactly what they are getting into when they agree to an action, in the case of Minors their decision making is impaired by the fact that they do not have enough life experience to truly understand what they are agreeing to.

Now I do understand that "18" is an arbitrary age and some people mature to a point of being consensual before that and some later than that, but when you are talking legality you need a base point and our society has deemed it to be "18" (depending on your state or country of residence).
User avatar #862 to #856 - donkeyking (05/24/2012) [-]
I completely agree with you. If they could evaluate each case personally, that would be what I think is good. Unfortunately, this can't really happen. I just think that in certain cases it should be okay, but they need the rule to be safe rather than sorry.
User avatar #822 to #778 - amantes (05/24/2012) [-]
This kind of debate has been had on other sites. One argument is that children can't understand long-term consequences of their actions. I don't recall the details, but I'm just saying you're opening yourself to ********** .
User avatar #839 to #822 - donkeyking (05/24/2012) [-]
Yeah, I get that. I'm just saying, sometimes someone who is 15 or 16 will be able to understand. Other times they can't. It's not like when you turn 18 you magically attain judgement, that just seems to be about an average age.
#819 to #778 - heyyeyaaeyaaaeyaey (05/24/2012) [-]
A child can't give informed consent, end of story.
User avatar #824 to #819 - donkeyking (05/24/2012) [-]
So you think when you turn 18, you instantly become wise about your decisions?
User avatar #891 to #824 - ultrarobbie (05/24/2012) [-]
Between 15-18, yes. But he's right; a child can't do that because they are too young to grasp it.
User avatar #841 to #824 - amantes (05/24/2012) [-]
Donkey... don't argue over this. You won't win. You'll only earn yourself red thumbs.
User avatar #847 to #841 - donkeyking (05/24/2012) [-]
Just saying bro, not arguing, just stating my opinon
#860 to #847 - heyyeyaaeyaaaeyaey (05/24/2012) [-]
Your opinion is stupid
User avatar #867 to #860 - donkeyking (05/24/2012) [-]
I'm sure, that's why I've been getting so many thumbs
#880 to #867 - heyyeyaaeyaaaeyaey (05/24/2012) [-]
Ya definitely bro, some people agree with your ridiculous opinion, so you must be right!
User avatar #888 to #880 - donkeyking (05/24/2012) [-]
Some people agree, that's why it has more than 50 thumbs. You disagree, you get tins of thumbs down. At this point, you're not going to give any more "logical," if you could call it that, arguments, so I'm done, and I think I won. And hey, if I'm wrong, I'm sure there'll be a kick ass party in hell, with Freddy Mercury as the entertainment and Niel Patrick Harris helping me get some poon.
#897 to #888 - heyyeyaaeyaaaeyaey (05/24/2012) [-]
You're arguing for pedophilia, your opinion in itself is illogical, and Queen sucks.
User avatar #907 to #897 - donkeyking (05/24/2012) [-]
You just bought yourself a whole lot of red thumbs sir. And no, my logic makes sense, you're just either a troll or an idiot, possibly both, so I'm not gonna sit you and convince you I'm right
User avatar #753 to #746 - vikingfaen (05/24/2012) [-]
Then why the **** does the male gender have its G-spot up its ass?
#762 to #753 - anon (05/24/2012) [-]
well somebody has taken it too far...
User avatar #772 to #762 - vikingfaen (05/24/2012) [-]
Bitches better know.
#767 to #762 - dramakid (05/24/2012) [-]
...in his ass
User avatar #741 to #734 - dyllygaf (05/24/2012) [-]
Okay, to the person who thumbed this guy down, did you even read what's in his picture? It's called sarcasm

God they really need a sarcasm font for the internet
#810 to #741 - Salamenceco (05/24/2012) [-]
It's a satire :3
User avatar #745 to #741 - donkeyking (05/24/2012) [-]
Yes, thank you
User avatar #749 to #745 - dyllygaf (05/24/2012) [-]
Yep :)

Thumbs for you too, since we pretty much said the same thing lol
User avatar #740 to #734 - donkeyking (05/24/2012) [-]
People, read the image, not just the title
 Friends (0)