Bill O'Reilly, wait wat?. Do not look at the tags. ME GOES IN. JESUS POPS [HIT THAT the game
x
Click to expand

Comments(75):

[ 75 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
0
#72 to #9 - finalomega has deleted their comment [-]
#10 to #9 - spankyy (05/13/2012) [-]
I love these pictures.
#4 - field (05/13/2012) [-]
#17 to #4 - whofortytwo (05/13/2012) [-]
That story is taming dragons, not fighting one.
User avatar #26 to #20 - drewsky (05/13/2012) [-]
Gawd, I wanna punch that kid in the face.

#8 - ragingbrony (05/13/2012) [-]
This image has expired
Bitch please
Man appears out of nothing.

#16 to #8 - whofortytwo (05/13/2012) [-]
Technically made from dirt.
But yeah
User avatar #27 to #16 - Keril (05/13/2012) [-]
But if we came from dirt, why is there still dirt?
#87 to #27 - whofortytwo (05/14/2012) [-]
Because God
#35 to #27 - anon (05/13/2012) [-]
Bu if we came from apes, why are there still apes?
#52 to #35 - strangenorwegian (05/13/2012) [-]
If you look at the resemblance; do we look more like apes, or do we look more like dirt?

That'll be all.
User avatar #80 to #35 - marinepenguin ONLINE (05/13/2012) [-]
Because we didn't come from them, we have a common ancestor.
#18 to #16 - bawsbattle (05/13/2012) [-]
...... so Christians want us to believe we're all dirt children? those of you who don't know what dirt children are, here's a pic
#31 to #18 - justatest (05/13/2012) [-]
looks like a juggalo
#19 to #18 - whofortytwo (05/13/2012) [-]
I don't get it
User avatar #59 to #8 - deltadeltadelta (05/13/2012) [-]
In classical art genitals are portrayed as smaller because they were considered ugly and a distraction.
#62 to #59 - huckimfigh (05/13/2012) [-]
*roll image* True, as well as the fact that large genitalia were considered brute-like and primitive. Small genitals were believed to show that a man was intelligent and creative. That however, is known to be untrue, because OP has a micro-dick and is an unoriginal imbecile.
#63 to #62 - huckimfigh (05/13/2012) [-]
**huckimfigh rolled a random image posted in comment #144 at Just let me hold this water for you ** I forgot how to roll. iamnotacleverman.jpg
User avatar #69 to #62 - deltadeltadelta (05/13/2012) [-]
I think that's wishful thinking on your part.
#53 - cortas (05/13/2012) [-]
Awesome Queen's album!
User avatar #22 - TnytsGunaBAGdNyt (05/13/2012) [-]
Why do these people talk like they stood guard outside the gates of Mary's vagina all her life?
#33 - imwhalen (05/13/2012) [-]
*insert religious ********* starting comment here*
#5 - allamericandude (05/13/2012) [-]
Alright: using an equation I learned from a certain Brian Cox (which he got from Richard Feynman), I am going to show that a virgin birth is possible with science.

Quantum mechanics says that it is perfectly possible for an object to jump from one point to another. Even if that object is in a container, it can jump out of it without opening the container and suddenly appear at another point in space. The equation for how long you would have to wait for that object to jump is given by (time) > ((distance jumped)*(size of container)*(mass))/(Planck's constant)

So lets say we want to get 1 gram of sperm cells from a man's testicles to quantum-leap into a woman's uterus 1 meter away without the woman (or man, or anyone else for that matter) ever knowing. And let's say the diameter of one of the man's testes is 2 centimeters.

Plugging all that in, you get that 1 gram of sperm cells leaping into a woman's uterus 1 meter away would happen once every 3.03*10^28 seconds. That's nearly 70 billion times the age of our universe.

Then you have to consider the odds of that happening at the exact moment the man is standing 1 meter away from the woman, and the odds that the woman is in the right conditions to get pregnant--and you get that the probability of a virgin birth happening this way is astronomically small. HOWEVER, even an astronomically small number is an infinite amount of numbers away from zero, so a virgin birth IS possible. Just very, VERY unlikely.

So there you go, Mr. O'Reilly. ****** just been explained. Sort of. Not really.
#6 to #5 - anon (05/13/2012) [-]
shut up faggot
#7 to #5 - anon (05/13/2012) [-]
you will be virgin forever
#21 to #5 - monmouth (05/13/2012) [-]
Quantum mechanics only really applies at quantum orders of magnitude. 1 gram of sperm is hardly "quantum." Even 1 sperm is hardly "quantum."
User avatar #43 to #21 - allamericandude (05/13/2012) [-]
Actually no, it CAN happen on macroscopic scales--but as I said, it would be extremely unlikely. The odds of quantum leaping increases as the size of the object (and its container) decrease. Hence the equation. Electrons and quarks and stuff like that leap around all the time. Atoms can leap around, but it's very very rare. And bigger objects, well, you're going to have to wait a very long time to see it leap.

I mean, the amount of time I said in my first comment is a minimum.
User avatar #13 to #5 - Taiga (05/13/2012) [-]
that might be correct but you left out some important facts, this applies for individual atoms, and for that to happen all single atoms would have to synchronize themselves simultaneously
User avatar #46 to #13 - allamericandude (05/13/2012) [-]
So the odds are even astronomically smaller, but as I said--still not zero.
User avatar #71 to #46 - theist (05/13/2012) [-]
nothing is ever "zero"
#77 - Naimzorz (05/13/2012) [-]
that's what waterbending's for
#64 - realvegzillar (05/13/2012) [-]
Fox? The Onion? Same **** isn't it?
#74 to #64 - durkadurka (05/13/2012) [-]
No, not really. Unless bias towards the right is the same thing as political satire in your books.
#78 to #74 - realvegzillar (05/13/2012) [-]
you must be new here
you must be new here
#88 to #78 - durkadurka (05/15/2012) [-]
Blue username........................
Blue username........................
#66 to #64 - drunkenphysics (05/13/2012) [-]
You're so edgy.
User avatar #81 to #66 - unlukky (05/13/2012) [-]
I like your username. So therefor, you get a thumb.
#70 to #64 - anon (05/13/2012) [-]
Gee, that joke wasn't on the front page yesterday. Was it?
#41 - nephrithotroll (05/13/2012) [-]
well what if a guy was fapping furiously and caught the loot in his hand and secretly put the fluid in her vagina while she was asleep or
she just claim she was a virgin while she was the whore of Babylon
#37 - aakn (05/13/2012) [-]
i hate this faggot
i hate this faggot
User avatar #75 to #37 - durkadurka (05/13/2012) [-]
What'd he do to you?
User avatar #76 to #75 - aakn (05/13/2012) [-]
he is a misleading person along with this his channel mats , i'm with Ron Paul
#67 to #37 - anon (05/13/2012) [-]
He's smarter than your sorry ass. He went out and got extensive education. What the **** did you do?
#73 to #67 - aakn (05/13/2012) [-]
i make video games which some faggots like you play ...
#1 - krabsan (05/13/2012) [-]
inb4 religious *********
#14 - azerath (05/13/2012) [-]
mfw I lost the game
#3 - anon (05/13/2012) [-]
"He was made completely by the force with his midichlorine count higher than anything i've ever seen before." -qui gon jin
#24 - anon (05/13/2012) [-]
[ 75 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)