Captian Obvious. i cant count to five. Cha rattan rists cs of a its dwarf an r? Lust II eh an "hle dwarf slar'? Yhanks a lat Best Onsager - Channa by Haters It" anus
x
Click to expand

Captian Obvious

Captian Obvious. i cant count to five. Cha rattan rists cs of a its dwarf an r? Lust II eh an "hle dwarf slar'? Yhanks a lat Best Onsager - Channa by Haters It"

i cant count to five

Tags: anus
Cha rattan rists cs of a its dwarf an r?
Lust II eh an "hle dwarf slar'? Yhanks a lat
Best Onsager - Channa by Haters
It": white
is a dwarf
an Mar
511% 2 Votes
ON THE.
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+2686
Views: 44645
Favorited: 85
Submitted: 05/13/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to herpsomederp submit to reddit

Comments(175):

[ 175 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#41 - unicornmangina (05/14/2012) [-]
heres a white dwarf star
#178 to #41 - Rascal (05/14/2012) [-]
**** yeah, Steve-O is my favorite actor!!
0
#181 to #178 - unicornmangina has deleted their comment [-]
#56 to #53 - unicornmangina (05/14/2012) [-]
**** YEAH ADVENTURE TIME!!!
#60 to #56 - yunablade (05/14/2012) [-]
Here is another one, I also enjoy it a lot.   
   
Specially because of Marceline.
Here is another one, I also enjoy it a lot.

Specially because of Marceline.
#59 to #41 - machetewarrior (05/14/2012) [-]
Here is a another
#72 - bcfolz (05/14/2012) [-]
Brown dwarf star
#105 - problematique (05/14/2012) [-]
Ι love how everyone suddenly turned into an astrophysics major
#170 - derpkipz (05/14/2012) [-]
Does anyone else get really pissed off at COMPLETELY pointless demotivational captions? Like where it just says 'Yes' or something?
#179 to #170 - Rascal (05/15/2012) [-]
When they just say "yes".
When they just restate the joke.
When they are captioned with "THIS. Is how it is."
When people have conversations with captions (normally one correcting the other.)
When they are captioned with "LOL. Too funny."
When they explain a subtle joke.
When they aren't demotivational at all, and are instead just a black border with white captions.
#155 - Rascal (05/14/2012) [-]
You didn't need to make this a demotivational.

In fact, if anything, you made is significantly less funny.
#67 - ReeferTrees (05/14/2012) [-]
But... It says his name is Lieutenant Sarcasm, not Captain Obvious...

Just sayian.
#131 - Deception (05/14/2012) [-]
**Deception rolled a random image posted in comment #4600612 at FJ Pony Thread **
#93 - zepplien (05/14/2012) [-]
MFW On the bright side
#39 - captainobivous (05/14/2012) [-]
reporting in duty!
#164 - thirdstonefromsun (05/14/2012) [-]
Dubs decides my new profile pic
#165 to #164 - Rascal (05/14/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolls 14**
User avatar #166 to #164 - mexikaner (05/14/2012) [-]
**mexikaner rolls 69**
User avatar #172 to #166 - therealsuperguy (05/14/2012) [-]
dyslexic dubs
+1
#175 - ponyboyi **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #171 - frysfrys (05/14/2012) [-]
If someone ever called me "Captain Obvious", I'd probably slap them with the blackest part of my hand.
0
#109 - cerealisticbeing **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
-2
#111 to #109 - cerealisticbeing **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
-2
#112 to #111 - cerealisticbeing **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#116 to #112 - mindsculptorjace ONLINE (05/14/2012) [-]
**mindsculptorjace rolled a random image posted in comment #24207 at Video Games Board ** why do all these rolls seem relevant?
#139 to #116 - sabet (05/14/2012) [-]
**sabet rolled a random image posted in comment #328 at Marmaduke ** one two three five
#142 to #139 - mindsculptorjace ONLINE (05/14/2012) [-]
**mindsculptorjace rolled a random image posted in comment #8 at Oh look ** mfw I realize I read all but one of these wrong.   
eight six seven five
**mindsculptorjace rolled a random image posted in comment #8 at Oh look ** mfw I realize I read all but one of these wrong.
eight six seven five
#146 to #142 - ThatSucks (05/14/2012) [-]
**ThatSucks rolled a random image posted in comment #88 at Most Interesting Man redone pt5 ** three oh-niiiine!!!
#180 to #146 - mindsculptorjace ONLINE (05/15/2012) [-]
**mindsculptorjace rolled a random image posted in comment #4679069 at FJ Pony Thread ** have this picture as thanks for finishing it
#160 to #139 - popcornisland (05/14/2012) [-]
That roll is epic, Thomas <3
That roll is epic, Thomas <3
#127 to #112 - mrfishie (05/14/2012) [-]
**mrfishie rolled a random image posted in comment #74 at Restraining cat ** one four three two five.
User avatar #144 - anthonyh (05/14/2012) [-]
one
potato
cabbage
onion
peanut
five.
#25 - claiveman (05/14/2012) [-]
1) goes against modern physics
2) people follow it to the letter every day
3) yet no proof anyone in the book ever existed
#38 to #25 - carrotman (05/14/2012) [-]
**carrotman rolled a random image posted in comment #98 at MASTER THROWS. MUST. CATCH. FRISBEE. ** Jesus was a real person; there is more evidence to prove that he was real than there is to prove Julius Ceaser was. However, whether he had superpowers and **** is unknown, but unlikely, he was probs more like a Gandhi than Batman.
User avatar #63 to #25 - killeralex (05/14/2012) [-]
Why in the **** ? This picture has ***************** nothing to do with religion. Go make a flame war somewhere else.
-5
#84 - fappi **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #89 to #84 - sgc (05/14/2012) [-]
frodo is not a dwarf
-7
#92 to #89 - fappi **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#94 to #92 - sgc (05/14/2012) [-]
this is how stupid you look right now
#98 to #94 - amuzen (05/14/2012) [-]
I am so confused.... Wouldn't he be on the opposite extreme? that's a picture of the kind of guy that would be upset if you made a slight Err on terminology in one of their many favorite fictitious worlds.
Else wise known as a super nerd.
The guy you replied to the other hand is someone who made such an error and said it was not a problem.
These are generally known as either Trolls or people who don't really care enough about the genre to distinguish a difference in terms which really Hobbits from LotR share so many common features with dwarves that it doesn't matter. But the biggest part of this all.
Is he is actually terminologically correct BECAUSE he was referring to Frodo as a dwarf in the same way that one might refer to a star as dwarf which is to say someone/something that is particular small which was a key descriptor of Frodo and indeed all hobbits.
0
#97 to #94 - fappi **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #1 - shinigamigod (05/14/2012) [-]
1) It is not a Star it is a sun.
Stars do not technically exist as they're all just suns.
We called them stars because we did not know they were suns like our own at the time.

2) It is not a dwarf either.

3) They're not always white.
Some can be red and others can be light blue.
#133 to #1 - thatrussiantroll (05/14/2012) [-]
I think were just feeding the troll
User avatar #136 to #133 - Crusader (05/14/2012) [-]
No, he really is that much of a pompous asshole.
User avatar #152 to #1 - sunnyday (05/14/2012) [-]
You sir are the biggest retard I've ever seen. I hope for the entire human race's sake that you're trolling. Otherwise I can see us dead within the then 100 years.
User avatar #5 to #1 - xmonolithx (05/14/2012) [-]
1) Not true lol
#77 to #1 - Rascal (05/14/2012) [-]
According to Merriam-Webster, definition 4 of &quot;dwarf&quot;: a star (as the sun) of ordinary or low luminosity and relatively small mass and size.    
Confirmed by National Geographic: &quot;White dwarfs typically have a radius just .01 times that of our own sun, but their mass is about the same.&quot;   
Nat. Geo on &quot;the sun&quot;: &quot;The sun is a big star.&quot;   
And Encyclopedia Britannica on&quot;dwarf star&quot;: &quot;dwarf star, any star of average or low luminosity, mass, and size. Important subclasses of dwarf stars are white dwarfs (see white dwarf star) and red dwarfs. Dwarf stars include so-called main-sequence stars, among which is the Sun. The colour of dwarf stars can range from blue to red, the corresponding temperature varying from high (above 10,000 K) to low (a few thousand K).   
   
Pic related: A white dwarf star size comparison with Earth, taken from Ohio State University astronomy page.   
   
I hope you're trolling, because your idiocy is off the charts.
According to Merriam-Webster, definition 4 of "dwarf": a star (as the sun) of ordinary or low luminosity and relatively small mass and size.
Confirmed by National Geographic: "White dwarfs typically have a radius just .01 times that of our own sun, but their mass is about the same."
Nat. Geo on "the sun": "The sun is a big star."
And Encyclopedia Britannica on"dwarf star": "dwarf star, any star of average or low luminosity, mass, and size. Important subclasses of dwarf stars are white dwarfs (see white dwarf star) and red dwarfs. Dwarf stars include so-called main-sequence stars, among which is the Sun. The colour of dwarf stars can range from blue to red, the corresponding temperature varying from high (above 10,000 K) to low (a few thousand K).

Pic related: A white dwarf star size comparison with Earth, taken from Ohio State University astronomy page.

I hope you're trolling, because your idiocy is off the charts.
+1
#124 to #1 - effervescent **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #33 to #1 - greatgatsby (05/14/2012) [-]
you are a new level of stupid
User avatar #91 to #1 - abaraxus (05/14/2012) [-]
Its like you're saying "We should call a heart a pumping thing because "heart" is often used to describe a symmetrical shape with two curves and a corner.
#35 to #1 - joeykaze ONLINE (05/14/2012) [-]
+5
#78 to #1 - electricsheep **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#81 to #1 - ilikebigdick (05/14/2012) [-]
1. Star is the general term for those white dots you see in the sky
2. Technically no, but compared to VY Canis Majoris, its ******* tiny
3. If it was red then it would be a red dwarf
User avatar #13 to #12 - shinigamigod (05/14/2012) [-]
I love how people get so offended when presented with scientific facts that doesn't portray the stories they were told as a child.
Its fascinating.
User avatar #15 to #14 - shinigamigod (05/14/2012) [-]
Awwh wikipedia, so cute.
Grew out of that when I left high school.
User avatar #18 to #15 - fukkendragonite (05/14/2012) [-]
Clearly haven't grown out of trying to pretend that you're somehow superior. If you had any brains at all you'd know that wikipedia is a good casual source. Obviously when you need to be near enough 100% sure of something you can't use wiki but I'd say most of the time it's right. Dates, locations, name spelling etc can sometimes be wrong but the majority of the time they have the basic facts right.
User avatar #17 to #15 - monotuei (05/14/2012) [-]
So, you are saying your information is more refutable than the one there?
#96 to #15 - Rascal (05/14/2012) [-]
It's time to stop commenting.
It's time to stop commenting.
User avatar #122 to #15 - Crusader (05/14/2012) [-]
Yet you still use a username based off of a pantheon of gods that ceased to be worshiped in any great number years ago, and you got from a series of books that turned into literary trash halfway through.
I grew out of that before I even left high-school.
+6
#32 to #1 - speightsix **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #4 to #1 - kierano (05/14/2012) [-]
1) You're
2) A
3) Cunt
User avatar #130 to #1 - garentei (05/14/2012) [-]
Wow, you're stupid.
0
#10 to #1 - icefried has deleted their comment [-]
#88 to #1 - abaraxus (05/14/2012) [-]
This is how smart you look right now.
#169 to #1 - unknownbytes (05/14/2012) [-]
Pay no attention to shinigamigod, we purposely trained him wrong...as a joke.
User avatar #85 to #1 - losttostars (05/14/2012) [-]
Not sure if you're trolling, or just stupid...
User avatar #107 to #1 - hillko (05/14/2012) [-]
I have read all of your comments on this thread, gave you the benefit of the doubt, and assumed you were trolling, but after looking at your profile I noticed that every single comment you've ever made and even the bio on your profile has the same condescending, "I'm superior" attitude . After reviewing all of that I would just like to say that I truly hate you as a human being. That is all, good day
+1
#113 to #107 - speightsix **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#16 to #1 - fukkendragonite (05/14/2012) [-]
1) Go with it faggot, we've called them stars for too long for a little miss pissypants like you to want to change the name.

2) Part of the name, part of the joke, therefore hang yourself.

3) They would be Red Dwarves and Blue Dwarves. I know this because one of those is a famous TV show in the UK of which I am a HUGE FAN (borderline obsessive)
User avatar #49 to #16 - wasrigmonkey (05/14/2012) [-]
it’s cold outside, there’s no kind of atmosphere, I’m all along, more or less!
User avatar #54 to #49 - fukkendragonite (05/14/2012) [-]
"We couldn't do that!... Who'd clean up the mess?"
User avatar #55 to #54 - fukkendragonite (05/14/2012) [-]
Damn gif not loading and **** ... Apparently it's already flagged?? Have you seen that episode anyway? "Quarantine"?
#58 to #55 - wasrigmonkey (05/14/2012) [-]
No i havent seen the new episodes (unfortunately), i shall have to start though
No i havent seen the new episodes (unfortunately), i shall have to start though
User avatar #62 to #58 - fukkendragonite (05/14/2012) [-]
It's in series 5. My favourite is series 6 by far. I've seen every episode of every series countless times lol. Me and my two brothers are obsessed with the show so much that we quote from it all the time in everyday life, at the same time! We immediately know what the other is going to say because we were all going to say it too!! We're quite sad! :P

You could quiz me on any RD trivia and I could get it right straight away (Although you couldn't do it on FJ because I could google it anyway and there'd be no way of telling but rest assured, I'm a geek for that show! :S)
User avatar #65 to #62 - wasrigmonkey (05/14/2012) [-]
Thats.........pretty awesome lol

my favourite episode is the one where Kryten is introduced :D
#68 to #65 - fukkendragonite (05/14/2012) [-]
I was watching that last night! :P With the Androids tv show that Kryten is watching xD

"I'm saying, Brooke Junior...."

"What about Brooke Junior?"

"He isn't your android..."

I love that episode, especially with Kryten's Marlon Brando speech!
User avatar #74 to #1 - daelril (05/14/2012) [-]
Those are not moons, those are satellites.
That's not an asteroid, that's a planetoid.
That's not a star system, that's a galaxy.
See, i can play this game too, is not funny, and surely has no point
#141 to #1 - zenagirl (05/14/2012) [-]
<--- You
#26 to #1 - xboxperks (05/14/2012) [-]
Say something wrong. Get told you're wrong. Continue to battle that you're "right"? WELCOME TO AMERICA!
User avatar #28 to #26 - shinigamigod (05/14/2012) [-]
I live in England where majority opinion isn't considered fact. Unlike America.
User avatar #76 to #28 - supernig ONLINE (05/14/2012) [-]
I live in England, you're making us look like dicks
#42 to #28 - xboxperks (05/14/2012) [-]
I guess when you get older, you lose a sense of humor. People like you aren't fun to be around..
I guess when you get older, you lose a sense of humor. People like you aren't fun to be around..
User avatar #44 to #42 - shinigamigod (05/14/2012) [-]
I guess I just have higher standards of humour.
User avatar #45 to #44 - xboxperks (05/14/2012) [-]
You're on FunnyJunk. You chose the wrong place to look for any "high standards" of humor.
User avatar #50 to #44 - wasrigmonkey (05/14/2012) [-]
Or you just like to be a smartass and ruin a joke
User avatar #52 to #50 - shinigamigod (05/14/2012) [-]
This one.
User avatar #51 to #44 - wasrigmonkey (05/14/2012) [-]
Like to pretend to be a smartass*
0
#6 to #1 - gregiss **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#110 to #1 - wollis (05/14/2012) [-]
This is for you, shinigamigod
0
#150 to #1 - speightsix **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#69 to #1 - Rascal (05/14/2012) [-]
welcome to funnyjunk,where white dwarf stars are neither white,dwarf or even exist in a first place
#132 to #1 - McBalls (05/14/2012) [-]
How is it not a dwarf or a star? The 			*******		 question was asking what are characteristics of a &quot;white dwarf star&quot;. Dwarf stars are small, low mass stars that burn off their hydrogen faster than regular sized ones. White dwarfs are from collapsed larger stars. Stop posting, you're making an ass of yourself.
How is it not a dwarf or a star? The ******* question was asking what are characteristics of a "white dwarf star". Dwarf stars are small, low mass stars that burn off their hydrogen faster than regular sized ones. White dwarfs are from collapsed larger stars. Stop posting, you're making an ass of yourself.
#22 to #1 - crackboots (05/14/2012) [-]
the sun is a star, we named it the sun like we named our moon luna and this planet earth.

dwarf is a stellar class, like hyper-giant/giant.

white dwarfs are the remains of normal sized star, like our sun.
red/brown dwarfs aren't remains but rather very tiny stars they don't accurately name the colour but rather the nature of the star.
0
#8 to #1 - gameoverlord has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #9 to #8 - shinigamigod (05/14/2012) [-]
As usual I made this mistake of thinking people on this site could have even a remote degree of intelligence.
User avatar #48 to #9 - absynthe (05/14/2012) [-]
because youre definitely one of those people on the site with intelligence. if you WERE then you'd realize that what you said is completely idiotic, youre saying something is wrong because of a different term you use. suns are stars and stars are suns. simple as that, and a dwarf star can be red, blue, white, brown, and many other colors just as stars can as well. and the stars are in fact dwarf because theyre small and dense this makes them dwarf stars. just as there are giants there are other ones as well. you are feigning inelegance by using pseudo-intelligence and synonyms and if by chance you ARENT trolling then grow the **** up bro, your superiority complex wont get you anywhere in life
User avatar #3 to #1 - alleksi ONLINE (05/14/2012) [-]
1) stop being a smart ass
2) well it is small compared to the star it originated from, its just a name, once again, stop being a smart ass
3) we were talking about white dwarfs not red/blue/brown
4)L2Humor
User avatar #7 to #3 - shinigamigod (05/14/2012) [-]
3) White Dwarves are not always white is the point I was making.
User avatar #118 to #7 - whynospacesallowed (05/14/2012) [-]
White Dwarves are always white. That's why they're called WHITE dwarves
User avatar #123 to #7 - Crusader (05/14/2012) [-]
If they are not white dwarves then they are not classified as such.
User avatar #20 to #19 - shinigamigod (05/14/2012) [-]
That would require me to be wrong.
User avatar #21 to #20 - zwappes (05/14/2012) [-]
you are wrong you ******* retard
User avatar #23 to #21 - shinigamigod (05/14/2012) [-]
I'm not in anyway wrong.
User avatar #24 to #23 - zwappes (05/14/2012) [-]
in what way are you right?
User avatar #27 to #24 - shinigamigod (05/14/2012) [-]
All three statements.
A star is better used to describe a 5 pointed shape than it does a sun.
Not only that but it also describes a celebrity better than it does a sun.
We call them stars when we look at them at a distance however when we look at them individually we call them suns.
That is simply flawed logic.

It is not technically a dwarf because a dwarf means it would be out of proportion, it is better to use the term small to describe it as the requirements that would be a dwarf sun would be that parts of it wont be in proportion to the rest of it.

They're not white because white is a very specific colour that not only can we not confirm at such a large distance but would imply the entire body of it is white, which is simply incorrect, not to mention there are red dwarf suns and blue dwarf suns.

It is mostly about the proportions of it really, if the universes largest sun was to go into the dwarf state of its lifespan, it'd still be larger than our own sun, therefore using size as a unit of measurement when nearly none of them are similar enough for us to have a valid average is completely pointless.

It is just another one of the many scientific things they have simplified so that the common person could understand it.
I have never seen the need to simplify it, so I don't.
#29 to #27 - zwappes (05/14/2012) [-]
<---- you
User avatar #30 to #29 - shinigamigod (05/14/2012) [-]
I do like when someone cannot think of a smart reply and goes into petty and childish insults.
#71 to #30 - Rascal (05/14/2012) [-]
Believe me,I have been in a lot of discussions with morons who could only reply with stupid pictures to my arguments,but in this case,you are just an obnoxious kid trying to defend pointless ideas.
And in any case; it is called dwarf because compared with other stars,GUESS WHAT?,THEY ARE DWARFS,OR SMALL,WHO THE **** CARES?,THE GUY WHO DISCOVERED THEM DECIDED TO CALL THEM DWARF NOT SMALL,DEAL WITH IT!!!!
2.White is not refered to color,they are called white BECAUSE DEPENDING ON THE TEMPERATURE OF THE STAR THEY HAVE DIFFERENT COLORS,AND WHITE IS THE ******* HOTTEST,SO THEY ARE ******* WHITE,IF YOU ARE GOING TO SAY THEY ARE NOT WHITE THEN ANY SCIENTIST COULDNT KNOW ITS AVERAGE TEMPERATURE WITH ITS NAME.SO STFU
3.And third, STAR AND SUN ARE THE SAME WORD,POTATO POTATO,WHO CARES?,STOP BITCHING ABOUT IT DISGUSTING NERD

IN ANY CASE SHUT THE **** UP,YOU ARE REALLY OBNOXIOUS
User avatar #34 to #30 - zwappes (05/14/2012) [-]
star or astro if you will was a word that came up long before your beloved pentagon, and you can not prove that either of us are wrong inn tha state that the ''star'' is white
and A white dwarf, also called a degenerate dwarf, is a small star composed mostly of electron-degenerate matter. They are very dense
i sent it to the wrong comment so now i look like you, ie a retard
User avatar #37 to #34 - shinigamigod (05/14/2012) [-]
I never said that a Star was never used to describe that which we now know are suns.
I simply pointed out that it no longer accurate and its meaning is purely subjective and therefore is a null argument, meanings of words change, just because people are attached to the childhood concept of a star does not mean it is correct.

Your second point has no meaning in this discussion.
User avatar #40 to #37 - zwappes (05/14/2012) [-]
did you have a weird childhood with no basic understanding of the universe`?
but no longer will i discuss this matter with you because it's silly to argue over the internet
User avatar #43 to #40 - shinigamigod (05/14/2012) [-]
You mean because I choose not to use dumbed down language and look at detail much more finely than others I have no basic understanding of the universe?
The reason I am getting so much hate for my post is because my understanding is so much more in depth than theirs that they simply cannot comprehend that what they understand about it is a way to explain it to those who do not know how to understand it when explained to them in fine detail.
I mean look at Chemistry or Physics, almost everything you learn is wrong because the very fine detail of it is so complex that it is so hard to teach it to common people.
User avatar #61 to #43 - zwappes (05/14/2012) [-]
and whose to say i or anyone here is ''common people''?
if there is a common person here i think that is you
User avatar #64 to #61 - shinigamigod (05/14/2012) [-]
By common it generally means those who have not studied into it at the level in which the information becomes up to date.
And I make the assumption that they're 'common people' is because I am the only one who actually understands it and is correct in the matter.

Almost every single science does it.
Only once you study it at the highest levels do you actually get the accurate information.
User avatar #70 to #64 - zwappes (05/14/2012) [-]
this is what disorder i think you have
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger_effect
tl&dr you think you are much better than everybody else but you are clearly losing almost every convo in this conversation
User avatar #73 to #70 - shinigamigod (05/14/2012) [-]
Don't waste my time with wikipedia, it is the most worthless site in existence, any academic would tell you that.
I haven't lost any conversation in this post, it is a bunch of idiots who cannot understand more in depth scientific information because they prefer the simple version the learnt in high school.
User avatar #75 to #73 - zwappes (05/14/2012) [-]
but still the disorder is true and you a person who can obviuslly not read ( im terrible at english ) and you still think you are better thsn everyone else
if you search thee disorder up i think most people who has seen this argument will agree that i'm right and you wrong
end of conversation,
ps. don't troll, makes you look even more retardet than you already are
User avatar #79 to #75 - shinigamigod (05/14/2012) [-]
I couldn't care what lesser minds think about this matter.
I am being scientifically correct here, they're not.
The entire website could disagree with me but it would in no way make them correct.
Simply because science is correct, opinion isn't.
The majority of the planet used to believe the world was flat, so clearly by your logic, we should accept that it is, just because the majority opinion was that it is.
#90 to #79 - Rascal (05/14/2012) [-]
the majority opinion is that you're a dick and i agree, not because the majority think it, but because it is true
0
#106 to #90 - paddyflat **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
+3
#108 to #79 - paddyflat **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
0
#134 to #108 - whiteniggers has deleted their comment [-]
#145 to #79 - Rascal (05/14/2012) [-]
I hope this idiotic ****** gets banned for these posts
#140 to #79 - claptonisgod (05/14/2012) [-]
shut the 			****		 up.
shut the **** up.
User avatar #119 to #79 - Crusader (05/14/2012) [-]
oxforddictionaries.com/definition/star?q=star
The meanings of the word "star" by the oxford english dictionary, which is the globally recognized pinnacle of meanings and spellings of words within the English Language
0
#103 to #79 - paddyflat **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #117 to #73 - Crusader (05/14/2012) [-]
Wikipedia actually has many people that go over many of the articles to make sure that they have not been altered to give any drastically incorrect information.
#115 to #27 - kujawu (05/14/2012) [-]
"A sun"

Hey guys! I saw a London today!
User avatar #128 to #115 - Crusader (05/14/2012) [-]
There is more than one sun.
The proper comparison to the sun would be if you are in an area situated around one town.
Let us use the parallel world of "The Walking Dead" the series on AMC.
In the first season they reference to Atlanta as The City, it is not the only city, but it is the only city that they can be talking about.
Our sun can be called The Sun, or A Sun, as it is our only sun, but one of millions of suns throughout the universe.
#101 to #27 - moggycore (05/14/2012) [-]
I think you forgot this
0
#126 to #27 - effervescent **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #114 to #27 - Crusader (05/14/2012) [-]
A sun is a star that is the center of a solar system and has planets that are in continuous orbit around it.
All suns are stars, but not all stars are suns.
You are thinking of a pentagram, which is used to symbolize stars because they are easy to draw.
It is considered a dwarf since the comparison between it and an "average" star (for which we use our sun, is much like the Earth compared to Jupiter, in which case we are dwarfed.
It is called a white dwarf because when you look at it, it is white. Yes there can be red and blue, green and even purple ones, but those are not white dwarf stars, white dwarf stars are only white. Like how only black people can be considered african-american, and not white people, as white people from Africa are called Afrikaners.
#159 to #27 - sunnyday (05/14/2012) [-]
This image has expired
>A star is better used to describe a 5 pointed shape than it does a sun.

By that logic, a pentagon is a star. And so is everything else with 5 corners.

I'm not even going to bother with the rest of this comment. You're simply too self-righteous and retarded to reason with. But if I had to I would point out a few more flaws in your logic.

>a dwarf means it would be out of proportion

When dwarf is used to describe a person, then they would be disproportionate. Because they are small. You do not call conjoined twins "dwarf". Neither would you call someone with a disproportionate head a "dwarf". Dwarfism is a condition that makes you grow to a maximum height of around 4 ft. The reason the term dwarf is used with both the white dwarf stars and black dwarf stars is because they have shrunk down to the size of the earth because it is at the end of it's life span. Our sun (Note: Sun is just a name given to our own star that resides in the centre of our solar system. Nothing more.) will also become a white dwarf star in 4 billion years when it comes to the end of it's life. The after a few more billion years, it'll turn into a black dwarf.

They're white. Why is it white? Because a white dwarf is a dying star giving out an immense amount of light energy. It's so bright, that it is indeed, white. Once it stops giving out light energy, it'll turn into a black dwarf star and be completely dead.

The universes largest star would not go into a dwarf state. It would be a red super giant. And it would be huge. Bigger than a trillion of our own sun. Probably bigger. A star this size, when at the end of it's life, would either go supernova or turn into a black hole.

No, this is not simplified. You're stupid. You made this entire thing up. I should know. I'm taking a college course is all the sciences right now, as well as A-levels in physics. You're making the rest of us Brits look stupid.

Don't go pretending you know things that you don't have a damn clue about.

/rebuttal.
0
#31 to #27 - zwappes has deleted their comment [-]
[ 175 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)