Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#642 - anon
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
I just think it's funny that Atheists only bash on Christians. I have no religious preference, but there's more religions out there that in all seriousness believe some RETARDED ****. Like Muslims have to stop everything their doing 5 times a day to face a certain direction and bow down

WTF?

The only thing I can agree with is reincarnation. That makes sense because science has proved energy rotates in a cycle, and is neither created nor destroyed.
#650 to #642 - tanfapstick
Reply -1
(05/07/2012) [-]
**** man i never thought of reincarnation like that

#658 to #650 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#748 to #658 - tanfapstick
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
seing as replying to that last comment was unavailable ill continue here i agree with evolution not disproving a god but whats to say that reincarnation was not the law of conservation of energy applied to human life before they knew what the law was and that they are actually one in the same thing to doubt that its a viable theory to reincarnation is one thing but to out right say that he dead wrong is a bit presumptuous
#749 to #748 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#750 to #749 - tanfapstick
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
but your not telling me why it does support it or atleast a reason that makes sense
#751 to #750 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#664 to #658 - tanfapstick
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
no i dont believe in it i just never thought it would have plausible theory behind it

#666 to #664 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
-2
has deleted their comment [-]
#715 to #666 - anon
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
That's not what anon said at all you ******* retard.

He said energy recycles and that's the entire theory behind reincarnation.

People just warp it into a bunch of stupid **** about becoming different animals because they teach you it in 3rd grade and you're retarded.
#717 to #715 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#790 to #717 - anon
Reply 0
(05/16/2012) [-]
"SPIRITUAL ENERGY IS A RELIGIOUS INVENTION, IT HAS NOTTHING TO DO WITH ACTUAL SCIENCE."

Prove it!
#752 to #717 - tanfapstick
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
spiritual energy is still energy right if you break it down just because you throw spiritual infront of it doesnt change what it is like look at that spiritual man hes still a man or that spiritual book its still a book

#753 to #752 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#754 to #753 - tanfapstick
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
are you kidding theory aka idea hypothesis notion a ******* inkling of why something is or isnt so it wouldnt make sense to take any guesses educated or not as to why reincarnation happens and thats a literal translation of what you just said i do believe im not putting words into your mouth or anything
#756 to #754 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#764 to #756 - tanfapstick
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#724 to #717 - anon
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
OP anon here. I can smell your butt hurt from here first off.

Second off, what I did was compare scientific evidence with an ancient belief system.

I never said **** about spiritual energy, you're just a ******* idiot and assume **** because you think you're some sort of internet prophet.

**** your ****.
#757 to #724 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#755 to #724 - tanfapstick
Reply -1
(05/07/2012) [-]
i <3 anon
#671 to #666 - tanfapstick
Reply -1
(05/07/2012) [-]
thats unrelated and besides in a way you do get reincarnated through the carbon cycle not instantly but eventually c'mon man
#676 to #671 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#684 to #676 - tanfapstick
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
no because your claim could be dis proven easily while anons cannot and why are u arguing against the law of the conservation off energy anyway its a scientific law
and any type of energy super-natural or not doesnt just go away
#695 to #684 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#693 to #684 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#711 to #693 - tanfapstick
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
also your retarded because the scientific laws are unvirsally accepted because they cant be disproven along with alot of religions though that has more to do with faith but say something like ancient roman and greek religions that can be disproven are not accepted anymore

#719 to #711 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#730 to #719 - anon
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
No, no, no you've got it all wrong.

Science is only THEORY.

These theories are only accepted as universal once the scientific community has bashed it into nothing, but still can't prove that it may be possible.

You're right about science only dealing with natural energy and not supernatural energy but all I was doing was comparing the two, even though they can't be compared scientifically, but expand your mind for one ******* second and THINK. It may be ******* true you retard. Maybe they were onto something thousands of years before we discovered it was actually true.
#734 to #730 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#744 to #734 - anon
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
Nope, once again you are wrong.

Theories are not proven by evidence proving it true, but by lack of evidence against it.

I could get plenty of evidence saying that all dogs attack people. Dogs attack people all of the time.

The reason this can't be scientifically accurate is because I could show you my dog and it's instantly dis proven because it is not absolute.
#747 to #744 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#770 to #747 - anon
Reply 0
(05/08/2012) [-]
You really are just a ******* idiot rofl.

l2science you faggot

/thread
#775 to #770 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#722 to #719 - tanfapstick
Reply +1
(05/07/2012) [-]
scietific LAWS i do believe i said LAWS look up scientific LAW in the dictionary i do believe it says something about never ever ever being able to be disproven
#726 to #722 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#733 to #726 - tanfapstick
Reply +1
(05/07/2012) [-]
thats not even the point the conservation of energy has been proven without a doubt that it is true under all circumstances so why do you think it suddenly doesnt apply here
#736 to #733 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#741 to #736 - tanfapstick
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
why not though its alot better than saying its just magic that reincarnates you
its a scientific explanation of something and it makes sense
#707 to #693 - tanfapstick
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
so when you said it doesnt reffering to it not having a plausible theory behind it your saying that the conservation of mass isnt plausible but at the same time it is
#710 to #707 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#714 to #710 - tanfapstick
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
no because it completely backs it up thats like saying hey that balloons floating because it has helium in it and thats a 100% plausible theory even though it could be any kind of light than air gas
#721 to #714 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#732 to #721 - anon
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
No it's not. Reincarnation is a religious belief that when someone or something dies it becomes a part of the earth or is REINCARNATED into another living being.

GTFO pony fag.
#738 to #732 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#729 to #721 - tanfapstick
Reply +1
(05/07/2012) [-]
but it is a viable theory not a fact of course
it makes sense that at the very least your energy be transfered to another living thing
maybe not your "soul" but definately your life force aka energy
#731 to #729 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#735 to #731 - tanfapstick
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
and so your saying that because it carries some religious feelings its automatically mumbo jumbo and hocus pocus
#740 to #735 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#742 to #740 - tanfapstick
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
im just trying to understand your reasonings
#743 to #742 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#745 to #743 - tanfapstick
Reply 0
(05/07/2012) [-]
so then tell me whats wrong with having religious thoughts about it
#746 to #745 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]